Where can a function change sign, and how do we use that to solve inequations and to begin a sketch?
Examine the sign of a function by building a table of test values that dodge around its zeroes and discontinuities, and use the resulting sign pattern to solve inequations and to start a curve sketch
The Year 11 Extension 1 dot point on the sign of a function. Why a function can only change sign at a zero or a discontinuity, how to build a table of signs with test values, the repeated-factor exception, rational functions with vertical asymptotes, and using the sign pattern both to solve inequations and to begin a sketch.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
What this dot point is asking
NESA wants you to work out the sign of a function, that is, the set of for which it is positive, negative or zero, by building a short table of test values, and then to use that sign pattern for two purposes: to solve inequations and to begin a sketch of the curve. It is the engine room behind a surprising amount of the course.
The whole technique rests on one idea, and it is worth stating before anything else: a function can only change sign at a zero or at a discontinuity. Everywhere else its sign is locked. So if you know the zeroes and the discontinuities, the sign of the function is settled on each interval between them, and a single test value reveals it.
A quick note on language, the same one made on the companion inequations page: we solve an inequation such as , and we prove an inequality such as . NESA uses the word "inequality" for both, so do not be thrown if a question says "solve the inequality".
The answer
Where can a function change sign?
Picture tracing a continuous curve from left to right. To get from below the -axis to above it, the pen must cross the axis, that is, pass through a zero. It cannot jump from negative to positive without either touching zero or lifting off the page. "Lifting off the page" is a discontinuity: a break in the graph, which for the functions in this course happens only where a denominator is zero. This is the intuition behind the Intermediate Value Theorem, and for Year 11 the picture is all the justification you need.
So the candidate places for a sign change are exactly the zeroes and the discontinuities. The word "candidate" matters: the sign changes at some of them but not necessarily all. The figure below shows a curve with a simple zero (sign flips) and a double zero (sign holds).
Building a table of signs
The method turns that idea into a routine you can lay out cleanly for a marker.
- Factor the expression completely so the zeroes and any denominator are visible.
- List the critical values: every zero (of the whole expression) and every discontinuity (every zero of a denominator). Mark each discontinuity as already excluded.
- Order them on a number line; they carve it into intervals.
- Test one value in each interval, dodging around the critical values, and record the sign.
- To solve an inequation, keep the intervals with the sign you want; to start a sketch, use the signs to know which side of the axis the curve sits on in each interval.
A small but real efficiency: you can find the sign of the whole expression either by substituting the test value into the function directly, or by reading the sign of each factor and multiplying. Both are examined; the factor method scales better when there are several factors, and is what the stage-by-stage figures below use.
Polynomials: a worked sign table
Polynomials are the easy case because they have no discontinuities at all, so the test values only have to dodge around the zeroes. Take , with zeroes at . Testing gives
so the sign row is . The graph below is the same information drawn as a curve: below the axis, above, below, above. The -intercept is .
To solve , keep the intervals where the sign is negative and, because the inequality is weak, include the zeroes: or . Notice that the sketch is incomplete, we have not found the turning points, but it is complete enough to confirm the inequality. That dual use, enough for the inequation, a head start on the sketch, is the point of the method.
The repeated-factor exception
There is one trap worth isolating. A factor raised to an even power, like , is never negative, so it does not change the sign of the product as passes its zero. A factor raised to an odd power behaves, for sign purposes, like a single factor and does change the sign. The shortcut: count each multiplicity modulo , so even powers can be ignored when you track sign changes.
Concretely, for the sign changes at the simple zero but not at the double zero , which is exactly the curve drawn in the first figure: it crosses at and merely touches at . This connects sign analysis to the graphing of polynomials by multiplicity: a simple zero is a crossing, an even zero is a touch.
Functions with discontinuities
When the function has a denominator, the test values must dodge around the discontinuities (zeroes of the denominator) as well as the zeroes. The method is otherwise identical. Take : a zero at (numerator zero) and a discontinuity at (denominator zero). Testing gives , so the sign row is . The sign genuinely flips at both the zero and the discontinuity.
The dashed lines show the vertical asymptote (the function shoots off to at the discontinuity) and a horizontal asymptote . Finding the vertical asymptote at a denominator zero is in your Year 11 toolkit; the horizontal asymptote (here , found by writing ) is a Year 12 refinement and is shown only to make the sketch honest. For the sign, all you need is the table.
