Skip to main content
NSWChemistrySyllabus dot point

Inquiry Question 1: How are the ions present in the environment identified and measured?

Conduct investigations to use colourimetry, UV-visible spectrophotometry and atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) to measure the concentration of species in aqueous solution

A focused answer to the HSC Chemistry Module 8 dot point on instrumental concentration measurement. The Beer-Lambert law, building and using a calibration curve, when to choose colourimetry vs UV-vis vs AAS, how AAS uses a hollow-cathode lamp to reach part-per-billion detection of metals, and worked HSC past exam questions.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.811 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

NESA wants you to explain how a coloured or absorbing species can be quantified by measuring how much light it absorbs, apply the Beer-Lambert law, use a calibration curve to determine an unknown concentration, and choose between colourimetry, UV-vis and AAS based on the species and the concentration range.

The answer

Beer-Lambert law: the common foundation

For a solution that absorbs light, the absorbance AA is related to the path length ll and concentration cc by:

A=εclA = \varepsilon \, c \, l

where ε\varepsilon (molar absorptivity, L mol1^{-1} cm1^{-1}) is a constant for a given species at a given wavelength. Absorbance is defined as A=log10(I0/I)A = \log_{10}(I_0 / I), where I0I_0 is the incident light intensity and II is what passes through.

The law is linear in the dilute regime (typically A<2A < 2). The calibration curve is therefore a straight line through the origin, and you can read off any unknown by measuring its absorbance and using the line.

Building a calibration curve

  1. Prepare standards by serial dilution of a stock solution of the target species. Use at least five standards bracketing the expected concentration range.
  2. Choose the wavelength at which the species absorbs most strongly (λmax\lambda_{\max}). For Cu2+Cu^{2+} this is around 600 nm (a copper sulfate solution is blue, so it absorbs orange).
  3. Zero the instrument on a blank (distilled water or solvent) to subtract the cell and solvent contribution.
  4. Measure absorbance of each standard.
  5. Plot AA vs cc and fit a line. Slope is εl\varepsilon \cdot l.
  6. Measure the unknown and read its concentration from the line, or solve c=A/(εl)c = A / (\varepsilon l).

Colourimetry

The simplest version. A coloured filter (a piece of coloured glass or plastic) selects a band of visible light a few tens of nanometres wide. A photocell measures the light passing through the cuvette. Suitable for any solution with a visible colour.

For colourless ions, a reagent is added that forms a coloured complex:

  • Phosphate: react with molybdate and reductant to give a deep blue complex (molybdenum blue), absorbance at 880 nm.
  • Iron(III): react with thiocyanate to give the blood-red [FeSCN]2+[FeSCN]^{2+} complex.
  • Nitrate: reduce to nitrite, react with sulfanilamide and N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine to give a pink azo dye.

Detection limits are about 0.5 ppm. Colourimetry is the standard field method for swimming-pool chemistry, aquarium testing, and basic water quality work.

UV-visible spectrophotometry

A more capable instrument. A diffraction grating (monochromator) selects a narrow (about 1 nm) band anywhere from 200 to 800 nm. A photomultiplier or photodiode detector measures the transmitted intensity.

Extends colourimetry into:

  • The UV region, 200 to 400 nm, where many organic molecules with conjugated π\pi systems absorb. Aromatic rings absorb around 260 to 280 nm; conjugated carbonyls around 220 to 260 nm.
  • Higher accuracy, because the bandwidth is narrower and the wavelength can be tuned to λmax\lambda_{\max}.
  • Multi-wavelength scans that produce a full absorption spectrum, useful for identification as well as quantitation.

Detection limits are 0.01 to 0.1 ppm. UV-vis is the workhorse of biochemistry (DNA at 260 nm, protein at 280 nm) and inorganic complex analysis.

Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS)

The technique of choice for trace metal analysis. Three components are unique:

  1. Hollow-cathode lamp, with a cathode made of the target element. The lamp emits the line spectrum of that element only. To analyse lead, use a lead lamp; to analyse copper, use a copper lamp.
  2. Atomiser (flame or graphite furnace). The sample is aspirated into an air-acetylene flame (about 2300 degrees C), which evaporates the solvent and breaks the metal salts into free gaseous atoms.
  3. Monochromator and detector, tuned to a single line of the target element.

The free atoms absorb the lamp's light at exactly the wavelength they would emit. Other elements present do not absorb because they have different atomic energy levels. The selectivity is intrinsic.

Calibration is by Beer-Lambert against standards. Detection limits are 1 to 10 ppb for most metals in flame AAS, and around 0.1 ppb in graphite furnace AAS.

AAS is used for:

  • Lead, mercury, cadmium in drinking water.
  • Iron, calcium, magnesium in plant nutrition studies.
  • Trace metals in blood and urine for forensic and clinical work.
  • Metallurgical assays of ores and alloys.

Choosing the right tool

Question Use
Solution is already coloured, ppm-level, need a quick number Colourimetry
Need to use UV, or higher accuracy on a coloured complex UV-vis
Target is a metal in the ppb range AAS
Need to distinguish many metals at once at ppb ICP-MS (beyond HSC scope)

Common reagents to colour the colourless

Target Reagent Coloured product Wavelength
PO43PO_4^{3-} Molybdate, ascorbic acid Molybdenum blue 880 nm
Fe3+Fe^{3+} KSCN [FeSCN]2+[FeSCN]^{2+} red 480 nm
NO3NO_3^- Diazotising reagent Pink azo dye 540 nm
NH4+NH_4^+ Nessler's reagent Yellow HgI2NH3HgI_2 \cdot NH_3 complex 425 nm

Examples in context

Example 1. Lead testing in Sydney water mains by AAS. Sydney Water's central laboratory at Potts Hill uses atomic absorption spectroscopy with a lead hollow-cathode lamp at 217.0 nm to test for lead at the regulatory threshold of 10 μ\mug L1^{-1}. A calibration curve from five lead standards (0, 5, 10, 20, 50 μ\mug L1^{-1}) gives a linear plot of absorbance vs concentration with R2>0.998R^2 > 0.998. An unknown reading 0.052 absorbance units back-converts to 14 μ\mug L1^{-1}, flagging an exceedance. AAS is preferred over colourimetry here because lead in tap water is at parts-per-billion levels, two orders of magnitude below colourimetry's detection limit, and the hollow-cathode lamp gives element-specific selectivity.

Example 2. Phosphate in NSW catchment monitoring by colourimetry. WaterNSW field officers test phosphate in rural streams using the molybdenum-blue colourimetric method: PO43PO_4^{3-} reacts with molybdate and ascorbic acid to give a blue complex with maximum absorbance at 880 nm. A calibration curve from standards at 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg L1^{-1} enables field instruments to report concentration directly. Readings above 0.10 mg L1^{-1} flag potential eutrophication risk and trigger algal bloom monitoring. The HSC Beer-Lambert framework A=εclA = \varepsilon c l explains the linear range and the limit of detection set by blank noise.

Try this

Q1. State the Beer-Lambert law in symbols and words, and define each variable. [3 marks]

  • Cue. A=εclA = \varepsilon c l: absorbance is proportional to molar absorptivity ε\varepsilon, concentration cc and path length ll.

Q2. A calibration curve gives the equation A=0.180×cA = 0.180 \times c where cc is in mg L1^{-1}. A sample reads 0.072 absorbance. Calculate the concentration. [2 marks]

  • Cue. c=0.072/0.180=0.40c = 0.072 / 0.180 = 0.40 mg L1^{-1}.

