Skip to main content
ExamExplained
NSW · Ancient History
Ancient History study scene
§-Syllabus dot point
NSWAncient HistorySyllabus dot point

What do the public and private buildings reveal about urban life in Pompeii and Herculaneum?

The public buildings of Pompeii and Herculaneum, including the Forum and its surrounding temples, basilica, macellum and Eumachia building, the public baths (Stabian, Forum, the unfinished Central Baths, and the Suburban Baths at Herculaneum), the amphitheatre of c. 70 BC, the theatres and the palaestra, and the private buildings, including the atrium-peristyle domus (e.g. the House of the Faun and the House of the Vettii), insulae and upper-floor apartments, and the Villa of the Mysteries and Villa of Papyri, and what they reveal about urban life

A focused answer to the HSC Ancient History Core Study dot point on public and private buildings. The Forum precinct (basilica, macellum, Eumachia building), the four bath complexes, the amphitheatre and theatres, the atrium-peristyle domus, insulae, and the Villas of the Mysteries and Papyri, read through Zanker and Wallace-Hadrill.

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. How to read a source on this topic
  4. Historians on the buildings of Pompeii and Herculaneum

What this dot point is asking

NESA expects you to describe the public buildings that structured civic, religious, commercial and leisure life (the Forum precinct, the baths, the amphitheatre, the theatres and the palaestra) and the private buildings that housed Pompeians and Herculaneans across the social scale (the atrium-peristyle domus, insulae and rented upper floors, and the two great suburban villas), and to argue what this built environment reveals about urban life: status, benefaction, leisure culture and the gap between rich and poor. Strong answers name specific buildings, dates and patrons rather than describing "Roman architecture" in general.

The answer

The Forum: the civic, religious and commercial heart

Pompeii's Forum was a long, rectangular, colonnaded piazza closed to wheeled traffic (stone bollards still mark the entrances) at the south-western end of the walled city. It was the physical stage for everything the dot point on local political life covers (elections, the decurional council, public notices) and for state religion, but it was also ringed by buildings with distinct civic, religious and commercial functions in their own right.

At the north end stood the Capitolium (Temple of Jupiter, also housing Juno and Minerva as the Capitoline Triad), dominating the view down the length of the piazza; it was badly damaged in the AD 62 earthquake and still under repair in AD 79. On the west side stood the Temple of Apollo, the oldest cult site on the Forum, with visible Greek and Samnite-period origins predating Roman colonisation.

The basilica, the macellum and the Eumachia building

At the south-west corner stood the Basilica, Pompeii's largest roofed building (probably built in the late 2nd century BC, making it one of the earliest identifiable basilicas anywhere in Italy). It combined the functions of a law court and a covered exchange for business, with a raised tribunal at one end for magistrates.

On the north-east corner stood the macellum, the covered meat and fish market. Excavation has recovered fish scales and animal bone in its drains, confirming its trading function; at its centre stood a tholos, a small circular structure (most likely a fountain or a fish tank) that gave the market a recognisable civic form rather than a mere row of stalls.

On the east side, between the Sanctuary of the Public Lares and the small, unfinished Temple of Vespasian, stood the Eumachia building: a large hall behind an elaborate porticoed facade, funded by the public priestess Eumachia (whose father had been a duumvir) and dedicated, according to its surviving inscription, to Concordia Augusta and Pietas, values closely tied to the imperial family. The building has traditionally been associated with Pompeii's fullers (wool-cleaners) as a guild headquarters, though this identification is now debated among historians rather than certain. Whatever its precise trade function, the Eumachia building is unmistakable evidence of a wealthy woman using monumental public architecture, alongside the Forum's temples, to convert private wealth into lasting civic prestige.

Schematic plan of the Pompeii Forum precinct An illustrative, not-to-scale block plan of the Forum piazza at Pompeii, oriented with north at the top. The Capitolium (Temple of Jupiter) sits at the north end. The Temple of Apollo lies on the west side. The Basilica occupies the south-west corner. Moving up the east side from the south: the Curia and Comitium at the south end, the Eumachia building, the Temple of Vespasian, the Sanctuary of the Public Lares, and the macellum at the north-east corner. All labels sit outside the plan on leader lines. The Forum precinct (illustrative block plan, not to scale) North at top - closed to wheeled traffic N Capitolium (Temple of Jupiter) Temple of Apollo oldest Forum cult site Basilica law courts and exchange Macellum covered market, tholos Sanctuary of the Public Lares Temple of Vespasian (unfinished) Eumachia building Eumachia's benefaction Comitium and Curia voting and council Religious Civic/political Commercial Benefaction hall

Public bathing: the four bath complexes

Bathing was one of the most important shared leisure activities in Pompeii and Herculaneum, and the surviving complexes show the practice evolving across two and a half centuries. The Stabian Baths, with origins in the 2nd century BC, are the oldest and largest, built around a spacious palaestra (exercise yard) with separate suites for men and women, each running frigidarium (cold room) to tepidarium (warm room) to caldarium (hot room) over an underfloor hypocaust heating system.

