How do we differentiate a relation that is not written as , and how does the second derivative reveal concavity and points of inflection?
Implicit differentiation of relations defined by equations in and , the second derivative and its use to determine concavity and points of inflection, and the analysis of curves using first and second derivative information
A focused answer to the VCE Specialist Mathematics Unit 3 key-knowledge point on implicit differentiation and second derivatives. Differentiating relations in x and y, concavity, points of inflection, and curve analysis, with a verified worked example.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
VCAA wants you to differentiate relations given implicitly, such as , where is not isolated, and to use the second derivative to determine concavity and locate points of inflection. These tools extend the differentiation of Methods to curves that are not functions and deepen curve sketching.
Implicit differentiation
When a curve is given by an equation linking and , such as , we can find without solving for . Differentiate every term with respect to , remembering that depends on , so any function of needs the chain rule:
After differentiating, collect the terms on one side and factor to solve for the gradient. The result is usually an expression in both and , which is fine: you supply a point on the curve to get a numeric gradient.
The second derivative and concavity
The second derivative is the rate of change of the gradient. It tells you how the curve bends:
- : the gradient is increasing, the curve is concave up (holds water).
- : the gradient is decreasing, the curve is concave down.
The second derivative also classifies stationary points: at a stationary point where there is a local minimum, and where a local maximum. If the test is inconclusive and you check the sign of the gradient on each side.
Points of inflection
A point of inflection is where concavity changes from up to down or vice versa. A necessary condition is , but that alone is not sufficient: the second derivative must actually change sign there. A point where without a sign change is not an inflection. A stationary point of inflection has both and a change of concavity.
Examples in context
Example 1. For , differentiating gives , so .
Example 2. For , , which changes sign at , giving a stationary point of inflection at the origin.
Try this
Q1. Find for by implicit differentiation. [2 marks]
- Cue. , so .
Q2. State the concavity of everywhere. [1 mark]
- Cue. , so concave up everywhere.
Q3. Find any points of inflection of . [3 marks]
- Cue. at , sign changes, so inflection at .