Skip to main content
ExamExplained
SA · General Mathematics
General Mathematics study scene
§-Syllabus dot point
SAGeneral MathematicsSyllabus dot point

How do we describe and compare values within a bell-shaped distribution?

Use the normal distribution, the 68-95-99.7 rule and z-scores to describe data and compare values from different distributions.

How to apply the 68-95-99.7 rule, calculate z-scores to standardise values, find proportions and compare results from different normal distributions.

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The shape of the normal distribution
  3. Z-scores: standardising a value
  4. Comparing values from different distributions
  5. The inverse problem: from proportion to value
  6. Comparing groups with different spreads
  7. Finding proportions and percentiles

What this dot point is asking

You must apply the 68-95-99.7 rule, compute and interpret z-scores, find proportions, and use z-scores to compare values from different distributions.

The shape of the normal distribution

A normal distribution is symmetric about its mean μ\mu, with most data clustered near the centre and the curve tailing off either side. Its spread is set by the standard deviation σ\sigma. The mean, median and mode all sit at the centre.

Z-scores: standardising a value

A z-score rescales any value so it can be compared on a common scale. It tells you how many standard deviations the value lies above (positive) or below (negative) the mean.

z=xμσz = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}

Comparing values from different distributions

Z-scores let you compare results measured on different scales, because they convert everything to "standard deviations from the mean."

The inverse problem: from proportion to value

Many SACE questions run the standardisation backwards: you are told a proportion or percentile and must find the corresponding value. Use the inverse normal to get the zz-score for that area, then unstandardise with x=μ+zσx = \mu + z\sigma. For example, the cut-off for the top 10% of a distribution has z1.2816z \approx 1.2816, and substituting the mean and standard deviation gives the actual boundary value. Watch the direction: "the slowest 2%" or "the fastest 2%" both refer to a lower-tail area, while "the top 5%" is an upper-tail area, so the sign of zz must match the side of the distribution the question describes.

Comparing groups with different spreads

A subtle but examinable point is that a larger standard deviation puts more of a distribution into the tails. Two groups with similar means can have very different proportions beyond a high threshold if their spreads differ, with the more variable group having more extreme values at both ends. This is why a candle type with a lower mean burn time can still have a greater proportion burning beyond a long target, as in the candle question above. Comparing zz-scores at the threshold, rather than comparing means, is the reliable way to settle such claims.

Finding proportions and percentiles

Beyond the round numbers of the empirical rule, a calculator gives the proportion below any z-score, which is the percentile. For example, z=1.5z = 1.5 corresponds to about the 93rd percentile, meaning roughly 93% of values fall below it.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of SACE Board exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

SACE 20222 marksCalculator-assumed. Tennis service times are normally distributed with mean 20.320.3 seconds and standard deviation 2.42.4 seconds. Calculate the longest service time within the fastest 2% of service times.
Show worked answer →

The "fastest 2%" is the shortest 2%, so find the value with 0.020.02 of the area to its left (the 2nd percentile).

The zz-score with 0.020.02 below it is z=2.054z = -2.054. Unstandardise with x=μ+zσx = \mu + z\sigma:

x=20.3+(2.054)(2.4)=20.34.9315.4 seconds.x = 20.3 + (-2.054)(2.4) = 20.3 - 4.93 \approx 15.4 \text{ seconds}.

Marks: one for the inverse-normal boundary, one for the value 15.4\approx 15.4 seconds.

SACE 20212 marksCalculator-assumed. Brand X battery life is normally distributed with mean 16.316.3 hours and standard deviation 2.42.4 hours. If 834 batteries were tested, how many would be expected to last less than 15 hours?
Show worked answer →

Standardise: z=1516.32.4=1.32.40.542z = \dfrac{15 - 16.3}{2.4} = \dfrac{-1.3}{2.4} \approx -0.542, so P(X<15)0.2939P(X < 15) \approx 0.2939. [1 mark]

Multiply by the number tested: 0.2939×8342450.2939 \times 834 \approx 245 batteries. [1 mark]

So about 245 batteries would be expected to last less than 15 hours.

SACE 20233 marksCalculator-assumed. Vanilla candles burn for a mean of 252 minutes (SD 20). Rose candles burn for a mean of 245 minutes (SD 25). A company claims a greater proportion of rose than vanilla candles burn longer than 300 minutes. Test the claim with calculations.
Show worked answer →

Vanilla: z=30025220=2.4z = \dfrac{300 - 252}{20} = 2.4, so P(X>300)0.0082P(X > 300) \approx 0.0082 (about 0.82%).

Rose: z=30024525=2.2z = \dfrac{300 - 245}{25} = 2.2, so P(X>300)0.0139P(X > 300) \approx 0.0139 (about 1.39%). [2 marks]

Since 1.39%>0.82%1.39\% > 0.82\%, a greater proportion of rose candles burn beyond 300 minutes, so the claim is accurate. Despite the lower mean, rose's larger standard deviation puts more of its distribution beyond 300. [1 mark]

ExamExplained