Skip to main content
ExamExplained
WA · Modern History
Modern History study scene
§-Syllabus dot point
WAModern HistorySyllabus dot point

How did Europe change between the end of World War II and the early 21st century?

The division and reunification of Europe, the Cold War in Europe, European integration, and the collapse of communism after 1989

A focused answer to the WACE Modern History Unit 4 elective on the changing European world since 1945, covering the division of Europe, the Cold War, European integration, the fall of communism in 1989, and the new European order.

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

What this dot point is asking

SCSA wants you to explain how Europe was transformed from the devastated, divided continent of 1945 into the integrated, post-Cold War Europe of the early 21st century. You need to handle the division of Europe by the Cold War, the contrasting development of Western and Eastern Europe, the project of European integration, the collapse of communism in 1989, and the new European order that followed. The elective is examined through source analysis and essays in the external paper.

Europe in 1945 was shattered: cities destroyed, economies ruined, millions dead or displaced. It quickly became the central arena of the Cold War. As described in the Cold War elective, the wartime alliance broke down, the Iron Curtain divided the continent, and Europe split into two blocs, the Western democracies aligned with the United States and the Eastern states under Soviet control. Germany itself was divided, and the Berlin Wall, built in 1961, became the physical symbol of a divided Europe.

The two halves of Europe developed very differently. Western Europe recovered with remarkable speed, aided by the Marshall Plan and by the post-war economic boom. Democratic governments and welfare states were rebuilt, and Western Europe enjoyed rising prosperity. Eastern Europe, by contrast, was reshaped on the Soviet model: one-party rule, planned economies and subordination to Moscow. Attempts to break free, the Hungarian Uprising of 1956 and the Prague Spring of 1968, were crushed by Soviet force, confirming the limits of Eastern European autonomy.

European integration was driven by the determination never to repeat the catastrophe of two world wars, and by the economic logic of a common market. Beginning with six nations, the community widened and deepened across the decades. Integration bound former enemies, especially France and West Germany, into cooperation, and created a distinctive model of pooled sovereignty that transformed the politics of Western Europe.

The decisive turning point was 1989. Mikhail Gorbachev's reforms and his refusal to use force to prop up Eastern European regimes removed the threat that had held the Soviet bloc together. In 1989 communist governments across Eastern Europe collapsed in a wave of largely peaceful revolutions, culminating in the fall of the Berlin Wall on 9 November 1989. Germany was reunified in 1990, the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, and the Cold War division of Europe ended.

The new European order brought both opportunity and instability. Formerly communist states moved towards democracy and the market and sought to join NATO and the European Union, which expanded eastward. But the collapse of communism also unleashed conflict, most tragically in the violent break-up of Yugoslavia through the 1990s. By 2001 Europe was being remade as an enlarging, integrating community, though questions about its borders, identity and unity remained open.

Historiographically, debate surrounds the causes of the 1989 revolutions, balancing Gorbachev's choices, the structural failure of the communist economies, and the agency of Eastern European dissidents and movements such as Poland's Solidarity. There is also debate over European integration: whether it is best understood as driven by idealistic peace-building, by economic self-interest, or by the strategic context of the Cold War.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of SCSA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

WACE 20218 marksEvaluate the usefulness of Sources 1 and 2 (a Western and an Eastern bloc account of the Berlin Wall) for a historian investigating the division of Europe, referring to their content, origin and perspective.
Show worked answer →

An 8 mark usefulness question wants a structured evaluation of each source against the inquiry.

Set up the inquiry. Restate that the historian is investigating the division of Europe.

Source by source. For each account, identify origin (Western or Eastern bloc) and perspective, revealing how each side justified or condemned the Berlin Wall, the physical symbol of a divided Europe.

Comparative judgement. Conclude they are very useful together because the opposing perspectives reveal the ideological division of the continent. Explain that each propaganda source is useful for showing its side's worldview.

Markers reward evaluation against the question, attention to origin and perspective, and the recognition that opposing sources reveal division.

WACE 202316 marksTo what extent was European integration the most significant development in Europe since 1945?
Show worked answer →

A 16 mark essay needs a thesis weighing integration against the Cold War division and 1989.

Thesis. Argue that integration was a transformative and distinctive development, but it must be weighed against the Cold War division and the revolutions of 1989, which were equally significant.

Integration. Show the ECSC of 1951, the Treaty of Rome of 1957, the EEC, the Maastricht Treaty of 1992 and the euro, binding former enemies such as France and West Germany.

The division and its end. Weigh the Iron Curtain, the contrasting paths of West and East, the crushing of Hungary 1956 and Prague 1968, and the 1989 revolutions reunifying Germany in 1990.

The connection. Argue integration and the end of division together remade Europe, with eastward EU enlargement linking them.

Judgement. Conclude with a position on relative significance, and reference debates over whether integration was idealistic or self-interested.

Markers reward a weighed thesis keeping integration central, accurate evidence, and a clear answer to "to what extent".

ExamExplained