How do you write a short, focused response that explains your inspiration and influences and links them to your own developing work?
Produce short written responses on inspiration and influences that connect your research to your own artmaking decisions.
How to write the short response on inspiration and influences in TCE Visual Art: structuring a focused written task, analysing rather than describing an influence, and explicitly linking researched artists to your own artmaking decisions.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
What this dot point is asking
Module 2 includes a written work requirement: short written responses on inspiration and influences. This is a distinct task from the visual diary annotations and from the longer reflective writing of Module 3. It is a concise, structured piece in which you explain what has inspired and influenced your developing work and, crucially, how. The course pairs the practical investigation with this writing so you can articulate the thinking behind your making, and doing it well is partly a matter of knowing what the task is actually asking for.
The single most important principle is the link. A response on influences is not a research report about an artist; it is an account of the relationship between that artist and your own work. The structure that always works is influence, analysis, application. Identify the influence specifically. Analyse what is significant about it, the particular strategy, device or idea you are responding to. Then state the application: how that has shaped a decision in your own artmaking. The third step is where the marks live, and it is the step weak responses omit entirely.
Be specific about the influence rather than general. Naming an artist and giving a potted biography is description and adds little. Instead, isolate the precise thing you are drawing on. It is far stronger to write that you were influenced by an artist's use of a single saturated accent in an otherwise neutral palette than to write that you were influenced by their use of colour, because the specific observation can be analysed and then applied, whereas the vague one cannot. Specificity in the influence makes a genuine link possible.
Analyse the influence, do not just admire it. The course rewards understanding, so explain why the strategy you have identified works and what it achieves. If you are influenced by an artist's layering of transparent media to suggest memory, analyse how transparency produces that sense of time and partial recall. This analytical layer shows you understand the influence well enough to use it deliberately, and it is the bridge between the source and your application. Without it, the link is asserted rather than reasoned.
Then make the application concrete and visible. Point to the actual decision in your work that the influence shaped: the device you adapted, how you changed it for your own subject, and what it now does in your piece. The strongest applications show transformation, not transplant. Saying you adopted layering but applied it to your own imagery and palette demonstrates that the influence was metabolised into your developing aesthetic rather than copied. This connects the written task directly to your personal visual aesthetic and to the artworks that may feed your Module 3 body of work.
Keep the writing focused and disciplined, because it is a short response. That means choosing a small number of genuine influences and treating each properly rather than scattering a long list of names with no analysis. Two or three influences explored with real influence, analysis, application depth will always outperform a roll-call. Use correct art-specific terminology, the elements and principles, technical and contextual vocabulary, because precise language signals genuine understanding and is part of what is assessed.
Treat the response as evidence, not decoration. Because it documents the reasoning behind your making, it is the written counterpart to the practical investigation in your diary, and it should be honest. If an influence led you somewhere and you then changed direction, that is worth saying, because it shows real decision-making. The task is ultimately a record of how research drove your practice, which is the heart of Module 2.
The short response on inspiration and influences is your chance to prove that your research did real work, so anchor every influence to a specific, analysed, applied decision and let the writing show the thinking behind the making.