Leadership and stakeholder management during change (QCE Business Unit 4)
“Leadership styles during change (transformational, transactional, servant); stakeholder management during transformation including employee consultation, customer communication, supplier relationships and community engagement; the role of corporate communication”
Leadership styles relevant to transformation include transformational (vision-led, inspirational), transactional (performance-led, target-oriented) and servant (enabling, supportive). Major cultural transformations need transformational style primarily, with servant elements; operational delivery suits transactional. Stakeholder management during transformation covers employees (consultation, retraining, redeployment), customers (communication, continuity), suppliers (engagement, fair terms), community (engagement, transparency) and owners (reporting, governance). Corporate communication ties it together - consistent across audiences, honest, timely. Apply with real Australian transformations such as Telstra T25 and Coles automated DC.
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
QCAA wants you to know the leadership styles relevant to transformation, the stakeholder management practices that support successful change, and the role of corporate communication. Both IA3 (the research investigation) and the EA frequently use a transformation context that requires leadership and stakeholder analysis.
The answer
Leadership styles during change
Multiple leadership frameworks describe styles relevant to change. The most commonly examined.
Transformational leadership
The leader inspires and motivates followers by articulating a compelling vision of the future, modelling the values the change embodies, and developing followers individually. Focused on long-term change and capability building.
Characteristics:
- Idealised influence (charisma). The leader is a role model whose behaviour followers want to emulate.
- Inspirational motivation. Articulates an attractive vision and inspires commitment.
- Intellectual stimulation. Encourages innovation and challenges assumptions.
- Individualised consideration. Develops each follower individually.
Examples: Mike Cannon-Brookes and Scott Farquhar at Atlassian; Vicki Brady at Telstra; Melanie Perkins at Canva.
Transactional leadership
The leader manages through clear performance expectations, contingent rewards (for meeting targets) and corrective action (for missing them). Focused on consistent performance against current objectives.
Characteristics:
- Contingent reward. Clear performance targets with rewards for achieving them.
- Management by exception (active). Monitoring for deviation from expected performance.
- Management by exception (passive). Intervening only when problems become serious.
Examples: many high-performing operational management environments (Coles store-management, Macquarie's variable-pay culture, professional-services partner systems).
Servant leadership
The leader prioritises the needs of followers, removes obstacles to their work, and develops their capability. Focused on enabling others to succeed.
Characteristics:
- Listening. Active listening to followers.
- Empathy. Understanding follower perspectives.
- Stewardship. Stewarding the business and its people for long-term wellbeing.
- Building community. Creating a sense of belonging and shared purpose.
Examples: Atlassian's "open and no bullshit" culture incorporates servant-leadership elements; many Australian not-for-profit and social-enterprise leaders model servant leadership explicitly.
Choosing the leadership style
The right style depends on the context.
- Major cultural or strategic transformation: transformational primary, with servant-leadership elements. The change requires belief, not just compliance.
- Operational delivery against established objectives: transactional fits, with adaptive elements when context changes.
- High-skill knowledge work: servant leadership empowers; over-direction reduces engagement.
- Crisis or emergency: more autocratic style appropriate (see VCE management styles for the related framework).
Most effective leaders blend styles across situations rather than adopting one as a fixed identity.
Stakeholder management during transformation
Major transformations affect multiple stakeholder groups. Successful change requires deliberate management of each.
Employees
The most directly affected stakeholder group in most transformations.
Practices.
- Early and structured consultation, often through union or works-council channels.
- Clear communication of decisions, rationale and timeline.
- Retraining for staff whose roles change.
- Redeployment options before resorting to redundancy.
- Generous voluntary-redundancy packages where roles are lost.
- Ongoing engagement and feedback (pulse surveys, town halls).
The Fair Work Act, awards and enterprise agreements set legal obligations on consultation and redundancy.
Customers
Communication and continuity matter.
Practices.
- Communicating changes in advance (price, service, channel).
- Dedicated support channels during transition periods.
- Continuity of service - no unplanned outages.
- Honest acknowledgement of what is changing and why.
Suppliers
Supplier relationships often change in transformation.
