← Section III (Peace and Conflict): Conflict in the Gulf 1980-2011
How did the US war in Iraq end, and what was the state of Iraq at the December 2011 withdrawal?
The negotiation of the Status of Forces Agreement, the Obama withdrawal timeline, the final US departure on 18 December 2011, the costs of the war, and the unstable Iraq inherited by the Maliki government
A focused answer to the HSC Modern History Conflict in the Gulf dot point on the US withdrawal from Iraq. The November 2008 US-Iraq Status of Forces Agreement, the Obama February 2009 withdrawal plan, the failure of follow-on SOFA talks in 2011, the final convoy departure of 18 December 2011, the costs of the eight-year war, and the fragile state Maliki inherited.
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
What this dot point is asking
NESA expects you to explain how the US war in Iraq ended in December 2011. Strong answers integrate the 2008 Status of Forces Agreement, the Obama withdrawal plan, the failed 2011 negotiations to extend a residual force, the final 18 December 2011 departure, the costs of the eight-year war, and the unstable state of the Maliki Iraq the US left behind.
The answer
The Status of Forces Agreement of 2008
By 2008 the political conditions for US troop presence in Iraq had changed. The Surge had reduced violence; Maliki's Shia-dominated government was increasingly confident; Iraqi public opinion strongly opposed continued occupation. The UN mandate was due to expire on 31 December 2008.
Bush 43 administration officials (led by Ambassador Ryan Crocker and Deputy Secretary of State David Satterfield) and Maliki's team negotiated through summer-autumn 2008.
Status of Forces Agreement (17 November 2008). Three key provisions:
- US combat forces would leave Iraqi cities, villages, and localities by 30 June 2009.
- All US forces would leave all Iraqi territory by 31 December 2011.
- US forces would be subject to Iraqi jurisdiction for major felonies committed off-duty and off-base.
The Iraqi cabinet approved 27-1 on 16 November 2008; the Iraqi Council of Representatives approved 149-35 on 27 November 2008.
Obama's withdrawal plan
Barack Obama had opposed the Iraq war from October 2002 ("a dumb war") and made withdrawal a central campaign promise. His 27 February 2009 address at Camp Lejeune Marine Corps Base laid out the plan:
- US combat operations would end by 31 August 2010.
- A residual force of 35,000 to 50,000 would remain for training, equipping, advising, and counterterrorism through 2011.
- Full withdrawal as required by the SOFA on 31 December 2011.
Operation Iraqi Freedom (which had begun on 20 March 2003) formally ended on 31 August 2010; Operation New Dawn (advise and assist) ran from 1 September 2010 to the final withdrawal.
The 2011 negotiations
By 2011 both administrations had reason to extend the SOFA. The Iraqi army was nowhere near able to provide its own air defence, train its own pilots, or conduct serious counterterrorism without US support.
US generals Lloyd Austin (commander of US Forces-Iraq) and Martin Dempsey (Joint Chiefs Chairman from October 2011) recommended a residual force of around 16,000 to 24,000. Obama's NSC counterproposed around 5,000.
The immunity question broke the talks. Maliki's 2010 government depended on a coalition that included Moqtada al-Sadr's bloc and the other Shia parties whose street base was deeply anti-American. The Iraqi parliament would not pass immunity.
Maliki offered to issue immunity by executive order; the Pentagon and the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee insisted on parliamentary approval. The talks deadlocked in October 2011.
Obama announced full withdrawal on 21 October 2011 in a joint statement with Maliki.
The final departure
The US footprint had been drawn down through 2011 from around 50,000 troops at the start of the year to around 6,000 by late November.
The official end-of-mission ceremony at Camp Liberty on 15 December 2011 saw Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, General Lloyd Austin, and the Iraqi joint chiefs attend. The Iraq War flag was cased.
The last US combat convoy of around 110 vehicles crossed the Iraq-Kuwait border at Khabari Crossing at 07:38 Baghdad time on 18 December 2011.
A small US security force remained at the embassy in Baghdad under State Department authority, but no US combat units would return until June 2014 in response to the Islamic State's seizure of Mosul.
The cost
Direct US costs.
- 4,491 US military killed in Iraq.
- 32,226 US military wounded in action.
- Direct appropriations: around 800 billion US dollars. Total economic costs including future veterans care and interest: estimates from Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes range from 2 to 3 trillion US dollars.
Iraqi costs.
- Iraq Body Count documents around 115,000 to 125,000 documented civilian deaths from violence between March 2003 and end 2011.
