How do you generate, develop and synthesise original dramatic ideas from theory, stimulus and practitioners?
Undertake creative inquiry by generating, experimenting with and synthesising dramatic ideas from diverse sources into original work.
How to generate and develop original dramatic ideas in the Evaluation and Creativity assessment, experimenting with stimulus, theory and practitioners and synthesising them into coherent dramatic outcomes.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
Reviews look outward at existing drama; creative inquiry looks inward at the drama you can make. This dot point is about the disciplined, documented experimentation that turns a blank page into an original idea.
Generating ideas
Creative inquiry begins with deliberate idea generation rather than waiting for inspiration. You take a stimulus (an image, a headline, a piece of music, a question, a practitioner's technique) and respond to it in many quick, low-stakes ways: improvising, sketching, freewriting, trying a convention. The goal at this stage is quantity and range, not quality. You are mapping the territory of what the stimulus could become.
Original example. Given the stimulus of a single found photograph of an empty fairground, a student generates a dozen seeds: a ghost story, a verbatim piece about closure, a clown's last day, a Boal-style scene about a sacked worker, an Artaudian sensory ride of light and noise. None is yet a piece; each is a direction.
Experimenting and developing
The strongest seeds are then tested practically. You put them on their feet, try them through different practitioner lenses, and see what survives contact with an audience or an ensemble. Development is iterative: an idea changes shape as you work it, and the changes are the point. Keeping the empty-fairground example, the student tries the ghost story through a Stanislavskian lens and finds it too quiet, then through an Artaudian lens of disorienting sound and light and finds it suddenly alive.
Synthesis
Synthesis is where inquiry becomes art. You combine the surviving ideas, often from different sources, into a single coherent concept. This is not collage; it is fusion, where the parts change one another. The empty-fairground student might synthesise the verbatim closure idea (the content) with the Artaudian sensory approach (the form), producing a piece where real words about the fairground's death are delivered inside an overwhelming wash of distorted carousel music and strobing light. Neither source alone would have produced it.
This kind of writing, explaining how two ideas became one and why that fusion serves an intention, is precisely what the creativity criterion rewards.
Evaluating your own inquiry
Creative inquiry is assessed alongside evaluation for a reason: you must judge your own ideas. Be able to explain why you abandoned promising-looking seeds, what an experiment taught you even when it failed, and how each refinement improved the work against your intention.
Why it matters
Creative inquiry is the engine behind every other task. The ideas you devise in the Group Production and the concept behind your Creative Presentation both come from this kind of generative, experimental, synthesising thinking. Documenting it well shows markers an original, disciplined creative mind at work, which is the heart of the creativity criterion.