Skip to main content

Population Genetics - TCE Biology (Tasmania)

Syllabus dot point

“Concepts of natural selection, mutation, gene flow and genetic drift as causes of change in allele frequencies; investigate how populations with reduced genetic diversity, such as those affected by population bottlenecks, have an increased risk of extinction”

TCEBiologyEvolution (Module 3)8 min read

Quick answer

Population genetics studies how allele frequencies change in a gene pool. The Hardy-Weinberg principle gives the frequencies expected when a population is not evolving, so that real changes can be detected. Mutation, natural selection, genetic drift, gene flow, and non-random mating all shift allele frequencies, which is evolution at the population level.

What this dot point is asking

Gene pools and allele frequencies

A population is a group of interbreeding organisms of the same species in an area. The gene pool is the total of all alleles for all genes in that population. Evolution, in genetic terms, is a change in allele frequencies in a gene pool over generations (often called microevolution).

Allele frequency is the proportion of a particular allele among all copies of that gene in the population. If 70 per cent of the alleles for a gene are the dominant form and 30 per cent are recessive, the allele frequencies are 0.7 and 0.3.

Microevolution

Microevolution is a change in the allele frequencies of a population over a small number of generations, driven by selection, drift, gene flow, mutation, or non-random mating.

The Hardy-Weinberg principle

The Hardy-Weinberg principle describes the allele and genotype frequencies expected in a population that is not evolving. It acts as a null model: if real frequencies match the prediction, no evolutionary force is acting on that gene; if they do not, something is changing the population.

For a gene with two alleles, let p be the frequency of the dominant allele and q the frequency of the recessive allele. Then:

  • p + q = 1 (the allele frequencies add to 1).
  • p squared + 2pq + q squared = 1 (the genotype frequencies add to 1).

Here p squared is the frequency of homozygous dominant individuals, 2pq is the frequency of heterozygotes, and q squared is the frequency of homozygous recessive individuals.

The principle only holds under five conditions: no mutation, no natural selection, a very large population (no genetic drift), no gene flow (no migration), and random mating. Because these are rarely all true, the value of the principle is in showing when a population is changing.

Calculating carrier frequency

A recessive condition affects 1 in 10 000 people, so q squared = 0.0001. Taking the square root, q = 0.01. Then p = 1 minus 0.01 = 0.99. The frequency of carriers (heterozygotes) is 2pq = 2 times 0.99 times 0.01, which is about 0.0198, or roughly 2 per cent of the population. This shows how many people can carry a hidden recessive allele even when the condition itself is rare.

Hardy-Weinberg is background only

The Hardy-Weinberg principle and its calculations are not listed in the BIO315124 course or its external assessment specifications. Read the section above as background; the examined content is the four mechanisms below and the effect of reduced genetic diversity.

Forces that change allele frequencies

Five processes can shift allele frequencies and so cause evolution:

  • Mutation: introduces new alleles into the gene pool. It is the ultimate source of variation but changes frequencies slowly on its own.
  • Natural selection: favours alleles that increase fitness, raising their frequency over generations.
  • Genetic drift: random changes in allele frequency due to chance, strongest in small populations where chance events can remove or fix alleles. The founder effect (a new population started by a few individuals) and the bottleneck effect (a sharp population crash) are examples that reduce genetic diversity.
  • Gene flow (migration): movement of alleles between populations as individuals or gametes move, which tends to make populations more similar.
  • Non-random mating: when mate choice depends on traits, certain genotype combinations become more common, changing genotype frequencies.
Drift versus selection

Natural selection changes allele frequencies in a non-random, direction (favouring fitter alleles), while genetic drift changes them purely by chance. Drift has the largest effect in small populations, where a single chance event can dramatically alter the gene pool.

Genetic diversity and survival

Populations with high genetic diversity have more variation for selection to act on, so they are more likely to include individuals that can survive environmental change. Small populations lose diversity through drift and inbreeding, which raises extinction risk. This is why conservation programs try to maintain large, genetically varied populations and gene flow between them.

Misusing the Hardy-Weinberg equation

Students often confuse q squared (the frequency of the homozygous recessive phenotype) with q (the recessive allele frequency). Always start from the homozygous recessive frequency, which is q squared, then take the square root to find q before calculating p. Also remember that 2pq gives heterozygotes, not the dominant phenotype.

Bottlenecks and extinction risk

A population bottleneck is a sharp fall in population size caused by an event such as disease, hunting or habitat loss. The survivors carry only part of the original gene pool, and genetic drift in the small population removes more alleles. With little genetic diversity, the population is less likely to contain individuals able to survive a new disease or environmental change, and harmful recessive alleles are more often expressed, so the risk of extinction rises. The Tasmanian devil, which has low genetic diversity, is a local example often discussed alongside devil facial tumour disease.

Exam-style questions

Questions in the style of TASC exam questions on this dot point, each with a worked answer. They are written by ExamExplained unless tagged "Past paper"; the year shows the paper a question is modelled on.

Original7 marks
In a population in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, a recessive condition affects 11 in 400400 individuals. Using p2+2pq+q2=1p^2 + 2pq + q^2 = 1 and p+q=1p + q = 1, calculate the frequency of the recessive allele qq, the frequency of the dominant allele pp, and the frequency of heterozygous carriers. State two conditions that must hold for the population to be in equilibrium.
Show worked answer →

A 7 mark answer works through all three frequencies and states two conditions.

Recessive allele qq
Affected (homozygous recessive) frequency q2=1400=0.0025q^2 = \dfrac{1}{400} = 0.0025. So q=0.0025=0.05q = \sqrt{0.0025} = 0.05.
Dominant allele pp
p=1−q=1−0.05=0.95p = 1 - q = 1 - 0.05 = 0.95.
Carriers (2pq2pq)
2pq=2×0.95×0.05=0.0952pq = 2 \times 0.95 \times 0.05 = 0.095, that is about 9.5%9.5\% of the population are heterozygous carriers.
Two conditions (any two)
No mutation; no migration (no gene flow); random mating; very large population (no genetic drift); no natural selection.

Markers reward q=0.05q = 0.05, p=0.95p = 0.95, carrier frequency 0.0950.095, and two valid equilibrium conditions.

Original5 marks
Explain how genetic drift and gene flow each change allele frequencies in a population, and explain why genetic drift has a greater effect on a small population than a large one.
Show worked answer →

A 5 mark answer explains both mechanisms and the small-population effect.

Genetic drift
A random change in allele frequencies from chance events (such as which individuals happen to survive or reproduce). It can cause alleles to be lost or fixed by chance, not by fitness.
Gene flow
The movement of alleles between populations through migration and interbreeding. It introduces or removes alleles, tending to make populations more genetically similar.
Why drift hits small populations harder
In a small population, a chance event (for example a few deaths) removes a large proportion of the alleles, so frequencies swing sharply. In a large population the same chance event changes only a tiny fraction, so the effect averages out.

Markers reward correct mechanisms for drift (random) and gene flow (migration) and the sampling-error reasoning for small populations.

Practise this

Sources & how we know this

ExamExplained