Skip to main content

The industrial relations framework and workplace negotiations: HSC Legal Studies

Syllabus dot point

“Regulation of the workplace: industrial relations - the state and federal framework; negotiations between employers and employees; examine the legal framework for workplace law; assess the role of the legal system in regulating the workplace”

HSCLegal StudiesOption: Workplace15 min read

Quick answer

Australia regulates work through two systems. The national system, under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), covers most employees, because it relies on the corporations power and, since 1 January 2010, on NSW's referral of power over private sector employers. The NSW system, under the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW), now covers mainly NSW public sector and local government employees, with the Industrial Relations Commission and a re-established Industrial Court (from 1 July 2024). NSW also keeps its own laws on safety, workers compensation, discrimination and long service leave. Within this framework, the law structures negotiations: individual requests and contracts, and above all enterprise bargaining, with good faith obligations, FWC approval under the better off overall test, protected industrial action as a lawful pressure tactic, multi-employer bargaining (from 2022) and, when talks deadlock, intractable bargaining determinations. The framework encourages cooperation, but outcomes still depend on bargaining power.

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. In one sentence
  4. Try this
  5. Exam-style questions

What this dot point is asking

Regulation of the workplace is the second part of the Workplace option of the Legal Studies Stage 6 Syllabus (2009). This page covers industrial relations: the state and federal framework and negotiations between employers and employees, and the skills of examining the legal framework for workplace law and assessing the role of the legal system in regulating the workplace.

The rest of the regulation of the workplace is on dispute resolution and workplace institutions (courts, tribunals, government organisations, unions, employer associations, NGOs and the media) and remuneration.

This material was examined directly in 2024, when Question 30(a) asked students to analyse the role of state and federal governments in responding to the rights of employees. NESA's feedback rewarded answers that explicitly distinguished the two levels, named the correct institutions and legislation at each level, and explored the relationship between them.

The must-know spine

Constitution s 51(xxxv), s 51(xx), s 51(xxxvii), s 51(xxix), s 109. Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth); national system. Industrial Relations (Commonwealth Powers) Act 2009 (NSW), from 1 January 2010. Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW); IRC; Industrial Court re-established 1 July 2024; wages cap removed (Industrial Relations Amendment Act 2023 (NSW)); Workplace Protections Act 2025 (NSW). Good faith bargaining (s 228); BOOT; protected action ballots; s 424 suspension or termination; supported bargaining (ECEC agreement, 10 December 2024); intractable bargaining (TWU v Cleanaway, 12 June 2024). Union membership 13.1 per cent (August 2024). NSW nurses IRC decision (16 April 2026); NSW doctors' strike (8 to 10 April 2025).

The answer

The constitutional basis

The Commonwealth has no general power over employment. It has built a national system from several heads of power in s 51 of the Constitution:

Power How it is used
s 51(xxxv) conciliation and arbitration The original basis (1904 to 2005): only interstate disputes, settled by an independent tribunal
s 51(xx) corporations The main basis since WorkChoices: regulates the employees of trading, financial and foreign corporations (upheld in New South Wales v Commonwealth (2006))
s 51(xxxvii) referral States can refer power; every state except Western Australia has referred power over most private sector employers
s 51(xxix) external affairs Supports laws implementing ILO conventions, such as parts of the unfair dismissal and anti-discrimination provisions
s 122 territories Covers all employers in the territories

Under s 109, a valid Commonwealth law overrides an inconsistent state law. But the Fair Work Act expressly leaves room for state laws on work health and safety, workers compensation, discrimination, long service leave and some other matters.

The federal framework

The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) is the centre of the national system. It sets the NES, provides for modern awards and enterprise agreements, protects employees from unfair dismissal and adverse action, regulates industrial action and right of entry, and creates two key institutions:

  • the Fair Work Commission (FWC), an independent tribunal that makes and varies awards, conducts the Annual Wage Review, approves agreements, supervises bargaining and industrial action, and hears unfair dismissal and other disputes; and
  • the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO), the regulator that educates, investigates, issues compliance notices and prosecutes breaches, including referring the wage theft offence (from 1 January 2025).

