Australia's overseas aid program and the SDGs for VCE Health and Human Development Unit 4 AoS 2
“The role of Australia's overseas aid program in supporting the achievement of the SDGs, including its focus and the partnerships involved”
Australia's aid program is the Australian Government's official development assistance (ODA), managed by the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). It is worth $5.209 billion in 2026-27, and more than 75 cents in every development dollar benefits the Indo-Pacific (the Pacific and South-East Asia). Guided by the 2023 International Development Policy, it targets health, education, water and sanitation, gender equality, climate resilience, economic development and governance, and is delivered through bilateral, regional, multilateral and NGO partnerships. Each focus area links to specific SDGs, which is how the program supports their achievement.
Jump to a section
- What this dot point is asking
- What Australia's aid program is
- The policy framework: the 2023 International Development Policy
- Geographic focus: the Indo-Pacific
- Priority areas and the SDGs
- Health: Australia's major health investments
- How the aid is delivered: types of aid and partnerships
- Evaluating Australia's aid program
- How this dot point appears in the VCE exam
- Exam-style questions
What this dot point is asking
Exam questions give a stimulus about a real Australian aid project (the 2023 Kiribati Education Improvement Program, the 2025 Global Partnership for Education) and ask you to identify its priority areas or type of aid, explain how it promotes an SDG, or justify the partnership used. You need the program's purpose, focus, delivery channels and partners, plus current examples.
What Australia's aid program is
Official development assistance is government aid designed to promote the economic development and welfare of developing countries. Australia's program aims to reduce poverty and support sustainable development in its region, which also advances Australia's interest in a stable, prosperous and secure Indo-Pacific.
Size and trend.
- $5.209 billion in 2026-27, an increase of $112 million through indexation (DFAT, Development Budget Summary 2026-27).
- This is roughly 0.17 per cent of gross national income, according to analysis of the budget by Micah Australia, well below the United Nations target of 0.7 per cent for developed countries.
The policy framework: the 2023 International Development Policy
In August 2023 the government released Australia's International Development Policy, the first long-term development policy in a decade. Its vision is a peaceful, stable and prosperous Indo-Pacific. Key commitments:
- Gender equality: every new investment over $3 million must have a gender equality objective, and 80 per cent of investments must effectively address gender equality in their implementation.
- Climate change: from 2024-25, at least half of all new country and regional investments over $3 million include a climate change objective.
- Locally led development: more funding and decision-making through local partners, including direct support to community organisations in the region.
- Disability equity and inclusion, and working through strong, respectful partnerships.
Geographic focus: the Indo-Pacific
More than 75 cents in every development dollar benefits the Indo-Pacific. The Pacific receives the largest share, followed by South-East Asia, with smaller programs in South and Central Asia and in response to global crises. Reasons for this focus:
- proximity and strong people-to-people, economic and security links;
- high need in small island states and lower-income countries in the region;
- greater impact where Australia has long-term relationships and knowledge;
- regional stability and health security (disease outbreaks do not respect borders).
Priority areas and the SDGs
| Priority area | Examples of work | Main SDGs |
|---|---|---|
| Health | Strengthening health systems, disease surveillance, immunisation, maternal and child health | SDG 3 |
| Education and skills | School infrastructure, teacher training, scholarships, girls' education | SDG 4 (and 5) |
| Water, sanitation and hygiene | Safe water and toilets, hygiene programs | SDG 6 (and 3) |
| Gender equality | Women's leadership, ending violence against women, economic empowerment | SDG 5 |
| Climate and disaster resilience | Climate-proof infrastructure, disaster preparedness, humanitarian response | SDG 13 (and 1, 11) |
| Economic development, governance and infrastructure | Jobs, trade, infrastructure financing, public administration | SDGs 1, 8, 16, 17 |
Health: Australia's major health investments
- Partnerships for a Healthy Region (2023-2028)
- A five-year, $620 million initiative led by DFAT's Indo-Pacific Centre for Health Security. It supports governments in the Pacific and South-East Asia to build resilient, inclusive health systems, covering communicable diseases, non-communicable diseases, sexual and reproductive health and rights, and health system functions. It is delivered with Australian government agencies, multilateral and regional bodies, product development partnerships and health institutions from Australia and the region. It builds on the earlier Indo-Pacific Health Security Initiative (2017-2022).
- Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance
- At Gavi's pledging summit in Brussels on 25 June 2025, Australia committed $386 million for 2026-2030 ($300 million in direct contributions plus $86 million in payments to Gavi's financing facility), a 29 per cent increase on its previous pledge. Gavi buys vaccines and supports immunisation in lower-income countries, contributing to SDG 3 target 3.2 (ending preventable deaths of children under 5) and 3.8 (universal health coverage, including vaccines).
- Global Partnership for Education
- As the 2025 VCAA stimulus noted, Australia has committed $570 million to the GPE since 2007, supporting SDG 4.
How the aid is delivered: types of aid and partnerships
| Channel | What it is | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Bilateral aid | Government to government, usually long-term development programs agreed with the partner country | The Kiribati Education Improvement Program, delivered with Kiribati's Ministry of Education (2023 VCAA) |
| Regional programs | Programs covering several countries in a region | Partnerships for a Healthy Region across the Pacific and South-East Asia |
| Multilateral aid | Contributions to international organisations that pool funds from many donors | Gavi, the GPE, the WHO, UNICEF, the World Bank |
| NGO partnerships | Funding Australian and local NGOs to deliver programs in communities | The Australian NGO Cooperation Program (ANCP) co-funds accredited NGOs |
| Emergency (humanitarian) aid | Short-term help after disasters or conflict: food, water, shelter, medical care | Responses to cyclones and earthquakes in the region |
Why partnerships? Working with others lets a medium-sized donor pool funds and expertise, reach more countries and communities, use partners' local knowledge and networks, avoid duplication, share cost and risk, and support countries' own plans, which makes gains more sustainable.
Evaluating Australia's aid program
Strengths:
- Focused on a region where Australia has deep relationships and knowledge, so aid can be targeted and sustained.
- Strong focus on health systems, immunisation and health security, which address underlying causes rather than only symptoms.
- Clear policy commitments to gender equality, climate resilience and locally led development, which support sustainability and equity.
- Mix of channels, including multilateral partners that multiply Australia's contribution.
Limitations:
- The total is small relative to national income (about 0.17 per cent of GNI), limiting scale.
- Aid serves Australia's strategic interests as well as need; critics argue some countries with high need outside the region receive little.
- Results depend on partner governments' capacity and on long-term, predictable funding; short projects can struggle to create lasting change.
- Measuring impact across many small programs is difficult.
A question describes an Australian-funded education project run with a partner country's government and asks you to link it to one SDG and justify the partnership. Build the answer.
Step 1: Identify the SDG
Name SDG 4 "Quality education" (or SDG 5 "Gender equality" if girls' education is the focus) and state that the project advances it.
Step 2: Explain the link
The funding puts more children in school, trains teachers and promotes girls' education, directly increasing access to quality education and progressing the goal (about 2 to 3 marks).
Step 3: Identify the type of aid
State whether it is bilateral (government to government) or multilateral (through a body such as a UN agency or the GPE), based on the stimulus.
Step 4: Justify the partnership
Explain that working with partners lets a medium-sized donor like Australia pool funds and expertise, reach more communities, avoid duplication and share cost and risk, and that working with the partner country's own ministry builds local capacity, so gains last after Australia's funding ends.
Australia's aid relies on collaboration: government to government, through multilateral bodies such as Gavi and the GPE, and with NGOs and communities. Pooling funds and expertise lets Australia support large global efforts and reach communities directly, which is why the partnerships involved are explicitly part of this dot point.
