Skip to main content
ExamExplained
SA · Math Methods
Math Methods study scene
§-Syllabus dot point
SAMath MethodsSyllabus dot point

What does the graph of a logarithmic function look like and how is it related to the exponential graph?

The logarithmic graph is the reflection of the exponential graph in the line y = x, with a vertical asymptote and a characteristic slow growth.

The shape, domain, asymptote and intercepts of y = log_a(x), how it reflects the exponential graph, and how transformations shift and stretch it.

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. Key features of y=logaxy=\log_a x (a>1a>1)
  3. Reflection of the exponential
  4. Transformations
  5. Vertical stretches and reflections
  6. Logarithmic scales in context
  7. Common errors
  8. Why it matters

What this dot point is asking

The logarithmic function is the inverse of the exponential function, so its graph is the exponential graph reflected in the line y=xy=x. Knowing the basic shape lets you sketch any transformed log curve. Because reflection in y=xy=x swaps the xx and yy roles, every feature of the exponential has a mirror feature on the log: the exponential's yy-intercept becomes the log's xx-intercept, and the exponential's horizontal asymptote becomes the log's vertical asymptote.

Key features of y=logaxy=\log_a x (a>1a>1)

The point (a,1)(a,1) also lies on the curve, since logaa=1\log_a a=1 - a handy second point when sketching.

Reflection of the exponential

The exponential y=axy=a^x has a horizontal asymptote (y=0y=0), domain all reals, and range y>0y>0. Reflecting in y=xy=x swaps these:

Feature y=axy=a^x y=logaxy=\log_a x
Domain all xx x>0x>0
Range y>0y>0 all yy
Asymptote y=0y=0 (horizontal) x=0x=0 (vertical)
Key point (0,1)(0,1) (1,0)(1,0)

This is exactly the inverse relationship: every point (p,q)(p,q) on y=axy=a^x becomes (q,p)(q,p) on y=logaxy=\log_a x.

Transformations

A transformed log function combines shifts and stretches. For y=loga(xh)+ky=\log_a(x-h)+k:

  • hh shifts the graph (and its asymptote) horizontally to x=hx=h.
  • kk shifts the graph vertically by kk.

Vertical stretches and reflections

A coefficient in front of the log, as in y=clogaxy=c\log_a x, stretches the graph vertically by factor cc; if cc is negative the graph also reflects in the xx-axis, so it falls instead of rising while keeping the same asymptote and xx-intercept at (1,0)(1,0). A coefficient inside, as in y=loga(bx)y=\log_a(bx), looks like a horizontal stretch but, by the product law, equals logax+logab\log_a x+\log_a b, which is just a vertical shift by logab\log_a b. Recognising that an inside multiplier becomes an additive constant is a favourite SACE testing point because it catches students who assume every inside change is a horizontal one.

Logarithmic scales in context

The slow growth of the log graph is exactly why logarithmic scales are used to display quantities that span many orders of magnitude. The Richter scale, the decibel scale and pH are all logarithmic: a one-unit increase corresponds to a tenfold change in the underlying quantity. On such a scale, equal spacings represent equal ratios rather than equal differences, which is the graphical signature of the log function and a context SACE often frames modelling questions around.

Common errors

Why it matters

Recognising the log graph's shape, domain and asymptote is examined directly and underpins your interpretation of logarithmic models (such as decibel, pH and Richter scales). It also reinforces the inverse relationship with exponentials that drives the equation-solving in this topic.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of SACE Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

SACE 20232 marksCalculator-free. Consider the graphs of f(x)=ln(5x)f(x) = \ln(5x) and g(x)=lnxg(x) = \ln x. Point AA is at (2,f(2))(2, f(2)) and point BB is at (2,g(2))(2, g(2)). Find the exact distance between AA and BB.
Show worked answer →

AA and BB share the same xx-coordinate, so the distance is the vertical gap f(2)g(2)|f(2) - g(2)|.

f(2)=ln(5×2)=ln10f(2) = \ln(5 \times 2) = \ln 10 and g(2)=ln2g(2) = \ln 2. By the quotient law,

ln10ln2=ln ⁣(102)=ln5.\ln 10 - \ln 2 = \ln\!\left(\frac{10}{2}\right) = \ln 5.

So the exact distance is ln5\ln 5 units. Marks: one for both heights, one for combining to the exact value ln5\ln 5. Leaving it exact (not 1.611.61) is required.

SACE 20222 marksCalculator-assumed. Comment on the relationship between the graphs of g(x)=lnxg(x) = \ln x and h(x)=ln(kx)h(x) = \ln(kx), where k>0k > 0, and state the effect on the asymptote.
Show worked answer →

Use the product law: h(x)=ln(kx)=lnk+lnx=g(x)+lnkh(x) = \ln(kx) = \ln k + \ln x = g(x) + \ln k.

So hh is gg translated vertically by lnk\ln k (upwards if k>1k > 1, downwards if 0<k<10 < k < 1). The vertical asymptote stays at x=0x = 0, because adding a constant does not move a vertical asymptote.

Marks: one for identifying the vertical translation by lnk\ln k, one for noting the asymptote is unchanged. The key insight is that a horizontal scale factor inside a log becomes an additive constant, a vertical shift, not a horizontal stretch.

SACE 20213 marksCalculator-assumed. The curve y=log2(x+4)y = \log_2(x + 4) is given. State its domain, the equation of its vertical asymptote, and its xx-intercept.
Show worked answer →

The argument must be positive: x+4>0x + 4 > 0, so the domain is x>4x > -4.

The vertical asymptote is where the argument is zero: x+4=0x + 4 = 0, giving x=4x = -4.

The xx-intercept is where y=0y = 0: log2(x+4)=0\log_2(x + 4) = 0 means x+4=20=1x + 4 = 2^0 = 1, so x=3x = -3, giving the point (3,0)(-3, 0).

Marks: one for the domain x>4x > -4, one for the asymptote x=4x = -4, one for the xx-intercept (3,0)(-3, 0).

ExamExplained