How do you build a coherent integrated project that connects performing, composing and musicology around one narrative intention?
Plan and realise the IA3 integrated project so that the performer, composer and musicologist roles inform one another around a single narrative intention, demonstrating coherence and integration
A focused guide to the QCE Music IA3 integrated project. Explains how to choose a single narrative intention and connect performing, composing and musicology so the roles inform one another, how integration differs from doing three separate tasks, how it is judged, with a worked project plan and the mistakes that fragment a project. Confirm exact conditions with the current QCAA syllabus.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
IA3 is the integrated project, the capstone instrument of Unit 4. It asks you to bring the performer, composer and musicologist roles together around a single narrative intention, so that the roles inform one another rather than sitting side by side. The word that matters is integration: this is not three separate assessments stapled together but one project in which analysis shapes composition, composition shapes performance, and doing the making deepens the analysis. This page is about achieving that coherence. Confirm the exact format, components, conditions and weighting against the current QCAA Music syllabus.
Integration, not three tasks
The defining feature of IA3 is that the roles connect. In a weak project, a student analyses one thing, composes an unrelated thing, and performs a third, and the result is three thin tasks. In a strong project, one narrative intention runs through everything: the musicology investigates how a narrative effect is achieved, the composition applies what the analysis revealed, and the performance realises the composition in service of the same intention. The marks reward this connective tissue, so it must be designed in from the start.
Start with one narrative intention
Everything hangs on a single, clear narrative intention chosen early. It should be specific enough to focus all three roles: a particular story, character, mood or dramatic idea you want to investigate, create and realise. A vague intention produces a vague project, while a sharp one gives every component a shared target and makes integration almost automatic, because each role is working on the same problem.
Letting the roles inform one another
Plan the flow of influence. Musicology comes first or runs throughout: by analysing how existing narrative repertoire achieves an effect, you discover devices you can use. Composition applies those devices toward your intention, so your analysis directly feeds your creating. Performance realises the composition, and the act of performing often reveals what does and does not work, feeding back into both the music and your evaluation. The making and responding strands genuinely cross-pollinate.
Managing the project
A project spans time and components, so plan backward from the deadline, sequence the roles so each can feed the next, and keep documenting how decisions in one role were driven by another. That documentation is often where you make the integration visible to your markers. Avoid leaving the composition or performance so late that there is no time for the feedback loops that produce coherence.
The mistakes that fragment a project
Begin IA3 by writing your single narrative intention in one sentence, then sketch how each role will serve it and feed the others. Revisit that sentence at every decision. A project built outward from one clear intention, with deliberate influence flowing between the roles, is what turns IA3 from three thin pieces into the coherent, integrated capstone the syllabus rewards. Confirm the current components and conditions with your teacher.