How do we describe the possible outcomes of a chance experiment and their probabilities?
A discrete random variable assigns a numerical value to each outcome, and its probability distribution lists every value together with its probability.
What a discrete random variable is, how to build and read a probability distribution table, and the two rules every valid distribution must satisfy.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
A random variable is a rule that attaches a number to each outcome of a chance experiment. It is discrete when its possible values can be listed - typically counts such as the number of heads in three tosses, or the number of defective items in a sample.
The probability distribution
The probability distribution of lists each value alongside its probability. For tossing a fair coin three times and counting heads, :
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
The two rules of a valid distribution
Every probability distribution must satisfy two conditions:
The second rule is the workhorse of exam questions: you are often given a distribution containing an unknown and must use "the probabilities sum to 1" to solve for it.
Reading probabilities from the table
Compound events are found by adding the relevant rows. Watch the inequality carefully:
- (strictly greater, so is excluded).
- ( included).
- The complement: can be quicker.
The cumulative distribution
Beyond individual probabilities, you can build a running total , called the cumulative distribution. For the three-toss coin example, the cumulative probabilities are , , and . Cumulative values make "less than or equal to" questions immediate and let you find any interval probability by subtraction: . Examiners use cumulative phrasing ("no more than two") precisely to test whether you include or exclude the boundary value.
Common errors
Distributions given by a rule
A distribution need not be a table; it can be a formula. If for , you generate the probabilities by substitution: . Always confirm the rule produces a valid distribution by checking each value lies in and the total is exactly . Rule-based distributions are common because they let an examiner embed an unknown constant - for example - which you solve for using .
Why it matters
Discrete random variables are the foundation for expected value, variance, and the binomial distribution that follow in this topic. The "sum to 1" technique and careful inequality reading reappear throughout the probability strand and into Topic 5's continuous distributions, where the sum becomes an integral.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of SACE Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
SACE 20234 marksCalculator-assumed. A discrete random variable takes values , and with probabilities , and . (a) Explain why . (b) Given , write a second equation for and . (c) Find and .Show worked answer →
(a) Every valid probability distribution must have probabilities that sum to 1. Here , so . (1 mark)
(b) The expected value is . Setting gives , i.e. . (1 mark)
(c) From (b), . Substitute into to get . (2 marks)
So and . The two ideas tested are that probabilities sum to 1 and the definition of expected value.
SACE 20222 marksCalculator-assumed. In a game, the number printed on a randomly selected duck takes the values , , and with probabilities , , and respectively. Calculate the expected value .Show worked answer →
Use across all four values:
So . Marks: one for the sum of value times probability, one for the arithmetic. A quick check that confirms the distribution is valid before computing the mean.
SACE 20213 marksCalculator-assumed. The distribution of is for . (a) Verify this is a valid probability distribution. (b) Find .Show worked answer →
(a) Compute each probability: , , , . Each lies between and , and the sum is , so it is valid. (2 marks)
(b) . (1 mark)
Marks reward checking both validity conditions and reading the inclusive inequality correctly.
