§-Syllabus dot point

NSWAncient HistorySyllabus dot point

What was the social structure of Athens in the age of Pericles, and who counted as a citizen?

The social and political organisation of Athens in the age of Pericles, including the citizen body and Pericles' citizenship law of 451/0 BC, the Cleisthenic tribes and demes, the residual Solonian property classes, the roles, rights and limits of metics, the scale and role of slavery (including at Laurion), and the extent of social mobility for non-citizens

A focused answer to the HSC Ancient History dot point on Athenian social structure under Pericles: the citizen body and the 451/0 BC citizenship law, the Cleisthenic tribes and demes, the residual Solonian property classes, metics, the scale of slavery including Laurion, and social mobility for non-citizens.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.813 min answerUpdated 2026-07-01

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section

What this dot point is asking
The answer
How to read a source on this topic
Historians on Athenian citizenship and status

What this dot point is asking

NESA expects you to describe who counted as an Athenian citizen in the age of Pericles and why, the structural bedrock of tribes and demes inherited from Cleisthenes, the fading but still-referenced Solonian property classes, and the roles, rights and limits of the two large non-citizen groups, metics and slaves, including the near-total absence of any path from either group into the citizen body.

In plain English

Imagine a very exclusive club with three very different kinds of people around it. Full members (citizens) get every privilege: a vote, a say in every decision, a shot at running the place, even a small daily allowance just for turning up to help judge disputes. But halfway through the club's most famous era, the members voted to make membership much harder to inherit: from then on, BOTH your parents had to already be members, not just your dad, even though almost everyone running the club, including its most famous leader, had spent years arguing that the club should be more democratic on the inside.

Around the club are the "long-term guests" (metics): people who live there for decades, sometimes run its best businesses, fight to defend it when it is attacked, and pay extra fees for the privilege, but never get a vote, can't own the building, and always need an actual member to vouch for them.

Then there is a much larger group who are not guests at all: people owned as property (slaves), doing everything from cooking and childcare to the backbreaking work of digging silver out of a mountain, with no rights of their own at all. The club's wealth, its free time for politics, and even its taxes all lean heavily on this bottom group, while the rules make it almost impossible for anyone outside the founding families ever to become a full member.

The answer

Residual Solonian property classes

Solon's reforms (around 594 BC) divided Athenian citizens into four property classes by annual agricultural yield, measured in medimnoi (a dry measure, roughly a bushel): the Pentakosiomedimnoi (500 or more), the Hippeis (300 or more, wealthy enough to maintain a cavalry horse), the Zeugitai (200 or more, the hoplite-farmer class), and the Thetes (below 200, often landless).

By the age of Pericles these classes had lost most of their original political function. Ephialtes' reforms of 462/1 BC stripped the aristocratic Areopagus of most powers, transferring authority to the ekklesia, boule and dikasteria; the archonship was opened to the Zeugitai in 457 BC; and Pericles' introduction of pay for jury service (misthos), traditionally dated to the 450s BC, allowed even Thetes to participate fully in the courts. The classes survived mainly as a residual system for allocating tax burdens and liturgies (such as funding a warship or a dramatic chorus), not as gatekeepers of political rights.

The citizen body and Pericles' citizenship law of 451/0 BC

Before 451/0 BC, Athenian citizenship required only an Athenian father; the mother's origin was not restricted. In 451/0 BC, Pericles carried a law requiring BOTH parents to be Athenian citizens for a child to be a citizen (Aristotle, Athenaion Politeia 26.4).

Plutarch (Life of Pericles 37) records that the law was enforced with real consequences. In 445 BC, after the Egyptian ruler Psammetichus sent a gift of grain to Athens, a scrutiny of the citizen registers found that nearly 5,000 people had been falsely claiming citizenship; they were expelled and, according to Plutarch, some were sold into slavery. The episode shows the law was policed, not simply proclaimed.

The law also affected Pericles' own family. His legitimate sons, Xanthippus and Paralus, died in the plague of 430 to 426 BC. His sons by the metic Aspasia of Miletus, including a younger Pericles, were not legally Athenian citizens under his own law; the Assembly later granted the younger Pericles citizenship by special decree, an exception that proves how rare such grants were.

