Healthy eating initiatives: The Australian Dietary Guidelines and the Guides to Healthy Eating for VCE Health and Human Development Unit 3 AoS 2
“Initiatives to promote healthy eating in Australia, including the Australian Dietary Guidelines, the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Guide to Healthy Eating”
Australia's main healthy eating initiatives are the Australian Dietary Guidelines (five evidence-based guidelines from the NHMRC, 2013), the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating (a visual plate showing the proportions of the five food groups) and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Guide to Healthy Eating (the same proportions, adapted with culturally relevant foods and design). They develop personal skills by informing choices, and they underpin labelling, school and health service programs. Their impact has been limited: in 2023 only 4.3 per cent of Australians aged 2 and over usually ate enough vegetables (ABS), because information alone cannot overcome cost, access and marketing.
Jump to a section
- What this dot point is asking
- Why healthy eating is a priority
- The Australian Dietary Guidelines
- The Australian Guide to Healthy Eating
- The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Guide to Healthy Eating
- Other initiatives that build on the Guidelines
- Evaluating their impact
- Command terms and how to answer them
- How this dot point appears in the VCE exam
- Exam-style questions
What this dot point is asking
The 2025 study design key knowledge is "initiatives to promote healthy eating in Australia, including the Australian Dietary Guidelines, the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Guide to Healthy Eating". The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Guide is new to this study design, and it was examined in the first exam (2025 Q2a). The matching key skill is to "evaluate the impact of initiatives to promote healthy eating in Australia and their ability to improve health outcomes". The barriers that limit their impact are a separate key knowledge point, covered in challenges in bringing about nutritional change.
Why healthy eating is a priority
- Dietary risks caused 4.8 per cent of Australia's total burden of disease in 2024, the third-largest risk factor group after overweight and obesity (8.3 per cent) and tobacco use (7.6 per cent). A diet low in legumes contributed most, followed by a diet high in sodium, low in wholegrains and high-fibre cereals, and high in red meat (AIHW).
- Dietary risks contributed 22 per cent of the burden from coronary heart disease in 2024 (AIHW).
- In 2023, 31.3 per cent of daily energy came from discretionary foods, average sodium intake was just under 2,400 mg a day, and 63.7 per cent of people had an inadequate calcium intake (ABS).
The Australian Dietary Guidelines
The Australian Dietary Guidelines were published by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) in 2013. They are based on a review of the scientific evidence about the types and amounts of foods that promote health and wellbeing and reduce the risk of diet-related chronic disease. They apply to healthy Australians of all ages, not people who need special diets for a medical condition. The NHMRC is reviewing them, and the 2013 Guidelines remain the current advice while that review continues.
The five guidelines (summarised):
- Achieve and maintain a healthy weight: be physically active and choose amounts of nutritious food and drinks to meet your energy needs.
- Enjoy a wide variety of nutritious foods from the five food groups every day: plenty of vegetables of different types and colours, and legumes/beans; fruit; grain (cereal) foods, mostly wholegrain and/or high cereal fibre; lean meats and poultry, fish, eggs, tofu, nuts and seeds, and legumes/beans; milk, yoghurt, cheese and/or alternatives, mostly reduced fat. And drink plenty of water.
- Limit intake of foods containing saturated fat, added salt, added sugars and alcohol.
- Encourage, support and promote breastfeeding.
- Care for your food: prepare and store it safely.
Recommended serves. The Guidelines give a minimum number of serves from each food group by age and sex. For example, adults aged 19 to 50 are advised to eat 2 serves of fruit a day and 6 serves (men) or 5 serves (women) of vegetables (ABS summary of the NHMRC recommendations).
