Analysing Values and Attitudes in Texts - TCE English (Tasmania)
“Analyse the values and attitudes a text promotes, challenges or assumes, and how it positions readers toward them.”
You need to uncover the values and attitudes a text promotes, challenges or quietly assumes, and explain how its choices position the reader to accept, question or resist those values. The focus is on ideology beneath the surface, not on plot.
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
The perspectives strand of the course asks you to read beneath the surface of a text to the values and attitudes it carries. Every text takes some things for granted and pushes others. A text might celebrate self reliance, distrust authority, or assume that family loyalty outranks personal happiness. Often these values are not stated; they are built into who the text rewards, who it punishes, and whose viewpoint it lets us share. Your task is to make those buried values visible and to show how the text steers the reader toward or against them.
Begin by distinguishing values from attitudes. A value is a broad principle a text treats as worthwhile, such as honesty, ambition or community. An attitude is the stance the text takes toward a particular subject, person or group, such as sympathy for the poor or scorn for the powerful. The two work together: a text that values community will usually show a warm attitude toward characters who sacrifice for others and a cold attitude toward those who put themselves first.
How texts position readers
The key concept is positioning. A text does not just hold values; it works to make the reader share them. It does this through point of view, by giving us access to one character's thoughts and not another's; through sympathy, by making some characters likeable and others repellent; through outcomes, by rewarding the behaviour it approves of and punishing what it condemns; and through language, by attaching warm or cold words to different ideas. When you analyse positioning, you explain the machinery that invites the reader to feel a certain way.
Watch especially for what a text assumes without arguing. These naturalised values are the hardest to see because the text presents them as obvious common sense rather than as a position. A film that treats wealth as the natural reward for hard work, or a novel that assumes the city is corrupt and the country pure, is asserting a value while pretending to describe reality. Naming an assumption a text never defends is some of the most sophisticated analysis you can offer.
Positioning is the way a text uses its choices, including viewpoint, sympathy, outcomes and language, to invite the reader to adopt particular values, attitudes and judgements, often without the reader noticing the invitation.
Reading with and against the text
Strong analysis can read both with the text and against it. Reading with the text means tracing how it wants to be received and what values it endorses. Reading against the text, sometimes called a resistant reading, means asking what the text leaves out, whose perspective it silences, and what its assumptions cost. Both are legitimate, and the most impressive responses move between them with control.
Whose hard work counts
Imagine a short story that follows a young entrepreneur who builds a business and is celebrated in the final scene. The narration grants us only his thoughts, the prose attaches words like grit and vision to his work, and the workers he employs appear only briefly and are never named. The story endorses the value of individual ambition and positions us to admire him, partly by withholding the inner lives of everyone whose labour made his success possible. A resistant reading notices that the text quietly assumes one person's effort is worth telling and others' is not. The point to analyse is not whether ambition is good, but how the text's choices make the reader take its hierarchy of effort for granted.
Stating that a text holds a value earns little. The marks come from showing the choices, such as viewpoint, sympathy, outcome and word choice, that position the reader to share it. Always connect a value back to the technique that promotes it.
A frequent error is to praise or condemn a text for matching or clashing with your own beliefs, rather than analysing the values the text itself carries. Your personal agreement is not the question. Keep the focus on what the text endorses and how it does so, and reserve your own judgement for a controlled, evidence based evaluation near the end of the response.
When you write, ground every claim about values in a specific choice the text makes. A value you assert without textual evidence is an opinion about life, not an analysis of a text, and only the second is being assessed here.
Exam-style questions
Questions in the style of TASC exam questions on this dot point, each with a worked answer. They are written by ExamExplained unless tagged "Past paper"; the year shows the paper a question is modelled on.
Practice15 marksSection B (Extended Response). Analyse the values a studied text endorses or challenges, and how it positions the reader toward them. Refer closely to the text.Show worked answer →
A high 15 mark response makes positioning the assessable skill, not a list of values.
Plan: name the value the text endorses and any it challenges or quietly assumes. Then choose the positioning techniques that promote them: point of view, distribution of sympathy, outcomes, and the warm or cold language attached to ideas.
Para 1: show how viewpoint and sympathy invite the reader to share a value, naming who we are given access to and who we are not.
Para 2: show how outcomes (who is rewarded, who punished) endorse a value through the text's own logic.
Para 3: surface an assumed or naturalised value the text never argues, and offer a brief resistant reading of what it costs.
Markers reward values grounded in specific choices and penalise confusing your own beliefs with the text's, or asserting a value with no technique behind it.
Practice10 marksSection A (Responding to Texts). Explain how the passage positions the reader to judge a character or group. Support your answer with close reference.Show worked answer →
A 10 mark answer explains the machinery of positioning rather than restating the judgement.
Open by naming the judgement the text invites (sympathy, scorn, suspicion) toward the character or group.
Body: take two or three choices that build it, such as whose thoughts we share, the connotation of the words attached to them, and whether the text grants or withholds their inner life.
Argue the effect of each choice on the reader's allegiance.
Markers reward analysis of how allegiance is steered and penalise simply agreeing or disagreeing with the text's judgement.