How do we model quantities that grow or decay by a constant factor over time?
Model and analyse linear and geometric growth and decay using recurrence relations and rules.
Linear (arithmetic) versus geometric (exponential) growth and decay, recurrence relations, closed-form rules, and applications in TCE Mathematics Applications.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
What this dot point is asking
Growth and decay extend the financial recurrence ideas to any repeating process: populations, drug concentrations, radioactive material, or savings. The key question is whether each step adds a fixed amount (linear) or multiplies by a fixed factor (geometric).
Recurrence relations
A recurrence relation defines each term from the previous one and a starting value:
Linear: , with given. Here is growth, is decay.
Geometric: , with given. Here is growth, is decay.
The closed form lets you jump straight to any term without listing all the ones before it.
Recognising the model
If the differences between consecutive terms are constant, the data is linear. If the ratios between consecutive terms are constant, the data is geometric. Always test which one fits before choosing a rule.
Comparing the two models
Over the long run, geometric growth always overtakes linear growth, because multiplying repeatedly outpaces adding repeatedly. Geometric decay approaches zero but never quite reaches it, whereas linear decay hits zero (and would go negative if the rule kept applying).
Finding how long a change takes
A frequent task asks not for a value but for the time to reach a target: how long for an investment to double, or for a drug to fall below a threshold. Set the closed form equal to the target and solve for . Because is in the exponent, this needs logarithms or a guess-and-check on the calculator. For example, to find when first exceeds a target , solve , then , and round up to the next whole period because the target is reached part way through.
Sum of a finite geometric series
Many growth-and-decay problems ask for a running total, such as the total output over several years. The sum of the first terms of a geometric sequence is (equivalently for ). When the total over infinitely many periods converges to , which is what a "adding forever" question is testing.
A complete answer states the type of model, gives both the recurrence and the closed form, solves for time using logarithms where asked, and rounds sensibly to the context (whole people for populations, two decimals for milligrams).
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of TASC exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
TCE 20248 marksA table shows the declining births per year in a large country: 2021 (), 2022 (), 2023 (). a) Is the sequence arithmetic or geometric? Show working. b) Find the explicit rule. c) Predict the total births over the 10 years from 2021 (inclusive), to the nearest whole number. d) Adding the births forever, what is the total?Show worked answer →
a) (2 marks) Test ratios: and . The ratio is constant (the differences are not), so the sequence is geometric with .
b) (2 marks) Geometric rule with and : .
c) (2 marks) Sum of the first 10 terms births (nearest whole number).
d) (2 marks) Since , the infinite sum converges: . Adding forever does not give infinity; it approaches this fixed value (though in reality births cannot continue indefinitely).
TCE 20233 marksa) i. Growth of organisms in a petri dish follows Find an equation to model the sequence. ii. A herd of 1500 wildebeest grows by each year, but loses 40 to lion attacks each year. Find an equation to model the situation.Show worked answer →
a) i. (1 mark) Ratios: and , so this is geometric with and . Explicit rule: .
a) ii. (2 marks) Each year the herd grows by (multiply by ) then loses 40. This both multiplies and subtracts a fixed amount, so it is a first-order linear recurrence: , with . Markers want the multiplier and the subtraction of 40, not a pure geometric rule.