Modern historians debate WHY Pericles restricted citizenship at the very moment he was expanding democratic participation. Cynthia Patterson's study of the law (1981) argues it protected the finite material benefits of citizenship, jury pay, cleruchy land allotments abroad, and periodic grain distributions, for a defined and increasingly valuable community as Athens' empire grew. Other historians add a political dimension: the law disadvantaged elite families with a tradition of marrying foreign aristocratic wives to build alliances, a practice associated with earlier leading families.

The Cleisthenic tribes and demes

Cleisthenes' reforms of 508/7 BC, a generation before Pericles, created the structural bedrock that Periclean Athens still relied on. Cleisthenes replaced the old aristocratic tribal groupings with ten new tribes (phylai), each built from three trittyes (thirds), one from the coastal region (paralia), one from the city (asty) and one from inland (mesogeia). Mixing these regions deliberately broke up existing aristocratic and regional power bases.

Within each tribe, the basic administrative and registration unit was the deme (demos), of which there were roughly 139. Deme membership, recorded as a man's demotic (for example "of Kollytos"), replaced clan or family names as the primary marker of an Athenian's political identity, alongside his own name and his father's name.

At age 18, following a scrutiny called the dokimasia, a young man was enrolled in his deme's official register, the lexiarchikon grammateion. This enrolment was his lifelong proof of citizenship. Deme membership was hereditary through the father's line and did not change even if a family later moved to a different part of Attica, so a citizen's deme reflected his ancestors' original residence, not necessarily his own.

The tribe-and-deme system remained functionally central under Pericles: the boule of 500 was filled by fifty citizens chosen by lot from each of the ten tribes, itself built from deme-level participation, so a structure designed in 508/7 BC still ran the daily machinery of Periclean democracy.

Metics: roles, rights and limits

Metics (metoikoi) were free non-citizens who took up permanent residence in Attica, typically as craftsmen, traders, bankers or manufacturers. Athens' commercial prominence in the 5th century BC drew a substantial metic population, particularly around the port of Piraeus.

Metics had no political rights: they could not vote in the ekklesia, sit on a jury, or hold public office. They could not own land or a house in Attica unless individually granted the privilege of enktesis (the right to own property) as a rare honour for exceptional service. Every metic required a citizen sponsor, a prostates, to represent his legal standing. Metics paid the metoikion, an annual residence tax traditionally cited as around 12 drachmas for a man and 6 drachmas for an independent woman.

Despite these restrictions, metics carried real obligations and real economic weight. They served as hoplites or rowers when the city was mobilised, paid the eisphora (an emergency property tax) in wartime, and wealthy metics could be called on to fund liturgies. Lysias, Against Eratosthenes 12.4, records that his father Cephalus of Syracuse settled in Athens on Pericles' own invitation and lived there for thirty years, running a profitable shield-manufacturing workshop, a well-documented example of a prominent, economically significant metic family in the Periclean period.

A rare honour, isoteleia, exempted a favoured metic from the metoikion and taxed them at the same rate as citizens, without granting citizenship itself. This was as close as most metics ever came to formal equality.

The scale and role of slavery

Slaves (douloi) were legal property with no civic rights of their own. They entered slavery through purchase (commonly from Thrace, Scythia, Caria and Phrygia via long-distance trade networks), capture in war, or birth to an enslaved mother.

Slaves worked across almost every sector of Athenian life. Domestic slaves managed households, cared for children, and, for wealthier families, accompanied boys to school as a paedagogos. Agricultural and craft slaves worked farms and workshops; Demosthenes' father, for example, owned slave craftsmen in a furniture and a knife-making workshop. Public slaves (demosioi), owned by the state rather than an individual, performed specialised functions, most famously the Scythian archers who acted as an Athenian police force, alongside mint workers and clerical roles. A small number of especially trusted and skilled slaves, such as the later banker Pasion, managed significant business affairs on their owner's behalf.

The largest concentration of slave labour was at Laurion, the state-owned silver mines in south-eastern Attica, leased out to citizens who worked them with large numbers of purchased slaves under harsh conditions. Laurion silver, especially after a major vein was struck in the 480s BC, funded much of Athens' naval power and, indirectly, the wealth that supported the Periclean building programme.

