Skip to main content

Proof by mathematical induction: VCE Specialist Mathematics Unit 3

Syllabus dot point

“The principle of mathematical induction and its use to prove propositions about positive integers, including the base step, the inductive assumption and the inductive step, applied to summation formulas, divisibility results and inequalities”

6 min read

Quick answer

Mathematical induction proves a statement P(n)P(n) for all integers n≥n0n \ge n_0 in two steps. The base step checks P(n0)P(n_0) directly (often n0=1n_0 = 1). The inductive step assumes P(k)P(k) is true for some k≥n0k \ge n_0 (the inductive assumption) and uses it to prove P(k+1)P(k + 1). If both succeed, the statement holds for every n≥n0n \ge n_0, because truth at the base cascades upward one integer at a time. A complete proof names the assumption, manipulates the k+1k+1 case until it matches the target, and ends with a concluding statement that the result holds for all nn by induction.

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The principle
  3. Three standard families
  4. Writing it well
  5. Examples in context
  6. Try this
  7. Exam-style questions

What this dot point is asking

VCAA wants you to prove statements about all positive integers using mathematical induction, setting out the base step, the inductive assumption and the inductive step clearly, and reaching a correct conclusion. The method applies to summation formulas, divisibility claims and inequalities. Marks are awarded for structure as much as for algebra, so the layout matters.

The principle

To prove a proposition P(n)P(n) for all integers n≥n0n \ge n_0:

  1. Base step. Show P(n0)P(n_0) is true by direct substitution.
  2. Inductive step. Assume P(k)P(k) is true for some integer k≥n0k \ge n_0 (this is the inductive assumption), and prove that P(k+1)P(k + 1) follows.
  3. Conclusion. By the principle of mathematical induction, P(n)P(n) is true for all n≥n0n \ge n_0.

The logic is a chain of dominoes: the base knocks over P(n0)P(n_0), and the inductive step guarantees each true case topples the next, so every case falls.

Three standard families

Summation formulas
To prove ∑r=1nar=S(n)\sum_{r=1}^{n} a_r = S(n), the inductive step adds the (k+1)(k+1)th term to the assumed sum S(k)S(k) and simplifies to S(k+1)S(k+1).
Divisibility
To prove that an expression is divisible by dd, write the assumption as "the expression at kk equals d×(integer)d \times (\text{integer})", then rearrange the k+1k+1 expression to expose a factor of dd.
Inequalities
To prove f(n)≥g(n)f(n) \ge g(n), use the assumption f(k)≥g(k)f(k) \ge g(k) and bound the extra growth from kk to k+1k+1.

Writing it well

Always state explicitly "Assume true for n=kn = k", write down exactly what that means, and signal where you use it in the k+1k+1 working. End with a sentence invoking the principle of induction. A proof that omits the base step, or that never uses the assumption, earns few marks even if the algebra is right.

Worked example

A summation formula

Prove that ∑r=1nr=n(n+1)2\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n} r = \frac{n(n + 1)}{2} for all integers n≥1n \ge 1.

Step 1: Base step (n=1n = 1)

Check the formula at the smallest value. The left side is ∑r=11r=1\sum_{r=1}^{1} r = 1. The right side is 1⋅22=1\frac{1 \cdot 2}{2} = 1. They agree, so P(1)P(1) is true. Without this anchor the entire chain of inference has nowhere to start.

Step 2: Inductive assumption

Assume the formula holds for n=kn = k, where k≥1k \ge 1 is a specific (but arbitrary) integer, that is,

∑r=1kr=k(k+1)2.\sum_{r=1}^{k} r = \frac{k(k + 1)}{2}.

This assumption is the only tool we may use to prove the case n=k+1n = k + 1; it must be stated explicitly.

Step 3: Inductive step

We need to show ∑r=1k+1r=(k+1)(k+2)2\sum_{r=1}^{k+1} r = \frac{(k+1)(k+2)}{2}. Split off the last term and apply the inductive assumption:

∑r=1k+1r=(∑r=1kr)+(k+1)=k(k+1)2+(k+1).\sum_{r=1}^{k+1} r = \left(\sum_{r=1}^{k} r\right) + (k + 1) = \frac{k(k + 1)}{2} + (k + 1).

Factor out the common factor (k+1)(k + 1):

=(k+1)(k2+1)=(k+1)⋅k+22=(k+1)(k+2)2.= (k + 1)\left(\frac{k}{2} + 1\right) = (k + 1)\cdot\frac{k + 2}{2} = \frac{(k + 1)(k + 2)}{2}.

This is exactly the formula with n=k+1n = k + 1, confirming that the truth at kk implies the truth at k+1k + 1.

Step 4: Conclusion

The base step holds and the inductive step shows truth at kk implies truth at k+1k + 1, so by the principle of mathematical induction the formula holds for all integers n≥1n \ge 1.