Other federal laws and bodies protect employees in specific areas: the Sex Discrimination Act 1984, Racial Discrimination Act 1975, Disability Discrimination Act 1992 and Age Discrimination Act 2004, administered by the Australian Human Rights Commission; the Workplace Gender Equality Act 2012 and its agency (WGEA), which since 2024 publishes employer gender pay gaps; the Paid Parental Leave Act 2010; superannuation guarantee law; and the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth) for Commonwealth workplaces. The Federal Court and the Federal Circuit and Family Court enforce the Fair Work Act.

The federal government also acts through policy and funding: it makes submissions to the Annual Wage Review, funded wage increases for aged care and early childhood workers, and legislates reforms such as Closing Loopholes.

The NSW framework

When NSW referred its power from 1 January 2010 (Industrial Relations (Commonwealth Powers) Act 2009 (NSW)), most private sector employees moved to the national system. The NSW system under the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) now mainly covers NSW public sector employees (such as nurses, teachers, police and doctors in public hospitals) and local government employees.

  • The Industrial Relations Commission of NSW (IRC) makes and varies state awards, sets public sector pay, conciliates and arbitrates disputes, and can order industrial action to stop.
  • The Industrial Court of NSW was re-established from 1 July 2024 by the Industrial Relations Amendment Act 2023 (NSW), which also abolished the former government's cap on public sector wage rises. The Court is a superior court of record that hears serious industrial and safety matters.
  • The Industrial Relations and Other Legislation Amendment (Workplace Protections) Act 2025 (NSW) (assent 3 July 2025) gave the IRC power to deal with workplace bullying and sexual harassment of state system employees, raised the Industrial Court's small claims limit from $10,000 to $100,000, and let unions bring certain WHS proceedings.

NSW law also applies to all NSW workplaces, whichever system covers the employee, in four areas the Fair Work Act leaves to the states:

Area NSW law and body
Safety Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW); SafeWork NSW (a standalone regulator since 1 July 2025)
Workers compensation Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW); SIRA, icare and the Personal Injury Commission
Discrimination Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW); Anti-Discrimination NSW and NCAT
Long service leave Long Service Leave Act 1955 (NSW); portable schemes such as the community services scheme from 1 July 2025

The state and federal relationship

Cooperation
The system is an example of cooperative federalism. NSW's referral created a mostly national system, reducing the confusion of overlapping awards. The states and Commonwealth adopted model work health and safety laws (in NSW from 2012), so safety duties are largely harmonised, and all jurisdictions banned engineered stone from 1 July 2024.
Overlap and gaps
A NSW employee who is discriminated against can complain under federal or state law but must choose one forum. Different rules for state and national system employees can confuse workers. Some reforms are state-led and uneven: NSW introduced industrial manslaughter in 2024, while Victoria's work from home Bill (2026) would apply only there.
Government as employer
In the NSW system, the government is both the employer and the lawmaker, which creates tension. The IRC's independence is therefore important. In NSW Nurses and Midwives' Association v Health Secretary (decision of 16 April 2026), the IRC awarded increases over three years from 1 July 2025 of 16 per cent for registered nurses and midwives, 18 per cent for enrolled nurses and 28 per cent for assistants in nursing, finding that nursing had been undervalued "principally because it involves the exercise of caring or interpersonal skills that women were considered to have a natural capacity to perform". The union had sought 35 per cent.

Negotiations between employers and employees

The law structures negotiation at three levels.

1. Individual negotiation. Employees negotiate their own contract (usually only realistic for skilled or senior workers), agree to individual flexibility arrangements, and make statutory requests: for flexible working arrangements (s 65), extended parental leave (s 76) or conversion to permanent work. Since 6 June 2023, an employer must respond to a flexible work request in writing within 21 days and discuss it genuinely, and the FWC can review a refusal; in Chandler v Westpac Banking Corporation [2025] FWC 3115, the FWC ordered Westpac to grant a work from home request it had refused without genuine engagement.

