How do the zeros of a numerator and denominator dictate the shape of a rational function's graph?
Sketch graphs of rational functions, identifying intercepts, vertical asymptotes, and horizontal or oblique asymptotes.
Sketching rational functions by locating intercepts and vertical asymptotes from the denominator, and finding horizontal or oblique asymptotes from the degrees of numerator and denominator.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
You need to sketch graphs of rational functions, identifying their intercepts and their vertical, horizontal and oblique asymptotes.
Vertical asymptotes and intercepts
For with and sharing no common factors:
- Vertical asymptotes occur at the zeros of : the graph shoots to there. Check the sign of on each side to see whether the branch goes up or down.
- -intercepts occur where (provided there).
- -intercept is , when defined.
If and share a factor, that point is a hole (removable discontinuity), not an asymptote - cancel the common factor first.
Behaviour far from the origin
Finding an oblique asymptote
When the numerator degree is exactly one more than the denominator, polynomial long division writes . As the remainder term vanishes, so the line is the oblique asymptote.
Putting the features together into a sketch
A reliable sketching routine for any rational function is: factorise numerator and denominator; mark vertical asymptotes (denominator zeros) and intercepts (numerator zeros and ); determine the end behaviour from the degree comparison; then test the sign of on each interval the vertical asymptotes create. The sign test tells you which way each branch heads near an asymptote, and the end behaviour tells you how each branch settles far out. Joining these constraints smoothly, never crossing a vertical asymptote, produces an accurate graph. The order matters: features first, curve last.
A horizontal-asymptote example
For , the degrees are equal, so the horizontal asymptote is the ratio of leading coefficients . The denominator has no real zeros, so there are no vertical asymptotes; the -intercept is and the -intercepts solve .
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of SACE Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
SACE 20223 marksCalculator-assumed. Let . Identify the asymptotes and intercepts, and describe the sign of on each branch.Show worked answer →
Vertical asymptotes: the denominator is zero at and . [1 mark]
Horizontal asymptote: numerator degree , denominator degree , so as , ; the line is a horizontal asymptote. There is no -intercept (numerator ). The -intercept is . [1 mark]
Sign: for and the product , so (above the axis, approaching ). For the product is negative, so on the middle branch, dipping below the axis. [1 mark]
SACE 20234 marksCalculator-assumed. For , find all asymptotes and the -intercept, and state whether the curve has any -intercepts.Show worked answer →
Vertical asymptote: denominator zero at , numerator there is , so is a vertical asymptote. [1 mark]
Oblique asymptote: divide, . As the remainder term vanishes, so is an oblique asymptote. [2 marks]
Intercepts: -intercept ; has no real solutions, so no -intercepts. [1 mark]
SACE 20212 marksCalculator-assumed. State the horizontal asymptote of and explain why it has no vertical asymptotes.Show worked answer →
The degrees are equal, so the horizontal asymptote is the ratio of leading coefficients . [1 mark]
The denominator is never zero for real (since gives ), so there are no vertical asymptotes. [1 mark]
