How has Australia used health promotion to reduce smoking and its burden of disease?
Initiatives and strategies, including those reflecting the action areas of the Ottawa Charter, used to promote health and reduce tobacco smoking in Australia
VCE HHD Unit 3 AoS 2 case study of tobacco control in Australia - taxation, plain packaging, advertising bans and campaigns mapped to the Ottawa Charter.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
What this dot point is asking
This dot point asks you to describe Australia's tobacco control measures, explain how they reduced smoking and its burden of disease, and classify each measure against the Ottawa Charter action areas. Tobacco is the classic application case because every action area can be illustrated and the data show a clear long-term decline.
Why tobacco matters
Tobacco smoking has long been one of the leading preventable causes of burden of disease in Australia, driving cancers, cardiovascular disease and respiratory disease. Daily smoking among adults has fallen from roughly a quarter of the population in the 1990s to around one in ten today, one of the great public health successes, achieved through sustained, layered health promotion rather than a single measure.
Key initiatives and the Ottawa Charter
Build healthy public policy. Government policy has done the heavy lifting:
- High and rising tobacco excise (taxation), making cigarettes among the most expensive in the world to reduce affordability.
- Plain packaging laws, which removed branding and added large graphic health warnings.
- Bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship.
- Laws banning the sale of tobacco to minors.
- Create supportive environments
- Smoke-free laws ban smoking in workplaces, restaurants, pubs, public transport and many outdoor areas, making the non-smoking choice the easy default and protecting people from second-hand smoke.
- Develop personal skills
- Mass-media campaigns such as the long-running Quit campaign and graphic anti-smoking advertising teach people the risks and the skills to quit, supported by services such as the Quitline phone counselling line.
- Strengthen community action
- Organisations such as Quit and the Cancer Council work with communities and have built broad public support that made tough policies politically possible.
- Reorient health services
- GPs are encouraged to ask about smoking, advise quitting and prescribe nicotine replacement therapy, shifting clinical care toward prevention.
Evaluating the strategy
The strength of Australia's approach is that it uses every Ottawa Charter action area at once, so policy, environment, education and clinical care reinforce one another. The result is a sustained fall in smoking prevalence and, with a lag, falling rates of lung cancer and other smoking-related disease. Remaining challenges include higher smoking rates among some groups, such as people in low socioeconomic areas and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, and new products such as vaping, which has prompted further policy responses.
When asked to evaluate, judge effectiveness against criteria such as reach across the population, the determinants addressed and the reduction in smoking prevalence and tobacco-related burden of disease over time.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of VCAA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
2025 VCAA7 marksa. Explain two ways in which smoking/vaping may affect health outcomes in Australia. (4 marks)
b. Describe one initiative based on the social model of health and outline how it could reduce rates of smoking/vaping. (3 marks)
Show worked answer →
Part a (4 marks): two distinct effects on health outcomes, each explained (2 marks each). For example, smoking damages the lungs and airways, causing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer, which increases morbidity and mortality (2 marks). Secondly, smoking and vaping raise the burden of disease and place pressure on the health system, while also harming mental health and wellbeing through addiction and the stress of ill health (2 marks). Frame each in terms of a health outcome such as morbidity, mortality or burden of disease.
Part b (3 marks): Name one social-model initiative (1 mark), for example mass-media anti-smoking campaigns, plain packaging and graphic health warnings, or smoke-free public-place laws. Then outline how it reduces smoking/vaping (about 2 marks): for example, graphic warnings and hard-hitting campaigns raise awareness of the harms and discourage people from starting or continuing, while smoke-free laws reduce the social acceptability and opportunities to smoke, lowering rates. The initiative must reflect the social model (addressing the broader determinants and using health promotion), not a biomedical treatment.