Ancient population figures for slaves must be handled as estimates, not census data. Thucydides (7.27) records that during the Peloponnesian War more than 20,000 enslaved people, "the greater part of them craftsmen," deserted to the Spartan fort at Decelea in 413 BC, a striking wartime figure for the whole of Attica rather than a peacetime count of Laurion alone. A later ancient census attributed to Demetrius of Phalerum (around 317 BC), preserved by Athenaeus quoting Ctesicles, claims 21,000 citizens, 10,000 metics and 400,000 slaves; most modern historians regard the slave figure as either a manuscript corruption or a wild exaggeration, and in any case it describes Athens a full generation after Pericles' death (429 BC), not his own lifetime. Modern estimates for the Periclean period itself vary enormously and remain sharply disputed among historians.

Social mobility and the status of non-citizens

Social mobility across the citizen/non-citizen boundary was extremely limited in Periclean Athens, even though movement within a group was possible.

A citizen could, in principle, rise or fall between the Solonian property classes as his wealth changed, since classification depended on self-declared annual yield, not birth into a fixed caste. But movement from metic or slave status INTO citizenship was almost impossible. A freed slave (apeleutheros) typically became a metic, not a citizen, and often retained continuing obligations (paramone) to a former owner. Metic status itself was hereditary: children of two metic parents remained metics. Naturalisation, the grant of citizenship to an outsider, required a specific decree of the Assembly and was reserved for genuinely exceptional cases, such as individuals rewarded for extraordinary service to the city; it was never a routine path open to ordinary metics or freed slaves. Isoteleia, similarly, upgraded a metic's tax status without ever converting metic status into citizenship.

The overall picture is a citizen body that became, after 451/0 BC, both more internally democratic and more externally closed, resting economically and militarily on two much larger groups, metics and slaves, who were structurally excluded from ever crossing into it.

Athenian social structure at a glance

Status	Legal position	Rights	Key obligations
Citizens (Politai)	Full legal and political status	Vote, hold office, jury pay	Military service, liturgies (wealthy citizens)
Metics (Metoikoi)	Free, permanent non-citizen resident	None political; enktesis only by grant	Metoikion tax, prostates, military service, eisphora
Slaves (Douloi)	Legal property	None	Labour as directed by an owner or the state

How to read a source on this topic

Section II sources on Athenian social structure typically include extracts from Aristotle's Athenaion Politeia, Plutarch's Life of Pericles, Thucydides (especially Book 7 on the Decelea desertions and Book 2 on Pericles' review of Athens' resources), Lysias' court speeches (a rich source for metic life), and inscriptions such as deme decrees or funerary monuments. Three reading habits matter most.

First, separate contemporary from retrospective evidence. Thucydides and Lysias wrote within or close to the events described; Plutarch wrote around 550 years later, drawing on earlier lost sources (including Ion of Chios and Stesimbrotus) whose own biases he does not always disclose.

Second, treat every ancient population figure as an estimate, never a precise census. No reliable census of Attica exists for Pericles' own lifetime; even the later Demetrius of Phalerum census (around 317 BC) is transmitted through a much later author (Athenaeus) and contains a slave figure most historians consider corrupted or exaggerated. Numbers such as Thucydides' 20,000 Decelea deserters describe a specific wartime moment, not a stable baseline.

Third, note whose voice is missing. Almost no surviving source was written by a metic or a slave about their own condition; Lysias speaks for his metic father, and slave experience is reconstructed almost entirely through citizen-authored texts, court speeches and later philosophical discussion (such as Aristotle's theory of "natural slavery" in the Politics), which reflects an owning class's justification more than a lived account.

Historians on Athenian citizenship and status

Cynthia Patterson (Pericles' Citizenship Law of 451-0 B.C., 1981) is the standard modern study, arguing the law protected the finite material and status benefits of citizenship, jury pay, cleruchies, grain distributions, for a defined community as Athens' empire expanded, resolving the apparent paradox of a democratic leader narrowing the franchise. David Whitehead (The Ideology of the Athenian Metic, 1977) is the standard study of metic status, arguing metics were expected to display loyalty and usefulness without ever gaining full civic belonging. Josine Blok (Citizenship in Classical Athens, 2017) has more recently revised the mechanics of citizenship, stressing that religious participation and communal recognition, not law alone, defined belonging. Moses Finley (Ancient Slavery and Modern Ideology, 1980) argued Athens, alongside Rome, was one of history's genuine "slave societies," in which slave labour was structurally central to production rather than marginal, a view that remains the reference point for the scale-of-slavery debate. Peter Hunt (Slaves, Warfare, and Ideology in the Greek Historians, 1998) has examined how far ancient authors' own biases shape surviving evidence about enslaved people, particularly in military contexts such as the Decelea desertions.

