Remuneration and how pay is determined: HSC Legal Studies
“Regulation of the workplace: remuneration; outline how remuneration is determined”
Pay in Australia is set in layers. The Fair Work Commission's Annual Wage Review sets the national minimum wage and adjusts every modern award rate each year: from 1 July 2026, award rates rose 4.75 per cent and the minimum wage became $26.44 an hour ($1,004.90 a week). Modern awards add classifications, penalty rates, overtime and allowances; enterprise agreements usually pay more and must leave employees better off overall; individual contracts and salaries can pay above the minimums. Employers add 12 per cent superannuation, paid with wages from 1 July 2026. Equal remuneration and gender undervaluation cases are lifting pay in female-dominated work. The biggest problem is underpayment: the FWO recovered $453 million in 2025-26, the Federal Court found in 2025 that Woolworths and Coles underpaid salaried managers, and intentional underpayment has been a crime since 1 January 2025.
What this dot point is asking
Remuneration is the last item under regulation of the workplace in the Workplace option of the Legal Studies Stage 6 Syllabus (2009). The syllabus asks you to outline how remuneration is determined. Remuneration means everything an employee receives for their work: wages or salary, penalty rates, overtime, allowances, loadings, bonuses and superannuation.
Pay is also where non-compliance is most visible. The 2025 HSC asked whether "non-compliance challenges the effectiveness of the law" in the workplace, and the 2020 HSC asked whether compliance is difficult to achieve. Underpayment is the best evidence for both, so this page covers how pay is set and how the law makes sure it is paid.
Annual Wage Review 2026 (announced 2 June 2026): award rates +4.75 per cent; NMW $26.44 an hour, $1,004.90 a week; C13 to be phased out in stages. Minimum wages objective (Fair Work Act s 284). 2017 penalty rates decision; Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates Act 2025. Equal remuneration orders (s 302); gender undervaluation review (pharmacists 14.1 per cent over three years from 2025). Super guarantee 12 per cent (1 July 2025); Payday Super (1 July 2026). Pay secrecy ban (s 333B). Same job, same pay (1 November 2024). Wage theft offence s 327A (1 January 2025). FWO 2025-26: $453 million recovered; FWO 2024-25: $23.7 million penalties; Sushi Bay $15.3 million. FWO v Woolworths Group [2025] FCA 1092 (5 September 2025). WGEA gap 21.1 per cent (private sector total remuneration).
The answer
How remuneration is determined
1. The Annual Wage Review (the safety net). Each year the FWC's Expert Panel reviews the national minimum wage and modern award minimum rates (Fair Work Act Part 2-6). It must apply the minimum wages objective (s 284): the performance and competitiveness of the economy, promoting social inclusion through workforce participation, relative living standards and the needs of the low paid, equal remuneration for work of equal or comparable value, and, since 2022, the need to achieve gender equality. Unions (the ACTU), employer groups, governments and researchers make submissions.
The 2026 decision (announced 2 June 2026) shows the balancing:
- modern award rates rose 4.75 per cent from 1 July 2026;
- the FWC began phasing out the lowest ongoing classification (C13) in stages, lifting the national minimum wage to $26.44 an hour ($1,004.90 a week);
- it considered how far the fall in the real value of award wages since July 2021 could be remedied, against higher inflation and the uncertainty added by the Middle East conflict that broke out on 28 February 2026.
In May 2025, 22.7 per cent of employees were paid by award only, and over 60 per cent of them were women (ABS). The FWC describes award-reliant employees as predominantly part-time, female-dominated and a majority casual.
2. Modern awards. Each award sets classifications (pay grades by skill and experience) with a minimum rate, plus:
- penalty rates for weekends, public holidays and late nights; overtime rates; allowances (tools, travel, uniforms); loadings, including the casual loading (usually 25 per cent) and annual leave loading;
- junior rates (a percentage of the adult rate), apprentice and trainee rates, and the supported wage system for some workers with disability.
Penalty rates show how pay reflects values. In 2017 the FWC reduced Sunday and public holiday penalty rates in the hospitality, fast food, retail and pharmacy awards, finding they were no longer justified. After years of union campaigning, the Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates) Act 2025 (assented to 28 August 2025) now requires the FWC to ensure awards do not reduce penalty or overtime rates, or replace them with "annualised" arrangements that leave any employee worse off.
- 3. Enterprise agreements
- Most employees in large organisations are paid under agreements negotiated through collective bargaining, which usually set pay above the award, with annual increases for the life of the agreement. The FWC approves an agreement only if it passes the better off overall test. Multi-employer agreements, such as the early childhood education agreement approved on 10 December 2024, can lift pay across low-paid sectors. See negotiations.
