Employment contracts, awards, agreements and statutory conditions: HSC Legal Studies
“The nature of workplace law: contracts - of service, for services, express and implied terms; awards and agreements; statutory conditions; describe the rights and responsibilities of employers and employees in the workplace”
Every job rests on a contract. A contract of service makes someone an employee; a contract for services is made with an independent contractor, who gets none of the employee protections. In 2022 the High Court held that written contract terms decide the question (CFMMEU v Personnel Contracting; ZG Operations v Jamsek), but since 26 August 2024 s 15AA of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) looks at the practical reality of the relationship, and casual employment has a new statutory definition. Contracts contain express terms (agreed) and implied terms (added by law, such as the employee's duty to obey lawful and reasonable directions and the employer's duty of care). On top of the contract sit modern awards (industry minimums), enterprise agreements (bargained at the workplace and approved only if employees are better off overall) and statutory conditions, above all the National Employment Standards (NES). Rights and responsibilities flow in both directions.
What this dot point is asking
This page covers the second half of the nature of workplace law in the Workplace option of the Legal Studies Stage 6 Syllabus (2009): contracts (of service, for services, express and implied terms), awards and agreements, and statutory conditions. The syllabus asks you to describe the rights and responsibilities of employers and employees in the workplace, so this page finishes with a table of them.
These are the building blocks of every Workplace answer. Before you can judge whether the law achieves justice, you need to know which instrument gives a worker a right: a contract, an award, an enterprise agreement or a statute. The history of how these instruments developed is on the nature of workplace law, and how they are made and enforced is on the industrial relations framework and negotiations.
Contract of service vs for services; multi-indicia test (Hollis v Vabu (2001)). CFMMEU v Personnel Contracting [2022] HCA 1; ZG Operations v Jamsek [2022] HCA 2 (9 February 2022). Fair Work Act s 15AA (from 26 August 2024). WorkPac v Rossato [2021] HCA 23; casual definition and employee choice pathway (26 August 2024). Implied terms: Commonwealth Bank v Barker [2014] HCA 32 (no mutual trust and confidence). Modern awards (Part 2-3); enterprise agreements and the BOOT (Part 2-4); zombie agreements ended 7 December 2023. NES (Part 2-2): 38 hours, flexible work, casual conversion, parental leave, annual leave, personal/carer's, compassionate and FDV leave, community service leave, long service leave, public holidays, notice and redundancy pay, information statements, superannuation (from 1 January 2024). Pay secrecy ban (s 333B); fixed-term limits (s 333E, from 6 December 2023); right to disconnect (s 333M). Super guarantee 12 per cent (1 July 2025); Payday Super (1 July 2026).
The answer
Contracts of service and contracts for services
| Contract of service | Contract for services | |
|---|---|---|
| Worker | Employee | Independent contractor |
| Control | Employer directs how, when and where work is done | Contractor decides how to do the job |
| Business | Works in the employer's business | Runs their own business, may have many clients |
| Tools, risk | Employer supplies tools and bears the risk | Contractor supplies tools, carries insurance and bears the risk of loss |
| Pay | Wages for time worked; tax withheld | Invoices for results; has an ABN |
| Law that applies | Fair Work Act, NES, awards, unfair dismissal, super guarantee, workers compensation | Mainly commercial law; the Independent Contractors Act 2006 (Cth); limited protections |
- Why the distinction matters
- Only employees get minimum wages, leave, unfair dismissal protection and most workers compensation. That gives employers an incentive to describe workers as contractors, so the law needs a test that looks past the label.
- The common law test
- Courts apply a multi-factor ("multi-indicia") test, weighing control, integration into the business, the ability to delegate, who supplies equipment and bears risk, and how payment is made. In Hollis v Vabu (2001), bicycle couriers who wore the company's uniform and could not build their own business were held to be employees, making the company liable for a courier who injured a pedestrian.