Model exam responses

1. Source-analysis response (content, reliability, usefulness, perspective). "Source B, an imagined funerary inscription for a metic craftsman, is useful evidence for long-term metic residence in Periclean Athens, corroborating Lysias' account (Against Eratosthenes 12.4) of his father Cephalus living in Athens for thirty years on Pericles' own invitation. Its reliability as evidence of metic status generally is limited, since a single commemorative inscription reflects one family's self-presentation for public display, not an administrative survey, and grave monuments conventionally emphasise virtue rather than legal grievance. Its perspective is also necessarily partial: the metic's own voice, filtered through a genre designed to honour the dead, cannot tell us how typical his forty years of residence were among the wider metic population."

Marker's note: markers reward a clear content-to-corroboration link, an explicit reliability limitation tied to genre, and an acknowledgement of whose perspective the source can and cannot represent.

2. Essay paragraph (the citizenship law as protecting finite benefits). "The apparent contradiction of a democratic reformer narrowing the citizen body dissolves once citizenship is understood as a bundle of finite material privileges rather than an abstract ideal. By the 450s BC, Athenian citizens alone could vote, hold office, sit on paid juries, and share, at moments such as the 445 BC gift of Egyptian grain, in the city's material windfalls. As Patterson argues, protecting these tangible benefits for a defined community, rather than diluting them among an ever-growing population drawn in by an expanding empire, gave Pericles every democratic incentive to close the citizen body even as he opened its internal institutions to the poorest Athenians through jury pay."

Marker's note: this paragraph scores because it sustains an argument (material self-interest explains the paradox), deploys precise dated evidence, and integrates a named historian (Patterson) as part of the reasoning rather than as decoration.

3. Short-answer response (metics and slaves compared). "Metics and slaves were both excluded from Athenian citizenship, but their legal status differed fundamentally. A metic was a free person who chose or inherited residence in Attica, paid a tax (the metoikion) in exchange for the protection of a citizen sponsor (a prostates), and could accumulate considerable wealth, as Cephalus of Syracuse did. A slave was legal property, with no independent legal personality at all, obtained by purchase, capture or birth, and set to labour wherever an owner or the state required, from domestic households to the Laurion silver mines. The clearest evidence of the distinction is that a freed slave became a metic, never a citizen, showing the two statuses sat on the same side of the citizen boundary despite their very different daily realities."

Marker's note: markers reward the explicit legal distinction (free-but-excluded versus owned property), a named example for each group, and the observation that manumission converted a slave into a metic, not a citizen.

Command words and how to use a source

"Outline"/"identify" want brief, correctly sequenced points, not evaluation. "Explain" wants a causal mechanism (deme registration feeds the boule; the citizenship law protects finite material benefits), not a bare definition. "Assess"/"evaluate"/"to what extent" demand a sustained JUDGEMENT defended in every paragraph: state your verdict first and hold it throughout. For any source on this topic, work through CONTENT (what does it actually say), RELIABILITY (origin, author, genre, distance from the events, purpose), USEFULNESS (what a historian can genuinely learn from it), and PERSPECTIVE (whose voice is present and whose is missing, especially for metics and slaves, who almost never speak for themselves in the surviving evidence). Weave historiography as argument ("Patterson explains the paradox of a democratic reformer restricting citizenship as protecting finite material benefits, which the 445 BC purge then confirms in practice") rather than naming a historian as decoration at the end of a paragraph.

Common exam traps

Treating metics and slaves as the same group: Metics were free, taxed residents with a citizen sponsor; slaves were legal property. Confusing the two loses marks on any question distinguishing them.
Overstating ancient population figures as precise: Numbers such as Thucydides' 20,000 Decelea deserters or the 317 BC census's 400,000 slaves are ancient estimates from specific, often extreme, moments, not stable censuses of Pericles' Athens. Always flag the source and its limitations.
Forgetting the 451/0 BC law reversed the OLD rule: Before the law, only an Athenian father was required. Stating the law "introduced" the two-parent requirement without noting what it replaced misses the reform's significance.
Assuming any path from metic or slave status to citizenship was common: Naturalisation was exceptionally rare and required a specific Assembly decree; manumission produced a metic, not a citizen. Do not describe Athenian citizenship as broadly open to upward mobility.

