Skip to main content

Contemporary issue: discrimination in securing shelter: HSC Legal Studies

Syllabus dot point

“Contemporary issues concerning shelter: discrimination; identify and investigate this issue involving the provision of shelter and evaluate the effectiveness of legal and non-legal responses”

HSCLegal StudiesOption: Shelter14 min read

Quick answer

Discrimination in shelter means people are refused housing, offered worse terms, harassed or evicted because of who they are, most often in the private rental market, where agents and landlords choose among many applicants. Research (AHURI, 2021) identifies Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, ethnic minorities, migrants and refugees, people with disability, young people, single parents, low-income households and domestic violence survivors as most affected. The Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) and the federal Racial, Sex, Disability and Age Discrimination Acts make discrimination in accommodation unlawful on protected grounds, with complaints to Anti-Discrimination NSW (then NCAT) or the Australian Human Rights Commission. But the law works poorly in renting: rejected applicants rarely know why, much disadvantage (income, children, pets) is lawful, and Anti-Discrimination NSW received only 100 accommodation complaints in 2024-25. Tenancy reforms help indirectly: since 19 May 2025 a landlord needs a reason and evidence to evict, pets can no longer be banned outright, and tenancy databases are regulated. The law addresses discrimination in shelter to a limited extent.

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. In one sentence
  4. Try this
  5. Exam-style questions

What this dot point is asking

Discrimination is one of the four contemporary issues that must be studied in the Shelter option of the Legal Studies Stage 6 Syllabus (2009). You must identify and investigate the issue and evaluate the effectiveness of legal and non-legal responses to it.

It was examined in 2023, when Question 30(a) paired it with homelessness: "To what extent do legal responses relating to shelter address discrimination and homelessness?". NESA's feedback praised answers that linked discrimination to the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW), noting that no-grounds evictions made discrimination hard to prove, and asked students to focus on legal responses rather than statistics or description.

The must-know spine

Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) (accommodation provisions; shared accommodation exception; carer's responsibilities only in employment); NSW Law Reform Commission review (consultation papers May 2025 and July 2026; no final report yet). Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) s 12; Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth); Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) s 25; Age Discrimination Act 2004 (Cth). CERD art 5(e)(iii); CRPD arts 9, 19, 28. ADNSW 2024-25: 1,945 complaints; 100 in accommodation (disability 46, race 20, victimisation 17). AHURI Final Report 363 (2021). RTA: reasonable grounds for eviction (19 May 2025); pets (deemed consent after 21 days); tenancy database rules; DV termination; retaliatory eviction challenges; Residential Tenancies Amendment (Protection of Personal Information) Bill 2025 (introduced June 2025, passed September 2026, expected to start early 2027). NCC 2022 Livable Housing Design Standard (NSW opted out). Special measures: Aboriginal Housing Office; priority housing for DV survivors.

The answer

Identifying the issue

Where it happens:

  • Private rental selection. Agents and landlords often receive many applications and choose without giving reasons. The Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI Final Report 363, 2021) found discrimination is "a key issue in the private rental market", often subtle: minority applicants may be asked for more information, told a property is no longer available, or treated less courteously. It described "statistical discrimination", choosing tenants by stereotypes about which groups are risky.
  • During and at the end of tenancies. Harassment, refusal of repairs, higher rent and eviction.
  • Shared living. Strata by-laws and boarding house rules that exclude people with disability or assistance animals.
  • Buying and building. Housing that is not accessible to people with disability.

Who is affected (AHURI, 2021): Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people; established ethnic minorities, especially non-white Australians; new migrants and refugees; low-income households; young people and students; single parents; older people; victim-survivors of domestic violence; and LGBTIQ people. Discrimination is intersectional: an Aboriginal single mother on income support faces several barriers at once.

Complaints are rare. Anti-Discrimination NSW received 1,945 complaints in 2024-25, but only 100 (5.1 per cent) concerned accommodation, most about disability (46), race (20) and victimisation (17). The low number reflects how hard rental discrimination is to detect and prove, not its rarity.

Legal responses: anti-discrimination law

The Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) makes it unlawful for a person, whether as principal or agent, to discriminate in accommodation on grounds including race, sex (including pregnancy and breastfeeding), marital or domestic status, disability, homosexuality, transgender status and age: by refusing an application, offering worse terms, denying access to benefits, evicting, or subjecting the person to any other detriment. Sexual harassment and victimisation are also prohibited. Complaints go to Anti-Discrimination NSW, which conciliates; unresolved complaints can go to NCAT, which can award damages and order the respondent to stop.

Federal law gives parallel protection: the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (s 12, land, housing and accommodation), Sex Discrimination Act 1984, Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (s 25, accommodation, including refusing a person with an assistance animal) and Age Discrimination Act 2004. Complaints go to the Australian Human Rights Commission, then the federal courts. These Acts implement Australia's obligations under CERD (art 5(e)(iii), equal enjoyment of the right to housing) and the CRPD.

