How do you turn scattered evidence into a controlled, building argument?
Synthesise evidence from a text and structure it into a coherent, developing argument.
How to synthesise evidence and structure an argument in TCE English: selecting and combining evidence, sequencing ideas so the argument builds, and avoiding listing.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
This part of the course assesses how well you synthesise evidence and structure ideas. It is a different skill from analysing a single technique or writing a single paragraph. Synthesis is about bringing several pieces of evidence together so they reinforce one another, and structure is about ordering your ideas so the whole response builds toward a clear position. A student can analyse individual quotes beautifully and still write a weak response if those analyses sit in a random pile rather than a developing argument.
Synthesis begins with selection. You cannot use everything, so you choose the evidence that does the most work for your contention. The best evidence is specific, relevant and capable of being unpacked, not just the first quote you can find. Once you have selected, you combine. Two pieces of evidence placed side by side can prove something neither proves alone, especially when one confirms a pattern and the other complicates it. A response that shows a writer doing something early in a text and then doing it differently later has synthesised, because the second piece reframes the first.
Structuring so the argument develops
A strong response moves; a weak one repeats. The test is simple: if you could reorder your body paragraphs without anything breaking, your argument is not developing, it is listing. To make an argument build, each paragraph should advance the position beyond the previous one. You might move from establishing a pattern, to complicating it, to drawing out what it means, so that a reader feels the case getting stronger as it goes.
Topic sentences carry the structure. A good topic sentence states a claim that is part of your overall argument, not a description of what the paragraph will mention. Compare "This paragraph looks at imagery" with "The decay imagery hardens as the novel progresses, turning early unease into open dread." The second tells the reader where the argument has reached and where it is heading. When your topic sentences, read in order, sketch the spine of your whole case, your structure is working.
Linking and signposting
Cohesion is the glue. Transitions such as building on this, by contrast, and more tellingly do real work when they signal the logical relationship between ideas, not just decorate the seams. A reader should always know whether the next point adds to, qualifies or challenges the one before. This is where structure becomes visible on the page.
Plan structure before you write. A few words per intended paragraph, arranged so the argument clearly builds, will save you from the most common cause of mid range marks: good local analysis with no overall shape.