Not every candidate point produces a change. The function has denominator , so it has no zeroes and no discontinuities at all; a single test value settles that it is positive everywhere. Always check whether the table is even needed.
Two routes for a rational inequation
For an inequation with the unknown in the denominator you now have two complete methods, and the HSC examines both. The companion page develops the first; this page develops the second.
- Multiply by the square of the denominator. Since a square is never negative, the inequality sign is preserved, and you reduce the problem to a polynomial inequation. Fast for a single fraction against a constant.
- Collect on one side as a single fraction, then sign-table. No multiplying by anything of unknown sign; you analyse the sign of one quotient directly. This is the more general method and the one that scales to the harder rational inequations met in the Year 12 polynomial and rational inequalities page.
The worked centrepiece below solves the same inequation, , by the sign-table route; the final worked example solves it again by multiplying by the square, so you can compare them side by side and pick the right tool under exam pressure.
Solve a rational inequation by sign table, stage by stage
Take . Collect everything on the left over the common denominator :
The numerator factors as , so the inequation is , equivalently after multiplying both sides by (which flips the sign). Now sign-table .
Stage 1, mark the zeroes and the discontinuity. The numerator gives zeroes at and ; the denominator gives a discontinuity at , which is excluded from the outset. These three values cut the line into four intervals.
Stage 2, find the sign of each factor in every interval. Test , one inside each interval, and record the sign of each of , and . Each linear factor is negative to the left of its own zero and positive to the right, so every row is a clean run of minuses then pluses.
Stage 3, combine the signs into the quotient row. In each interval, multiply the two numerator signs and divide by the denominator sign: , then , then , then . So the quotient row is . A quotient sign behaves just like a product sign, since dividing by a negative flips the result exactly as multiplying by one would.
Stage 4, read off the solution and fix the endpoints. We need the quotient , so keep the intervals where it is positive, and . Fix the endpoints: include the numerator zeroes and (there the quotient equals , allowed by ), and exclude the discontinuity . The solution is or .
How exam questions ask about the sign of a function
The wording tells you what the table is for:
- "Draw up a table of signs for " or "examine the sign of ". Factor, list zeroes and discontinuities, test one value per interval, and state the sign on each piece. This is the direct task.
- "Hence solve (or , , )". Read the inequation straight off the sign row you just built: keep the intervals with the matching sign and fix the endpoints by the rules below.
- "Find the zeroes and discontinuities, and hence sketch the curve". Use the sign table to know which side of the axis the curve is on in each interval, then add the intercepts and asymptotes. The sketch will be incomplete without turning points, but the sign pattern is the skeleton.
- "For what values of is ?" Rewrite as and sign-table the difference. "Above" means the difference is positive.
- "Solve (a fraction against a constant)". Subtract first, combine into one fraction, then sign-table; or multiply by the square of the denominator. Never multiply by the bare denominator.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of NESA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
HSC-style3 marksDraw up a table of signs for , and hence solve .Show worked answer →
The factored form already gives the zeroes: , and . A polynomial has no discontinuities, so these are the only places the sign can change. They cut the number line into four intervals; pick one test value in each.
So the sign row is across , , , .
We want , so keep the intervals where is negative and, because the inequality is weak, include the zeroes where :
Markers reward computing a test value in every interval, the correct sign row, and including the zeroes for the weak inequality.
HSC-style3 marksFind the zero and the discontinuity of , and state where the function is positive and where it is negative.Show worked answer →
The function is zero where the numerator is zero, at , and is undefined (discontinuous) where the denominator is zero, at . These are the only two places the sign can change, so they split the line into three intervals. Test one value in each:
So the sign row is across , , .
Hence is positive for or , and negative for . The sign genuinely changes at both the zero and the discontinuity .
Markers reward identifying both the zero and the discontinuity, testing each interval, and stating the sign on each piece.
Practice questions
Original practice questions graded from foundation to exam level, each with a full worked solution. Try them before revealing the solution.
foundation2 marksSolve using a table of signs.Show worked solution →
List the zeroes. The factored form gives zeroes at , and . A polynomial has no discontinuities, so these are the only places the sign can change. They cut the line into four intervals.
Test one value in each interval. Take :
So the sign row is across , , , .
Keep the positive intervals. We want , and the inequality is strict, so exclude the zeroes.
