When every outcome is equally likely, how do you turn a probability into a ratio of two counts, and how do the counting moves (multiplication principle, permutations, combinations, complement, cases) supply both the favourable count and the total?
Compute probabilities of equally likely outcomes as P = (favourable outcomes)/(total outcomes) where both counts come from the counting methods (multiplication principle, ^{n}P_{r} and ^{n}C_{r}), and apply the complement, separate-pool multiplication, cases and inclusion-exclusion to find the favourable count for selection, card-hand, digit-string and with/without-replacement problems
Turning counting into probability. When outcomes are equally likely, P = favourable/total and both counts come from the multiplication principle, nPr and nCr. Committee and card-hand probabilities by combinations, exactly-k of a type, at-least-one by the complement, a five-digit-number probability, inclusion-exclusion, and with versus without replacement.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
What this dot point is asking
The three counting pages of this module gave you machinery for counting outcomes: the multiplication principle and ordered selections for counting in stages with and , the grouping, complement and cases moves for restricted arrangements, and combinations for unordered selections with . This page puts that machinery to work on probability. NESA's ME-A1 dot point asks you to compute a probability by counting: find the number of favourable outcomes and the number of total outcomes, then divide.
The single idea is the equally likely model. When every outcome of an experiment is equally likely, the probability of an event is
and the whole skill is using counting to fill in those two numbers. Both the numerator and the denominator are counts of the same kind of object, so they must be counted the same way: if the sample space is "all -card hands", the favourable count must also be a count of hands. Everything else is choosing the right counting tool for each count, the multiplication principle, a permutation, a combination, the complement, cases, or inclusion-exclusion, and being consistent about ordered versus unordered between the two counts.
The answer
The equally likely model: probability as a ratio of two counts
A probability experiment has a set of possible outcomes called the sample space , and an event is a subset of those outcomes. When the outcomes are equally likely, no single outcome is favoured over another, so the probability of is simply the share of outcomes that lie in . Drawing a card "at random", dealing a hand "at random", choosing a committee "at random", arranging letters "in random order": each phrase signals that the underlying outcomes are equally likely, which is exactly the licence to count.
The reason the formula works is a direct sum. Each of the outcomes carries the same probability , and the event contains of them, so
So a probability question becomes two counting questions: count the sample space, and count the favourable event. The art is choosing what an "outcome" is and counting consistently.
Ordered or unordered? Choose once, and use it for both counts
Before counting anything, settle the two questions that run through all of combinatorics: are the outcomes ordered or unordered, and, if ordered, is repetition allowed? The answer decides which tool counts the sample space, and you must then count the favourable event the same way. Both choices are valid as long as they match, because any consistent factor cancels in the ratio.
A clean illustration is dealing cards from a pack and asking for the probability of one club then two hearts in that order. Counting ordered outcomes, the sample space is , and the favourable outcomes are club, heart, heart, which is , giving . If instead the question asked for one club and two hearts in any order, the natural count is unordered: the sample space is and the favourable count is , giving , three times larger because the club can sit in any of three positions. The rule of thumb: if a problem can be done either way, use unordered selections, because the numbers are smaller and the combinations are easier to handle.
Selection probabilities with combinations
The commonest equally likely model is a random selection: a committee, a team, a hand, a handful of discs. Order does not matter, so the sample space is a combination, and the favourable count is a combination (or a product of combinations from separate pools). The whole pattern is
Take a committee of chosen at random from women and men, people in all. The sample space is every committee of , namely equally likely committees. To find , count the all-women committees, , and divide:
The same total serves every event for this committee. The diagram below shows how the committees split by the number of men, and where the favourable count of sits.
The bars make the shape of the problem visible: most committees are mixed, the all-women and all-men committees are rare, and the five case counts recover the whole sample space. That last fact is a free check: the favourable counts of all the disjoint cases must add to the total.
Exactly of a type, and the separate-pools rule
When an event fixes how many come from each pool, choose from each pool separately and multiply the combinations, then divide by the total. Staying with the committee of from women and men, the probability of exactly men chooses of the men and of the women:
The numerator multiplies because the two pools are chosen independently; the denominator is the same . Running through every value of "number of men" gives the full distribution, and the favourable counts are exactly the column counts in the diagram above. Because these cases are disjoint and exhaustive, their probabilities sum to :
which is the most reliable check available on a "by cases" probability.
Card-hand probabilities
A standard pack has cards in suits of . A poker-style hand of cards is an unordered selection, so the sample space is
equally likely hands, a number worth computing once and reusing. Every hand probability is then a combination count over . Three patterns cover most questions.
