Skip to main content
VICChemistrySyllabus dot point

What are the current and future options for supplying energy?

redox reactions with reference to the electrochemical series, including the writing of balanced half-equations and overall ionic equations, the identification of oxidants and reductants, the prediction of spontaneous reactions, and the use of standard electrode potentials at 25°C

A focused VCE Chemistry Unit 3 answer on redox reactions and the electrochemical series. Covers oxidation and reduction in terms of electron transfer, writing and balancing half-equations, identifying oxidants and reductants, and using standard electrode potentials to predict spontaneous reactions.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.811 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

VCAA wants the definition of oxidation and reduction in terms of electron transfer, the writing of balanced half-equations and overall ionic equations, the identification of the oxidant and reductant in a reaction, and the use of the electrochemical series (standard electrode potentials at 25°C) to predict whether a reaction is spontaneous.

The answer

Redox in terms of electrons

A redox reaction involves the transfer of electrons between species.

  • Oxidation is the loss of electrons.
  • Reduction is the gain of electrons.

Memory aid: OIL RIG ("Oxidation Is Loss, Reduction Is Gain") or LEO the lion says GER ("Lose Electrons Oxidation, Gain Electrons Reduction").

The species being oxidised is the reducing agent (reductant): it gives electrons away, causing the other species to be reduced. The species being reduced is the oxidising agent (oxidant): it accepts electrons, causing the other species to be oxidised.

Process Electron change Oxidation number change
Oxidation Loses electrons Increases (more positive)
Reduction Gains electrons Decreases (less positive)

Half-equations

A half-equation shows just one half of the redox process (the oxidation OR the reduction), including the electrons transferred. Half-equations must be balanced for atoms and charge.

For a metal/metal-ion couple:
Cu^2+(aq) + 2e^- -> Cu(s) (reduction)
Zn(s) -> Zn^2+(aq) + 2e^- (oxidation)

For a more complex species in acidic solution (e.g. permanganate), the steps are:

  1. Balance the atom being oxidised or reduced.
  2. Balance O by adding H2O.
  3. Balance H by adding H^+.
  4. Balance charge by adding electrons (e^-) to the more positive side.

Example. Permanganate reducing to Mn^2+ in acid:
MnO4^-(aq) + 8H^+(aq) + 5e^- -> Mn^2+(aq) + 4H2O(l)

The Mn oxidation number goes from +7 (in MnO4^-) to +2 (in Mn^2+), a 5-electron change.

Combining half-equations into an overall ionic equation

  1. Multiply each half-equation so the number of electrons in oxidation equals the number in reduction.
  2. Add the two half-equations.
  3. Cancel electrons (they should fully cancel).
  4. Cancel any species (like H^+ or H2O) that appear on both sides.

Example. Cu^2+ oxidising Zn:

Zn(s) -> Zn^2+(aq) + 2e^- ×1
Cu^2+(aq) + 2e^- -> Cu(s) ×1

Zn(s) + Cu^2+(aq) -> Zn^2+(aq) + Cu(s)

The electrons are equal (2 each) so no multiplication is needed.

The electrochemical series

The electrochemical series (in your VCAA data book) lists half-equations written as reductions with their standard electrode potentials (E°) measured at 25°C, 1 mol L^-1 (or 1 atm for gases), against the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE = 0.00 V).

Reading rules:

  • The half-equation higher up the series (more positive E°) is a stronger oxidant. Strong oxidants on the left of the arrow.
  • The half-equation lower down the series (more negative E°) is a stronger reductant on the right of the arrow (the metal, the lower oxidation state).
  • A redox reaction is spontaneous if the species you want to act as the oxidant sits above the species you want to act as the reductant in the series.

Visualisation: the species on the left of an upper half-equation can oxidise any species on the right of a lower half-equation.