- 4. Individual contracts and salaries
- Many professional and managerial employees are paid an annual salary under their contract, often above the award. Where the award still applies, the salary must cover all the employee's award entitlements (overtime, penalties) and employers must keep records to prove it. High income employees (above $190,100 a year from 1 July 2026, with a guarantee of annual earnings) can be excluded from award terms. Contracts can add bonuses, commissions and shares. Since 7 December 2022, pay secrecy clauses are banned (s 333B), so employees can share and ask about pay.
- 5. Superannuation
- Employers must contribute 12 per cent of ordinary time earnings (from 1 July 2025) under the superannuation guarantee. From 1 July 2026, under Payday Super, the 12 per cent is worked out on qualifying earnings (ordinary time earnings plus some other amounts, such as commissions), and contributions must be paid with each pay so they reach the employee's fund within 7 business days, rather than quarterly, making unpaid super easier to detect. The right to super has also been part of the NES since 1 January 2024.
- 6. Pay equity
- The Fair Work Act lets the FWC make equal remuneration orders (s 302) and vary awards for work value. After 2022 amendments, the FWC does not need a male comparator to find female-dominated work undervalued. In 2025 it ordered pharmacists' minimum rates to rise 14.1 per cent in three stages, and on 11 September 2026 it finalised its review of five priority awards, with increases phased in for early childhood educators, dental assistants, pathology workers, disability home care workers, pharmacists and other health professionals; nurses and flight attendants are next. In the NSW system, the IRC's nurses decision of April 2026 made similar findings. WGEA reports a private sector gender pay gap of 21.1 per cent in average total remuneration, and the ABS gap in full-time base earnings was 11.3 per cent in May 2026.
- 7. Labour hire
- Since 1 November 2024, a same job, same pay order can require a labour hire provider to pay its workers at least what the host's enterprise agreement pays its own employees, closing a loophole where labour hire was used to undercut agreements.
Maya, 19, works casually at a supermarket covered by the General Retail Industry Award 2020. Her pay is determined by: (1) the classification in the award for her duties; (2) the Annual Wage Review increase that applied from 1 July 2026; (3) the casual loading of 25 per cent instead of paid leave; (4) penalty rates for Sunday and evening shifts, which cannot now be reduced (2025 Act); (5) 12 per cent super paid with each pay from 1 July 2026. If the supermarket has an enterprise agreement, it replaces the award but must leave her better off overall. If she is underpaid, she can ask the FWO for help or make a small claim for up to $100,000.
Marker's note: showing the layers in order (AWR, award, loadings and penalties, agreement, super) is exactly what "outline how remuneration is determined" rewards.
Non-compliance: the underpayment problem
Setting pay is one thing; paying it is another. Underpayment is widespread:
- Scale. The Fair Work Ombudsman recovered $453 million for more than 181,000 workers in 2025-26, up 27 per cent on the year before, taking back-payments to almost $2.5 billion over six financial years. Close to half came from large corporate employers. In 2024-25 it secured a record $23.7 million in court penalties, including $15.3 million against the operators of Sushi Bay outlets for deliberately underpaying 163 workers more than $650,000.
- Big employers. In FWO v Woolworths Group [2025] FCA 1092 (5 September 2025), Justice Perram decided four proceedings together (two FWO cases and two class actions). He held that annual salaries could be set off only against award entitlements falling due in the same pay period, so the salaries did not necessarily discharge the managers' overtime and penalty entitlements. Woolworths employed about 19,000 salaried managers between 2015 and 2019 (the FWO's own case tested a sample of 70), and the FWO alleged that Coles underpaid more than 7,800 salaried employees between 2017 and 2020. The ABC reported that the underpayments could cost more than $1 billion.
- Vulnerable workers. International students, visa holders and young workers are exploited most, as the 7-Eleven scandal (2015) showed.
Why compliance is difficult. Awards are complex; some employers deliberately underpay because the chance of detection was low and the penalty was only back pay; vulnerable workers fear losing their job or visa; phoenix companies close to avoid debts; and many underpayments are only found through audits or whistleblowers.