Exactly of one suit. For exactly hearts, choose of the hearts and the other from the non-hearts:
A specified split across two suits. For spades and hearts, choose from each suit and multiply:
All five of one suit (a flush). Any one of the suits supplies all cards, so multiply by :
Each is favourable-over-total with both counts as combinations of cards, the only difference being how the favourable hands are built.
"At least one" by the complement
"At least one" almost always fragments into several cases ("exactly one", "exactly two", ...), so it is far shorter to count the complement, "none", and subtract its probability from :
Deal cards and ask for . The complement is a hand with no ace, drawn from the non-aces, , so
Counting "at least one ace" directly would mean adding the exactly-one, exactly-two, exactly-three and exactly-four ace cases; the complement collapses all of that into one clean count.
A five-digit-number probability, and inclusion-exclusion
Digit problems use the multiplication principle for both counts. A five-digit number chosen at random has a first digit from to ( choices, since a number cannot start with ) and four further digits each from to , so the sample space is
equally likely numbers. For , reach for the complement: a number with no has choices for the first digit ( to except ) and for each of the other four ( to except ), so have no , and the rest have at least one:
The case tree shows the split: the whole sample space branches into "no " and "at least one ", and the favourable count is what is left after removing the complement.
When two "at least one" conditions are joined by "and", the complement of the event is an "or", and an "or" of overlapping sets needs inclusion-exclusion. For , let be the numbers with no and the numbers with no . Then the numbers failing the event (no or no ) form , and
Here , and (no and no ) has choices for the first digit and for each of the rest, . So
and the favourable numbers (at least one and at least one ) are everything else:
The key move is recognising that "and" on two at-least-one conditions complements to an "or", and that the "or" overlaps, so the overlap must be subtracted once.
With replacement versus without replacement
Whether an item is replaced between draws changes the model, and so changes both counts. Without replacement (or drawing all at once), the items drawn are distinct, so a selection of is naturally an unordered combination, and the probability is a ratio of combinations. With replacement, each draw is from the full set and the draws are independent, so probabilities multiply.
Take a bag of red, yellow and blue balls ( in all) and draw . Without replacement, the sample space is and uses the favourable count :
With replacement, each draw is yellow with probability independently, so
Replacement is slightly more likely here, because the proportion of yellow is held at on every draw, whereas without replacement each yellow removed leaves a smaller proportion for the next draw. Spotting "drawn together" or "all at once" (no replacement, combinations) versus "replaced before the next" (with replacement, independent multiplication) is half the battle on these questions.
How exam questions ask about this dot point
The wording tells you the model and the move. Map the phrase to the method:
- "...chosen / selected / drawn at random", "a committee / team / hand is formed". Equally likely outcomes: , almost always with combinations.
- "...all of one type", "all male", "all the same suit". Favourable is a single combination from one pool over the total: .
- "...exactly of one type and the rest another", "two men and three women". Multiply per-pool combinations in the numerator: .
- "...at least one", "at most", "none ... so find the chance of some". Complement: .
- "...at least one and at least one ", "contains both". Complement to an "or", then inclusion-exclusion on the overlap.
- "...a majority", "more Labor than Liberal", "at least ". Split into the qualifying cases, count each by multiplying pools, then add.
- "...a five-digit number / a four-digit code is chosen at random; find the probability that ...". Multiplication principle for both counts; mind the no-leading-zero restriction.
- "...drawn together / all at once / without replacement" versus "...replaced before the next draw". Combinations for without replacement; independent multiplication for with replacement.
Practice questions
Original practice questions graded from foundation to exam level, each with a full worked solution. Try them before revealing the solution.
foundation3 marksA club has members, of whom are men and are women. A committee of is chosen at random. (i) How many different committees are possible? (ii) Find the probability that the committee consists entirely of men.Show worked solution →
Part (i): the total is an unordered selection. A committee is unordered, so count combinations. Choose any of the members:
Part (ii): the favourable count is the all-men committees. All members come from the men:
Form the ratio favourable over total. Both counts use the same equally likely committees, so
Answer. (i) committees; (ii) .
foundation3 marksThe integers to are written on ten cards. Four cards are drawn at random (all at once). Find the probability that (i) the card numbered is among those drawn, and (ii) the card numbered is not drawn.Show worked solution →
Count the total selections. Four cards chosen from ten, order irrelevant:
Part (i): force card in, then choose the rest. With already drawn, the other cards come from the remaining , giving favourable selections:
Part (ii): ban card , then choose freely. Removing leaves cards, from which all are drawn, giving favourable selections:
Answer. (i) ; (ii) .
