Skip to main content
NSWPhysicsSyllabus dot point

Inquiry Question 2: What is observed when light interacts with matter?

Analyse the photoelectric effect, including Einstein's photon equation hf = phi + KE_max, the role of Planck's constant, and the inability of the wave model to explain the threshold frequency and the kinetic-energy results

A focused answer to the HSC Physics Module 7 dot point on the quantum model of light. Photon energy E = hf, Einstein's photoelectric equation hf = phi + KE_max, Planck's constant, threshold frequency and stopping voltage, and why the wave model cannot explain the observations.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.812 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

NESA wants you to use Einstein's photon model to explain the photoelectric effect, write and apply hf=ϕ+KEmaxh f = \phi + KE_{\max}, calculate the threshold frequency and stopping voltage, and clearly state which observations the classical wave model cannot account for.

The answer

The diagram below sketches the photoelectric effect. A photon of energy hfhf above the metal's work function ϕ\phi ejects an electron with kinetic energy KEmax=hfϕKE_{\max} = hf - \phi. Below the threshold frequency f0=ϕ/hf_0 = \phi / h, no electrons are ejected regardless of intensity.

Maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons against frequency A straight line plot of K E max on the y axis against frequency f on the x axis. The line has positive slope equal to Planck's constant h. It crosses the f axis at the threshold frequency f sub zero equal to phi over h and has y intercept minus phi. Below f sub zero no photoelectrons are emitted. KEmax f f0 threshold −φ ⁄ e slope = h hf = φ + KEmax; intercept gives work function, slope gives Planck's constant.

Setting the scene

By the late 1800s the wave model of light was the standard. But in 1887 Heinrich Hertz noticed UV light striking metal electrodes increased the spark distance in his radio-wave apparatus. Lenard's careful experiments (1902) revealed three features the wave model could not explain:

  1. Threshold frequency. Below a metal-specific frequency f0f_0, no electrons are ejected no matter how intense the light or how long it shines.
  2. Frequency, not intensity, sets electron energy. KEmaxKE_{\max} depends linearly on frequency. Intensity sets the number of photoelectrons per second, not their energies.
  3. No measurable time delay. Electrons are ejected effectively instantaneously when the light starts, even at very low intensity. A classical wave would need time to accumulate enough energy in one electron.

Einstein's photon hypothesis (1905)

Building on Planck's 1900 idea that energy is exchanged in discrete amounts hfh f, Einstein proposed that light itself is made of discrete energy packets:

Ephoton=hfE_{\text{photon}} = h f

A single photon is absorbed by a single electron all at once. If the electron is bound to the metal by an energy ϕ\phi (the work function, the minimum energy to remove the least tightly bound electron), then:

hf=ϕ+KEmax\boxed{h f = \phi + KE_{\max}}

This is Einstein's photoelectric equation. KEmaxKE_{\max} is the maximum kinetic energy of the ejected photoelectron; electrons deeper in the metal lose more energy before escape and emerge with less.

Threshold frequency

The minimum frequency that can eject any electron is the one where KEmax=0KE_{\max} = 0:

f0=ϕhf_0 = \frac{\phi}{h}

Below f0f_0, photons simply do not carry enough energy to free an electron, no matter how many arrive. This is the killer observation for the wave model: a classical wave of any frequency should eventually deliver enough energy if intense or sustained enough.

Stopping voltage

In the standard experiment, a positive collector electrode is gradually reverse-biased until the most energetic photoelectrons are turned back. The reversing voltage at which photocurrent vanishes is the stopping voltage VsV_s:

eVs=KEmax=hfϕe V_s = KE_{\max} = h f - \phi

A plot of VsV_s vs ff is a straight line with gradient h/eh / e (giving Planck's constant) and xx-intercept f0f_0 (giving the threshold) and yy-intercept ϕ/e-\phi / e (giving the work function). This is Millikan's 1916 experiment, which confirmed Einstein's equation to high precision and helped earn both their Nobel Prizes.

Worked example: caesium photocell

Caesium has work function ϕ=2.10\phi = 2.10 eV. Calculate the maximum kinetic energy and stopping voltage when light of wavelength 400400 nm illuminates the cathode.