How the law responds
| Response | What it does | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| FWO enforcement | Audits, compliance notices, enforceable undertakings, civil litigation | Large recoveries, but it reaches only a fraction of workers |
| Protecting Vulnerable Workers Act 2017 | Franchisor and holding company liability; ten times higher penalties for "serious contraventions"; record-keeping offences | A direct response to 7-Eleven; increases deterrence |
| Wage theft offence (s 327A, from 1 January 2025) | Intentional underpayment of wages, super or entitlements is a crime; up to 10 years' imprisonment for individuals; large fines for companies | Strong deterrent in principle; inadvertent mistakes are excluded, and small businesses following the Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code will not be referred |
| Higher civil penalties (Closing Loopholes, 2023) | Increased maximum penalties for underpayment contraventions | Raises the cost of non-compliance |
| Payday Super (1 July 2026) | Super paid with wages | Should reduce the estimated billions in unpaid super each year |
| Small claims (up to $100,000) | Workers can recover unpaid wages cheaply in court | Still requires the worker to act |
| Class actions | Groups of employees sue together (Woolworths and Coles) | Useful for large employers; slow |
Judgement. Remuneration is determined fairly and transparently at the minimum level: the Annual Wage Review is independent, evidence-based and increasingly focused on gender equality, and penalty rates are now protected by statute. But non-compliance seriously challenges the effectiveness of the law. The response since 2017 has been to shift from education to deterrence: franchisor liability, higher penalties, a criminal offence and Payday Super. The effectiveness of the wage theft offence will depend on whether prosecutions follow; as it applies only to conduct from 1 January 2025, its impact is still emerging.
- Using old minimum wage figures
- From 1 July 2026 the national minimum wage is $26.44 an hour ($1,004.90 a week), and award rates rose 4.75 per cent.
- Saying most workers are paid the minimum wage
- Very few are paid the national minimum wage itself; 22.7 per cent were paid by award only in May 2025, and most workers are paid under agreements or contracts above them.
- Saying all underpayment is now a crime
- Only intentional underpayment from 1 January 2025 is an offence; other underpayment is still a civil contravention.
- Forgetting superannuation
- It is part of remuneration: 12 per cent, and paid with wages from 1 July 2026.
In one sentence
Remuneration is determined in layers, from the Fair Work Commission's Annual Wage Review and modern awards to enterprise agreements, individual contracts and 12 per cent superannuation, with pay equity cases lifting female-dominated work, but widespread underpayment means the law's effectiveness depends on enforcement, which is why it now includes franchisor liability, higher penalties, Payday Super and a wage theft offence.
Try this
Q1. Outline the role of the Annual Wage Review in determining remuneration. (4 marks)
- What the marker wants. Who conducts it, what it sets, the factors it weighs, and the 2026 outcome.
Q2. Explain how the law has responded to wage underpayment. (6 marks)
- What the marker wants. Two or three responses (2017 Act, wage theft offence, FWO enforcement) with evidence.
Q3. To what extent does the law achieve fair remuneration for women? (8 marks)
- What the marker wants. The gender pay gap data, equal remuneration and gender undervaluation cases, pay secrecy ban, WGEA reporting, and a judgement.
Exam-style questions
Questions in the style of NESA exam questions on this dot point, each with a worked answer. They are written by ExamExplained unless tagged "Past paper"; the year shows the paper a question is modelled on.
2025 HSC Q30 (a)Past paper25 marks'Non-compliance challenges the effectiveness of the law.' To what extent is this statement accurate in relation to the workplace?Show worked answer →
Criteria (NESA 2025 marking guidelines). 21-25: extensive understanding of the law concerning workplaces; an informed judgement about the extent to which non-compliance challenges the effectiveness of the law; integrates relevant examples such as legislation, cases, media, international instruments and documents; sustained, logical and cohesive. The guidelines suggest the state and federal framework, dispute resolution mechanisms, the changing nature of the workplace and contemporary issues. NESA's feedback praised answers using the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), WHS Act 2011 (NSW) and Workplace Gender Equality Act 2012 (Cth), the roles of the FWO and FWC, and cases on wage underpayment and safety breaches; it asked students to link non-compliance to weaknesses in enforcement, to distinguish the FWO (enforcement) from the FWC (dispute resolution), and to sustain evaluation.
A plan. Largely accurate. (1) Underpayment: $453 million recovered in 2025-26; Woolworths and Coles (2025); Sushi Bay $15.3 million penalty. (2) The law's response to non-compliance: wage theft offence from 1 January 2025; franchisor liability (2017); record-keeping duties. (3) Safety: 188 deaths in 2024; industrial manslaughter (NSW, 16 September 2024); codes of practice enforceable from 1 July 2026. (4) Discrimination: positive duty and AHRC enforcement (2023). (5) Counterpoint: most employers comply; enforcement is improving. Judgement: non-compliance challenges the law's effectiveness to a large extent, which is why recent reforms target enforcement rather than new rights.