2. Enterprise bargaining (single employer). This is the main form of collective negotiation.

  1. Starting bargaining. The employer agrees to bargain, or the FWC makes a majority support determination; for a replacement agreement, employees can now initiate bargaining in writing.
  2. Representation. The employer notifies employees of their right to appoint a bargaining representative; a union member is represented by their union by default.
  3. Good faith bargaining (s 228). Representatives must attend meetings, disclose relevant information in a timely way, respond to proposals, give genuine consideration, not act capriciously or unfairly, and recognise other representatives. The FWC can make bargaining orders.
  4. Industrial action. Employees can take protected industrial action (strikes, work bans) if approved in an FWC-ordered protected action ballot and after written notice; employers can respond with lockouts. Protected action is immune from most legal liability. The FWC can suspend or terminate action that threatens life, safety, health or welfare, or significant damage to the economy (s 424). Unprotected action can be stopped by orders and penalised.
  5. Agreement and approval. A majority of employees who vote must approve the agreement, and the FWC approves it if it was genuinely agreed, passes the better off overall test (BOOT) and complies with the NES.

3. Multi-employer bargaining. The Secure Jobs, Better Pay Act 2022 expanded bargaining across several employers, aimed at low-paid, female-dominated sectors where single-employer bargaining had failed:

  • Supported bargaining, for sectors such as early childhood education, aged care and disability care. The FWC authorised supported bargaining for early childhood services in September 2023, and on 10 December 2024 it approved the Early Childhood Education and Care Multi-Employer Agreement 2024-2026, delivering government-funded wage rises.
  • Single interest employer agreements, for employers with common interests, such as franchisees.
  • Cooperative workplace agreements, which are voluntary.

When bargaining fails: intractable bargaining. If bargaining is deadlocked, the FWC can make an intractable bargaining declaration and then a binding workplace determination. The first determination, TWU v Cleanaway (12 June 2024), set pay increases for employees at a Cleanaway waste services site after negotiations stalled over hours of work, weekend penalty rates and pay. Critics argue this returns to arbitration and discourages genuine bargaining; supporters say it stops endless disputes.

NSW public sector negotiations. In the state system, the IRC arbitrates when bargaining fails. When NSW doctors struck from 8 to 10 April 2025, the government said the union was acting in breach of IRC orders. An interim agreement in February 2026 gave 3.5 per cent from 1 July 2024 and a further 3.5 per cent from 1 July 2025, with maximum shift lengths and minimum rest periods, while the IRC continued to arbitrate other claims.

Assessing the role of the legal system in regulating the workplace

Criterion Strengths Weaknesses
Setting fair minimums NES, modern awards and the Annual Wage Review (4.75 per cent from 1 July 2026) protect award-reliant workers (22.7 per cent of employees were paid by award only in May 2025, ABS) Minimums are a floor; award minimum wages lost real value after 2021, as the FWC acknowledged
Encouraging cooperation Good faith bargaining, dispute clauses, FWC conciliation, supported bargaining for low-paid sectors Bargaining power is uneven; union membership was only 13.1 per cent in August 2024 (ABS)
Resolving conflict Protected action rules channel conflict; intractable bargaining ends deadlocks Strikes can be suspended or ordered to stop; unions argue the rules are among the most restrictive in the developed world
Responding to change Multi-employer bargaining (2022); gender equality objects; IRC gender undervaluation findings (2026) Complex two-system structure; reforms swing with changes of government
Accessibility FWC is informal and low cost; small claims up to $100,000 Many workers do not know their rights; complex agreements

Judgement. The legal system plays a central and largely effective role in regulating the workplace. It sets enforceable minimums, channels negotiation into a structured process that rewards cooperation, and gives both employers and employees independent tribunals. Since 2022 it has leaned towards collective protection of low-paid and female-dominated sectors. Its limits are the complexity of a divided federal system, the decline of unions, which makes bargaining less accessible for many workers, and the fact that rights depend on compliance and enforcement, discussed on remuneration.