Photon energy: E=hc/λE = h c / \lambda. Using the shortcut hc=1240h c = 1240 eV nm:

E=1240/400=3.10E = 1240 / 400 = 3.10 eV.

KEmax=3.102.10=1.00KE_{\max} = 3.10 - 2.10 = 1.00 eV.

Stopping voltage: Vs=KEmax/e=1.00V_s = KE_{\max} / e = 1.00 V.

If the wavelength is increased to 700700 nm: E=1240/700=1.77E = 1240 / 700 = 1.77 eV <ϕ< \phi, so no photoelectrons are emitted regardless of intensity.

Why the wave model fails

Three predictions of the classical wave model are flatly contradicted:

Wave model prediction Observation
Any frequency works given enough intensity A sharp threshold frequency f0f_0 exists
KEmaxKE_{\max} increases with intensity KEmaxKE_{\max} depends only on ff, not intensity
Time lag at low intensity (energy builds up) No measurable delay

The wave model is rescued for interference and diffraction, but for absorption and emission by atoms, the quantum (photon) model is needed. This duality is the heart of "wave-particle duality": light behaves as a wave in propagation and as a particle in interaction.

Planck's constant

h=6.626×1034h = 6.626 \times 10^{-34} J s is the universal constant relating frequency to energy quantum. It also appears in:

  • The energy of a photon: E=hfE = h f.
  • The momentum of a photon: p=h/λp = h / \lambda.
  • De Broglie's matter-wave relation: λ=h/p\lambda = h / p.
  • The Heisenberg uncertainty principle: ΔxΔp/2\Delta x \Delta p \geq \hbar / 2.

Millikan's measurement of the slope h/eh / e in the photoelectric stopping-voltage plot gave h=6.57×1034h = 6.57 \times 10^{-34} J s, agreeing with Planck's blackbody value.

Examples in context

Example 1. Photoelectric effect on a sodium photocathode at UNSW. Sodium has work function ϕ=2.28 eV\phi = 2.28 \text{ eV}. UV light of λ=350 nm\lambda = 350 \text{ nm} has photon energy E=hc/λ=6.626×1034×3.0×108/3.5×107=5.68×1019 J=3.55 eVE = h c / \lambda = 6.626 \times 10^{-34} \times 3.0 \times 10^8 / 3.5 \times 10^{-7} = 5.68 \times 10^{-19} \text{ J} = 3.55 \text{ eV}. Maximum kinetic energy of ejected electrons is KEmax=hfϕ=3.552.28=1.27 eVKE_{\max} = h f - \phi = 3.55 - 2.28 = 1.27 \text{ eV}. The stopping voltage is Vs=KEmax/e=1.27 VV_s = KE_{\max} / e = 1.27 \text{ V}. Doubling the light intensity doubles the number of photoelectrons but leaves KEmaxKE_{\max} unchanged, the key prediction of Einstein's model that classical wave theory cannot explain.

Example 2. Solar panels on a Sydney rooftop. A silicon solar cell has band gap Eg=1.12 eVE_g = 1.12 \text{ eV}, corresponding to threshold wavelength λ0=hc/Eg=1240/1.12=1107 nm\lambda_0 = h c / E_g = 1240 / 1.12 = 1107 \text{ nm} (near-IR). Visible photons at λ=600 nm\lambda = 600 \text{ nm} carry E=2.07 eVE = 2.07 \text{ eV}, so each one excites an electron across the band gap with 0.95 eV0.95 \text{ eV} "wasted" as heat. UV photons at 300 nm300 \text{ nm} (E=4.13 eVE = 4.13 \text{ eV}) still produce only one electron per photon, dumping 3.01 eV3.01 \text{ eV} as heat. This single-photon-single-electron limit is exactly the photoelectric ratio and explains the 33%\sim 33\% Shockley-Queisser efficiency cap for single-junction silicon.

Try this

Q1. State the photoelectric equation and explain what each term means. [2 marks]

  • Cue. hf=ϕ+KEmaxh f = \phi + KE_{\max}. Photon energy = work function + max KE of ejected electron.

