Skip to main content

Bad and Doubtful Debts WACE Accounting and Finance Unit 3

Syllabus dot point

“Distinguish bad debts from doubtful debts, write off a bad debt, create and adjust an allowance for doubtful debts, and present accounts receivable at net realisable value”

WACEAccountingUnit 3: Financial Accounting8 min read

Quick answer

A bad debt is a receivable known to be uncollectable, so it is written off against the customer's account. A doubtful debt is one that might not be collected, estimated at balance day and recognised through an Allowance for Doubtful Debts. Doubtful debts expense is the change needed to bring the allowance to its required level. On the balance sheet, accounts receivable less the allowance equals net realisable value, the amount the business expects to actually collect.

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. Bad debts versus doubtful debts
  3. Writing off a bad debt
  4. The allowance for doubtful debts
  5. Why write-offs against the allowance do not touch profit
  6. Recovering a debt previously written off
  7. Net realisable value
  8. Exam-style questions

What this dot point is asking

SCSA wants you to distinguish the two, record the write-off and the allowance adjustment, and present receivables net of the allowance.

Bad debts versus doubtful debts

Bad debt and doubtful debt

A bad debt is a specific receivable now considered uncollectable, for example because the customer has become insolvent. It is removed from accounts receivable by writing it off. A doubtful debt is an estimate, made at balance day, of receivables that may not be collected in future. It is recognised by raising or adjusting an Allowance for Doubtful Debts, a contra-asset that offsets accounts receivable.

Writing off a bad debt

When a debt is known to be bad, remove it: debit Allowance for Doubtful Debts (if an allowance exists) or Bad Debts Expense, and credit Accounts Receivable. Writing a debt off against an existing allowance does not affect profit again, because the expense was already recognised when the allowance was created.

The allowance for doubtful debts

The allowance applies the matching principle: the estimated cost of uncollectable sales is recognised in the same period the sales revenue is earned, not later when specific debts go bad.

Adjusting the allowance

Doubtful debts expense is the amount needed to move the allowance from its current balance to the required closing balance. If the required allowance is larger than the existing balance, the difference is an expense (debit Doubtful Debts Expense, credit Allowance). If the required allowance is smaller, the excess is reversed (debit Allowance, credit a recovery or reduction in expense). You adjust to the target, you do not simply add the full estimate every year.

Why write-offs against the allowance do not touch profit

A point students often miss is that writing off a bad debt against an existing allowance is profit-neutral. The expense was already recognised in an earlier period when the allowance was created or topped up. The write-off simply removes the specific uncollectable receivable and draws down the allowance that was set aside for exactly this purpose: debit Allowance for Doubtful Debts, credit Accounts Receivable. Both accounts fall, net realisable value is unchanged, and the Income Statement is untouched. Profit is affected only when the allowance is later adjusted back up to its required level, which is a separate step. If no allowance exists, the write-off instead debits Bad Debts Expense directly, which does hit profit; but under the allowance method the two steps are kept distinct.

Recovering a debt previously written off

Occasionally a customer pays a debt that was already written off. This is handled by reversing the write-off to reinstate the receivable, then recording the cash collection normally. The reinstatement restores the asset and the cash receipt clears it, recognising a recovery rather than ordinary revenue. The point for the exam is that the recovery is not new sales income; it corrects an earlier estimate that turned out to be too pessimistic.

Net realisable value

On the Balance Sheet, accounts receivable is shown at gross, less the allowance, to give net realisable value:

Net realisable value=Accounts receivable−Allowance for doubtful debts\text{Net realisable value} = \text{Accounts receivable} - \text{Allowance for doubtful debts}

Write-off then adjust the allowance

At year end, Tarin Ltd has accounts receivable of $80 000 and an existing Allowance for Doubtful Debts of $2 000. A customer owing $1 200 is confirmed uncollectable, and the allowance must then be adjusted to management's estimate.