Common traps
Saying the FWC enforces the law
The FWC is a tribunal that makes awards and resolves disputes; the Fair Work Ombudsman is the enforcement body. NESA's 2025 feedback specifically asked students to distinguish them.
Treating the NSW IRC as covering all NSW workers
Since 2010 it mainly covers NSW public sector and local government employees.
Discussing unions and the media in a state and federal government question
NESA's 2024 feedback flagged these as irrelevant to that question.
Calling all strikes illegal
Protected industrial action during bargaining is lawful; action outside those rules is unprotected.

In one sentence

The Commonwealth regulates most workplaces through the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) using its corporations power and NSW's 2010 referral, while NSW regulates its public sector through the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) and keeps its own safety, compensation, discrimination and long service leave laws, and within this framework the law structures negotiation through enterprise and multi-employer bargaining, protected action and arbitration when talks fail.

Try this

Q1. Outline the state and federal framework for industrial relations in NSW. (5 marks)

  • What the marker wants. The constitutional basis, the national system and NSW referral, the NSW system and its coverage, and the areas NSW still regulates.

Q2. Explain how the law encourages cooperation in enterprise bargaining. (6 marks)

  • What the marker wants. Good faith bargaining, the vote and FWC approval, the BOOT, supported bargaining, and a limit.

Q3. Analyse the role of the NSW Industrial Relations Commission in achieving justice for employees. (8 marks)

  • What the marker wants. Its jurisdiction, the nurses decision (2026), its orders in the doctors' dispute (2025), its new bullying and harassment powers (2025), and a judgement.

Exam-style questions

Questions in the style of NESA exam questions on this dot point, each with a worked answer. They are written by ExamExplained unless tagged "Past paper"; the year shows the paper a question is modelled on.

Original25 marks
Assess the role of the legal system in regulating the workplace.
Show worked answer →
Thesis
The legal system plays a central and largely effective role in regulating the workplace by setting minimum standards, structuring bargaining and resolving disputes, but its effectiveness is limited by the complexity of a divided state and federal system, uneven bargaining power and non-compliance.
Framework
Constitution s 51(xxxv), (xx), (xxxvii); Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) national system from 1 January 2010 (NSW referral); Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) for NSW public sector and local government; Industrial Court of NSW re-established 1 July 2024.
Setting standards
NES, modern awards, Annual Wage Review (4.75 per cent from 1 July 2026; NMW $26.44).
Structuring negotiation
Good faith bargaining (s 228), BOOT, protected action; supported bargaining (ECEC multi-employer agreement approved 10 December 2024); intractable bargaining (TWU v Cleanaway, 12 June 2024).
State role
IRC work value decision for NSW nurses (16 April 2026: 16 to 28 per cent over three years); IRC orders against the doctors' strike (April 2025) show limits.
Limits
Complexity, low union density (13.1 per cent, 2024), strike rules that favour stability, underpayment.
Judgement
Significant and largely effective role; the framework now encourages cooperation more than it did before 2022, but outcomes still depend on bargaining power and enforcement.
Band guide (modelled on NESA Section III criteria)
21-25: extensive understanding, informed judgement, integrated legislation, cases, media and reports, sustained and cohesive. 16-20: sound judgement with relevant examples. 11-15: describes the law with some judgement. 6-10: descriptive. 1-5: general statements.
2024 HSC Q30 (a)Past paper25 marks
Analyse the role of state and federal governments in responding to the rights of employees.
Show worked answer →

Criteria (NESA 2024 marking guidelines). 21-25: extensive understanding of the role of state and federal governments in relation to employees; an informed analysis of government responses to the rights of employees; integrates relevant examples such as legislation, cases, media, international instruments and documents; sustained, logical and cohesive. The guidelines list regulation of the workplace, the state and federal framework, and the roles of courts, tribunals and governmental organisations. NESA's feedback praised responses that explicitly distinguished state and federal roles with correct institutions, legislation and cases and explored the relationship between them, and warned against discussing irrelevant aspects such as the media and trade unions.