How each guideline links to health outcomes:
| Guideline | Main health outcomes targeted |
|---|---|
| 1 Healthy weight | Lower prevalence of overweight and obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, osteoarthritis |
| 2 Five food groups and water | More fibre (lower bowel cancer and constipation risk), calcium (bone health, less osteoporosis), vitamins and antioxidants |
| 3 Limit saturated fat, salt, sugar, alcohol | Lower blood cholesterol and blood pressure, less coronary heart disease and stroke, less tooth decay, less alcohol-related harm |
| 4 Breastfeeding | Stronger infant immunity, fewer infections, lower risk of later obesity |
| 5 Food safety | Fewer cases of food poisoning |
The Australian Guide to Healthy Eating
The Australian Guide to Healthy Eating is the visual food selection guide that turns Guidelines 2 and 3 into a picture. It is a circle (plate) divided into the five food groups, with each segment sized to show the proportion of the total diet that should come from that group.
- The largest segments are vegetables and legumes, and grain (cereal) foods; fruit, lean meats and alternatives, and dairy and alternatives are smaller.
- A glass of water sits beside the plate.
- Unsaturated spreads and oils are shown as "use small amounts".
- Discretionary foods (such as cakes, chips, soft drinks and alcohol) sit outside the plate as "only sometimes and in small amounts".
It shows proportions, not amounts: the 2025 examiners noted this common error.
The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Guide to Healthy Eating
The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Guide to Healthy Eating is adapted from the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating so that the same evidence-based advice is presented in a culturally relevant way.
Similarities (2025 examiners' report): both visually represent the five food groups; the proportions recommended for each group are the same; both promote drinking water.
Differences (2025 examiners' report):
- it includes culturally relevant foods such as kangaroo and damper, and other traditional foods such as bush fruits and seafood;
- it uses muted, earthy tones, while the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating is blue and green.
Why a culturally adapted guide matters. Health promotion is more effective when people see their own foods and culture reflected in it. Including traditional foods values Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander knowledge and connection to Country, supports self-determination in choosing healthy foods, and can promote spiritual and social health and wellbeing as well as physical. It reflects the social justice principle of equity: providing what a group needs rather than one generic resource for everyone.
Limitations. Like the Australian Guide, it gives advice but does not change food prices or availability. In remote communities, where fresh foods cost far more (a healthy food basket cost 40 per cent more in remote Northern Territory stores than in district centre supermarkets in 2023, NT Health), the barrier is often access rather than knowledge. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples are diverse, with many different cultures, languages and foods, so one national guide cannot represent every community.
Always write "Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander" in full. The 2025 examiners' report states that abbreviating the term is considered culturally inappropriate. Use "Peoples" (plural) when referring to the many distinct nations and communities.
Other initiatives that build on the Guidelines
- Health Star Rating. A front-of-pack label that rates packaged foods from half a star to five stars, based on the same nutrition principles. It is currently voluntary; after a target of 70 per cent of intended products by November 2025 was not met, food ministers in February 2026 asked Food Standards Australia New Zealand to consider making it mandatory (Proposal P1067, first call for submissions 7 May to 5 July 2026).
- Eat for Health. The Australian Government's website publishes the Guidelines, both Guides, serve size information and resources for health professionals and educators.
- Schools and health services. Teachers, dietitians and GPs use the Guidelines and Guides in education and counselling, reorienting health services towards prevention.
Evaluating their impact
| Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|
| Based on a systematic review of scientific evidence | Advice only; no one is required to follow it |
| Free and available to everyone; the Guides are visual and easy to understand | The written guidelines and serve sizes can be hard to use for people with low literacy or limited English (2023 report) |
| The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Guide is culturally relevant | The written guidelines do not cater for different cultural eating patterns (2023 report) |
| Provide the basis for labelling, school canteen policies, health professional advice and food policy | Do not change cost, access, housing, time pressures or marketing |
| Discretionary foods fell from 35.4% (2011-12) to 31.3% (2023) of daily energy | Only 4.3% of people aged 2+ usually ate enough vegetables in 2023 (children 2.1%, adults 4.8%) |
Data on how far the population is from the Guidelines (ABS, usual intake, 2023):
| Food group | Met recommendation (people 2+) |
|---|---|
| Vegetables, legumes and beans | 4.3% |
| Milk, yoghurt, cheese and alternatives | 7.2% |
| Lean meat and alternatives | 20.6% |
| Fruit | 23.1% |
| Grains and cereals | 27.8% |
A self-reported measure tells the same story: in the National Health Survey 2022, only 6.5 per cent of adults met the vegetable recommendation, down from 7.5 per cent in 2017-18 (ABS). The Guidelines have not been enough, by themselves, to lift vegetable intake.