The Forum Baths, built soon after Pompeii became a Roman colony in 80 BC, are smaller and more architecturally refined, with a finely stuccoed, coffered ceiling surviving in the men's tepidarium. The Central Baths, begun after the AD 62 earthquake, were still unfinished when Vesuvius erupted in AD 79; their single continuous suite (no separate male/female wings) and much larger windows show a newer, later Roman approach to bathing that Pompeii never got to complete. At Herculaneum, the Suburban Baths sat just outside the town wall near the ancient shoreline, with unusually large windows opening onto the sea and a well-preserved private latrine, reflecting the town's smaller, more residential and less commercially driven character.

Entertainment architecture: theatres, amphitheatre and palaestra

The Theatre Quarter combined the Large Theatre (Hellenistic in origin, rebuilt in Roman form under the patronage of the Holconius family and seating around 5,000) with the smaller, roofed Odeon (seating roughly 1,500) used for music, recitation and mime, and the Quadriporticus (originally a portico for theatre-goers, later converted into gladiator barracks).

The amphitheatre, built around 70 BC by the duoviri Gaius Quinctius Valgus and Marcus Porcius, is the earliest surviving stone amphitheatre anywhere in the Roman world. Rather than the free-standing tiered arcades of Rome's later Colosseum, it was built into a raised earth embankment, an economical solution reached barely a decade after Pompeii's colonisation, seating around 20,000, more people than the town's own free population. A fresco from the House of Actius Anicetus depicts the violent AD 59 riot there between Pompeians and visiting Nucerians, an event also recorded by Tacitus (Annals 14.17), who notes the Senate's resulting ten-year ban on gladiatorial games at the town.

A large colonnaded palaestra (an open exercise ground, distinct from the smaller Samnite Palaestra) stood near the amphitheatre and, according to inscriptions, was associated with the town's organised youth (a collegium iuvenum), showing that physical training and civic identity for young free men were built into Pompeii's urban plan alongside religion, law and trade.

A typology of public buildings in Pompeii and Herculaneum A concept map with five function categories arranged around a central hub labelled shared urban life: religious buildings (the Capitolium, Temple of Apollo), civic and political buildings (the Basilica, Comitium, Curia), commercial buildings (the macellum, the Eumachia building), bathing complexes (the Stabian, Forum, Central and Suburban Baths), and entertainment buildings (the theatres, the amphitheatre, the palaestra). Arrows run from each category into the central hub. Five functions, one civic fabric Religious Capitolium, Temple of Apollo Commercial Macellum, Eumachia building Bathing Stabian, Forum, Central, Suburban Civic / political Basilica, Comitium, Curia Entertainment Theatres, amphitheatre, palaestra Shared urban life

Private architecture: the atrium-peristyle domus

The classic elite house at Pompeii combined a public-facing reception sequence (the fauces entrance corridor, the atrium with its rainwater-catching impluvium and compluvium, and the tablinum, the owner's office positioned so visitors could see straight through the house from the street) with a private rear courtyard, the peristyle, a colonnaded garden that typically held dining rooms (triclinia) and additional bedrooms (cubicula).

The House of the Faun, at roughly 3,000 square metres the largest private residence at Pompeii, took this plan to an almost palatial scale, with two atria and two peristyles, the bronze statuette of the Dancing Faun (giving the house its name) in its first impluvium, and the Alexander Mosaic (depicting Alexander the Great in battle) in a room off the second peristyle. It dates originally to the Samnite period (2nd century BC), showing that Pompeii's elite were building on this scale before the town even became a Roman colony.

