Skip to main content
VICSpecialist MathematicsSyllabus dot point

How does the principle of mathematical induction let us prove a statement true for every positive integer, and what are the essential parts of a valid induction proof?

The principle of mathematical induction and its use to prove propositions about positive integers, including the base step, the inductive assumption and the inductive step, applied to summation formulas, divisibility results and inequalities

A focused answer to the VCE Specialist Mathematics Unit 3 key-knowledge point on mathematical induction. The base step, inductive assumption and inductive step, applied to summation formulas, divisibility and inequalities, with a verified worked proof.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.76 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The principle
  3. Three standard families
  4. Writing it well
  5. Examples in context
  6. Try this

What this dot point is asking

VCAA wants you to prove statements about all positive integers using mathematical induction, setting out the base step, the inductive assumption and the inductive step clearly, and reaching a correct conclusion. The method applies to summation formulas, divisibility claims and inequalities. Marks are awarded for structure as much as for algebra, so the layout matters.

The principle

To prove a proposition P(n)P(n) for all integers nn0n \ge n_0:

  1. Base step. Show P(n0)P(n_0) is true by direct substitution.
  2. Inductive step. Assume P(k)P(k) is true for some integer kn0k \ge n_0 (this is the inductive assumption), and prove that P(k+1)P(k + 1) follows.
  3. Conclusion. By the principle of mathematical induction, P(n)P(n) is true for all nn0n \ge n_0.

The logic is a chain of dominoes: the base knocks over P(n0)P(n_0), and the inductive step guarantees each true case topples the next, so every case falls.

Three standard families

Summation formulas
To prove r=1nar=S(n)\sum_{r=1}^{n} a_r = S(n), the inductive step adds the (k+1)(k+1)th term to the assumed sum S(k)S(k) and simplifies to S(k+1)S(k+1).
Divisibility
To prove that an expression is divisible by dd, write the assumption as "the expression at kk equals d×(integer)d \times (\text{integer})", then rearrange the k+1k+1 expression to expose a factor of dd.
Inequalities
To prove f(n)g(n)f(n) \ge g(n), use the assumption f(k)g(k)f(k) \ge g(k) and bound the extra growth from kk to k+1k+1.

Writing it well

Always state explicitly "Assume true for n=kn = k", write down exactly what that means, and signal where you use it in the k+1k+1 working. End with a sentence invoking the principle of induction. A proof that omits the base step, or that never uses the assumption, earns few marks even if the algebra is right.

Examples in context

Example 1 (divisibility). To show 3n13^n - 1 is divisible by 22: at k+1k+1, 3k+11=3(3k1)+23^{k+1} - 1 = 3(3^k - 1) + 2, and the assumption makes 3k13^k - 1 even, so the whole expression is even.

Example 2 (inequality). To show 2n>n2^n > n for n1n \ge 1: from 2k>k2^k > k, 2k+1=22k>2kk+12^{k+1} = 2\cdot 2^k > 2k \ge k + 1 for k1k \ge 1.

Try this

Q1. State the three parts of a proof by mathematical induction. [2 marks]

  • Cue. Base step, inductive step using the inductive assumption, and a conclusion by the principle of induction.

Q2. Verify the base step for r=1nr2=n(n+1)(2n+1)6\sum_{r=1}^{n} r^2 = \frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6} at n=1n = 1. [2 marks]

  • Cue. Left side 11; right side 1236=1\frac{1\cdot 2\cdot 3}{6} = 1.

Q3. In proving 5n15^n - 1 is divisible by 44, write the inductive assumption. [1 mark]

  • Cue. 5k1=4m5^k - 1 = 4m for some integer mm.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of VCAA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

2023 VCAA4 marksA function f has the rule f(x) = x e^(2x). Use mathematical induction to prove that f^(n)(x) = 2^(n-1)(2x + n)e^(2x) for n in Z+, where f^(n)(x) represents the nth derivative of f(x). That is, f(x) has been differentiated n times.
Show worked answer →

Base step (n = 1). Differentiate once: f'(x) = 1 . e^(2x) + x . 2e^(2x) = (2x + 1)e^(2x), using the product rule. The formula gives 2^(1-1)(2x + 1)e^(2x) = (2x + 1)e^(2x). These agree, so the statement is true for n = 1.

Inductive assumption. Assume the statement is true for n = k, that is, f^(k)(x) = 2^(k-1)(2x + k)e^(2x).

Inductive step. Differentiate both sides to obtain f^(k+1)(x). Using the product rule on the right,
f^(k+1)(x) = 2^(k-1)[ 2 . e^(2x) + (2x + k) . 2e^(2x) ] = 2^(k-1) . 2e^(2x)[ 1 + 2x + k ] = 2^k (2x + (k + 1))e^(2x).

This is exactly the formula with n = k + 1. So if the statement holds for n = k it holds for n = k + 1.

Conclusion. Since the statement is true for n = 1 and the truth for n = k implies the truth for n = k + 1, by the principle of mathematical induction it is true for all n in Z+.

2025 VCAA4 marksUse mathematical induction to prove that the sum from i = 1 to n of (i + 1)^2 equals (n / 6)(2n^2 + 9n + 13) for n in N, where the sum from i = 1 to n of (i + 1)^2 = 2^2 + 3^2 + 4^2 + ... + (n + 1)^2.
Show worked answer →

Base step (n = 1). Left side is the single term (1 + 1)^2 = 4. Right side is (1 / 6)(2 + 9 + 13) = 24 / 6 = 4. They agree, so the statement is true for n = 1.

Inductive assumption. Assume true for n = k: 2^2 + 3^2 + ... + (k + 1)^2 = (k / 6)(2k^2 + 9k + 13).

Inductive step. Add the next term (k + 2)^2 to both sides:
sum to (k + 1) = (k / 6)(2k^2 + 9k + 13) + (k + 2)^2.
Put over a common denominator: = [ k(2k^2 + 9k + 13) + 6(k + 2)^2 ] / 6 = [ 2k^3 + 9k^2 + 13k + 6k^2 + 24k + 24 ] / 6 = [ 2k^3 + 15k^2 + 37k + 24 ] / 6.

The target with n = k + 1 is ((k + 1) / 6)(2(k + 1)^2 + 9(k + 1) + 13) = ((k + 1) / 6)(2k^2 + 13k + 24). Expanding the numerator (k + 1)(2k^2 + 13k + 24) = 2k^3 + 15k^2 + 37k + 24, which matches. So the statement holds for n = k + 1.

Conclusion. True for n = 1, and true for k implies true for k + 1, so by induction it holds for all n in N.