← Module 5: Advanced Mechanics

NSWPhysicsSyllabus dot point

Inquiry Question 3: How does the force of gravity determine the motion of planets and satellites?

Derive and apply the concept of gravitational potential energy in a radial gravitational field, U = -G M m / r, including the concept of escape velocity

A focused answer to the HSC Physics Module 5 dot point on gravitational potential energy in radial fields. Why U is negative, how it differs from the mgh approximation, the derivation of escape velocity, and the standard worked example using Earth.

Generated by Claude OpusReviewed by Better Tuition Academy6 min answer

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

What this dot point is asking

NESA wants you to extend the idea of gravitational potential energy from the near-Earth U=mghU = mgh approximation to the full radial-field formula U=βˆ’GMm/rU = -G M m / r, explain why it is negative, and apply it to problems including escape velocity. This dot point underpins every energy-based question on orbital motion in the second half of Module 5.

The answer

From mghmgh to the radial formula

Near Earth's surface, gravitational field strength gg is approximately constant, and U=mghU = mgh works fine. At astronomical scales, gg falls off as 1/r21/r^2, so the potential energy must be obtained by integrating the gravitational force from infinity inward:

U(r)=βˆ’βˆ«βˆžrF dr=βˆ’βˆ«βˆžr(βˆ’GMmr2)dr=βˆ’GMmrU(r) = -\int_{\infty}^{r} F \, dr = -\int_{\infty}^{r} \left(-\frac{G M m}{r^2}\right) dr = -\frac{G M m}{r}

The negative sign reflects two choices:

  1. Zero potential energy at infinity (the natural reference for radial fields).
  2. Attractive force, so moving inward releases energy.

A bound mass (closer than infinity) therefore has U<0U < 0.

Why negative U makes physical sense

Imagine releasing a stationary object from far away. Gravity does positive work pulling it inward, increasing kinetic energy. By conservation of energy, potential energy must decrease. Since we set U=0U = 0 at infinity, UU becomes negative as the object approaches the source.

The deeper into the well, the more negative UU becomes. To free a mass from the well (push it to infinity), positive work must be done equal to ∣U∣=GMmr|U| = \frac{G M m}{r}.

Escape velocity

Escape velocity vescv_{\text{esc}} is the minimum speed needed at a distance rr for an object to reach infinity with zero remaining kinetic energy. By conservation of energy:

12mvesc2+(βˆ’GMmr)=0+0\frac{1}{2} m v_{\text{esc}}^2 + \left(-\frac{G M m}{r}\right) = 0 + 0

Solving:

vesc=2GMrv_{\text{esc}} = \sqrt{\frac{2 G M}{r}}

Key features:

  • Independent of the mass of the escaping object.
  • Depends on the mass MM of the source and the launch distance rr.
  • At Earth's surface: vescβ‰ˆ11.2v_{\text{esc}} \approx 11.2 km/s.
  • For a black hole, rr shrinks until vescv_{\text{esc}} approaches the speed of light.

Change in potential energy

When a mass moves from r1r_1 to r2r_2:

Ξ”U=U(r2)βˆ’U(r1)=βˆ’GMmr2βˆ’(βˆ’GMmr1)=GMm(1r1βˆ’1r2)\Delta U = U(r_2) - U(r_1) = -\frac{G M m}{r_2} - \left(-\frac{G M m}{r_1}\right) = G M m \left(\frac{1}{r_1} - \frac{1}{r_2}\right)

If r2>r1r_2 > r_1 (moving away), Ξ”U>0\Delta U > 0: potential energy increases (becomes less negative).

Worked example with numbers

Find the work needed to lift a 500500 kg satellite from Earth's surface (r1=RE=6.37Γ—106r_1 = R_E = 6.37 \times 10^6 m) to an altitude of 10001000 km (r2=7.37Γ—106r_2 = 7.37 \times 10^6 m). Take ME=5.97Γ—1024M_E = 5.97 \times 10^{24} kg.

