Skip to main content
§-Philosophy syllabus
SA · SACE Board← Philosophy

Philosophy syllabus, dot point by dot point

Every dot point in the SA Philosophy subject outline, in syllabus order, with a focused answer for each. Open any dot point for the answer, exam-style questions and links to related points.

Epistemology

Topic overview →

Where does knowledge come from and can scepticism be answered?

What justifies our confidence that the future will resemble the past, and can inductive reasoning be rationally defended?

What does it mean for a belief or statement to be true?

Does perception give us direct knowledge of mind-independent objects, or only of our own sensory experiences?

What is knowledge and is justified true belief enough to have it?

Can we logically derive a conclusion about how things ought to be from premises only about how things are?

How should we decide what makes an action right or wrong?

How do general moral theories help us reason about concrete life and death cases such as euthanasia, abortion and animal welfare?

Are moral claims objectively true or merely expressions of attitude?

Is the existence of suffering and evil compatible with an all-powerful, all-knowing and wholly good God?

What is the relationship between the mind and the physical body?

What is the nature of causation, and can causal regularity be reconciled with the freedom we attribute to agents?

What makes a person at one time the same person as someone at a later time?

Can the existence of God be established by rational argument, and how strong are the classic proofs?

Are we free if every event is caused by prior events?

Philosophy of Mind

Topic overview →

Are mental states defined by what they do rather than what they are made of, and could a machine therefore think?

Why is there subjective experience at all, and can physical science explain what it is like to undergo a conscious state?

Reasoning and Argument Analysis

Topic overview →

What is the difference between an argument that guarantees its conclusion and one that only makes it probable?

How can the validity of an argument be tested by its logical form alone?

How do we tell a good argument from a bad one?

ExamExplained