The House of the Vettii, by contrast, belonged to two freedmen brothers, Aulus Vettius Restitutus and Aulus Vettius Conviva, whose wealth (probably made in trade) bought them an elaborate Fourth Style redecoration after the AD 62 earthquake but not, since freedmen could not hold magistracies, a tablinum used for legal business in the traditional sense. Andrew Wallace-Hadrill uses the Vettii house to argue that Roman domestic architecture is not a fixed social script: freedmen wealth could out-decorate old elite houses even while remaining formally excluded from the political roles those houses traditionally displayed.

Non-elite housing: insulae and upper-floor apartments

Most residents of Pompeii and Herculaneum did not live in a domus at all. Multi-storey blocks known as insulae combined ground-floor shops (tabernae), often with a small mezzanine or back room for the shopkeeper's family, and separate upper-storey rooms (cenacula) rented out independently. A painted notice advertising space in the Insula Arriana Polliana, owned by Gnaeus Alleius Nigidius Maius, offered shops with their upper rooms and additional lodgings for lease on a five-year term, with enquiries directed to the owner's slave, direct evidence of an organised rental business run for profit by a single wealthy landowner.

Most of Pompeii's upper floors collapsed either in the AD 62 earthquake or in the AD 79 eruption itself, so the clearest physical evidence for this kind of housing survives at Herculaneum, where the pyroclastic surge charred rather than destroyed timber. The Trellis House and the House of the Wooden Partition preserve carbonised wooden-framed upper storeys, in the Trellis House's case with a wooden balcony (maenianum) projecting out over the street, showing cramped rented lodgings stacked directly above street-level workshops, often within the same building, or even the same ownership, as a grand domus nearby.

The suburban villas: the Villa of the Mysteries and the Villa of Papyri

Just outside the Porta Ercolano, the Villa of the Mysteries combined an elite residence with active wine production (a torcularium, or wine press, survives on site). Its renown rests on the megalography frieze in one triclinium: a near life-size sequence of figures painted in the Second (Architectural) Style, generally interpreted as depicting rites connected with the cult of Dionysus/Bacchus, making the villa a rare survival of large-scale elite religious/mythological art outside a public temple.

At Herculaneum, the Villa of Papyri was a vast, multi-terraced seaside residence, traditionally though not certainly associated with the family of Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus (Julius Caesar's father-in-law). Excavated mainly by tunnelling in the 1750s under the engineer Karl Weber, it yielded a library of around 1,800 carbonised papyrus scrolls, overwhelmingly the philosophical writings of the Epicurean Philodemus of Gadara, the only substantially intact library to survive from the ancient world. The villa's design directly inspired the reconstructed J. Paul Getty Museum building in Malibu, California (opened 1974). Since 2023, an international effort using CT scanning and machine-learning image analysis (the "Vesuvius Challenge") has begun virtually unrolling and reading some of these still-unopened scrolls without physically damaging them, a genuinely live area of the evidence base.

Public and private buildings at a glance

Building Location Date / status in AD 79 What it reveals
Basilica Forum, south-west c. late 2nd century BC Law and commerce combined
Macellum Forum, north-east Roman-period rebuild Organised food retail
Eumachia building Forum, east side Julio-Claudian Elite female benefaction
Stabian Baths South-east of Forum Origins 2nd century BC Oldest, largest bath complex
Central Baths North of Forum Unfinished at AD 79 Later, ungendered bathing plan
Amphitheatre South-east corner c. 70 BC Earliest stone amphitheatre; civic pride and the AD 59 riot
House of the Faun Regio VI Samnite-period origin Palatial elite scale
House of the Vettii Regio VI Post-AD 62 redecoration Freedmen wealth and display
Insula Arriana Polliana Regio VI AD 79 rental notice Organised non-elite rental housing
Villa of the Mysteries Outside Porta Ercolano Second Style frieze Elite religious/artistic taste
Villa of Papyri Herculaneum shoreline Excavated 1750s Elite intellectual life; a working library

How to read a source on this topic

Section I sources on buildings typically include photographs or plans of the Forum, house facades, bath interiors, the amphitheatre, or extracts describing a villa. Three reading habits.

First, separate function from status. A building's function (market, bath, house) is only half the evidence; ask who paid for it, who used it, and what that combination reveals. The Eumachia building's dedication tells you about Eumachia's status as much as about wool-working.

Second, distinguish elite from non-elite evidence explicitly. The House of the Faun and the Villa of Papyri are spectacular but atypical; the Insula Arriana Polliana rental notice and Herculaneum's carbonised upper floors are rarer but more representative of how most residents lived. A high-band answer states which kind of evidence a source gives.