Link to the Ottawa Charter. The Guidelines and Guides mainly develop personal skills (knowledge and skills to choose healthy foods). Their impact improves when combined with healthy public policy (such as a mandatory Health Star Rating or healthy canteen policies), supportive environments (affordable fresh food), community action (community-led food programs) and reoriented health services (GPs and dietitians giving dietary advice).
Command terms and how to answer them
- Outline a similarity or difference: compare both guides in one sentence each ("Both ... ", "The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Guide ... whereas the Australian Guide ...").
- Explain how an initiative promotes health: initiative, then the behaviour it changes (specific food or nutrient), then the health outcome with a direction (for example lower incidence of bowel cancer).
- Analyse strengths and weaknesses: for each point, say why it helps or limits a specific change such as fibre intake (the 2023 report's main criticism).
- Evaluate: weigh strengths against limitations, use data, and finish with a judgement about the extent of the impact.
Question: Evaluate the ability of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Guide to Healthy Eating to improve health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples. (4 marks)
Step 1: What it does
It shows the five food groups in the recommended proportions, using culturally relevant foods such as kangaroo, bush fruits and seafood and an earthy design.
Step 2: Strength with a health outcome
Because people see foods from their own culture, the advice is more relevant and more likely to be followed, increasing intake of vegetables, fruit and lean protein and lowering the risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
Step 3: Limitation with a health outcome
It does not address the cost and availability of fresh food in remote communities, where a healthy food basket cost 40 per cent more than in district centre supermarkets (NT, 2023), so intake may not change.
Step 4: Judgement
It is a valuable, culturally safe education tool, but its ability to improve health outcomes is limited unless it is combined with action on food prices, supply and community-controlled programs.
Both Guides show the proportion of each food group in the total diet, not the amount. The number of serves comes from the Australian Dietary Guidelines' serve recommendations. VCAA flagged this error in 2025.
Listing features ("it has five food groups and a glass of water") earns little in an evaluate or analyse question. Each point needs a "which means ..." link to a specific dietary change and a health outcome, then a judgement.
Do not write "ATSI". VCAA's 2025 report describes abbreviating the term as culturally inappropriate.
How this dot point appears in the VCE exam
- Short answer (1 to 2 marks): outline a similarity or difference between the two Guides (2025 Q2a), or name a guideline.
- Explain or analyse (3 to 4 marks): strengths and weaknesses of the Guidelines for a specific nutrient such as fibre (2023 Q5c).
- Evaluate (4 to 6 marks): the ability of an initiative to improve health outcomes, using data on dietary intake and burden of disease, often paired with a challenges question.
Exam-style questions
Questions in the style of VCAA exam questions on this dot point, each with a worked answer. They are written by ExamExplained unless tagged "Past paper"; the year shows the paper a question is modelled on.
2025 VCAA Q2aPast paper2 marksOutline one similarity and one difference between the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Guide to Healthy Eating and the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating.Show worked answer →
Average 1.0 out of 2 (2025 examiners' report): 28 per cent scored 0, 47 per cent 1 and 25 per cent 2.
Accepted similarities (report): both contain a visual representation of the five food groups; the recommended proportions of the five food groups are the same in both; both promote drinking water.
Accepted differences (report): the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Guide to Healthy Eating includes cultural foods such as kangaroo and damper, which the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating does not; it uses muted, earthy tones, while the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating is blue and green.
- Why students lost marks
- Many wrote that both guides show the amount of food to eat; the report points out they show only the proportion of each food group in the overall diet. Others described one guide without comparing it with the other.