A plan. (1) Federal: Fair Work Act 2009, FWC (awards, Annual Wage Review, unfair dismissal), FWO (enforcement, wage theft offence from 2025), Sex Discrimination Act and AHRC, Paid Parental Leave Act. (2) State: NSW referral (2010); Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) and IRC for public sector workers (nurses decision, April 2026); WHS Act 2011 (NSW) and SafeWork NSW; workers compensation; Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW); Long Service Leave Act 1955 (NSW). (3) The relationship: cooperative federalism (referral, harmonised WHS laws), overlap and forum choice, gaps. (4) Analysis of how well each protects employee rights.

Source: NESA, 2024 HSC Legal Studies examination, Section III, Question 30(a), and 2024 marking guidelines and feedback.

2022 HSC Q31 (b)Past paper25 marks
Evaluate the effectiveness of the law in encouraging cooperation to resolve issues concerning the workplace. Support your response with reference to at least ONE issue.
Show worked answer →

Criteria (NESA 2022 marking guidelines). 21-25: extensive understanding of law concerning the workplace; an informed judgement about the effectiveness of the law in encouraging cooperation to resolve at least ONE issue concerning the workplace; integrates relevant examples; sustained, logical and cohesive. NESA's feedback praised responses that stayed on cooperation (not compliance), identified where cooperation occurs such as negotiations for enterprise agreements, used paragraphs on distinct workplace issues, and supported judgements with examples such as the availability of mediation.

A plan. (1) Bargaining: good faith obligations, BOOT, supported bargaining (ECEC, 2024); limits when bargaining breaks down (Cleanaway intractable bargaining determination, 2024). (2) Dispute resolution clauses and FWC conciliation (most unfair dismissal claims settle). (3) Issue, termination: consultation before redundancy and redeployment (Helensburgh Coal v Bartley, 2025). (4) Issue, safety: WHS consultation duties and health and safety representatives. (5) Judgement.

Source: NESA, 2022 HSC Legal Studies examination, Section III, Question 31(b), and 2022 marking guidelines and feedback.

Original6 marks
Outline the process of making an enterprise agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).
Show worked answer →

Bargaining starts when the employer agrees or is ordered to bargain (or, since 2022, when employees request it for a replacement agreement). The employer notifies employees of their right to a bargaining representative, usually a union. Representatives must bargain in good faith (s 228): attend meetings, disclose relevant information, respond to proposals and not undermine collective bargaining. Protected industrial action may be taken after a protected action ballot. The proposed agreement is explained to employees and approved by a majority vote. The FWC then approves it if it was genuinely agreed, passes the better off overall test against the award and complies with the NES.

Marking pattern (Original): 5-6 for the stages in order, good faith, the vote, FWC approval and the BOOT; 3-4 for most stages; 1-2 for general points.

Original4 marks
Explain what makes industrial action protected under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).
Show worked answer →

Industrial action is protected only if it is taken during bargaining for a proposed enterprise agreement, after a protected action ballot approved by the FWC in which employees vote in favour, with written notice to the employer (usually three working days), and while the bargaining representative is genuinely trying to reach agreement. Protected action is immune from most legal liability. The FWC can suspend or terminate it if it threatens life, safety, health or welfare, or significant harm to the economy. Unprotected action can be stopped by FWC orders and attract penalties.

Marking pattern (Original): 4 for the conditions and the effect of protection with a limit; 2-3 for some conditions; 1 for a general statement.

Practise this

Sources & how we know this

ExamExplained