Third, note what survived and why. Herculaneum's pyroclastic surge preserved timber and organic material that Pompeii's fall of ash and pumice destroyed, so silence in Pompeii's record (on upper floors, for instance) is not evidence of absence.

Historians on the buildings of Pompeii and Herculaneum

Paul Zanker (Pompeii: Public and Private Life, 1998) reads the public and private buildings together as one coordinated statement of civic and personal status: the same elite families who funded the Forum's temples and halls also redecorated their own houses, so public benefaction and private display reinforced each other rather than belonging to separate spheres. Andrew Wallace-Hadrill (Houses and Society in Pompeii and Herculaneum, 1994) demonstrates that Roman houses, elite or otherwise, routinely mixed production, commerce and modest lodging with formal reception space, undermining any tidy modern line between "public" and "private" architecture. Mary Beard (Pompeii, 2008) stresses that famous buildings such as the House of the Faun and the Villa of the Mysteries are unrepresentative outliers, and that the insulae and rented upper rooms, though far less visited and far less photographed, housed the majority of the population. Alison Cooley (Pompeii and Herculaneum: A Sourcebook, 2014) provides the standard translations of the building inscriptions (the Eumachia dedication, the amphitheatre benefaction) used to date and attribute these structures.

Practice questions

Original practice questions graded from foundation to exam level, each with a full worked solution. Try them before revealing the solution.

foundation3 marksOutline THREE public buildings that stood around the Forum at Pompeii and identify the function of each.
Show worked solution →

A 3-mark "outline" needs three named buildings each paired with a correctly stated function.

Point 1: The Basilica
Standing at the south-west corner of the Forum, the Basilica was Pompeii's largest roofed building and functioned as a law court and centre for business transactions.
Point 2: The macellum
On the north-east corner, the macellum was the covered meat and fish market, organised around a central tholos (a small circular structure, possibly a fountain or fish tank).
Point 3: The Eumachia building
On the east side, this large porticoed hall was dedicated to Concordia Augusta and Pietas by the public priestess Eumachia and combined commercial and civic-religious functions.

Markers award one mark per correctly named building with an accurately stated function; naming a building without its function earns no mark.

foundation4 marksIdentify the FOUR public bath complexes referred to in this dot point and outline ONE distinguishing feature of each.
Show worked solution →

A 4-mark "identify and outline" wants four named baths, each with one accurate distinguishing detail.

Stabian Baths
The oldest bath complex at Pompeii (origins in the 2nd century BC), built around a large palaestra with separate wings for men and women.
Forum Baths
Built soon after the Roman colony was founded (80 BC), smaller and more compactly planned, with a stuccoed, coffered vault in the men's tepidarium.
Central Baths
Still under construction when Vesuvius erupted in AD 79; designed as a single large suite without separate men's and women's sections, reflecting a later approach to bathing.
Suburban Baths (Herculaneum)
Positioned just outside the town wall near the ancient shoreline, with unusually large windows opening onto the sea view and a well-preserved private latrine suite.

Markers reward four correct names and one accurate feature per bath; confusing which bath was unfinished in AD 79 is a common error to avoid.

foundation3 marksDescribe the layout of a typical atrium-peristyle domus, naming the THREE core spaces.
Show worked solution →

A 3-mark "describe" needs the sequence of spaces and their function, not just a list of names.

The atrium
Entered from the street through the fauces (entrance corridor), the atrium was a partly roofed reception hall with a central impluvium (basin) that caught rainwater through the compluvium (roof opening) above.
The tablinum
Positioned opposite the entrance across the atrium, the tablinum was the owner's reception office, often left open so visitors could see straight through the house.
The peristyle
Behind the tablinum, a colonnaded garden courtyard provided private, informal living space, often the setting for dining rooms (triclinia) and additional bedrooms (cubicula).

Markers reward the front-to-back sequence (fauces to atrium to tablinum to peristyle) and correct Latin terminology.

core6 marksSOURCE ANALYSIS. Source A is an ExamExplained reconstruction of a painted rental notice of the kind found on Pompeian house facades: it advertises, in the property of a named landowner, ground-floor shops with the rooms above them, and a set of upper-storey rooms, available to let from the first of July for five years, with enquiries to be directed to the owner's slave. Using Source A and your own knowledge, explain what such rental notices reveal about non-elite housing in Pompeii.
Show worked solution →

A 6-mark source-analysis task needs the source USED (not just described), plus own knowledge, plus a qualification.