Common exam traps
Skipping the base step
Without verifying P(n0)P(n_0), the chain has nothing to start it, and the proof is invalid.
Never using the assumption
If the k+1k+1 working does not call on P(k)P(k), you have not done an induction proof. Point to where you substitute it.
Assuming what you want to prove
Assume P(k)P(k), the single previous case, not P(k+1)P(k+1) or the general statement.
No concluding statement
Finish with the sentence invoking the principle of mathematical induction, or you lose the final mark.

Examples in context

Example 1 (divisibility). To show 3n−13^n - 1 is divisible by 22: at k+1k+1, 3k+1−1=3(3k−1)+23^{k+1} - 1 = 3(3^k - 1) + 2, and the assumption makes 3k−13^k - 1 even, so the whole expression is even.

Example 2 (inequality). To show 2n>n2^n > n for n≥1n \ge 1: from 2k>k2^k > k, 2k+1=2⋅2k>2k≥k+12^{k+1} = 2\cdot 2^k > 2k \ge k + 1 for k≥1k \ge 1.

Try this

Q1. State the three parts of a proof by mathematical induction. [2 marks]

  • Cue. Base step, inductive step using the inductive assumption, and a conclusion by the principle of induction.

Q2. Verify the base step for ∑r=1nr2=n(n+1)(2n+1)6\sum_{r=1}^{n} r^2 = \frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6} at n=1n = 1. [2 marks]

  • Cue. Left side 11; right side 1⋅2⋅36=1\frac{1\cdot 2\cdot 3}{6} = 1.

Q3. In proving 5n−15^n - 1 is divisible by 44, write the inductive assumption. [1 mark]

  • Cue. 5k−1=4m5^k - 1 = 4m for some integer mm.

Exam-style questions

Questions in the style of VCAA exam questions on this dot point, each with a worked answer. They are written by ExamExplained unless tagged "Past paper"; the year shows the paper a question is modelled on.

2023 VCAA-style4 marks
A function f has the rule f(x) = x e^(2x). Use mathematical induction to prove that f^(n)(x) = 2^(n-1)(2x + n)e^(2x) for n in Z+, where f^(n)(x) represents the nth derivative of f(x). That is, f(x) has been differentiated n times.
Show worked answer →

Base step (n = 1). Differentiate once: f'(x) = 1 . e^(2x) + x . 2e^(2x) = (2x + 1)e^(2x), using the product rule. The formula gives 2^(1-1)(2x + 1)e^(2x) = (2x + 1)e^(2x). These agree, so the statement is true for n = 1.

Inductive assumption. Assume the statement is true for n = k, that is, f^(k)(x) = 2^(k-1)(2x + k)e^(2x).

Inductive step. Differentiate both sides to obtain f^(k+1)(x). Using the product rule on the right,
f^(k+1)(x) = 2^(k-1)[ 2 . e^(2x) + (2x + k) . 2e^(2x) ] = 2^(k-1) . 2e^(2x)[ 1 + 2x + k ] = 2^k (2x + (k + 1))e^(2x).

This is exactly the formula with n = k + 1. So if the statement holds for n = k it holds for n = k + 1.

Conclusion. Since the statement is true for n = 1 and the truth for n = k implies the truth for n = k + 1, by the principle of mathematical induction it is true for all n in Z+.

Source: VCAA 2023 Specialist Mathematics Examination 1, Question 8.

2025 VCAA-style4 marks
Use mathematical induction to prove that the sum from i = 1 to n of (i + 1)^2 equals (n / 6)(2n^2 + 9n + 13) for n in N, where the sum from i = 1 to n of (i + 1)^2 = 2^2 + 3^2 + 4^2 + ... + (n + 1)^2.
Show worked answer →

Base step (n = 1). Left side is the single term (1 + 1)^2 = 4. Right side is (1 / 6)(2 + 9 + 13) = 24 / 6 = 4. They agree, so the statement is true for n = 1.

Inductive assumption. Assume true for n = k: 2^2 + 3^2 + ... + (k + 1)^2 = (k / 6)(2k^2 + 9k + 13).

Inductive step. Add the next term (k + 2)^2 to both sides:
sum to (k + 1) = (k / 6)(2k^2 + 9k + 13) + (k + 2)^2.
Put over a common denominator: = [ k(2k^2 + 9k + 13) + 6(k + 2)^2 ] / 6 = [ 2k^3 + 9k^2 + 13k + 6k^2 + 24k + 24 ] / 6 = [ 2k^3 + 15k^2 + 37k + 24 ] / 6.

The target with n = k + 1 is ((k + 1) / 6)(2(k + 1)^2 + 9(k + 1) + 13) = ((k + 1) / 6)(2k^2 + 13k + 24). Expanding the numerator (k + 1)(2k^2 + 13k + 24) = 2k^3 + 15k^2 + 37k + 24, which matches. So the statement holds for n = k + 1.

Conclusion. True for n = 1, and true for k implies true for k + 1, so by induction it holds for all n in N.

Source: VCAA 2025 Specialist Mathematics Examination 1, Question 7.

Practise this

Sources & how we know this

ExamExplained