Australia's aid program is one government's official development assistance. NGOs are non-government organisations that deliver programs, sometimes funded by that aid. The WHO is a United Nations agency that may receive multilateral aid. Keep the Australian Government as the donor working through these partners.
Quote the 2026-27 total ($5.209 billion), the 2023 International Development Policy and current initiatives such as Partnerships for a Healthy Region, and date them.
Marks come from explaining how the specific activity (for example immunisation) changes an outcome (fewer child deaths) that the SDG targets (SDG 3). Always include the mechanism.
How this dot point appears in the VCE exam
- Short answer (1 to 3 marks): outline priority areas of Australia's aid program reflected in a stimulus, or identify the type of aid.
- Explain (3 marks): how an Australian aid project promotes one SDG.
- Justify or evaluate (3 to 6 marks): why Australia works through partnerships, or how effective an aid program is at promoting health and human development, using criteria such as sustainability, local ownership and targeting need.
Exam-style questions
Questions in the style of VCAA exam questions on this dot point, each with a worked answer. They are written by ExamExplained unless tagged "Past paper"; the year shows the paper a question is modelled on.
2025 VCAA Q11a-bPast paper6 marks[Stimulus, summarised: the Global Partnership for Education (GPE) is a multi-stakeholder partnership of bilateral and multilateral donors, developing country partners, and representatives from civil society and the private sector, whose goal is lifelong learning opportunities for all. Its objectives are strongly aligned with Australia's aid priorities, including promoting girls' education and access to education for the poorest and most marginalised children. Australia has committed a total of $570 million to GPE since 2007 (DFAT, 2024).]
a. Explain how Australia's support of the GPE promotes the achievement of one SDG. (3 marks)
b. Justify why the Australian Government works in partnership with multilateral organisations on a project such as the GPE. (3 marks)
Show worked answer →
Source: 2025 VCE Health and Human Development examination, Question 11a and 11b, and the 2025 examiners' report. Part c (a feature of effective aid) is on Effective aid programs.
Part a averaged 1.8 out of 3. The most common choices were SDG 4 'Quality education' and SDG 5 'Gender equality'. SDG 3 and SDG 1 were accepted, but students "generally could not explain how these SDGs were reflected in the GPE".
Show you understand the goal through its features (report). SDG 4: all children having access to primary and secondary education; universal literacy and numeracy; qualified and trained teachers; inclusive and safe schools; access to quality pre-primary education; eliminating discrimination in education for the vulnerable. SDG 5: ending discrimination and all violence against women and girls; eliminating forced marriages; valuing unpaid care; universal access to reproductive health care and rights. A common error was describing SDG 4 as women and girls having access to education: SDG 4 covers education for both boys and girls.
High-scoring response (report, summarised). Australia's support assists SDG 4 through the GPE's work to provide lifelong learning opportunities for all, improve children's access to quality teachers, promote girls' education and reach the poorest and most marginalised children. This helps achieve SDG 4's key features by ensuring all children can access safe, quality and affordable primary and secondary education, and by increasing the number of qualified teachers.
Part b averaged 0.9 out of 3; 46 per cent scored zero. The common issue was "not showing an understanding of multilateral aid organisations". Justifications accepted (report): multilateral organisations have greater influence; the partnership increases the global reach or scale of the project; greater access to resources, including knowledge; shared and specialist expertise; programs can be delivered in more than one country; greater funding is available.
High-scoring response (report, summarised). Partnering extends the reach and impact of Australia's aid and combines partners' resources. A multilateral organisation such as the United Nations has the knowledge to implement the GPE on a global scale while the Australian Government provides funding, so more children globally can receive an education and a greater positive impact is achieved.