Use the source
Source A shows a single property owner leasing out multiple separate units within one building: ground-floor tabernae (shops) with attached upper rooms, and additional upper-storey lodgings let independently of the shops below. The fixed five-year term and the naming of a slave as the point of contact both point to an organised, ongoing rental business rather than one-off subletting.
Own knowledge
This matches the archaeological pattern of the insula: multi-storey blocks such as the Insula Arriana Polliana at Pompeii combined shopfronts, workshops and rented upper rooms (cenacula) under single ownership. Herculaneum preserves the clearest physical evidence, since its upper floors survived the pyroclastic surge rather than the roof-collapse that destroyed most of Pompeii's upper storeys: the Trellis House and the House of the Wooden Partition show timber-framed upper rooms, some with wooden balconies (maeniana) overhanging the street.
Qualify it
Such notices do not describe the whole non-elite population; slaves living within elite households, and the poorest residents of shared or informal lodgings, leave little trace of their own. Andrew Wallace-Hadrill cautions that the surviving evidence over-represents the property-owning and shop-keeping strata who could afford to advertise and to pay rent.

Markers reward explicit use of the source's detail (the landowner, the five-year term, the shops-plus-upper-rooms structure), named comparative evidence (an insula, a named Herculaneum house), and a stated limitation.

core5 marksExplain how the Villa of the Mysteries and the Villa of Papyri differ in function and in the type of evidence each provides for elite life outside the city walls.
Show worked solution →

A 5-mark "explain" needs both villas correctly characterised and a clear point of difference.

The Villa of the Mysteries
Located just outside the Porta Ercolano, this was a working suburban villa combining elite residence with agricultural production (a torcularium, or wine press, has been excavated on site). Its fame rests on the Second Style megalography frieze in one triclinium, a near life-size painted sequence usually read as depicting rites associated with the cult of Dionysus/Bacchus, giving evidence for elite religious and artistic taste rather than for daily domestic routine.
The Villa of Papyri
This vast seaside villa at Herculaneum, terraced down toward the bay and traditionally (though not certainly) associated with the family of Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus, is defined by its library of around 1,800 carbonised papyrus scrolls, overwhelmingly the philosophical works of the Epicurean Philodemus of Gadara. It is therefore prized less for its wall paintings than as unique evidence for an elite Roman library and intellectual life.
The difference
The Mysteries villa is evidence for religious/artistic culture and estate agriculture; the Papyri villa is evidence for elite intellectual and literary culture. Both show that "villa" life combined display, production and, in the Piso case, scholarship, rather than pure leisure.

Markers reward correctly naming the frieze subject and the philosopher, and an explicit statement of the difference in evidence type.

exam8 marksTo what extent does the amphitheatre of c. 70 BC provide evidence for civic pride and social order in Pompeii?
Show worked solution →

An 8-mark "to what extent" needs a sustained judgement supported by specific dated evidence, not a description of the building.

Judgement
The amphitheatre provides strong evidence for civic pride through elite benefaction, but the AD 59 riot it hosted complicates any simple picture of social order.
Civic pride and benefaction
Built around 70 BC, within a decade of Pompeii becoming a Roman colony, by the duoviri Gaius Quinctius Valgus and Marcus Porcius at their own expense, the amphitheatre is the earliest surviving stone amphitheatre in the Roman world. Seating around 20,000 (more than Pompeii's own free population), it was built into an earth embankment rather than free-standing arcades, an economical Campanian solution later monumentalised at Rome's Colosseum. Its scale is itself an argument: the colony's new elite advertised its status and its Romanness through a building type associated with Rome's growing imperial identity.
Complicating evidence: the AD 59 riot
A fresco from the House of Actius Anicetus depicts a violent brawl between Pompeians and visiting Nucerians at a gladiatorial show in the amphitheatre in AD 59, an event also recorded by Tacitus (Annals 14.17), who reports that the Senate banned gladiatorial games at Pompeii for ten years. This shows the amphitheatre could also be a flashpoint for inter-town rivalry and disorder, not merely a symbol of harmonious civic life.
Weighing it
The riot was serious enough to draw imperial intervention, yet the ban was lifted (probably after the AD 62 earthquake) and games resumed, suggesting the building's civic value outweighed the disorder in the eyes of both the town and Rome.