- The 2022 High Court cases
- In CFMMEU v Personnel Contracting [2022] HCA 1, Mr McCourt, a young British backpacker with no construction experience, was labelled a "self-employed contractor" by a labour hire company and sent to work as a labourer on building sites under the builder's direction. The High Court held he was the labour hire company's employee, but its reasoning was that where the relationship is wholly in a written contract, the court looks at the rights and obligations in the contract, not how the relationship worked in practice. In ZG Operations v Jamsek [2022] HCA 2, two truck drivers who had been told in the 1980s to buy their own trucks and form partnerships were held to be contractors because of the contracts their partnerships signed, even though they worked for the same company for decades.
- Parliament's response
- The Closing Loopholes No. 2 Act 2024 inserted s 15AA into the Fair Work Act from 26 August 2024: whether someone is an employee is decided by "the real substance, practical reality and true nature" of the relationship, considering how the contract is performed in practice, not just its terms. A contractor earning above a high income threshold can opt out in writing. This is a clear example of law reform overriding a court decision in response to changing work.
- Gig workers
- Platform workers (food delivery, rideshare) are usually contractors. Rather than deem them employees, Parliament let the Fair Work Commission make minimum standards orders for "employee-like" workers. The first order, for on-demand food and grocery delivery, took effect on 17 August 2026, with minimum rates of $31.30 to $32 an hour of engaged time depending on the vehicle, and accident insurance. It followed an application by the Transport Workers' Union and a joint proposal on minimum standards by the union, Uber Eats and DoorDash, an example of cooperation producing law.
Types of employee
- Full-time and part-time (permanent) employees have ongoing work, paid leave and notice rights.
- Casual employees receive a casual loading (usually 25 per cent) instead of paid leave and notice. In WorkPac v Rossato [2021] HCA 23 the High Court held that a mine worker employed on a series of casual contracts was a casual because the contracts gave no firm advance commitment to ongoing work, even though he worked regular rosters for years. From 26 August 2024, the Fair Work Act defines a casual by the practical reality of the relationship, and an employee of at least 6 months (12 months with a small business) can use the employee choice pathway to notify the employer that they want to become permanent.
- Fixed-term employees work for a set period or task. Since 6 December 2023, employers generally cannot use fixed-term contracts that run for more than two years or are renewed more than once (s 333E), unless an exception applies.
- Labour hire workers are employed by an agency and placed with a host. Since 1 November 2024 a same job, same pay order can require them to be paid at least what the host's own employees receive under an enterprise agreement.
Express and implied terms
Express terms are those the parties actually agree, in writing or orally: the job title and duties, pay, hours, location, probation, notice, confidentiality and sometimes restraints of trade (clauses stopping an employee working for a competitor after leaving). Restraints are unenforceable at common law unless reasonable; in September 2026 the federal government released draft legislation to ban non-compete clauses for workers earning below the high income threshold ($190,100), but it was not law as at September 2026.
Implied terms are added by the law even though no one wrote them down:
| Implied duties of the employer | Implied duties of the employee |
|---|---|
| Pay the agreed wages | Obey lawful and reasonable directions |
| Take reasonable care for the employee's health and safety (provide a safe system of work) | Exercise reasonable care and skill |
| Reimburse expenses reasonably incurred in doing the job | Act with fidelity and good faith: do not compete, misuse confidential information or make secret profits |
| Not to require an employee to do something unlawful | Account for money and property received for the employer |
In Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker [2014] HCA 32, the High Court refused to imply a term of mutual trust and confidence into Australian employment contracts, holding that such a far-reaching term is a matter for Parliament. Mr Barker, made redundant after 27 years, therefore could not recover damages for the bank's failure to follow its own redeployment policy. The case shows the limits of the common law: statute, not contract, is where most employee protection now comes from.
Awards and agreements
Modern awards (Fair Work Act Part 2-3) are legal instruments made by the Fair Work Commission that set minimum wages and conditions for an industry or occupation, such as the General Retail Industry Award 2020 or the Nurses Award 2020. They cover classifications and minimum rates, ordinary hours and rosters, overtime and penalty rates, allowances, leave loading and consultation. The FWC varies award wages each year in the Annual Wage Review (4.75 per cent from 1 July 2026) and can vary awards for work value or gender undervaluation. Since the Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates Act 2025, it must ensure awards do not reduce penalty or overtime rates. In May 2025, 22.7 per cent of employees were paid by award only (ABS).