Step 1: Write off the bad debt

Because an allowance already exists, the write-off goes against the allowance rather than to expense, keeping the Income Statement untouched at this step. The entry is debit Allowance for Doubtful Debts $1 200, credit Accounts Receivable $1 200. After the write-off, accounts receivable falls to $78 800 and the allowance balance falls to $800.

Step 2: Calculate the required allowance

Management estimates that 5 per cent of the remaining receivables will not be collected. Applying the rate to the post-write-off balance:

0.05×78 800=3 9400.05 \times 78\,800 = 3\,940

This $3 940 is the closing allowance balance needed, not an additional charge on top of what already exists.

Step 3: Compute the adjustment needed

The allowance currently stands at only $800, so an additional $3 140 must be recognised as Doubtful Debts Expense to bring it up to the required $3 940. The entry is debit Doubtful Debts Expense $3 140, credit Allowance for Doubtful Debts $3 140. Only the top-up hits the Income Statement; the earlier write-off against the existing allowance was profit-neutral.

3 940−800=3 140 expense3\,940 - 800 = 3\,140 \text{ expense}

Step 4: Present net realisable value

On the Balance Sheet, accounts receivable is shown at its gross amount less the closing allowance, giving the amount the business expects to collect:

78 800−3 940=74 86078\,800 - 3\,940 = 74\,860

Final answer: Doubtful Debts Expense is $3 140 and net realisable value of accounts receivable is $74 860.

Recording the full estimate instead of the adjustment

Students often debit doubtful debts expense for the whole required allowance, ignoring the balance already there. The expense is only the movement needed to reach the required closing allowance. If $800 already sits in the allowance and $3 940 is required, the expense is $3 140, not $3 940. Charging the full amount double counts the existing allowance and overstates the expense.

Exam-style questions

Questions in the style of SCSA exam questions on this dot point, each with a worked answer. They are written by ExamExplained unless tagged "Past paper"; the year shows the paper a question is modelled on.

WACE 2021-style8 marks
At 30 June, Dorrin Ltd has accounts receivable of $120 000 and an Allowance for Doubtful Debts of $3 500. A customer owing $2 000 is confirmed uncollectable. Management then estimates the required allowance at 4 per cent of remaining receivables. Record the write-off and the allowance adjustment, calculate net realisable value, and state the total expense recognised.
Show worked answer →

An 8 mark response needs the write-off, the new required allowance, the adjustment, and net realisable value.

Write-off. Debit Allowance for Doubtful Debts 2 0002\,000, credit Accounts Receivable 2 0002\,000. Receivables now 118 000118\,000; allowance now 1 5001\,500.

Required allowance =0.04×118 000=4 720= 0.04 \times 118\,000 = 4\,720. The allowance must rise from 1 5001\,500 to 4 7204\,720, a top-up of 3 2203\,220. Adjustment: debit Doubtful Debts Expense 3 2203\,220, credit Allowance 3 2203\,220.

Net realisable value =118 000−4 720=113 280= 118\,000 - 4\,720 = 113\,280. The expense recognised this year is the 3 2203\,220 doubtful debts expense (the write-off itself hit the existing allowance, not the Income Statement).

Markers reward the write-off against the allowance, the correctly apportioned top-up (not the full 4 7204\,720), net realisable value, and identifying the expense as the adjustment only.

WACE 2023-style5 marks
Distinguish a bad debt from a doubtful debt, and explain how using an Allowance for Doubtful Debts applies the matching principle better than only writing off debts when they actually go bad.
Show worked answer →

A 5 mark response needs the distinction and the matching argument.

A bad debt is a specific receivable now known to be uncollectable and is written off. A doubtful debt is an estimate at balance day of receivables that may not be collected, recognised through the Allowance for Doubtful Debts (a contra-asset).

Matching. The allowance recognises the estimated cost of uncollectable sales in the same period the sales revenue is earned, rather than waiting until a later period when specific debts are confirmed bad. Writing off only when debts actually fail would understate expenses in the year of sale and overstate them later, breaching the accrual basis. Markers reward the clear distinction and the explicit link to recognising the expense in the period of the related revenue.

Practise this

Sources & how we know this

ExamExplained