Gaps in the law:

  • Lawful discrimination. Much common rental disadvantage is not unlawful: refusing people on income support or low incomes, people with pets (apart from assistance animals) and, in NSW, families with children (carer's responsibilities are protected only in employment). The Tenants' Union describes this as the gap between unlawful and lawful discrimination.
  • Exceptions. Anti-discrimination laws generally do not apply to shared accommodation where the accommodator or a relative lives on the premises with only a few others.
  • Proof. The complainant must prove the reason for their treatment, which is almost impossible when an agent simply chooses another applicant.
  • An old NSW Act. The NSW Law Reform Commission is reviewing the Act; its first consultation paper (20 May 2025) dealt with unlawful conduct, including the protected attributes and areas of public life, a second paper (24 July 2026) dealt with complaint procedures and remedies, and no final report had been released by September 2026.

Legal responses: tenancy law and housing policy

Because complaints law struggles, tenancy law and housing policy often do more:

  • Reasonable grounds for eviction (19 May 2025). Before the reforms, a landlord could end many tenancies with no reason, so a discriminatory or retaliatory eviction could be disguised, a point NESA's 2023 feedback specifically rewarded. Now the landlord must give a lawful ground and evidence, and NCAT can set aside a notice that is not genuine or is retaliatory.
  • Pets (19 May 2025). Blanket "no pets" rules are gone; landlords can refuse only on permitted grounds, and consent is deemed after 21 days. Assistance animals are separately protected under disability discrimination law.
  • Tenancy databases. The Residential Tenancies Act regulates "blacklists": a landlord or agent can list a tenant only for specified reasons, must notify them, and must remove outdated or inaccurate listings.
  • Domestic violence. Victim-survivors can end a tenancy immediately, without penalty, by giving a DV termination notice with evidence.
  • Application information. The Residential Tenancies Amendment (Protection of Personal Information) Bill 2025, introduced in June 2025 and passed by Parliament on 24 September 2026, requires a standard rental application form and stops landlords and agents asking for unnecessary details such as personal photos, social media accounts or details about applicants' children. The new laws are expected to start in early 2027, and should reduce opportunities for discrimination.
  • Special measures. Social housing allocations prioritise people escaping domestic violence and people experiencing homelessness, and the Aboriginal Housing Office provides housing for Aboriginal people; these are lawful special measures to overcome disadvantage. NCAT's Aboriginal Tenancy List makes the tribunal more accessible.
  • Accessible housing. The 2022 National Construction Code introduced minimum accessibility standards for new homes (the Livable Housing Design Standard), but NSW opted out, relying on planning guidance and council requirements, which disability advocates criticise as leaving people with disability with few accessible homes to rent or buy.

Non-legal responses

  • The Tenants' Union of NSW and Tenants' Advice and Advocacy Services publish guidance on discrimination and help renters make complaints.
  • Research by AHURI and universities documents the problem and informs reform.
  • Advocacy by First Nations, disability and multicultural organisations pushes for reform of the NSW Act and accessible housing standards.
  • Industry education: agents' training and codes of conduct under the Property and Stock Agents Act 2002 (NSW).
  • The media exposes blatant cases, such as advertisements that exclude groups.

Evaluating the effectiveness of legal and non-legal responses

Criterion Strengths Weaknesses
Prohibiting discrimination Clear state and federal prohibitions in accommodation; damages available Exceptions and lawful grounds (income, children, pets)
Access to remedies Free conciliation at ADNSW and the AHRC; NCAT; costs protection in federal courts Only 100 accommodation complaints in 2024-25; renters rarely complain while searching for a home
Proof Tenancy reforms require reasons for eviction; retaliation can be challenged Selection decisions are unexplained; discrimination is subtle
Systemic change Special measures; application data limits passed (2026, expected to start 2027); pet reforms NSW opted out of accessible housing standards; NSW Act review unfinished
Non-legal Guidance and research No power to compel landlords

Judgement. Legal responses address discrimination in shelter only to a limited extent. The law clearly prohibits the most serious forms, and NSW tenancy reforms since 2025 have made discriminatory evictions harder to disguise. But a complaints-based model works badly in a competitive rental market where rejected applicants never learn why, and much disadvantage is lawful. The most effective responses are structural: requiring reasons for eviction, limiting what information agents can collect, increasing social housing and building accessible homes, rather than relying on individual complaints.

Common traps
Writing only statistics and description
NESA's 2023 feedback asked for legal responses and judgement.
Assuming all unfair treatment is unlawful
Refusing tenants on income support, with pets or (in NSW) with children is generally lawful.
Forgetting the link to eviction reform
The end of no-grounds evictions on 19 May 2025 is the strongest recent legal response to hidden discrimination.
Inventing cases
If you use a case, make sure it is real and accurately described; otherwise use data and legislation.

