Skip to main content
ExamExplained
WA · Mathematics Applications
Mathematics Applications study scene
§-Syllabus dot point
WAMathematics ApplicationsSyllabus dot point

How do we model an asset that loses a fixed percentage of its value each year?

Model reducing-balance depreciation with a recurrence relation, compare it with flat-rate depreciation, and find book value and scrap-value timing.

How to model reducing-balance depreciation with a recurrence relation, contrast it with flat-rate depreciation, find an asset's book value after n years, and work out when it reaches a scrap value.

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The reducing-balance model
  3. Reducing-balance versus flat-rate
  4. Finding the rate from two values
  5. Choosing a depreciation method
  6. Unit-cost (kilometre) depreciation

What this dot point is asking

You must model reducing-balance depreciation with a recurrence, contrast it with flat-rate, find a book value, and find when an asset reaches a scrap value.

The reducing-balance model

Each year the asset loses a percentage of whatever it is currently worth, so it multiplies by a fixed factor.

A 12%12\% annual depreciation gives R=0.88R = 0.88. Because 0<R<10 < R < 1, the value decays towards (but never reaches) zero, flattening as it falls.

Reducing-balance versus flat-rate

The two methods produce very different value curves.

Feature Flat-rate (straight-line) Reducing-balance
Loss each year Same dollar amount Same percentage
Model Arithmetic, Vn=V0dnV_n = V_0 - dn Geometric, Vn=V0RnV_n = V_0 R^n
Graph Straight line Decaying curve
Early years Loses less Loses more

Finding the rate from two values

If you know the value at two times, find the ratio. If V0=40000V_0 = 40000 and V3=23000V_3 = 23000, then 40000R3=2300040000 R^3 = 23000, so R3=0.575R^3 = 0.575 and R=0.5753=0.8315R = \sqrt[3]{0.575} = 0.8315, giving an annual depreciation rate of about 16.9%16.9\%.

Choosing a depreciation method

Businesses choose between the two methods for tax and accounting reasons, and SCSA questions often ask you to compare them. Flat-rate depreciation writes off the same dollar amount each year, so its straight-line graph is simple to budget for and the asset reaches zero in a fixed number of years (costannual loss\dfrac{\text{cost}}{\text{annual loss}}). Reducing-balance depreciation writes off more in the early years, which better matches assets that lose value fastest when new (cars, technology), and it never quite reaches zero because each year removes a percentage of a shrinking value.

A useful check is the total depreciation. Under flat-rate, after nn years the total lost is n×dn \times d dollars. Under reducing-balance, the total lost is V0V0Rn=V0(1Rn)V_0 - V_0 R^n = V_0(1 - R^n). Comparing these for the same asset shows reducing-balance losing more early and flat-rate catching up later, the trade-off that decides which method suits a given asset. SCSA comparison questions reward computing both book values at the same year and stating which method leaves the higher value and why (the percentage loss shrinks each year under reducing-balance).

Unit-cost (kilometre) depreciation

A related model charges depreciation per unit of use rather than per year, for example cents per kilometre driven. The value after travelling kk kilometres is V=V0(rate per km)×kV = V_0 - (\text{rate per km}) \times k, an arithmetic (flat-rate) model in kk rather than in time. Read whether the question depreciates by time or by usage, because the variable in the explicit rule changes accordingly.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of SCSA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

WACE 20226 marksEquipment is bought for \80\,000anddepreciatesby and depreciates by 18\%ofitsvalueeachyear(reducingbalance).(a)Writearecurrencerelationforthebookvalue of its value each year (reducing balance). (a) Write a recurrence relation for the book value V_n.(b)Findthebookvalueafter. (b) Find the book value after 5years.(c)Findthefirstyearthevaluefallsbelowthescrapvalueof years. (c) Find the first year the value falls below the scrap value of \2500025\,000.
Show worked answer →

Reducing-balance loss of 18%18\% keeps 82%82\% each year.

(a) Common ratio R=10.18=0.82R = 1 - 0.18 = 0.82, so Vn+1=0.82VnV_{n+1} = 0.82 V_n, with V0=80000V_0 = 80000. (2 marks)

(b) Vn=80000×0.82nV_n = 80000 \times 0.82^n, so V5=80000×0.825=80000×0.37074=29659V_5 = 80000 \times 0.82^5 = 80000 \times 0.37074 = 29659, that is $29659\$29\,659. (2 marks)

(c) Solve 80000×0.82n<2500080000 \times 0.82^n < 25000, so 0.82n<0.31250.82^n < 0.3125. Testing, 0.825=0.37070.82^5 = 0.3707 and 0.826=0.30400.82^6 = 0.3040, so the value first falls below $25000\$25\,000 in year 66. (2 marks)

Markers reward the ratio 0.820.82, the explicit substitution, and finding the first whole year below the scrap value.

WACE 20245 marksA van costs \48\,000.Underflatratedepreciationitloses. Under flat-rate depreciation it loses \60006000 per year; under reducing-balance it loses 15%15\% per year. Compare the two book values after 44 years and state which method gives the higher value.
Show worked answer →

Compute each method's value at year 44.

Flat-rate: V4=480006000×4=4800024000=24000V_4 = 48000 - 6000 \times 4 = 48000 - 24000 = 24000, that is $24000\$24\,000. (2 marks)

Reducing-balance: R=0.85R = 0.85, V4=48000×0.854=48000×0.52200=25056V_4 = 48000 \times 0.85^4 = 48000 \times 0.52200 = 25056, that is $25056\$25\,056. (2 marks)

Reducing-balance gives the higher value after 44 years ($25056\$25\,056 versus $24000\$24\,000), because the percentage loss shrinks each year as the value falls. (1 mark)

Markers reward both correct book values and the comparison.

ExamExplained