- The Lancet study of 2006 estimated around 600,000 excess violent deaths to mid-2006 (controversial).
- Iraq Family Health Survey (WHO, 2008) estimated around 151,000 violent deaths to mid-2006.
- Internally displaced persons at peak: around 2.7 million.
- External refugees at peak: around 2 million (mostly in Syria, Jordan).
Coalition costs.
- UK: 179 military killed, around 9 billion pounds.
- Australia: 2 military killed.
The Iraq Obama inherited
The Iraq the US left in December 2011 was a fragile state.
Sectarian fragmentation. Maliki's Shia-dominated government had marginalised Sunni Arab political participation. Sunni Vice President Tariq al-Hashimi was charged with terrorism on 19 December 2011, the day after the US withdrawal; he fled to Turkey. The Sons of Iraq were not integrated into the army as promised.
Hollowed army. Maliki replaced competent professional officers with loyalists. The Iraqi army that would face the Islamic State in 2014 was nominally large but corruption-riddled and incompetent.
Iranian influence. Iran had been the silent winner of the 2003 war. The Maliki government included parties with deep Iranian ties.
Kurdish autonomy. The Kurdish Regional Government in the north exercised effective sovereignty.
Economic and oil. Iraqi oil production had recovered to 2.7 million barrels per day by late 2011 (above 2002 levels).
The 2014 verdict
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) seized Mosul on 10 June 2014 and Tikrit on 11 June. By August 2014 ISIL controlled a third of Iraqi territory and was attempting Yazidi genocide at Sinjar. US Special Forces returned to Iraq on 26 June 2014; Operation Inherent Resolve began airstrikes on 8 August 2014.
The 2014 collapse vindicated critics of the 2011 withdrawal terms: the underlying conflict had not been resolved, only suspended.
Timeline
| Date | Event | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Nov 2008 | SOFA signed | Withdrawal scheduled |
| 27 Feb 2009 | Camp Lejeune speech | Obama plan |
| 30 June 2009 | US out of cities | First milestone |
| 31 Aug 2010 | Iraqi Freedom ends | Combat ends |
| 1 Sept 2010 | New Dawn begins | Advise mission |
| Oct 2011 | Talks collapse | Immunity dispute |
| 21 Oct 2011 | Obama announces full withdrawal | Decision made |
| 15 Dec 2011 | End-of-mission ceremony | Camp Liberty |
| 18 Dec 2011 | Last convoy crosses | War ends |
| 10 June 2014 | Mosul falls to ISIL | Verdict on withdrawal |
Historiography
Michael Gordon (The Endgame, 2012) is the standard journalism on the 2007-2011 endgame.
Emma Sky (The Unraveling, 2015) is the major reflective account from a participant adviser.
Peter Baker (Days of Fire, 2013) on the Bush presidency.
Ali Khedery (essays 2014-15) provides US-Iraqi insider critique of the Obama-Maliki endgame.
How to read a source on this topic
Sources commonly include the SOFA text, Obama's Camp Lejeune address, the 21 October 2011 joint Obama-Maliki announcement, the 15 December 2011 Camp Liberty ceremony photos, and the 18 December 2011 final convoy footage.
First, note the difference between Bush-era and Obama-era framing. The SOFA was Bush's commitment; Obama implemented it.
Second, weigh the 2014 lens. Most sources written before June 2014 describe the withdrawal as ending the war; most after describe it as suspending the war.
Common exam traps
Treating the withdrawal as Obama's choice alone. The 2008 SOFA committed both administrations.
Forgetting the immunity issue. It was the immediate cause of the extension's failure.
Confusing combat end (31 August 2010) with full withdrawal (18 December 2011). Two distinct dates.
In one sentence
The US war in Iraq ended on 18 December 2011 when the last combat convoy crossed into Kuwait under the terms of the November 2008 Bush-Maliki Status of Forces Agreement and the Obama administration's Camp Lejeune withdrawal plan of 27 February 2009, after eight years and nine months in which around 4,491 US military and over 115,000 Iraqi civilians had died, the war had cost the United States around 800 billion to 3 trillion US dollars depending on accounting, the Maliki government had emerged as a sectarian Shia-dominated state increasingly aligned with Iran, and the unresolved Sunni Arab grievances would erupt into the Islamic State seizure of Mosul on 10 June 2014.
Past exam questions, worked
Real questions from past NESA papers on this dot point, with our answer explainer.
Practice (NESA)15 marksEvaluate the US withdrawal from Iraq in December 2011 as the end of the conflict in the Gulf 1980 to 2011.Show worked answer →
Needs criteria, dated evidence, judgement.