2023 VCAA Q11aPast paper2 marks[Stimulus, summarised: Kiribati, a Pacific country of small, low-lying islands susceptible to rising sea levels, faces multiple threats from climate change. Through the $97 million (2011-2023) Kiribati Education Improvement Program (KEIP), Australia is working with the Ministry of Education to ensure school facilities have raised floors and optional protective seawalls to reduce future coastal flooding, with disability access and regionally sourced sustainable materials. Children learn a curriculum that integrates climate change, taught by teachers trained in climate change (DFAT).]
Outline two priority areas of Australia's aid program that are reflected in the Kiribati Education Improvement Program. (2 marks)
Show worked answer →
Source: 2023 VCE Health and Human Development examination, Question 11a, and the 2023 examiners' report. Part b (the type of aid) is set out verbatim on Types of aid.
Average 0.6 out of 2; 58 per cent scored zero, because many students could not accurately name priority areas of Australia's aid program. Students could refer to either the current or the previous priorities, "but not a mix of both".
- Accepted (report)
- Current priorities at the time: the Pacific region; climate change and environment / climate (financing); gender equality and disability inclusion; expanding opportunities for everyone. Previous priorities: education and health; effective governance: policies, institutions and functioning economies; building resilience: humanitarian assistance, disaster risk reduction and social protection; infrastructure, trade facilitation and international competitiveness.
- Applied to the KEIP
- From one list: the Pacific region (Kiribati is a Pacific country) and climate change (raised floors, seawalls and a climate change curriculum); disability access also reflects gender equality and disability inclusion. From the other: education and health (schools and teacher training) and building resilience (protecting schools from coastal flooding). Pairing, say, "Pacific region" with "education and health" mixes the lists.
- For 2026
- This question was set under the previous study design. The VCAA FAQ (February 2026) says the 2025 study design "does not require students to know the priority areas for Australia's aid program"; the focus is its role in supporting the SDGs and the partnerships involved.
Original5 marksExplain how ONE health initiative funded by Australia's aid program promotes the achievement of SDG 3, and evaluate the partnership used to deliver it.Show worked answer →
- Marks guide (Original, modelled on VCAA criteria)
- 5 marks: accurately describes a current Australian health initiative, explains the link to specific SDG 3 targets, and evaluates the partnership with strengths and a limitation. 3-4 marks: describes the initiative and explains the link with limited evaluation. 1-2 marks: some relevant information.
- Initiative
- In June 2025 Australia pledged $386 million to Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, for 2026-2030. Gavi uses donors' funds to buy vaccines and strengthen immunisation in lower-income countries.
- Link to SDG 3
- Vaccines prevent diseases such as measles, pneumonia and diarrhoeal disease that cause many deaths of young children, reducing under-5 and infant mortality (target 3.2), and extend access to essential vaccines as part of universal health coverage (target 3.8). Healthier children also attend school more, supporting other SDGs.
- Evaluation of the partnership
- Gavi is a multilateral partnership that pools funds from many governments and philanthropies, so Australia's contribution is multiplied, and Gavi's bulk purchasing lowers vaccine prices. Countries co-finance vaccines and take on more of the cost over time, which builds sustainability. A limitation is that Australia has less direct control over where the funds are spent than with bilateral aid, and results depend on national health systems' ability to deliver vaccines to remote communities.
Practise this
Sources & how we know this
- Australia's Official Development Assistance Budget Summary 2026-27 — Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (2026)
- Australia's International Development Policy — Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (2023)
- Partnerships for a Healthy Region — Indo-Pacific Centre for Health Security (DFAT)
- Australia's renewed 386 million dollar Gavi commitment — Australian Global Health Alliance (2025)
- What the 2026-2027 Budget means for Australian aid — Micah Australia (2026)
- 2025 VCE Health and Human Development external assessment report — VCAA (2026)
- 2023 VCE Health and Human Development external assessment report — VCAA (2024)
- VCE Health and Human Development from 2025: Frequently asked questions (updated February 2026) — VCAA (2026)
- VCE Health and Human Development Study Design (from 2025) — VCAA
- VCE Health and Human Development: examination specifications, past examinations and reports — VCAA