Predicting spontaneity

To check whether a proposed reaction is spontaneous:

  1. Identify the oxidant (the species being reduced) and write its half-equation as a reduction.
  2. Identify the reductant (the species being oxidised) and write its half-equation as a reduction (to look it up), then reverse it for the oxidation in your overall equation.
  3. Compare E° values:
    • If E°(oxidant) > E°(reductant), the reaction is spontaneous.
    • If E°(oxidant) < E°(reductant), the reaction is non-spontaneous (the reverse reaction is spontaneous).
  4. Calculate the cell EMF:
    E°_cell = E°(reduction, cathode) - E°(reduction, anode)
    E°_cell > 0 means spontaneous; E°_cell < 0 means non-spontaneous.

Examples in context

Example 1. Hot-dip galvanising at Bluescope Western Port. Bluescope's Hastings hot-dip galvanising line coats steel coils with molten zinc at 460C460^{\circ}\text{C}. Once the coil leaves the bath, the zinc layer becomes a sacrificial anode protecting the iron substrate. From the electrochemical series, Zn2+Zn\text{Zn}^{2+} | \text{Zn} has E=0.76VE^{\circ} = -0.76 \, \text{V} and Fe2+Fe\text{Fe}^{2+} | \text{Fe} has E=0.44VE^{\circ} = -0.44 \, \text{V}. Zinc is the stronger reductant: Ecell=0.44(0.76)=+0.32VE^{\circ}_{cell} = -0.44 - (-0.76) = +0.32 \, \text{V} for Zn+Fe2+Zn2++Fe\text{Zn} + \text{Fe}^{2+} \to \text{Zn}^{2+} + \text{Fe}, indicating spontaneous reduction of any iron(II) by zinc. Even where the coating is scratched, zinc oxidises preferentially, keeping the iron metallic for up to 2525 years in inland Victoria.

Example 2. Lead-acid car battery on a Toyota Hilux. A standard 12V12 \, \text{V} lead-acid battery delivers cranking current to the engine starter via the redox reaction Pb+PbO2+2H2SO42PbSO4+2H2O\text{Pb} + \text{PbO}_2 + 2 \text{H}_2 \text{SO}_4 \to 2 \text{PbSO}_4 + 2 \text{H}_2 \text{O}. From the electrochemical series, PbO2/PbSO4\text{PbO}_2 / \text{PbSO}_4 has E=+1.69VE^{\circ} = +1.69 \, \text{V} and PbSO4/Pb\text{PbSO}_4 / \text{Pb} has E=0.36VE^{\circ} = -0.36 \, \text{V}. EMF =1.69(0.36)=2.05V= 1.69 - (-0.36) = 2.05 \, \text{V} per cell; six cells in series give 12.3V\sim 12.3 \, \text{V}. The oxidant is PbO2\text{PbO}_2 (reduced to Pb2+\text{Pb}^{2+}) and the reductant is metallic Pb (oxidised to Pb2+\text{Pb}^{2+}). Both products are PbSO4\text{PbSO}_4, which deposits on each plate; recharging reverses the reactions.

Try this

Q1. Using standard electrode potentials, determine whether copper will displace silver from AgNO3\text{AgNO}_3 solution. E(Cu2+Cu)=+0.34VE^{\circ}(\text{Cu}^{2+} | \text{Cu}) = +0.34 \, \text{V}, E(Ag+Ag)=+0.80VE^{\circ}(\text{Ag}^+ | \text{Ag}) = +0.80 \, \text{V}. [3 marks]

  • Cue. Ecell=0.800.34=+0.46VE^{\circ}_{cell} = 0.80 - 0.34 = +0.46 \, \text{V}, positive so spontaneous; Cu (lower EE^{\circ}) is oxidised, Ag+\text{Ag}^+ reduced. Cu does displace Ag.