core4 marksFive cards are dealt from a standard pack of . Find the probability that (i) all five cards are hearts, and (ii) exactly one of the five cards is a heart. Leave each answer as a fraction and as a decimal to four places.Show worked solution →
Count the total number of hands. A hand is an unordered selection of from :
Part (i): all five from the hearts. The favourable count is , so
Part (ii): one heart and four non-hearts, multiplied. Choose of the hearts and of the non-hearts, then multiply (separate pools):
Hence
Answer. (i) ; (ii) .
core3 marksA five-digit number is chosen at random (so the first digit is not ). Find the probability that all five of its digits are different. Leave the answer as a fraction and as a decimal to four places.Show worked solution →
Count the total of five-digit numbers (the sample space). The first digit has choices ( to ), and each of the other four has choices:
Count the favourable numbers slot by slot, without repetition. The first digit avoids , so choices; the second avoids only the first used digit, so choices (the is now back in play); then , then , then :
Form the ratio.
Why the second slot still has . The first digit removed one value but freed nothing; the digit , banned only from the first slot, becomes available from the second slot onward, so the falling pattern is rather than .
Answer. .
exam4 marksA committee of is chosen at random from Labor and Liberal members of a council. Find the probability that Labor holds a majority on the committee (that is, at least of the members are from Labor). Leave the answer as a fraction and as a decimal to four places.Show worked solution →
Count the total committees. Five chosen from , order irrelevant:
Read 'majority' as the cases , or Labor, and add them. Each case fixes how many come from each pool, so multiply within a case and add across cases. The favourable count is
Evaluate each case.
Add and form the ratio. The favourable total is , so
Answer. .
exam4 marksA bag holds white and black discs. Three discs are taken. Find the probability that all three are black if (i) the discs are taken without replacement (all at once), and (ii) the discs are taken one at a time, each replaced before the next is drawn. Leave each answer as a fraction and as a decimal to four places.Show worked solution →
Part (i): without replacement is an unordered selection. The total is and the favourable count is the all-black selections :
Part (ii): with replacement, each draw is independent. The bag is restored each time, so each draw is black with probability , and the three draws multiply:
Compare the two. Replacement keeps black among every time, so it is slightly more likely to draw three blacks than the without-replacement case, where each black removed leaves fewer for the next draw.
Answer. (i) ; (ii) .
Related dot points
- Use the combination formula to count unordered selections, including with restrictions and complementary counting
A focused answer to the HSC Maths Extension 1 dot point on combinations. The combination formula, why you divide by , key identities, applications including complementary counting, splitting into groups, and at-least/at-most counts, with a stepped diagram and worked examples.
- Use the multiplication principle to count ordered selections across stages, count ordered selections with repetition as n^r and without repetition as nPr = n!/(n-r)!, and apply restriction techniques: deal with the difficulty first, fix a position, keep items together as a block, and count 'at least one' by the complement
A first-contact answer to the HSC Maths Extension 1 dot point on counting ordered selections. The multiplication principle across stages, ordered selections with repetition (n^r) versus without (nPr), and the restriction moves: deal with the difficulty first, fix a position, keep items together as a block, and count at-least-one by the complement, using the filled-box slot method.
- Apply three reusable counting principles to ordered arrangements with restrictions: keep tied items together by grouping them into a block and ordering inside it, count an unwanted condition and subtract it from the total (the complement), and split an 'or' count into non-overlapping cases, subtracting the overlap by inclusion-exclusion when the cases meet
The three restriction moves the HSC Extension 1 counting dot point keeps testing. Group tied items into a block and order inside it, count the unwanted and subtract it (the complement), and split an 'or' count into cases, subtracting the overlap by inclusion-exclusion. Includes a symmetry shortcut, slot diagrams and a Venn picture.
- Define and evaluate factorials, use the recursive relation n! = n(n-1)!, and simplify factorial expressions and fractions by unrolling and cancelling
A first-contact answer to the HSC Maths Extension 1 dot point on factorial notation. What n! means, why 0! = 1, the recursive rule n! = n(n-1)!, and how unrolling cancels factorial fractions, combines them over a common factorial, and counts trailing zeroes, with the arranging-in-a-row motivation and worked examples.
- State and use the binomial theorem, identify general and specific terms, and relate it to Pascal's triangle
A focused answer to the HSC Maths Extension 1 dot point on the binomial theorem. The expansion of using binomial coefficients, the general term , applications to coefficient finding and approximation, and Pascal's triangle built row by row, with worked examples.
- Compute exact probabilities for the binomial distribution including , , , and use complementary counting
A focused answer to the HSC Maths Extension 1 dot point on computing binomial probabilities. Exact pmf values, cumulative sums, complements (at least, at most), and standard problem patterns, with worked examples.