Integration by substitution (SACE Stage 2 Specialist Mathematics)
“Evaluate integrals using the method of substitution, including changing the limits for definite integrals.”
Substitution reverses the chain rule. Choose so that its derivative also appears in the integrand, then replace using . The integral becomes one in that you can do directly. For a definite integral, either convert the limits to -values, or convert back to before substituting the original limits.
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
You need to evaluate integrals by substitution, including correctly handling the limits of definite integrals.
The method
If then , so . The substitution rule is
The aim is to pick so the integrand turns into with no left over. Look for a function whose derivative (up to a constant factor) is also in the integrand.
A good is usually the "inside" of a composite function, or whatever sits under a root, inside a power, or in an exponent - provided its derivative appears (possibly times a constant) elsewhere in the integrand. After substituting, the integral must contain only and .
A worked indefinite integral
Find
Step 1: Choose , compute , and note it matches the integrand
The expression inside the square root, , is the natural candidate for because its derivative appears as the other factor in the integrand. Set , so and . The in the integrand is exactly , so the match is perfect with no extra constant needed.
Step 2: Substitute and integrate in terms of
Replacing with and with converts the integral into a standard power rule.
Step 3: Substitute back to express the answer in terms of
Replace with to return to the original variable.
Why substitution works
Substitution is the chain rule run in reverse. When you differentiate the chain rule produces , so any integrand of that shape antidifferentiates back to . Setting simply renames the inside function so the integral looks like the standard . This is why the search for a good substitution is really a search for an inside function whose derivative is already present, up to a constant, in the integrand. If you can spot that pairing, the substitution is guaranteed to collapse the integral.
Handling a constant factor
Often differs from the integrand by a constant. Solve for and carry the constant through.
For , let , so , hence :
Definite integrals: change the limits
For a definite integral, the cleanest approach changes the limits to -values so you never convert back.
Evaluate
Step 1: Choose , compute , and solve for
The inner function is the natural substitution. Set , so , which gives . The factor appears in the integrand, so the substitution removes all from the integral.
Step 2: Change the limits to -values
Converting the limits avoids the need to substitute back at the end, making the definite integral cleaner to evaluate. When , ; when , .
Step 3: Substitute and evaluate the integral in
The integral becomes a straightforward power rule, evaluated between the new limits.
Now , so
For an indefinite integral you can always check your answer by differentiating it - the chain rule should return the original integrand. This catches missing constant factors immediately.
Trigonometric substitutions
A frequent SACE pattern uses a trigonometric inside function. To integrate something like , first rewrite using an identity such as , then substitute so that . The leftover becomes , and the integral turns into a simple polynomial in . The general lesson is that an odd power of sine or cosine can always be split so that one factor pairs with to form the differential of the other function. Recognising this pairing is the key skill the technique tests.
- Forgetting to change to
- You must replace entirely; leaving a stray or after substituting means the substitution was not completed correctly.
- Not changing the limits for a definite integral
- If you switch to but keep the original -limits, the answer is wrong. Either convert the limits to , or convert the antiderivative back to first.
- Mishandling the constant factor
- When , you must divide by ; dropping this factor scales the whole answer.
- Choosing a whose derivative is absent
- If does not appear (even up to a constant) in the integrand, the substitution will not simplify it - try a different method.
Exam-style questions
Questions in the style of SACE Board exam questions on this dot point, each with a worked answer. They are written by ExamExplained unless tagged "Past paper"; the year shows the paper a question is modelled on.
SACE 2023-style3 marksCalculator-free. Given that , show that .Show worked answer →
Rewrite using the identity: .
Let , so , i.e. . Change limits: ; . [1 mark]
The antiderivative is (since ). [1 mark]
Evaluate: at , ; at , . Difference , as required. [1 mark]
SACE 2022-style3 marksCalculator-free. Evaluate using a substitution.Show worked answer →
Let , so and . Change limits: ; .
Marks: one for the substitution and limit change, one for the antiderivative, one for the value .
SACE 2021-style2 marksCalculator-free. Find .Show worked answer →
Let , so and :
Marks: one for the substitution with the constant factor, one for the answer including .