Skip to main content
ExamExplained
WA · Earth and Environmental Science
Earth and Environmental Science study scene
§-Syllabus dot point
WAEarth and Environmental ScienceSyllabus dot point

How does nitrogen cycle through ecosystems and how do humans alter it?

Explain the nitrogen cycle and how human activity disrupts it

A focused answer to the WACE Year 12 Earth and Environmental Science dot point on the nitrogen cycle. Covers nitrogen fixation, nitrification, assimilation, ammonification and denitrification, the role of bacteria, and human disruption through fertiliser use and eutrophication, with Australian context.

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

What this dot point is asking

SCSA wants you to explain the steps of the nitrogen cycle, the central role of microorganisms, and how human activity overloads the system. The key tension is that nitrogen is abundant in the air as unreactive nitrogen gas, yet often limits plant growth because most organisms cannot use that form directly.

Why nitrogen needs converting

The atmosphere is about 78 percent nitrogen gas, but the strong triple bond in the molecule makes it inert. Plants and animals cannot use nitrogen gas directly; they need it in reactive forms such as ammonium or nitrate. Converting nitrogen between these forms is what the cycle does, and bacteria do most of the work.

The steps of the cycle

  • Nitrogen fixation. Specialised bacteria, including those in legume root nodules, and lightning convert nitrogen gas into ammonia or ammonium.
  • Nitrification. Soil bacteria oxidise ammonium to nitrite and then nitrate, the form plants take up most readily.
  • Assimilation. Plants absorb nitrate and ammonium and build them into proteins and nucleic acids; animals get nitrogen by eating plants.
  • Ammonification. Decomposers break down dead organisms and waste, returning nitrogen to the soil as ammonium.
  • Denitrification. Other bacteria convert nitrate back to nitrogen gas, completing the cycle by returning nitrogen to the atmosphere.

How humans disrupt the cycle

The biggest human change is the industrial production of nitrogen fertiliser, which fixes atmospheric nitrogen on a vast scale, roughly doubling the natural input of reactive nitrogen to ecosystems.

  • Fertiliser runoff. Excess nitrate washes from farmland into rivers, wetlands and the sea.
  • Eutrophication. The added nutrients trigger algal blooms; when the algae die and decompose, oxygen is consumed, killing fish and other life. Australian waterways and estuaries, including parts of the Swan-Canning system, have suffered nutrient-driven algal blooms.
  • Other effects include nitrous oxide emissions, a potent greenhouse gas, and the leaching of nitrate into groundwater.

The Haber process and the scale of human change

The single biggest disruption to the global nitrogen cycle is industrial nitrogen fixation through the Haber process, which combines atmospheric nitrogen with hydrogen under high temperature and pressure to make ammonia for fertiliser. This one technology now fixes a quantity of reactive nitrogen comparable to all natural fixation combined, so humans have roughly doubled the rate at which nitrogen enters the biosphere in reactive form. The benefit is enormous (the food supply for billions depends on it), but the consequence is a flood of reactive nitrogen that natural denitrification cannot keep pace with, so reactive nitrogen accumulates in soils, water and the atmosphere. This is why SCSA frames the nitrogen cycle as a system humans have fundamentally altered, not merely nudged, and why the impacts (eutrophication, nitrate in groundwater, nitrous oxide emissions) appear at local, regional and global scales at once.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of SCSA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

WACE 20226 marksA flow diagram of the nitrogen cycle shows arrows labelled W, X, Y and Z connecting atmospheric nitrogen gas, soil ammonium, soil nitrate and plant protein. Describe the process represented by each of nitrogen fixation, nitrification, assimilation and denitrification, and state the type of organism responsible for each where relevant.
Show worked answer →

A 6 mark answer rewards a correct process description and the organism for each step.

Nitrogen fixation
Converts inert atmospheric nitrogen gas into ammonia or ammonium, carried out by nitrogen-fixing bacteria (for example in legume root nodules); a small amount is fixed by lightning.
Nitrification
Soil bacteria oxidise ammonium to nitrite and then nitrate, the form plants take up most readily; carried out by nitrifying bacteria.
Assimilation
Plants absorb nitrate and ammonium and build them into proteins and nucleic acids; animals assimilate nitrogen by eating plants. No bacteria needed.
Denitrification
Bacteria convert nitrate back to nitrogen gas under low-oxygen conditions, returning nitrogen to the atmosphere; carried out by denitrifying bacteria.

Markers reward an accurate one-line process for each step and naming the responsible bacteria for fixation, nitrification and denitrification.

WACE 20207 marksExplain how the industrial production and use of nitrogen fertiliser disrupts the nitrogen cycle, and evaluate one strategy farmers could use to reduce this impact.
Show worked answer →

A 7 mark answer needs the disruption explained plus an evaluated strategy.

Disruption. Industrial fixation manufactures reactive nitrogen on a vast scale, roughly doubling the natural input to ecosystems. Applied as fertiliser beyond crop uptake, the surplus nitrate leaches into groundwater and runs off into rivers and estuaries, driving eutrophication (algal blooms, then oxygen depletion and fish kills). Denitrification of the excess also releases nitrous oxide, a potent greenhouse gas.

Strategy and evaluation. Matching fertiliser application to crop demand (precision application, split timing, soil testing) reduces the surplus available to leach. Strength: it directly cuts runoff and nitrous oxide while saving cost. Limitation: it requires testing, equipment and good rainfall prediction, and weather can still wash applied nitrogen off before uptake. Buffer strips of vegetation along waterways are a complementary measure. The judgement: demand-matched application is effective and economically attractive but cannot fully eliminate losses.

Markers reward the scale-of-fixation and runoff-to-eutrophication chain plus a strategy with a balanced evaluation.

ExamExplained