Practice questions

Original practice questions graded from foundation to exam level, each with a full worked solution. Try them before revealing the solution.

foundation4 marksOutline the requirements introduced by Pericles' citizenship law of 451/0 BC.

Show worked solution →

A 4-mark "outline" wants correctly sequenced points, roughly one mark each.

Point 1: The old rule: Before 451/0 BC, an Athenian only needed a citizen father; his mother could be a foreign woman.
Point 2: The new rule: From 451/0 BC, full citizenship required BOTH parents to be Athenian citizens (Aristotle, Athenaion Politeia 26.4).
Point 3: Enforcement: Plutarch (Life of Pericles 37) records that in 445 BC, after the Egyptian ruler Psammetichus sent a gift of grain to Athens, a scrutiny of the citizen lists expelled nearly 5,000 people found to have falsely claimed citizenship.
Point 4: Consequence for Pericles himself: Pericles' own sons by his Athenian wife predeceased him; his sons by the metic Aspasia were not legally citizens until the Assembly granted his surviving son, also named Pericles, citizenship by special decree after the plague (430 to 426 BC) killed his legitimate heirs.

Markers reward the before/after contrast, the correct date (451/0 BC), and named ancient evidence (Aristotle, Plutarch).

foundation3 marksIdentify and briefly describe TWO of the following Solonian property classes: Pentakosiomedimnoi, Hippeis, Zeugitai, Thetes.

Show worked solution →

A 3-mark "identify and describe" wants two correctly matched definitions.

Any two of
Pentakosiomedimnoi: The wealthiest class, producing at least 500 medimnoi of produce a year; eligible for the highest offices, including the archonship.
Hippeis: Producing at least 300 medimnoi a year, wealthy enough to maintain a cavalry horse; the "knights" class.
Zeugitai: Producing at least 200 medimnoi a year, roughly the hoplite-farmer class; opened to the archonship in 457 BC.
Thetes: Below 200 medimnoi, the poorest free citizens, often landless; served as rowers in the navy and, after Pericles' introduction of jury pay, could sit on juries.

Markers reward the correct name-to-threshold match; accept approximate medimnoi figures.

foundation5 marksOutline the rights and obligations of a metic living in Athens in the time of Pericles.

Show worked solution →

A 5-mark "outline" wants several correctly sequenced points.

Point 1: No political rights: Metics could not vote in the ekklesia, sit on juries, or hold public office.
Point 2: Land ownership: Metics could not own land or a house in Attica unless individually granted the privilege of enktesis.
Point 3: The metoikion: Metics paid an annual residence tax, traditionally cited as 12 drachmas for a man and 6 for an independent woman.
Point 4: The prostates: Each metic needed a citizen sponsor (prostates) to represent his legal interests.
Point 5: Obligations: Metics served as hoplites or rowers when called up, paid the eisphora property tax in wartime, and wealthy metics could be required to fund liturgies such as a chorus or a warship.

Markers reward the correct balance of restrictions AND obligations, not restrictions alone.

core6 marksSOURCE A (ExamExplained reconstruction): a fragment of a reconstructed deme register entry, recording a young man's enrolment among his fellow demesmen after his dokimasia, listing his father's and grandfather's names and his deme of Kollytos, but making no reference to his mother's family. Using Source A and your own knowledge, explain what the source suggests about the basis of Athenian citizenship after 451/0 BC.

Show worked solution →

A 6-mark "explain using the source" needs source detail USED, own knowledge, and a clear link.

Use the source: The entry records the young man's father, grandfather and deme, but is silent on his mother's family, which is consistent with citizenship being traced through registration in a deme inherited from the father's line.
Own knowledge: the dokimasia: At 18, a young man's citizen status was scrutinised (the dokimasia) before his enrolment in the deme's official register (the lexiarchikon grammateion), which functioned as his primary proof of citizenship for life.
Own knowledge: the 451/0 BC law: Since Pericles' citizenship law required BOTH parents to be Athenian, in practice the mother's citizen status (rather than her family name) had to be established at this scrutiny, even though Athenian public documents, being drafted from a patrilineal viewpoint, rarely named women directly.
Link: The source's silence on the mother's identity reflects the documentary convention of the period, not an absence of the maternal citizenship requirement; a historian must read such silence carefully rather than assume the mother's status was irrelevant.