Marker's note: top answers state a clear verdict, cite the dated benefaction (c. 70 BC, Valgus and Porcius) and the dated riot (AD 59, Tacitus, Annals 14.17) together, and explicitly weigh pride against disorder rather than narrating the riot alone.

exam25 marksESSAY. To what extent do the public and private buildings of Pompeii and Herculaneum reveal a strict separation between elite and non-elite urban life?
Show worked solution →

A band-6 essay sustains a judgement on "to what extent," deploys precise named and dated evidence across BOTH public and private buildings, and integrates historiography as argument. This is a plan plus a model paragraph.

Thesis
The buildings reveal a marked but not absolute separation: public buildings such as the Forum, baths and amphitheatre were shared civic space used by all free residents, even as they displayed elite benefaction, while private buildings show a sharper contrast between palatial domus and cramped rented rooms, often within the very same building. The cities reveal a society of gradations, not two sealed worlds.
Argument line 1: Public buildings as shared but elite-sponsored space
The Forum precinct (Capitolium, Basilica, macellum, Eumachia building) was funded by named elite benefactors (Eumachia; the Holconii, who rebuilt the Large Theatre) yet used daily by the whole free population for law, trade, worship and voting. The four bath complexes (Stabian, Forum, the unfinished Central Baths, and Herculaneum's Suburban Baths) admitted a broad clientele for a small entry fee, and the c. 70 BC amphitheatre, funded by the duoviri Quinctius Valgus and Porcius, seated around 20,000, more than the free citizen population, meaning genuinely mixed audiences. Public architecture therefore blurs class lines even as its dedicatory inscriptions advertise elite status.
Argument line 2: Private housing as the sharpest contrast
The House of the Faun (about 3,000 square metres, two atria, two peristyles, the Alexander Mosaic) and the House of the Vettii (the freedmen brothers Aulus Vettius Restitutus and Aulus Vettius Conviva, lavishly redecorated in the Fourth Style) sit within metres of insulae where whole families rented single upper rooms above a shop, as the painted rental notice for the Insula Arriana Polliana attests. Herculaneum's better-preserved upper floors (the Trellis House, the House of the Wooden Partition) show timber-framed rented lodgings physically stacked above street-level workshops, meaning rich and poor often shared one building, not separate districts.
Argument line 3: The suburban villas as an elite escape from the mixed city
The Villa of the Mysteries (its Second Style Dionysiac frieze) and the Villa of Papyri at Herculaneum (traditionally linked to the Piso family, its library of around 1,800 Epicurean scrolls, chiefly Philodemus) sit physically outside the dense urban grid, suggesting the genuinely wealthy sought space and privacy the town itself could not offer, a spatial separation absent from the crowded intramural streets.
Historiography
Paul Zanker (Pompeii: Public and Private Life, 1998) argues Pompeii's urban fabric shows a "civic elite" using both public monuments and private houses as coordinated statements of status, so the two spheres reinforce rather than separate from each other. Andrew Wallace-Hadrill (Houses and Society in Pompeii and Herculaneum, 1994) demonstrates that even elite domus mixed production, display and modest lodging under one roof, arguing against any clean modern division between "public" and "private" or "rich" and "poor" space. Mary Beard (Pompeii, 2008) stresses that the famous houses are unrepresentative outliers; most residents lived far more modestly, often within the same city block as the elite.
Model paragraph (argument line 2)
Nowhere is the limit of any strict separation clearer than at street level. A visitor walking the Via dell'Abbondanza in AD 79 would have passed, within a single block, the vast peristyle gardens of an elite domus and, immediately next door, a narrow stairway leading to a rented upper room above a bakery or a thermopolium. The painted notice advertising rooms for rent in the Insula Arriana Polliana, offering shops with their upper storeys and separate lodgings on a five-year lease, shows that a single wealthy landowner might profit from letting space to exactly the non-elite tenants his own domus was designed to exclude from its inner rooms. As Wallace-Hadrill argues, the Roman house resists a tidy public/private or rich/poor binary; Pompeii's blocks physically interleaved the two rather than zoning them apart.
Conclusion
Separation was real, sharpest in private housing and softened in shared public space, and even there porous rather than absolute; a verdict of "marked but incomplete separation" is defensible and sustained throughout.

Marker's note: band 6 responses answer "to what extent" with an explicit, sustained verdict, draw evidence from BOTH the public and private building categories named in the dot point, name specific buildings and dates rather than generalising, and use at least two named historians as argument (Zanker and Wallace-Hadrill in tension/agreement), not as a decorative list. A response that only describes the buildings without weighing separation against integration caps at mid-band.

ExamExplained