Answer: or .
core3 marksSolve , taking care over the repeated factor.Show worked solution →
Find the zeroes and their multiplicities. The zeroes are (from the single factor ) and (from the squared factor , a double zero). They cut the line into three intervals.
Test one value in each interval. Take :
So the sign row is across , , .
- Read the repeated factor
- The sign does not change across the double zero , because on both sides; the run of pluses confirms it. The only sign change is at the simple zero .
- Keep the negative interval
- We want , which holds only on . The strict inequality excludes (where ) anyway.
- Answer
- .
core3 marksFind the zero and the discontinuity of , and hence solve .Show worked solution →
Locate the critical values. The expression is zero where the numerator is zero, at , and undefined where the denominator is zero, at . These split the line into three intervals.
Test one value in each interval. Take :
So the sign row is across , , .
Fix the endpoints. We want the quotient , so keep the positive intervals. Include , where the numerator is zero so the quotient equals (allowed by ). Exclude , where the expression is undefined.
Answer: or .
exam4 marksSolve by collecting everything on one side as a single fraction, then using a table of signs.Show worked solution →
Move the constant across first. Do not multiply by , whose sign is unknown. Subtract from both sides and combine over the common denominator :
- Simplify the sign question
- The numerator is the constant , so is equivalent to , which (since the numerator is positive) holds exactly when .
- Watch the discontinuity
- The original expression is undefined at , and the rearranged fraction can never equal (its numerator is ), so is excluded and no endpoint is gained there.
- Solve
- gives .
- Check
- At , , true. At , , false, so is correctly excluded.
- Answer
- .
exam4 marksFor , draw up a table of signs, state the -intercept, and hence solve . Use the table to describe how the curve meets the -axis at each zero.Show worked solution →
Find the zeroes and multiplicities. The zeroes are (simple) and (double, from ). They cut the line into three intervals.
Test one value in each interval. Take :
So the sign row is across , , .
- Read the y-intercept
- , so the curve cuts the -axis at .
- Describe each zero from the signs
- At the sign changes from to , so the curve crosses the -axis there. At the sign does not change (it stays ), so the curve touches the -axis and turns back, the hallmark of a double zero.
- Solve the inequation
- We want . The function is positive on and , zero at and , and these two intervals plus the touching point join into one piece. Including the zeroes (weak inequality):
- Answer
- .
Related dot points
- Solve absolute value inequations of the form |ax + b| < k, and inequations with the unknown in the denominator, by multiplying through by the square of the denominator
The Year 11 Extension 1 dot point on inequations with an absolute value or a pronumeral in the denominator. Three equivalent methods for |ax + b| < k, the multiply-by-the-square trick for rational inequations, the degenerate cases, and where students lose marks.
- Sketch the graph of from the graph of : turn zeroes into vertical asymptotes, send large values to small ones, fix the points where , and flip a maximum to a minimum where keeps its sign
The Year 11 Extension 1 dot point on sketching the reciprocal of a graphed function. Why zeroes of f become vertical asymptotes of 1/f, why large values become small, why the points where f equals plus or minus one are fixed, why a maximum flips to a minimum where f keeps its sign, how a horizontal asymptote at y = L moves to y = 1/L, and the edge cases textbooks bury.
- Sketch by reflecting the part of below the -axis upward, and sketch by keeping the part right of the -axis and mirroring it across the -axis, recognising that is always even and that the two transformations coincide only in special cases
The Year 11 Extension 1 dot point on the two absolute-value graph transformations. Why y = |f(x)| flips the part below the x-axis upward (so y stays at least zero) while y = f(|x|) discards the left half and mirrors the right half (always even), where they differ, how to combine them in order, and why |2^x| = 2^x.
- Form the inverse relation by reflecting in the line , use the horizontal line test to decide whether the inverse is a function, find the rule for and verify it by showing , swap the domain and range, and restrict a domain so that a many-to-one function gains an inverse
The Year 11 Extension 1 dot point on inverse relations and functions. Swap x and y to get the inverse (a reflection in y = x), use the horizontal line test to decide whether it is a function, find and verify f-inverse by composition, swap the domain and range, and restrict a domain so a many-to-one function gains an inverse.
- Solve polynomial and rational inequalities by factoring and analysing the sign of each factor across critical values
A focused answer to the HSC Maths Extension 1 dot point on solving polynomial and rational inequalities. Sign tables, critical values, multiplicity behaviour, and the special care needed when a denominator is involved, with worked examples.