Enterprise agreements (Part 2-4) are made by collective bargaining between an employer (or several employers) and employees, usually represented by a union. An agreement must be voted up by a majority of employees and approved by the FWC, which checks it passes the better off overall test (BOOT) against the relevant award and does not undercut the NES. Agreements typically give higher pay in exchange for productivity or flexibility, and have a nominal expiry date of up to four years. The Secure Jobs, Better Pay Act 2022 made bargaining across several employers easier and ended old pre-2010 "zombie" agreements on 7 December 2023. See negotiations between employers and employees.
Other arrangements. Award-free employees on individual contracts must still receive the national minimum wage ($26.44 an hour from 1 July 2026) and the NES. Individual flexibility arrangements can vary some award or agreement terms for one employee, but only if the employee is better off overall. Individual statutory agreements (AWAs) can no longer be made.
Statutory conditions
The National Employment Standards (Fair Work Act Part 2-2) apply to all national system employees and cannot be excluded by any contract, award or agreement:
| NES | Core entitlement |
|---|---|
| Maximum weekly hours | 38 hours plus reasonable additional hours (s 62) |
| Flexible working arrangements | Right to request (for parents, carers, people with disability, older workers, those experiencing FDV and others); a written response within 21 days; refusals reviewable by the FWC (ss 65 to 65C) |
| Casual employment | Employee choice pathway to permanent work (Div 4A) |
| Parental leave | 12 months' unpaid leave, with a right to request 12 more (s 70, s 76) |
| Annual leave | 4 weeks a year (5 for some shift workers) (s 87) |
| Personal/carer's, compassionate and FDV leave | 10 days' paid personal/carer's leave; 2 days' compassionate leave; 10 days' paid family and domestic violence leave |
| Community service leave | For jury service and voluntary emergency work |
| Long service leave | Preserved from state law, such as the Long Service Leave Act 1955 (NSW) |
| Public holidays | A day off, and the employer may only request work on a public holiday, which the employee can refuse if the request or refusal is reasonable |
| Notice and redundancy pay | 1 to 5 weeks' notice by length of service; redundancy pay of 4 to 16 weeks (ss 117, 119) |
| Information statements | Fair Work Information Statement; Casual and Fixed Term Contract Information Statements |
| Superannuation | Right to super contributions (from 1 January 2024) |
Other statutory conditions:
- Minimum wages set by the FWC's Annual Wage Review.
- Superannuation guarantee of 12 per cent of ordinary time earnings (from 1 July 2025); from 1 July 2026, under Payday Super, it is 12 per cent of qualifying earnings (ordinary time earnings plus some other amounts, such as commissions), paid with wages.
- Pay secrecy is banned (s 333B, from 7 December 2022): employees can disclose and ask about pay.
- Right to disconnect (s 333M): an employee can refuse to monitor, read or respond to contact outside working hours unless the refusal is unreasonable (from 26 August 2024; small business from 26 August 2025).
- Paid parental leave from the government under the Paid Parental Leave Act 2010 (Cth): 26 weeks for children born or adopted from 1 July 2026. See leave.
- Safety and workers compensation under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW) and Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW). See safety.
Rights and responsibilities of employers and employees
| Rights | Responsibilities | |
|---|---|---|
| Employee | Minimum wages and conditions (NES, award, agreement); safe workplace; freedom from discrimination and harassment; join a union and bargain collectively; take protected industrial action during bargaining; not be unfairly dismissed or subjected to adverse action; disconnect after hours; ask about pay | Obey lawful and reasonable directions; work with care and skill; act in good faith and keep confidences; take reasonable care for their own and others' safety (WHS Act s 28); not harass or discriminate against co-workers |
| Employer | Direct and manage work (managerial prerogative); expect loyalty and competent work; dismiss for valid reasons after a fair process; restructure and make genuine redundancies; bargain and take protected action (lockouts) | Pay at least the minimum lawful rate and keep records; provide a safe workplace (WHS Act s 19); eliminate sexual harassment and discrimination as far as possible (positive duty, Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) s 47C); consult on major change; give notice and redundancy pay; pay super |
Evaluating the balance. The system recognises rights through several layers, so a gap in one (a bad contract) is filled by another (the NES or an award). It encourages cooperation through bargaining and consultation. But protection depends on status (employee or not), and on compliance: the Fair Work Ombudsman recovered $453 million for more than 181,000 underpaid workers in 2025-26, and in FWO v Woolworths Group [2025] FCA 1092 (5 September 2025) the Federal Court found that Woolworths and Coles could not use annual salaries to offset award overtime and penalty entitlements across pay periods, exposing large underpayments of salaried store managers. Rights on paper are only as good as the systems that enforce them; see remuneration.