Practices.
- Early engagement with suppliers facing changed contracts or volumes.
- Clear timelines and transition support.
- Fair payment terms maintained (the Payment Times Reporting Act 2020 brings transparency to large-business payment of small suppliers).
- Where suppliers will be exited, reasonable notice and transition support.
Community
Community impact matters for businesses with significant local presence.
Practices.
- Communication with local councils and community organisations.
- Engagement on community-impact mitigation (job effects, environmental impact).
- Transparency about decisions affecting the community.
- For Indigenous-impact decisions, genuine engagement under the principles of the Free, Prior and Informed Consent framework.
Shareholders / owners
Owners bear the financial risk and reward.
Practices.
- Regular reporting against transformation milestones.
- ASX continuous disclosure for listed companies.
- Board oversight and governance.
- Independent assurance where appropriate.
Role of corporate communication
Corporate communication is the strategic discipline of communicating with all stakeholders. During transformation it covers:
- Internal communication. Staff briefings, all-hands events, intranet, email updates, manager cascades.
- Customer communication. Email, in-app messages, advertising, customer-service scripting, social channels.
- Investor communication. ASX announcements, investor presentations, results briefings, AGM addresses.
- Media and public communication. Press releases, media briefings, executive interviews, social-media presence.
- Crisis communication. Pre-planned responses for transformation-related incidents (project failure, public dispute, regulator action).
Good corporate communication during transformation is consistent across audiences (the message employees hear matches the message customers hear), honest (acknowledges difficulties), and timely (gets ahead of misinformation).
Bad corporate communication amplifies transformation problems. The Qantas baggage-handler outsourcing case is partly a corporate-communication failure - the public narrative was tone-deaf to the affected workers and customers.
Worked Australian examples
- Vicki Brady, Telstra (T25, 2022 onwards)
- Predominantly transformational leadership. Articulated a clear vision of a simpler, more customer-focused, digital-first Telstra. Modelled customer-centric behaviour personally. Invested in leadership development to build the cadre capable of carrying the change. Stakeholder management has been deliberate - employee consultation (CEPU), customer communication, regular investor updates.
- Mike Cannon-Brookes and Scott Farquhar, Atlassian
- Transformational and servant leadership combined. The "open and no bullshit" value sets the tone; the founders model the behaviour. Stakeholder management for employees through extensive culture investment; for customers through product-led-growth approach; for the broader community through Pledge 1 percent and visible climate activism (Cannon-Brookes's Grok Ventures investments in renewable energy and AGL).
- Australia Post in the post-Christine Holgate period (2020-2022)
- A case of leadership and stakeholder-management failure - the public removal of CEO Holgate over the four Cartier watches damaged executive talent attraction, employee engagement and customer trust. The subsequent CEO transitions illustrate the importance of stakeholder management at the executive level.
"Recommend a leadership and stakeholder management approach for a Brisbane mid-sized business undergoing a major operational and cultural transformation. (8 marks)"
Plan. Cover the leadership style, the stakeholder management for each group, and the corporate-communication approach.
Leadership style. The CEO should adopt a predominantly transformational style, supplemented by servant-leadership elements during the transition. The transformational style provides the vision and inspiration the change needs; the servant elements ensure that affected staff feel supported.
A purely transactional style would be inadequate - the change requires belief in the future state, not just performance against targets. A purely servant style might lack the directional urgency the transformation requires.
Stakeholder management.
Employees: structured 6-week consultation through team briefings and an open Q&A forum; clear announcement of the changes; voluntary-redundancy packages for the small number of roles being lost; retraining program for staff in changed roles; pulse engagement surveys every 6 weeks through the transition.
Customers: pre-transition email communication explaining what is changing and what is staying the same; dedicated FAQ resource; phone-support line for the first 3 months of the new operating model; no unplanned service outages during cutover.
Suppliers: individual meetings with the top 20 suppliers to explain the changes; standard letter to the remaining suppliers; clear 3-month notice on any contract changes; continued on-time payment.
Community: engagement with the local council (Brisbane City Council) and local chamber of commerce; transparency about employment effects.