Thesis. The 18 December 2011 withdrawal ended direct US combat involvement but left the underlying conflicts unresolved. The withdrawal was a formal conclusion rather than a strategic resolution; the eruption of the Islamic State in 2014 vindicates this view.
The SOFA. The US-Iraq Status of Forces Agreement was negotiated by the Bush 43 administration and signed on 17 November 2008. It required US combat forces to leave Iraqi cities by 30 June 2009 and all forces by 31 December 2011.
Obama's plan. Obama announced on 27 February 2009 at Camp Lejeune that US combat operations would end by 31 August 2010 and full withdrawal would follow the SOFA. Operation Iraqi Freedom became Operation New Dawn on 1 September 2010.
Follow-on negotiations (2011). Both governments preferred a residual US force of 5,000 to 10,000. Talks broke down over the Iraqi parliament's refusal to grant US troops immunity from Iraqi prosecution.
Final withdrawal (18 December 2011). The last US combat convoy crossed into Kuwait at 07:38 Baghdad time on 18 December 2011, ending nearly nine years of war.
Costs. Around 4,491 US military deaths, 32,000 wounded, 1 trillion US dollars direct costs. Iraqi deaths uncertain: Iraq Body Count documents around 110,000-120,000 civilian deaths.
Maliki Iraq. Sectarian, corrupt, increasingly authoritarian Shia-dominated state. The Sunni Arab population marginalised. Iraqi army hollowed out by Maliki appointments.
Conclusion. End of US war; not end of Iraqi conflict.
Practice (NESA)5 marksExplain why the US and Iraqi governments failed to extend the Status of Forces Agreement in 2011.Show worked answer →
A 5-mark "explain" needs three developed reasons.
The 2008 agreement. The Bush-Maliki Status of Forces Agreement of 17 November 2008 required all US forces to leave Iraq by 31 December 2011.
Initial willingness. Through 2011 both administrations explored a residual force of around 5,000 to 10,000 troops to continue training.
The immunity question. Any continued US military presence required US service members to have immunity from Iraqi criminal prosecution. Maliki initially agreed but could not deliver Iraqi parliament. The Sadrist bloc refused.
The political moment. Maliki, who had recovered from a contested 2010 election by forming a coalition with Sadrists, depended on anti-American allies. Obama, having run on withdrawal, was unwilling to accept troops without immunity.
Outcome. Talks collapsed in October 2011. Obama announced full withdrawal on 21 October 2011. The last forces left 18 December 2011. The failed extension is widely seen as enabling the 2014 Islamic State resurgence. Markers reward the immunity issue, Sadrist resistance, and the 21 October 2011 announcement.
Related dot points
- The course and consequences of the Iraqi insurgency and sectarian civil war 2003 to 2008, including the Sunni insurgency, al-Qaeda in Iraq, the bombing of the al-Askari shrine, the Shia militias, the 2007 Surge, and the Sons of Iraq Awakening
A focused answer to the HSC Modern History Conflict in the Gulf dot point on the Iraqi insurgency. The Sunni insurgency from 2003, al-Qaeda in Iraq under Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the al-Askari shrine bombing of 22 February 2006, the sectarian civil war 2006-2007, the Surge under General David Petraeus, the Sons of Iraq Awakening, and the violence reduction by 2008.
- The course and immediate outcome of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, including the Coalition order of battle, the three-week ground campaign, the fall of Baghdad on 9 April 2003, the looting and breakdown of order, and the early occupation under the Coalition Provisional Authority
A focused answer to the HSC Modern History Conflict in the Gulf dot point on the 2003 Iraq War. The Coalition order of battle, the 20 March 2003 invasion, the V Corps drive on Baghdad, the Marine advance through Nasiriyah, the Thunder Run on 5-7 April, the fall of Baghdad on 9 April, the looting, the 1 May 2003 Mission Accomplished speech, and the Coalition Provisional Authority under Bremer.
- The international response to Iraq 1991 to 2003, including UN sanctions, the No-Fly Zones, UNSCOM weapons inspections, the humanitarian consequences, the Oil-for-Food Programme, and the failure of containment
A focused answer to the HSC Modern History Conflict in the Gulf dot point on the containment of Iraq. UN Resolution 687 of 3 April 1991, UNSCOM weapons inspections under Rolf Ekeus and Richard Butler, the Northern and Southern No-Fly Zones, the Oil-for-Food Programme of 1995, the humanitarian crisis, Operation Desert Fox 1998, and the breakdown of containment by 2003.