- Relying only on Personnel Contracting
- Since 26 August 2024, s 15AA of the Fair Work Act requires the practical reality of the relationship to be considered. Explain both, and why Parliament acted.
- Mixing up awards and agreements
- Awards are made by the FWC and set industry minimums; agreements are bargained at the workplace and approved by the FWC if they pass the BOOT.
- Saying employees must work public holidays if rostered
- An employer may only request it; the employee can refuse if the request or refusal is reasonable (CFMMEU v OS MCAP, 2023).
- Listing rights without their source
- NESA's 2019 feedback praised answers that named where each right comes from: international law, common law or statute.
In one sentence
The terms of every job come from a contract, which only makes a worker an employee if the real relationship is one of employment, plus implied duties, modern awards, enterprise agreements and statutory minimums such as the NES, which together give both employers and employees enforceable rights and responsibilities, but only to the extent they are known and enforced.
Try this
Q1. Distinguish between express and implied terms of an employment contract. (4 marks)
- What the marker wants. Definitions, two examples of each, and one case (Commonwealth Bank v Barker).
Q2. Describe the rights and responsibilities of employees in the workplace. (6 marks)
- What the marker wants. Several rights and responsibilities with their sources (common law, NES, WHS Act, anti-discrimination law).
Q3. Assess the effectiveness of the law in determining whether a worker is an employee. (8 marks)
- What the marker wants. The multi-factor test, the 2022 High Court cases, s 15AA and gig worker minimum standards, and a judgement.
Exam-style questions
Questions in the style of NESA exam questions on this dot point, each with a worked answer. They are written by ExamExplained unless tagged "Past paper"; the year shows the paper a question is modelled on.
Original25 marksEvaluate the effectiveness of the law in balancing the rights and responsibilities of employers and employees.Show worked answer →
- Thesis
- The law balances the rights of employers and employees effectively to a large extent through a layered system of contract, awards, agreements and statutory minimums, but the balance has repeatedly been disturbed by contract labels, insecure work and non-compliance, which recent reforms only partly correct.
- Layers
- Common law contract: employer duties (pay, safe system of work) and employee duties (obey lawful and reasonable directions, care and skill, fidelity); no implied term of mutual trust and confidence (Commonwealth Bank v Barker, 2014). Modern awards and enterprise agreements (BOOT). The NES (11 standards plus information statements, with super added 1 January 2024).
- Balance shifted by labels
- CFMMEU v Personnel Contracting and ZG Operations v Jamsek (2022) and WorkPac v Rossato (2021) let written contracts decide status; Parliament restored a practical-reality test (s 15AA, 26 August 2024) and a new casual definition with an employee choice pathway.
- Employer interests
- Flexibility through IFAs, managerial prerogative, lawful and reasonable directions, the high income contractor opt-out, small business concessions.
- Limits
- Underpayment (FWO v Woolworths and Coles, 2025; $453 million recovered in 2025-26), sham contracting, gig workers only partly covered (employee-like minimum standards, food delivery order from 17 August 2026).
- Judgement
- Effective to a large extent in design; its effectiveness depends on enforcement and on keeping definitions up to date with new forms of work.
- Band guide (modelled on NESA Section III criteria)
- 21-25: extensive understanding, informed judgement, integrated legislation, cases, media and reports, sustained and cohesive. 16-20: sound judgement with relevant examples. 11-15: describes the law with some judgement. 6-10: descriptive. 1-5: general statements.