Q3. A NSW HSC depth study uses AAS to measure iron in a tablet. (a) Explain why an iron hollow-cathode lamp is used. (b) Outline how a calibration curve is constructed. (c) State two assumptions of the Beer-Lambert law that must hold for the measurement to be accurate. [2+2+2 marks]

  • Cue. (a) Lamp emits iron-specific wavelengths matching the absorption transitions of gaseous iron atoms. (b) Prepare standards of known [Fe][Fe], measure absorbance, plot AA vs cc. (c) Monochromatic light, dilute solution (no aggregation), constant path length.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of NESA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

2021 HSC5 marksA series of standard Cu2+Cu^{2+} solutions gave the following absorbances at 600 nm in a 1.00 cm cell: 0.020 mol/L gave 0.30; 0.040 mol/L gave 0.61; 0.060 mol/L gave 0.92; 0.080 mol/L gave 1.21; 0.100 mol/L gave 1.50. An unknown gave an absorbance of 0.78. Determine the unknown concentration and the molar absorptivity of Cu2+Cu^{2+} at 600 nm. State one assumption inherent in the calculation.
Show worked answer →

A 5 mark answer needs a calibration line, the unknown read off (or interpolated), the molar absorptivity from Beer-Lambert and one explicit assumption.

Step 1: Show linearity
The standards give a near-straight line. Slope from end points: (1.500.30)/(0.1000.020)=1.20/0.080=15.0(1.50 - 0.30)/(0.100 - 0.020) = 1.20/0.080 = 15.0 L/mol per cm. Intercept is essentially zero, so A=15.0cA = 15.0 c.
Step 2: Find the unknown concentration
c=A/slope=0.78/15.0=0.052c = A / \text{slope} = 0.78 / 15.0 = 0.052 mol/L.
Step 3: Molar absorptivity
Beer-Lambert: A=εclA = \varepsilon c l. With l=1.00l = 1.00 cm and slope εl=15.0\varepsilon \cdot l = 15.0, we have ε=15.0\varepsilon = 15.0 L mol1^{-1} cm1^{-1}.
Assumption
The Beer-Lambert relationship is linear only at sufficiently low concentrations. Beyond about A=2A = 2 the linearity breaks because stray light and refractive-index effects matter. The unknown's absorbance of 0.78 falls comfortably in the linear range, so the assumption holds. Other valid assumptions: monochromatic light, no chemical equilibrium shift with concentration, no scattering from particulates, matrix-matched standards.

Markers reward (1) the calibration line or equation, (2) correct interpolated concentration, (3) correct ε\varepsilon with units, (4) a stated assumption justified.

2019 HSC4 marksCompare colourimetry, UV-visible spectrophotometry and atomic absorption spectroscopy in terms of the species each is best suited to measure and the typical detection limits achievable.
Show worked answer →

A 4 mark answer needs a clear comparison across at least two of the named dimensions for all three techniques.

Colourimetry uses a coloured filter to select a band of visible light. It is the cheapest and simplest technique and works on any solution with a visible colour (or one made coloured by a complexation reagent, for example Fe3+Fe^{3+} with thiocyanate, or phosphate with molybdate). Typical detection limits are around 0.5 ppm. Suited to field testing and education.

UV-visible spectrophotometry uses a monochromator to select a narrow wavelength in the 200 to 800 nm range and a more sensitive detector. It covers UV (proteins, DNA, conjugated organics absorbing below 400 nm) as well as visible (coloured complexes). Detection limits are around 0.01 to 0.1 ppm. Suited to laboratory analysis of inorganic complexes and organic chromophores.

Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) atomises the sample in a flame or graphite furnace and uses a hollow-cathode lamp emitting the line spectrum of the target element. Only that element absorbs the lamp's specific wavelengths. Detection limits are 1 to 10 ppb for most metals (flame), and 0.1 ppb (furnace). Suited to trace metal analysis in environmental and biological samples.

Markers reward (1) at least one named target per technique, (2) the order-of-magnitude detection limit per technique, (3) a clear hierarchy from colourimetry to AAS in sensitivity.

Related dot points