How do we model an asset that loses a fixed percentage of its value each year?
Model reducing-balance depreciation with a recurrence relation, compare it with flat-rate depreciation, and find book value and scrap-value timing.
How to model reducing-balance depreciation with a recurrence relation, contrast it with flat-rate depreciation, find an asset's book value after n years, and work out when it reaches a scrap value.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
You must model reducing-balance depreciation with a recurrence, contrast it with flat-rate, find a book value, and find when an asset reaches a scrap value.
The reducing-balance model
Each year the asset loses a percentage of whatever it is currently worth, so it multiplies by a fixed factor.
A annual depreciation gives . Because , the value decays towards (but never reaches) zero, flattening as it falls.
Reducing-balance versus flat-rate
The two methods produce very different value curves.
| Feature | Flat-rate (straight-line) | Reducing-balance |
|---|---|---|
| Loss each year | Same dollar amount | Same percentage |
| Model | Arithmetic, | Geometric, |
| Graph | Straight line | Decaying curve |
| Early years | Loses less | Loses more |
Finding the rate from two values
If you know the value at two times, find the ratio. If and , then , so and , giving an annual depreciation rate of about .
Choosing a depreciation method
Businesses choose between the two methods for tax and accounting reasons, and SCSA questions often ask you to compare them. Flat-rate depreciation writes off the same dollar amount each year, so its straight-line graph is simple to budget for and the asset reaches zero in a fixed number of years (). Reducing-balance depreciation writes off more in the early years, which better matches assets that lose value fastest when new (cars, technology), and it never quite reaches zero because each year removes a percentage of a shrinking value.
A useful check is the total depreciation. Under flat-rate, after years the total lost is dollars. Under reducing-balance, the total lost is . Comparing these for the same asset shows reducing-balance losing more early and flat-rate catching up later, the trade-off that decides which method suits a given asset. SCSA comparison questions reward computing both book values at the same year and stating which method leaves the higher value and why (the percentage loss shrinks each year under reducing-balance).
Unit-cost (kilometre) depreciation
A related model charges depreciation per unit of use rather than per year, for example cents per kilometre driven. The value after travelling kilometres is , an arithmetic (flat-rate) model in rather than in time. Read whether the question depreciates by time or by usage, because the variable in the explicit rule changes accordingly.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of SCSA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
WACE 20226 marksEquipment is bought for \80\,00018\%V_n5\.Show worked answer →
Reducing-balance loss of keeps each year.
(a) Common ratio , so , with . (2 marks)
(b) , so , that is . (2 marks)
(c) Solve , so . Testing, and , so the value first falls below in year . (2 marks)
Markers reward the ratio , the explicit substitution, and finding the first whole year below the scrap value.
WACE 20245 marksA van costs \48\,000\ per year; under reducing-balance it loses per year. Compare the two book values after years and state which method gives the higher value.Show worked answer →
Compute each method's value at year .
Flat-rate: , that is . (2 marks)
Reducing-balance: , , that is . (2 marks)
Reducing-balance gives the higher value after years ( versus ), because the percentage loss shrinks each year as the value falls. (1 mark)
Markers reward both correct book values and the comparison.