Owners: monthly board reporting against transformation milestones; quarterly written update; clear financial reporting.
Corporate communication. Consistent messaging across all audiences (the "elevator pitch" for the transformation works equally for staff, customers, suppliers); honest acknowledgement of difficulties; timely - getting ahead of speculation; designed-in feedback mechanisms.
CSR overlay. The transformation should explicitly include CSR considerations - stable employment commitment where possible, environmental-impact mitigation, Indigenous-supplier engagement where relevant.
Outcome assessment. The combined approach gives the transformation the best chance of success. Major transformations fail most commonly on people and stakeholder grounds, not on strategy or technology. Deliberate leadership and stakeholder management is the difference between success and stalling.
- Treating leadership style as a personality
- Effective leaders flex style by context. Transformational for cultural change; transactional for operational delivery; servant for knowledge work.
- Listing stakeholder groups without management practices
- Marks come from the practices, not the enumeration.
- Forgetting suppliers as a stakeholder group
- Suppliers are often overlooked in transformation analysis but are materially affected.
- Treating communication as a one-way activity
- Good corporate communication includes feedback mechanisms.
- Generic "communicate clearly" answers
- Specific channels and practices earn higher marks.
Exam-style questions
Questions in the style of QCAA exam questions on this dot point, each with a worked answer. They are written by ExamExplained unless tagged "Past paper"; the year shows the paper a question is modelled on.
Practice6 marksDistinguish between transformational, transactional and servant leadership. Recommend the most appropriate style for an Australian business leading a major cultural transformation.Show worked answer →
A 6-mark answer needs all three styles, the contrast, and a justified recommendation.
- Transformational
- Leader inspires followers through a compelling vision, models the values, and develops followers individually. Long-term, capability-building focus.
- Transactional
- Leader manages through clear performance expectations, contingent rewards and corrective action. Focused on consistent delivery against current objectives.
- Servant
- Leader prioritises follower needs, removes obstacles, develops capability. Enables others to succeed.
- Comparison
- Transformational - vision-led, change-oriented. Transactional - performance-led, status-quo-oriented. Servant - enabling, follower-oriented.
- Recommendation for major cultural transformation
- Transformational is the primary style. The leader must articulate the future culture, model the new behaviours, and inspire discretionary effort. Servant elements (removing obstacles, supporting affected staff) reinforce it. Transactional alone is insufficient - cultural change requires belief, not just performance.
Worked example: Vicki Brady at Telstra has used a predominantly transformational style during T25, articulating the future vision through quarterly all-hands events, modelling customer-focused digital-first behaviour, and developing leaders capable of carrying the change.
Markers reward (1) definition of all three styles, (2) contrast across orientation and focus, (3) a justified recommendation linked to the change context.
Practice5 marksExplain how a business manages stakeholders during a major transformation. Use an Australian example.Show worked answer →
A 5-mark answer needs the stakeholder categories, the management approach for each, and a worked example.
Stakeholders.
Employees - job security, role change, workload, opportunities.
Customers - continuity, price impact, service quality.
Suppliers - continued business, payment terms, transition support.
Community - local employment, economic impact.
Shareholders/owners - cost, expected return, governance.
Management approaches.
Employees: structured consultation, communication of decisions and rationale, retraining, redundancy support, engagement surveys.
Customers: communication in advance, dedicated support during transition, continuity of service, transparent pricing.
Suppliers: early engagement, clear timelines, transition support, fair payment terms.
Community: communication with local councils and community organisations, engagement on impact mitigation, transparency about job effects.
Shareholders: regular reporting against milestones, ASX continuous disclosure compliance, board oversight.
Worked example: Coles automated DC rollout. Employees managed through extensive union consultation, redeployment for 1,000+ manual-DC workers, retraining and voluntary redundancy. Customers experienced no significant disruption due to phased and dual-run cutover. Suppliers received clear timelines for the new automated-receiving processes. Community impact in Kemps Creek and Truganina managed through redeployment commitments. Shareholders received reporting through half-year and full-year results.
Markers reward (1) at least three stakeholder categories, (2) the management approach for each, (3) a worked Australian example.