- High-scoring response (report, summarised)
- Similarity: both are visual tools showing the proportion of each of the five food groups that should be eaten. Difference: the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Guide to Healthy Eating features foods from Indigenous cultures such as bush fruits and kangaroo meat, whereas the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating shows more generic foods.
- Language note from the report
- Abbreviating "Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander" is considered culturally inappropriate. Write the term in full.
2023 VCAA Q5cPast paper4 marksAnalyse the strengths and weaknesses of the Australian Dietary Guidelines in terms of their ability to increase fibre intake in the Australian population.Show worked answer →
Average 1.2 out of 4 (2023 examiners' report); 38 per cent scored 0.
Strengths accepted (report): comprehensive guidance on the food groups to eat; serve sizes and daily serves itemised; the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating is part of the Guidelines and is a visual guide that is easy to understand; it shows a range of foods from different cuisines; Guideline 2 encourages a wide variety of foods from the five food groups, which include fibre-rich grains, fruits, vegetables and legumes.
Weaknesses accepted (report): hard to understand for people with low literacy or who are not native English speakers; the five written guidelines do not cater for different cultural eating patterns; calculating serve sizes and analysing intake is difficult and time consuming; mixed meals such as casseroles and soups are hard to analyse.
Why students lost marks. Many described features of the Guidelines without saying why each was a strength or weakness for increasing fibre intake.
Model answer. Strength: Guideline 2 recommends plenty of vegetables, legumes, fruit and mostly wholegrain cereals, all rich in fibre, and the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating shows these visually, so people can see what to eat more of and increase fibre intake. Weakness: the Guidelines are complex for people with low literacy, and working out serves is time consuming, so many people do not apply them and fibre intake stays low. On balance they give sound advice but depend on people being able and motivated to use it.
Original6 marksEvaluate the ability of the Australian Dietary Guidelines and the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating to improve health outcomes in Australia. Use data in your response.Show worked answer →
- Marks guide (Original, modelled on VCAA criteria)
- 5-6 marks: explains how the initiatives aim to improve health outcomes, uses accurate data, weighs strengths against limitations and makes a clear judgement. 3-4 marks: strengths and limitations with some link to health outcomes. 1-2 marks: describes the initiatives.
- How they aim to improve outcomes
- The Guidelines give evidence-based advice (eat a variety from the five food groups, limit saturated fat, added salt, added sugars and alcohol) and the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating shows the proportions visually. Following them lowers the risk of overweight and obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and some cancers, reducing morbidity and mortality.
- Strengths
- They are free, evidence-based and used across schools, health services and food policy; they reach the whole population and underpin other initiatives such as the Health Star Rating. Discretionary foods fell from 35.4 per cent of daily energy in 2011-12 to 31.3 per cent in 2023 (ABS).
- Limitations
- They are advice, not law, and do not remove barriers such as cost, access and marketing. In 2023 only 4.3 per cent of people aged 2 and over usually ate enough vegetables (ABS), and dietary risks still caused 4.8 per cent of the total burden of disease in 2024 (AIHW).
- Judgement
- They are an essential foundation for healthy eating but, on their own, have only a limited ability to improve health outcomes; they are most effective combined with healthy public policy and supportive environments.
Practise this
Sources & how we know this
- Consumption of food groups from the Australian Dietary Guidelines, 2023 — Australian Bureau of Statistics (2026)
- Food and nutrients, 2023 — Australian Bureau of Statistics (2025)
- Dietary behaviour, 2022 — Australian Bureau of Statistics (2023)
- Australian Burden of Disease Study 2024 — Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2024)
- Australian Dietary Guidelines — National Health and Medical Research Council (2013)
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Guide to Healthy Eating (poster) — Eat for Health, Australian Government
- P1067 - Health Star Rating System — Food Standards Australia New Zealand (2026)
- 2025 VCE Health and Human Development external assessment report — VCAA (2026)
- 2023 VCE Health and Human Development external assessment report — VCAA (2024)
- VCE Health and Human Development Study Design (from 2025) — VCAA
- VCE Health and Human Development: examination specifications, past examinations and reports — VCAA