Q2. Balance the redox equation between Cr2O72\text{Cr}_2 \text{O}_7^{2-} and Fe2+\text{Fe}^{2+} in acidic solution. (a) Write each half-equation. (b) Add to give the overall equation. (c) Identify oxidant and reductant. [4 marks]

  • Cue. (a) Cr2O72+14H++6e2Cr3++7H2O\text{Cr}_2 \text{O}_7^{2-} + 14 \text{H}^+ + 6 e^- \to 2 \text{Cr}^{3+} + 7 \text{H}_2 \text{O}; Fe2+Fe3++e\text{Fe}^{2+} \to \text{Fe}^{3+} + e^-. (b) Cr2O72+6Fe2++14H+2Cr3++6Fe3++7H2O\text{Cr}_2 \text{O}_7^{2-} + 6 \text{Fe}^{2+} + 14 \text{H}^+ \to 2 \text{Cr}^{3+} + 6 \text{Fe}^{3+} + 7 \text{H}_2 \text{O}. (c) Oxidant Cr2O72\text{Cr}_2 \text{O}_7^{2-}; reductant Fe2+\text{Fe}^{2+}.

Q3. Consider a galvanic cell with NiNi2+\text{Ni} | \text{Ni}^{2+} (E=0.25VE^{\circ} = -0.25 \, \text{V}) and AgAg+\text{Ag} | \text{Ag}^+ (E=+0.80VE^{\circ} = +0.80 \, \text{V}). (a) Calculate EcellE^{\circ}_{cell}. (b) Write the spontaneous overall equation. (c) Predict whether the cell will work if Ag electrode is replaced with Cu. [2+2+2 marks]

  • Cue. (a) Ecell=0.80(0.25)=+1.05VE^{\circ}_{cell} = 0.80 - (-0.25) = +1.05 \, \text{V}. (b) Ni+2Ag+Ni2++2Ag\text{Ni} + 2 \text{Ag}^+ \to \text{Ni}^{2+} + 2 \text{Ag}. (c) Yes: Cu still higher than Ni; Ecell=0.34(0.25)=+0.59VE^{\circ}_{cell} = 0.34 - (-0.25) = +0.59 \, \text{V}, spontaneous.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of VCAA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

2024 VCE4 marksA piece of zinc metal is placed in copper(II) sulfate solution. Predict whether a spontaneous reaction occurs, write the half-equations and the overall ionic equation, and identify the oxidant and reductant.
Show worked answer →

A 4-mark answer needs the prediction with reasoning, the two half-equations, the overall ionic equation and the oxidant/reductant labels.

From the electrochemical series:
Cu^2+(aq) + 2e^- -> Cu(s) E° = +0.34 V
Zn^2+(aq) + 2e^- -> Zn(s) E° = -0.76 V

Cu^2+ is a stronger oxidant than Zn^2+ (more positive E°), so Cu^2+ accepts electrons from Zn. The reaction is spontaneous.

Half-equations:
Oxidation: Zn(s) -> Zn^2+(aq) + 2e^-
Reduction: Cu^2+(aq) + 2e^- -> Cu(s)

Overall ionic equation:
Zn(s) + Cu^2+(aq) -> Zn^2+(aq) + Cu(s)

Cu^2+ is the oxidant (accepts electrons, is reduced). Zn is the reductant (donates electrons, is oxidised).

Markers reward the spontaneity argument (a comparison of E° values, not just "Zn is more reactive"), correctly balanced half-equations with equal electrons, and the correctly labelled species.

2025 VCE2 marksUse the electrochemical series to explain why silver metal does not react with dilute hydrochloric acid.
Show worked answer →

A 2-mark answer needs the relevant E° comparison and the conclusion.

From the electrochemical series:
Ag^+(aq) + e^- -> Ag(s) E° = +0.80 V
2H^+(aq) + 2e^- -> H2(g) E° = 0.00 V

For Ag to react with H^+, Ag would need to be oxidised by H^+. That requires H^+ to be a stronger oxidant than Ag^+, but H^+ has a lower E° (0.00 V vs +0.80 V). So H^+ cannot oxidise Ag, and no reaction occurs.

A common error is to argue from reactivity series alone. The marker rewards the explicit E° comparison.

Related dot points