Evidence for special relativity: muons, accelerators and GPS: VCE Physics Unit 4
“Explain and analyse examples of special relativity: muons reaching Earth despite their short half-lives, the design of particle accelerator lengths, and the correction of GPS satellite time signals for orbital speed”
Muons made high in the atmosphere reach the ground because their clocks run slow in our frame (time dilation), or equivalently because the atmosphere is contracted in their frame. Accelerators must allow for the contracted length seen by the fast particles, and GPS satellite clocks must be corrected for the time dilation caused by their orbital speed.
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
VCAA lists three examples you must be able to explain and analyse:
- muons can reach Earth even though their half-lives suggest they should decay in the upper atmosphere;
- particle accelerator lengths must be designed with special relativity in mind;
- GPS satellite time signals must be corrected for the effect of their orbital speed.
For each you should be able to explain it in words and do a calculation with and .
Example 1: muons from the upper atmosphere
Cosmic rays strike nuclei high in the atmosphere and make unstable particles called muons. Muons travel at close to . A muon has a half-life of about measured in its own rest frame (its mean lifetime is about , which is a half-life of ). Without relativity, even at nearly a muon would travel only about m in one half-life, so almost none should survive a trip of many kilometres. Yet large numbers are detected at the surface.
Explanation in the Earth frame (time dilation). The muon's half-life is its proper time. In our frame its clock runs slow, so the half-life we measure is times longer, and the muon travels times further.
Explanation in the muon frame (length contraction). The muon's half-life is unchanged, but the atmosphere rushes towards it at nearly and is length contracted. The distance to the ground is much shorter, so the muon gets there in only a few half-lives.
A muon is created km above the ground and travels straight down at . Take its half-life as in its own frame.
- Without relativity
- Distance in one half-life m. The trip is half-lives, so the surviving fraction is . Essentially none would arrive.
- Earth frame
- Travel time s . The dilated half-life is , so the trip lasts half-lives. Surviving fraction , about .
- Muon frame
- The height is contracted to km. Travel time , which is half-lives. The same .
The survival-fraction calculation () goes beyond the study design's key knowledge, which asks you to explain why muons reach Earth. It is included to show the size of the effect.
Both frames agree on the physical outcome (about survive). Without relativity the prediction is wrong by a factor of about .
Example 2: particle accelerators
In a linear accelerator, particles travel along a long tube of fixed length as measured in the laboratory. As the particles approach , the tube is length contracted in their frame, and the time they spend in it is short. Designers must use the relativistic relations when planning the machine. Classical formulas would give speeds above at these energies.
A km long linear accelerator brings electrons to a total energy of GeV. The electron rest energy is MeV. Find the length of the accelerator in the electrons' frame.
m, about cm.
To the electrons, the whole km machine is only a few centimetres long. (The relation is developed on the mass-energy page.)
Example 3: GPS satellites
GPS positions are found by comparing time signals from several satellites, each carrying an atomic clock. Light travels about m in a nanosecond, so the clocks must agree to a few nanoseconds.
The satellites orbit at about km s relative to the centre of the Earth. Their clocks are moving, so seen from the ground they run slow by time dilation. Without correction, this speed effect alone would build up an error of several microseconds each day. The system corrects for it, so the clocks match ground time.
For the very small speeds involved, , so the fractional slowing is . This approximation is a shortcut beyond the study design; you only need to use .
A GPS satellite has speed km s. By how much does special relativity make its clock lag behind a ground clock in one day?
Fractional difference
One day s, so the lag is s .
Left uncorrected, a signal-timing error of corresponds to a distance of km of ranging error per day from this effect alone.
The study design asks only about the correction for orbital speed. (General relativity also changes the clock rate because of the satellite's height in Earth's gravity, but that is beyond this key knowledge.)
- Not saying whose time is proper
- For muons, the proper half-life is measured in the muon frame. The ground sees the dilated half-life.
- Giving only one frame
- A strong answer can state the explanation in the Earth frame (time dilation) and mention the muon-frame explanation (length contraction).
- Using the classical distance
- Compute only to show what would happen without relativity, and label it as a prediction that fails.
- Saying GPS is "faster so more accurate"
- The satellite clocks run slow relative to the ground because they are moving, and the system must be corrected.
Try this
Q1. Explain why muons produced in the upper atmosphere can be detected at the surface even though their half-life is only about . [3 marks]
- Cue. Their speed is close to . In the Earth frame their clocks run slow, so the half-life measured on Earth is longer (time dilation) and they travel further before decaying. In the muon frame the atmosphere is length contracted so the distance is shorter.
Q2. A muon travels at . Calculate its Lorentz factor, its half-life as measured on Earth and the distance it travels in that time. Use a rest-frame half-life of . [4 marks]
- Cue. . . Distance km.
Q3. Explain why the length of a linear accelerator is not the length the electrons "see". [2 marks]
- Cue. The accelerator is at rest in the lab so its lab length is the proper length. In the frame of the fast electrons it is contracted by a factor of .
Q4. State why the clocks on GPS satellites must be corrected for special relativity. [2 marks]
- Cue. The satellites move at high speed relative to the ground, so by time dilation their clocks run slow relative to ground clocks. Uncorrected, the accumulating timing error would give large position errors.