Ξ”U=GMEm(1r1βˆ’1r2)\Delta U = G M_E m \left(\frac{1}{r_1} - \frac{1}{r_2}\right)

Ξ”U=6.67Γ—10βˆ’11Γ—5.97Γ—1024Γ—500Γ—(16.37Γ—106βˆ’17.37Γ—106)\Delta U = 6.67 \times 10^{-11} \times 5.97 \times 10^{24} \times 500 \times \left(\frac{1}{6.37 \times 10^6} - \frac{1}{7.37 \times 10^6}\right)

Ξ”U=1.99Γ—1017Γ—(1.570Γ—10βˆ’7βˆ’1.357Γ—10βˆ’7)\Delta U = 1.99 \times 10^{17} \times \left(1.570 \times 10^{-7} - 1.357 \times 10^{-7}\right)

Ξ”U=1.99Γ—1017Γ—2.13Γ—10βˆ’8=4.24Γ—109\Delta U = 1.99 \times 10^{17} \times 2.13 \times 10^{-8} = 4.24 \times 10^9 J.

About 4.24.2 GJ of work is required, ignoring kinetic energy.

Try it: Escape velocity calculator - choose Earth, Moon, Mars, Jupiter or Sun (or enter custom values) and get vescv_{\text{esc}} at the surface or any altitude.

Common traps

Forgetting the negative sign. U=βˆ’GMm/rU = -G M m / r, not +GMm/r+G M m / r. The sign matters for energy conservation.

Using mghm g h for astronomical distances. This approximation only works for small altitude changes near a planet's surface where gg is roughly constant. For satellites and planetary orbits, use the radial formula.

Wrong reference point. Zero potential energy is at infinity, not at the planet's surface or centre.

Confusing escape velocity with orbital velocity. Orbital velocity at radius rr is vorb=GM/rv_{\text{orb}} = \sqrt{G M / r}. Escape velocity is 2\sqrt{2} times larger: vesc=2β‹…vorbv_{\text{esc}} = \sqrt{2} \cdot v_{\text{orb}}.

Assuming escape velocity depends on the object's mass. It does not. A pebble and a rocket need the same escape velocity (though the rocket needs more total energy because E=12mv2E = \frac{1}{2} m v^2).

In one sentence

Gravitational potential energy in a radial field is U=βˆ’GMm/rU = -G M m / r (with zero at infinity), and the escape velocity is the speed vesc=2GM/rv_{\text{esc}} = \sqrt{2 G M / r} at which an object's total energy is zero and it just escapes the source's gravitational well.

Past exam questions, worked

Real questions from past NESA papers on this dot point, with our answer explainer.

2021 HSC4 marksCalculate the escape velocity from the surface of the Earth. (Mass of Earth = 5.97 x 10^24 kg, radius of Earth = 6.37 x 10^6 m, G = 6.67 x 10^-11 N m^2/kg^2.)
Show worked answer β†’

Escape velocity is the minimum speed an object needs at a distance rr from the centre of a mass MM to just barely escape to infinity with zero kinetic energy remaining.

Conservation of energy from the surface to infinity (where both UU and KK are zero):

12mvesc2βˆ’GMmr=0\frac{1}{2} m v_{\text{esc}}^2 - \frac{G M m}{r} = 0.

Solving for vescv_{\text{esc}}:

vesc=2GMrv_{\text{esc}} = \sqrt{\frac{2 G M}{r}}.

Substituting:

IMATH_7
IMATH_8
IMATH_9
vesc=1.12Γ—104v_{\text{esc}} = 1.12 \times 10^4 m/s, or about 11.211.2 km/s.

Markers reward the derivation from conservation of energy, the correct identification of the boundary conditions (zero energy at infinity), and the final answer with units. Note that escape velocity does not depend on the mass of the escaping object.

2019 HSC3 marksExplain why gravitational potential energy in a radial field is taken to be negative, and why this is physically reasonable.
Show worked answer β†’

Gravitational potential energy in a radial field is defined as:

U=βˆ’GMmrU = -\frac{G M m}{r}.

The negative sign arises from the choice of zero potential energy at infinity (the natural reference point for radial fields). Because gravity is always attractive, the gravitational force does positive work on a mass as it moves from infinity inward, reducing its potential energy below zero.

Physically, this means a mass that is bound to a gravitational source (such as a planet in orbit) has less energy than a free mass at infinity. To escape the field, work must be done against gravity equal to GMmr\frac{G M m}{r}, which raises the potential energy to zero at infinity.

The familiar formula U=mghU = m g h is the linear approximation valid near a planet's surface where gg is approximately constant. At astronomical scales, gg varies with rr and the full radial formula must be used.

Markers reward the explicit reference point at infinity, the link between attractive force and negative potential energy, and the comparison with mghmgh.

Related dot points