Q2. A metal has work function ϕ=4.5 eV\phi = 4.5 \text{ eV}. (a) Find the threshold wavelength. (b) When illuminated by λ=200 nm\lambda = 200 \text{ nm} light, calculate the maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons. [4 marks]

  • Cue. (a) λ0=hc/ϕ=1240/4.5=276 nm\lambda_0 = hc/\phi = 1240/4.5 = 276 \text{ nm}. (b) Ephoton=1240/200=6.20 eVE_{\text{photon}} = 1240/200 = 6.20 \text{ eV}; KEmax=6.204.5=1.70 eVKE_{\max} = 6.20 - 4.5 = 1.70 \text{ eV}.

Q3. A photoelectric experiment plots KEmaxKE_{\max} versus frequency. (a) State the gradient and y-intercept of this graph. (b) Explain how the graph yields Planck's constant. (c) Identify two observations from photoelectric experiments that the wave model cannot explain. [2+2+2 marks]

  • Cue. (a) Gradient hh, intercept ϕ-\phi. (b) From slope; h=h = rise/run. (c) Threshold frequency exists; KEmaxKE_{\max} depends on ff not intensity; no time delay.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of NESA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

2022 HSC5 marksLight of wavelength 300 nm is incident on a metal surface with work function 3.5 eV. Calculate the energy of an incident photon in eV, the maximum kinetic energy of the ejected photoelectrons, and the stopping voltage. State what would happen if the intensity of the light were doubled and what would happen if the wavelength were increased to 400 nm.
Show worked answer →

Photon energy:

E=hc/λ=(6.626×1034)(3.00×108)/(3.00×107)=6.63×1019E = h c / \lambda = (6.626 \times 10^{-34})(3.00 \times 10^8) / (3.00 \times 10^{-7}) = 6.63 \times 10^{-19} J =4.14= 4.14 eV.

Maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons (Einstein's equation):

KEmax=hfϕ=4.143.5=0.64KE_{\max} = h f - \phi = 4.14 - 3.5 = 0.64 eV.

Stopping voltage:

Vs=KEmax/e=0.64V_s = KE_{\max} / e = 0.64 V.

Doubling the intensity: doubles the photon flux, so doubles the photocurrent (more electrons ejected per second), but does not change KEmaxKE_{\max} or VsV_s (each electron still absorbs only one photon of the same energy).

At λ=400\lambda = 400 nm: photon energy E=1240/400E = 1240 / 400 nm-eV =3.10= 3.10 eV, which is below the 3.53.5 eV work function. No photoelectrons are emitted regardless of how bright the light is. This is the threshold-frequency phenomenon.

Markers reward correct photon energy in eV, the Einstein equation, the stopping voltage, and qualitative answers on intensity and wavelength changes consistent with the photon model.

2017 HSC4 marksOutline two experimental observations of the photoelectric effect that the classical wave model of light could not explain, and describe how Einstein's photon hypothesis accounts for them.
Show worked answer →

Observation 1: threshold frequency. Below a certain frequency f0f_0, no photoelectrons are emitted no matter how bright the light. A classical wave would deliver more energy when more intense, so it should always eject electrons given enough intensity.

Einstein's explanation: light is a stream of photons, each with energy hfh f. A single photon delivers its energy to one electron all at once. If hf<ϕh f < \phi (the work function), no electron can escape; if hfϕh f \geq \phi, electrons are ejected with KEmax=hfϕKE_{\max} = h f - \phi. Intensity controls photon number, not energy per photon.

Observation 2: maximum kinetic energy depends on frequency, not intensity. Brighter light of the same colour gives more photoelectrons per second but no extra energy per electron. Brighter blue light ejects faster electrons than dim blue light only in number, not in speed.

Einstein's explanation: each electron absorbs one photon and carries away energy hfϕh f - \phi. Doubling intensity doubles the number of absorbing electrons but each still gets exactly hfh f of input.

Observation 3 (bonus): essentially zero delay between switching on the light and ejection of photoelectrons, even at very low intensity. A wave model would predict a build-up time; the photon model predicts instantaneous absorption.

Markers reward two observations correctly described and a clear photon-by-photon explanation linked to hf=ϕ+KEmaxh f = \phi + KE_{\max}.

Related dot points