Skip to main content

Chemistry

NSWChemistryExam trends

Chemistry exam trends & analysis (2019–2025)

Across 2019–2025, Module 5 Equilibrium and Acid Reactions leads with 248 marks, ahead of Module 7 Organic Chemistry (182), Module 8 Applying Chemical Ideas (159) and Module 6 Acid/Base Reactions (110). By topic, Le Chatelier's principle, The equilibrium constant Keq and Solubility product (Ksp) are examined most, with Alcohols and Hydrocarbons recurring in most papers.

Based on 301 questions across 7 official NESA exam papers, their marking guidelines and marking feedback.

Work in progress

These exam-trend insights are an early release. The frequencies, mark ranges and figures are still being verified against the official NESA past papers and may change. Treat them as a study guide, not a guarantee of what will be examined.

Most-examined dot points

By module

Module 5
Equilibrium and Acid Reactions
109 questions
248 marks total
Module 6
Acid/Base Reactions
44 questions
110 marks total
Module 7
Organic Chemistry
83 questions
182 marks total
Module 8
Applying Chemical Ideas
65 questions
159 marks total

Every dot point, by exam frequency

Click any dot point for the full verbatim syllabus wording, worked answers and past questions.

Showing 33 of 33 dot points

Dot pointTimesMarks
Le Chatelier's principleM5

Showed sudden jumps for other species; didn't scale changes by stoichiometry.

23×1–5
The equilibrium constant KeqM5

Solved a quadratic instead of using the small-x approximation; calculator/substitution errors.

23×1–7
Solubility product (Ksp)M5

Didn't use Ksp values to justify solubility differences; unbalanced ionic equations.

21×1–5
AlcoholsM7

Used mass of ethanol not water in mcAT; wrong ethanol formula/atomic masses.

20×1–4
HydrocarbonsM7

Did not identify soot as C(s); unbalanced equations; failed to link soot to insufficient oxygen

16×1–7
Acid–base titrations and indicatorsM5

Made general ion statements; didn't name Ba2+/Cl- at equivalence; described rather than explained.

14×1–7
Nomenclature and IUPAC rulesM7

Could not distinguish a structural isomer from a functional isomer.

13×1–4
Static vs dynamic equilibriumM5

Referred to numbers' size on a number line instead of energy/entropy meaning; contradictory statements.

13×1–4
NMR spectroscopyM8

Didn't read spectra values against the data sheet; omitted required information.

12×1–7
Colourimetry, UV–vis and AASM8

Explained how rather than why AAS works; used generalised, non-specific terminology.

11×1–7
Ion identification testsM8

Could not write a balanced net ionic precipitation equation; failed to identify source ions

10×1–5
Mass spectrometryM8

Didn't state each technique's key use or how spectra work together.

10×1–3
PolymersM7

Did not use polymer-section conventions or give each carbon four bonds in the structure.

10×1–3
Strong vs weak acids and basesM6

Not explicit about which acid; failed to explain effects of acid strength and concentration

10×1–4
pH and pOH calculationsM5

Did not write a balanced equation, identify excess reactant, or use the 1:2 ratio.

1–4
Gravimetric and precipitation titrationM8

Misunderstood back titration; used AgCl molar mass instead of Cl; mishandled excess reagent

1–4
Organic reaction pathwaysM7

Weak on haloalkane reactions; omitted reactivity tests; vague spectroscopic data without wavelengths.

1–9
Titration curves: strong and weakM6

Weak equations; attributed conductivity rise to low OH- conductivity rather than small [OH-] change.

1–4
Conjugate acid–base pairsM6

Used an incorrect Kw value rather than the data-sheet value.

1–4
Aldehydes, ketones and carboxylic acidsM71
Esters and esterificationM7

Confused intra- and intermolecular forces; wrong IMF terminology; missed chain-length dispersion link

1–4
Reactions of acidsM6

Wrote an unbalanced equation; rounded mid-calculation; didn't use periodic-table masses.

1–4
Brønsted–Lowry acid–base theoryM5

Stated everything about the models instead of assessing advantages/limitations; poor balanced equations.

1–5
Chemical synthesis and designM8

Misconstrued ethene oxidation as polymerisation/combustion; thought water was a coolant not a reagent

2–8
Neutralisation and enthalpyM6

Used q incorrectly; confused dH with q; wrongly assumed c of water

2–5
Organic functional group testsM8

Gave physical tests instead of chemical tests to distinguish the isomers.

1–3
Amines and amidesM7

Poorly drawn amine structures; H looked like N; pencil not fully erased

1–4
Buffers and their applicationsM6

Made general Le Chatelier statements; didn't specify OH-/H3O+ effects or buffer composition.

1–5
Infrared (IR) spectroscopyM8

Misidentified compound; missed carbonyl-adjacent 13C; confused broad COOH vs OH IR peaks; wrong molecular ion

1–7
Properties of acids and basesM6

Did not show NH4Cl is a salt not an Arrhenius acid; omitted ion charges in equations

1–4
Buffer systemsM51
Dilution and concentrationM6

Not removing the outlier; rounding too early; mis-sequencing mole ratios through the back-titration steps.

7
Monitoring the environmentM8

Could not distinguish qualitative from quantitative analysis or link to specific ions

2