In one sentence

Discrimination keeps many Aboriginal, migrant, disabled, young, low-income and single-parent households out of secure shelter, and although NSW and federal law prohibit discrimination in accommodation and the 2025 tenancy reforms make discriminatory evictions harder to hide, the complaints-based model, lawful exclusions and weak accessibility standards mean the law addresses the issue only to a limited extent.

Try this

Q1. Identify TWO groups that face discrimination in the rental market and outline how. (4 marks)

  • What the marker wants. Two groups with specific forms of discrimination (for example, Aboriginal applicants told a property is unavailable; people with disability refused modifications).

Q2. Explain how the end of no-grounds evictions affects discrimination against tenants. (5 marks)

  • What the marker wants. The pre-2025 position, the new grounds and evidence requirements, retaliation challenges at NCAT, and a limit.

Q3. Assess the effectiveness of anti-discrimination law in protecting people seeking shelter. (8 marks)

  • What the marker wants. State and federal Acts, complaint processes and data, lawful discrimination and proof problems, and a judgement.

Exam-style questions

Questions in the style of NESA exam questions on this dot point, each with a worked answer. They are written by ExamExplained unless tagged "Past paper"; the year shows the paper a question is modelled on.

2023 HSC Q30 (a)Past paper25 marks
To what extent do legal responses relating to shelter address discrimination and homelessness?
Show worked answer →

Criteria (NESA 2023 marking guidelines). 21-25: comprehensive understanding of legal responses relating to shelter; an informed judgement about the extent to which legal responses relating to shelter address discrimination and homelessness; integrates relevant examples such as legislation, cases, media, international instruments and documents; sustained, logical and cohesive. NESA's feedback praised answers using the national housing and homelessness agreement and the impact of "no-grounds" evictions on proving discrimination under the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW), and judging that the law responds better in some areas than others; it asked students to move beyond statistics and description, to focus on legal (not non-legal) responses, and to integrate cases.

A plan. Discrimination (this page): Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) and federal Acts; hard to prove in rental selection; the end of no-grounds evictions (19 May 2025) makes discriminatory evictions harder to disguise; tenancy database rules; pet reforms; ADNSW data (100 accommodation complaints in 2024-25); lawful discrimination (income, children, pets). Homelessness (see the homelessness page): NASHH, the NSW Homelessness Strategy 2025-2035, specialist services, public space laws. Judgement: addresses discrimination to a limited extent and homelessness to a moderate extent.

Source: NESA, 2023 HSC Legal Studies examination, Section III, Question 30(a), and 2023 marking guidelines and feedback.

Original25 marks
Evaluate the effectiveness of legal and non-legal responses in addressing discrimination against people seeking shelter.
Show worked answer →
Thesis
Anti-discrimination law prohibits the most serious forms of discrimination in accommodation, but it is only effective to a limited extent in securing shelter because rental discrimination is hidden, hard to prove, and in many cases lawful.
The issue
Groups affected: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, ethnic minorities, migrants and refugees, people with disability, young people, single parents, people on income support, victim-survivors of domestic violence (AHURI 2021).
Legal responses
Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW); Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) s 12; Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) s 25; Sex and Age Discrimination Acts. Tenancy reforms: reasonable grounds for eviction (2025), pets, tenancy database rules, DV protections, limits on application data (passed September 2026, expected to start in early 2027). Social housing priority for Aboriginal people and DV survivors.
Non-legal
Tenants' Union guidance, advocacy, media, research.
Limits
Only 100 accommodation complaints to ADNSW in 2024-25; unlawful discrimination rarely provable; lawful discrimination (income, children, pets); NSW opted out of national accessible housing standards.
Judgement
Limited to moderate effectiveness; tenancy reform helps more than complaints law.
Band guide (modelled on NESA Section III criteria)
21-25: extensive understanding, informed judgement, integrated legislation, cases, media and reports, sustained and cohesive. 16-20: sound judgement with relevant examples. 11-15: describes the law with some judgement. 6-10: descriptive. 1-5: general statements.
Original6 marks
Explain why discrimination in the private rental market is difficult to address through the law.
Show worked answer →

Anti-discrimination law relies on individual complaints. A rejected applicant rarely knows why they were refused, because landlords and agents choose between many applicants and do not give reasons, so direct discrimination is hard to prove. Some treatment that disadvantages groups is lawful: refusing people on low incomes, people with children or people with pets is not generally prohibited. Complaints to Anti-Discrimination NSW about accommodation are few (100 in 2024-25), and renters under pressure to find a home seldom pursue them. Until 19 May 2025, landlords could also end tenancies without giving a reason, which made discriminatory evictions hard to prove.

Marking pattern (Original): 5-6 for proof, lawful discrimination, complaints-based model and evidence; 3-4 for a sound explanation; 1-2 for general points.

Practise this

Sources & how we know this

ExamExplained