Markers reward specific use of the source's details (father, grandfather, deme, silence on the mother), accurate own knowledge of the dokimasia and the 451/0 BC law, and an explicit link between the two.

core5 marksExplain how the Cleisthenic tribe and deme system underpinned citizen registration in Periclean Athens.

Show worked solution →

A 5-mark "explain" needs the mechanism spelled out, not just definitions.

The ten tribes: Cleisthenes (508/7 BC) divided Attica into ten new tribes (phylai), each combining one trittys (third) from the coastal, city and inland regions, deliberately mixing old aristocratic and regional loyalties.
The demes: Roughly 139 demes were the basic unit within each tribe. Deme membership, not tribal or family name, was the primary marker of citizen identity, recorded in a man's official name (his own name, his father's name, and his demotic).
Registration: At 18, after the dokimasia, a young man was entered in his deme's lexiarchikon grammateion. Deme membership was hereditary through the father's line and did not change even if the family later moved elsewhere in Attica.
Function under Pericles: Deme quotas (fifty citizens per tribe) supplied the boule of 500, so the tribe-and-deme structure was still the operational backbone of citizen participation, even though it dated from a generation before Pericles.

Markers reward the causal chain (tribes built from trittyes, demes as registration units, deme membership feeding the boule) and correctly dating Cleisthenes' reform to 508/7 BC.

core6 marksSOURCE B (ExamExplained reconstruction): an imagined funerary stele epitaph, in the style of surviving Attic grave monuments, commemorating a metic craftsman from Miletus who is praised for his fine work and his forty years living in Athens, but makes no claim to Athenian descent. Using Source B and your own knowledge, assess the usefulness and reliability of this type of source for a historian investigating the status of metics.

Show worked solution →

A 6-mark source-analysis task needs BALANCED usefulness and reliability, anchored in origin and perspective, plus own knowledge.

Origin and perspective: A funerary monument of this kind was commissioned by the family or the metic himself, intended for public display in a cemetery such as the Kerameikos, and reflects how a metic wished to be remembered, not an official legal record.
Usefulness: The source is useful for illustrating real, long-term metic residence (echoing Lysias 12.4, which records the metic Cephalus of Syracuse living in Athens for thirty years on Pericles' invitation) and for the absence of any Athenian genealogical claim, consistent with metics never becoming citizens by residence alone.
Reliability and limitation: Reliability is limited because a single funerary inscription reflects one family's circumstances and self-presentation, not a survey of the whole metic population, and grave epitaphs conventionally praise the deceased rather than record grievances about restricted rights.
Historian: David Whitehead's study of the ideology of the Athenian metic (1977) argues that metics were expected to display loyalty and usefulness to their host city without ever obtaining full civic belonging, a pattern this type of source illustrates well but cannot, on its own, quantify.

Markers reward explicit perspective analysis (commemorative, not administrative), a named corroborating source, a stated limitation, and a named historian.

exam25 marksESSAY. Evaluate the extent to which Athenian citizenship under Pericles became an increasingly exclusive status rather than an expression of radical democracy.

Show worked solution →

A band-6 essay sustains a judgement on "to what extent," marshals specific dated evidence, and weaves historiography. This is a PLAN plus a model paragraph.

Thesis: Athenian democracy became more internally participatory under Pericles (jury pay, wider access to office), yet the boundary of WHO could belong to that citizen body was simultaneously narrowed by the 451/0 BC citizenship law, so exclusivity and radical democracy expanded together rather than being opposites.
Argument line 1: Democracy deepened internally: After Ephialtes stripped the Areopagus of most powers (462/1 BC), the ekklesia, boule and dikasteria became sovereign; the archonship opened to Zeugitai (457 BC); Pericles introduced jury pay (misthos), traditionally dated to the 450s BC, enabling even Thetes to serve.
Argument line 2: Citizenship simultaneously narrowed: Aristotle (Athenaion Politeia 26.4) records that in 451/0 BC Pericles carried a law restricting citizenship to those born of two Athenian parents, reversing the previous rule that only required an Athenian father. Plutarch (Life of Pericles 37) records the 445 BC purge of the citizen rolls after the Psammetichus grain gift, in which nearly 5,000 people were expelled as falsely registered.
Argument line 3: The historiographical paradox: Cynthia Patterson's study of the citizenship law (1981) argues Pericles, the architect of radical democracy, restricted access to it in order to protect the material and status benefits (jury pay, cleruchies, grain distributions, land allotments) of a finite citizen body as Athens' empire and population grew. Some historians add a political motive: the law disadvantaged elite families with a tradition of foreign marriage alliances.
Model paragraph (argument line 3): The apparent contradiction, a democratic reformer narrowing the franchise, dissolves once citizenship is understood as a bundle of finite material privileges rather than an abstract ideal. By the 450s BC, Athenian citizens alone could vote, hold office, sit on paid juries, receive cleruchy land allotments in subject territories, and, at moments of crisis such as 445 BC, share in gifts of grain. As Patterson argues, protecting these tangible benefits for a defined community, rather than diluting them among an ever-growing population as the empire drew in wealth and migrants, gave Pericles every democratic incentive to close the citizen body even as he opened its internal institutions. The purge of 445 BC, expelling roughly 5,000 false claimants, shows the law was policed in practice, not merely proclaimed.
Conclusion: To a considerable extent: Periclean Athens combined an increasingly participatory democracy for those inside the citizen body with an increasingly closed boundary around who could enter it, a paradox best explained, following Patterson, by the material stakes of citizenship rather than any retreat from democratic principle.