2019 HSC Q30 (a)Past paper25 marksEvaluate the effectiveness of regulation of the workplace in protecting and recognising workplace rights.Show worked answer →
Criteria (NESA 2019 marking guidelines). 21-25: extensive understanding of regulation of the workplace; an informed judgement, using criteria, about the effectiveness of regulation in protecting and recognising workplace rights; integrates relevant examples such as legislation, cases, media, international instruments and documents; sustained, logical and cohesive. 16-20: substantial understanding and a sound judgement using explicit or implicit criteria. NESA's feedback praised responses that identified contemporary workplace rights AND their source (international law, common law, statute), explained how rights are regulated (legislation, statutory authorities, NGOs), appraised mechanisms such as the FWC, FWO and unions, and used criteria such as ratification, preservation, promotion, enforcement, remedies and compliance. It asked students to rely less on describing cases.
A plan. (1) Recognition: ILO conventions; common law duties; NES, awards and agreements; the right to disconnect (2024). (2) Protection and enforcement: FWO ($453 million recovered in 2025-26; wage theft offence from 1 January 2025); FWC unfair dismissal and general protections; unions. (3) Limits: status tests (Personnel Contracting, 2022; s 15AA from 2024), non-compliance, cost and delay. (4) Judgement against the criteria.
Source: NESA, 2019 HSC Legal Studies examination, Section III, Question 30(a), and 2019 marking guidelines and feedback.
Original6 marksDistinguish between a contract of service and a contract for services, and explain why the distinction matters.Show worked answer →
A contract of service creates an employment relationship; a contract for services is made with an independent contractor who runs their own business. Courts look at the totality of the relationship: control over how work is done, whether the worker can delegate, who supplies tools and bears commercial risk, how payment is made and whether the worker is part of the employer's business (Hollis v Vabu, 2001). In 2022 the High Court held that where a written contract exists, its terms decide the question (CFMMEU v Personnel Contracting; ZG Operations v Jamsek), but from 26 August 2024 s 15AA of the Fair Work Act requires the real substance and practical reality of the relationship to be considered. It matters because only employees receive the NES, award wages, unfair dismissal protection, leave and superannuation guarantee as employees; contractors carry their own risk.
Marking pattern (Original): 5-6 for the distinction, indicia, the 2022 cases and s 15AA, and consequences; 3-4 for a sound distinction; 1-2 for general points.
Original5 marksOutline the role of awards and enterprise agreements in setting employment conditions.Show worked answer →
Modern awards, made and reviewed by the Fair Work Commission, set minimum wages and conditions (penalty rates, overtime, allowances, rosters) for an industry or occupation; 22.7 per cent of employees were paid by award only in May 2025 (ABS). Enterprise agreements are negotiated collectively at the workplace (or across several employers), must be approved by the FWC and must leave employees better off overall than the award (the BOOT). Both operate on top of the NES, which they cannot undercut.
Marking pattern (Original): 5 for both instruments, the FWC's role, BOOT and the NES floor; 3-4 for a sound outline; 1-2 for general points.
Practise this
Sources & how we know this
- Treasury Laws Amendment (Payday Superannuation) Act 2025 — Federal Register of Legislation (2025)
- Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) — Federal Register of Legislation
- Closing Loopholes — Fair Work Ombudsman
- Secure Jobs, Better Pay — Fair Work Ombudsman
- Payday Super: New rules starting 1 July 2026 — Fair Work Ombudsman (2026)
- Annual Wage Review 2026 — Fair Work Commission (2026)
- Opening the door to better and higher paying jobs: banning unfair non-competes — Treasury Ministers (Andrew Leigh and Amanda Rishworth) (2026)
- Legal Studies 2019 HSC exam pack — NESA (2019)
- Fair Work Ombudsman recovers \$453 million for workers, as Booth urges compliance common ground — Fair Work Ombudsman (2026)
- Employee Earnings and Hours, Australia, May 2025 — Australian Bureau of Statistics (2025)
- Legal Studies Stage 6 Syllabus (2009) — NESA
- Legal Studies HSC exam papers — NESA