Source: NESA, 2025 HSC Legal Studies examination, Section III, Question 30(a), and 2025 marking guidelines and feedback.
2020 HSC Q30 (b)Past paper25 marksCompliance with the law can be difficult to achieve. To what extent is this statement true in relation to workplace law?Show worked answer →
Criteria (NESA 2020 marking guidelines). 21-25: extensive understanding of workplace law; an informed judgement about the extent to which compliance can be difficult to achieve in relation to workplace law; integrates relevant examples; sustained, logical and cohesive. NESA's feedback praised answers giving examples where compliance was or was not achieved (underpayment, racial discrimination, injuries), evaluating mechanisms (unions, courts, tribunals, statutory authorities) and criteria such as deficiencies in legislation, embedded workplace cultures and the economic incentives for wage theft; it wanted balanced judgements, for example that 7-Eleven shows compliance is hard, while stronger safety regulators show enhanced compliance.
A plan. Why compliance is hard: complexity of awards; economic incentives; vulnerable workers do not complain; phoenix companies. Evidence: 7-Eleven (2015); Woolworths and Coles (2025); FWO recoveries. Responses: Protecting Vulnerable Workers Act 2017; wage theft offence (2025); higher penalties; Payday Super (2026). Judgement: true to a large extent, but improving.
Source: NESA, 2020 HSC Legal Studies examination, Section III, Question 30(b), and 2020 marking guidelines and feedback.
Original6 marksOutline how remuneration is determined in Australia.Show worked answer →
The Fair Work Commission sets the national minimum wage and adjusts modern award minimum rates in the Annual Wage Review (4.75 per cent from 1 July 2026, with the minimum wage at $26.44 an hour), considering the economy, living standards, the needs of the low paid and gender equality. Modern awards set classifications, penalty rates, overtime and allowances. Enterprise agreements set higher pay by collective bargaining and must pass the better off overall test. Individual contracts and salaries can pay above these minimums. Superannuation of 12 per cent is added. Equal remuneration and gender undervaluation cases can lift pay in female-dominated work.
Marking pattern (Original): 5-6 for the AWR, awards, agreements, contracts and super with current figures; 3-4 for a sound outline; 1-2 for general points.
Original4 marksExplain the wage theft offence introduced into the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).Show worked answer →
From 1 January 2025, s 327A makes it a criminal offence for an employer to intentionally engage in conduct that results in a failure to pay an employee wages, superannuation contributions or other entitlements in full when they fall due. Inadvertent errors are not covered. The FWO investigates and refers cases to the CDPP or AFP for prosecution; individuals face up to 10 years' imprisonment and companies large fines. Small businesses that comply with the Voluntary Small Business Wage Compliance Code will not be referred.
Marking pattern (Original): 4 for commencement, intention, penalties and the code; 2-3 for the offence and a detail; 1 for a general statement.
Practise this
Sources & how we know this
- Treasury Laws Amendment (Payday Superannuation) Act 2025 — Federal Register of Legislation (2025)
- Annual Wage Review 2026 — Fair Work Commission (2026)
- \$358 million back-paid to Australian workers (Annual Report 2024-25) — Fair Work Ombudsman (2025)
- Criminalising wage underpayments and other issues — Fair Work Ombudsman
- Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates) Act 2025 — Federal Register of Legislation (2025)
- Payday Super: New rules starting 1 July 2026 — Fair Work Ombudsman (2026)
- Annual Wage Review 2026: Announcement of Decision — Fair Work Commission (2026)
- FWO takes action against Woolworths — Fair Work Ombudsman (2021)
- FWO takes action against Coles Supermarkets — Fair Work Ombudsman (2021)
- Gender-based undervaluation: priority awards review — Fair Work Commission (2026)
- The ABS data gender pay gap — Workplace Gender Equality Agency (2026)
- Average Weekly Earnings, Australia, May 2026 — Australian Bureau of Statistics (2026)
- WGEA Gender Pay Gap Data — Workplace Gender Equality Agency
- Legal Studies 2025 HSC exam pack — NESA (2025)
- Legal Studies 2020 HSC exam pack — NESA (2020)
- Fair Work Ombudsman recovers \$453 million for workers, as Booth urges compliance common ground — Fair Work Ombudsman (2026)
- Employee Earnings and Hours, Australia, May 2025 — Australian Bureau of Statistics (2025)
- Legal Studies Stage 6 Syllabus (2009) — NESA
- Legal Studies HSC exam papers — NESA