Marker's note: band 6 responses sustain a judgement on "to what extent," integrate specific dated evidence (462/1, 457, 451/0, 445 BC), and use named historiography (Patterson) as argument, not decoration. Simply narrating the citizenship law without addressing the "radical democracy" half of the question caps the response at mid-band.

exam20 marksESSAY. To what extent did metics and slaves, despite their exclusion from citizenship, remain indispensable to Athenian society and economy in the age of Pericles?

Show worked solution →

A band-6 essay for a 20-mark "to what extent" needs a clear verdict, evidence across both groups, and named historiography.

Thesis: Metics and slaves were excluded from every formal political right, yet the Periclean economy and even the democracy's material base depended on their labour, skill and military service to a degree that makes "indispensable" a defensible verdict, provided the argument also credits the deliberate legal structures that kept both groups permanently subordinate.
Argument line 1: Metics as economic and military contributors: Wealthy metics such as Cephalus of Syracuse, invited to Athens by Pericles and resident for thirty years (Lysias, Against Eratosthenes 12.4), ran manufacturing enterprises (Cephalus operated a shield workshop) and could be called on for liturgies and the wartime eisphora tax; metics also served as hoplites and rowers, filling out Athens' military manpower.
Argument line 2: Slaves as the base of production: Slaves worked as domestic servants, agricultural and craft labourers, and, most visibly, in the state-owned silver mines at Laurion in south-eastern Attica, whose revenue partly funded the Periclean fleet and building programme. Thucydides (7.27) records that during the Peloponnesian War more than 20,000 enslaved people, "the greater part of them craftsmen," deserted to the Spartan fort at Decelea (413 BC), a wartime figure that nonetheless indicates the sheer scale of slave labour across Attica by this period.
Argument line 3: Structural exclusion, not incidental disadvantage: Neither group could vote, hold office, or (for slaves) own their own labour; metics needed a citizen prostates and paid the metoikion; freed slaves (apeleutheroi) became metics, never citizens; citizenship itself was narrowed by law in 451/0 BC. Moses Finley's influential argument that Athens was one of history's genuine "slave societies," where slave labour was structurally central rather than marginal, supports reading this dependence as systemic rather than accidental.
Model paragraph (argument line 2): The scale of dependence on unfree labour is clearest at Laurion, where slaves, often purchased from Thrace or Asia Minor, worked the silver seams under harsh conditions that generated revenue used, in the following generation, to help fund Pericles' fleet and building programme. Thucydides' figure of over 20,000 enslaved deserters to Decelea in 413 BC, most of them skilled craftsmen, is wartime and Attica-wide rather than Laurion-specific, and should not be read as a precise peacetime headcount; even so, as Finley argues, no other explanation accounts for a figure of that magnitude except a society in which slave labour was structurally, not marginally, embedded in production.
Conclusion: To a very large extent: metics and slaves were economically and militarily indispensable, but that dependence coexisted with, and was reinforced by, deliberate legal exclusion from citizenship, so the system extracted maximum benefit from both groups while granting neither a stake in the polity they helped to sustain.

Marker's note: markers reward a sustained "to what extent" judgement, correctly attributed and appropriately hedged ancient evidence (Thucydides 7.27 as a wartime figure, not a precise census), and Finley's "slave society" thesis used as argument.