How does the principle of mathematical induction let us prove a statement true for every positive integer, and what are the essential parts of a valid induction proof?
The principle of mathematical induction and its use to prove propositions about positive integers, including the base step, the inductive assumption and the inductive step, applied to summation formulas, divisibility results and inequalities
A focused answer to the VCE Specialist Mathematics Unit 3 key-knowledge point on mathematical induction. The base step, inductive assumption and inductive step, applied to summation formulas, divisibility and inequalities, with a verified worked proof.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
VCAA wants you to prove statements about all positive integers using mathematical induction, setting out the base step, the inductive assumption and the inductive step clearly, and reaching a correct conclusion. The method applies to summation formulas, divisibility claims and inequalities. Marks are awarded for structure as much as for algebra, so the layout matters.
The principle
To prove a proposition for all integers :
- Base step. Show is true by direct substitution.
- Inductive step. Assume is true for some integer (this is the inductive assumption), and prove that follows.
- Conclusion. By the principle of mathematical induction, is true for all .
The logic is a chain of dominoes: the base knocks over , and the inductive step guarantees each true case topples the next, so every case falls.
Three standard families
- Summation formulas
- To prove , the inductive step adds the th term to the assumed sum and simplifies to .
- Divisibility
- To prove that an expression is divisible by , write the assumption as "the expression at equals ", then rearrange the expression to expose a factor of .
- Inequalities
- To prove , use the assumption and bound the extra growth from to .
Writing it well
Always state explicitly "Assume true for ", write down exactly what that means, and signal where you use it in the working. End with a sentence invoking the principle of induction. A proof that omits the base step, or that never uses the assumption, earns few marks even if the algebra is right.
Examples in context
Example 1 (divisibility). To show is divisible by : at , , and the assumption makes even, so the whole expression is even.
Example 2 (inequality). To show for : from , for .
Try this
Q1. State the three parts of a proof by mathematical induction. [2 marks]
- Cue. Base step, inductive step using the inductive assumption, and a conclusion by the principle of induction.
Q2. Verify the base step for at . [2 marks]
- Cue. Left side ; right side .
Q3. In proving is divisible by , write the inductive assumption. [1 mark]
- Cue. for some integer .
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of VCAA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
2023 VCAA4 marksA function f has the rule f(x) = x e^(2x). Use mathematical induction to prove that f^(n)(x) = 2^(n-1)(2x + n)e^(2x) for n in Z+, where f^(n)(x) represents the nth derivative of f(x). That is, f(x) has been differentiated n times.
Show worked answer →
Base step (n = 1). Differentiate once: f'(x) = 1 . e^(2x) + x . 2e^(2x) = (2x + 1)e^(2x), using the product rule. The formula gives 2^(1-1)(2x + 1)e^(2x) = (2x + 1)e^(2x). These agree, so the statement is true for n = 1.
Inductive assumption. Assume the statement is true for n = k, that is, f^(k)(x) = 2^(k-1)(2x + k)e^(2x).
Inductive step. Differentiate both sides to obtain f^(k+1)(x). Using the product rule on the right,
f^(k+1)(x) = 2^(k-1)[ 2 . e^(2x) + (2x + k) . 2e^(2x) ] = 2^(k-1) . 2e^(2x)[ 1 + 2x + k ] = 2^k (2x + (k + 1))e^(2x).
This is exactly the formula with n = k + 1. So if the statement holds for n = k it holds for n = k + 1.
Conclusion. Since the statement is true for n = 1 and the truth for n = k implies the truth for n = k + 1, by the principle of mathematical induction it is true for all n in Z+.
2025 VCAA4 marksUse mathematical induction to prove that the sum from i = 1 to n of (i + 1)^2 equals (n / 6)(2n^2 + 9n + 13) for n in N, where the sum from i = 1 to n of (i + 1)^2 = 2^2 + 3^2 + 4^2 + ... + (n + 1)^2.
Show worked answer →
Base step (n = 1). Left side is the single term (1 + 1)^2 = 4. Right side is (1 / 6)(2 + 9 + 13) = 24 / 6 = 4. They agree, so the statement is true for n = 1.
Inductive assumption. Assume true for n = k: 2^2 + 3^2 + ... + (k + 1)^2 = (k / 6)(2k^2 + 9k + 13).
Inductive step. Add the next term (k + 2)^2 to both sides:
sum to (k + 1) = (k / 6)(2k^2 + 9k + 13) + (k + 2)^2.
Put over a common denominator: = [ k(2k^2 + 9k + 13) + 6(k + 2)^2 ] / 6 = [ 2k^3 + 9k^2 + 13k + 6k^2 + 24k + 24 ] / 6 = [ 2k^3 + 15k^2 + 37k + 24 ] / 6.
The target with n = k + 1 is ((k + 1) / 6)(2(k + 1)^2 + 9(k + 1) + 13) = ((k + 1) / 6)(2k^2 + 13k + 24). Expanding the numerator (k + 1)(2k^2 + 13k + 24) = 2k^3 + 15k^2 + 37k + 24, which matches. So the statement holds for n = k + 1.
Conclusion. True for n = 1, and true for k implies true for k + 1, so by induction it holds for all n in N.