Skip to main content

Excavation, conservation and the ethics of human remains at Pompeii and Herculaneum for QCE Ancient History Unit 3

Syllabus dot point

“Investigate issues relating to the excavation, reconstruction, conservation and display of Pompeii and Herculaneum, including the history of excavation since 1748, the body casts and human remains, modern scientific techniques, and the ethics of studying and displaying the dead”

QCEAncient HistoryUnit 3: Reconstructing the ancient…6 min read

Quick answer

Excavation began in 1748 and was for centuries treasure hunting, not science. Giuseppe Fiorelli from 1863 introduced systematic recording and the plaster body casts of victims. Herculaneum yielded skeletons in the boat sheds in the 1980s. Modern DNA, CT scanning and isotope analysis now extract far more, but the sites face severe conservation pressures (exposure, tourism, the 2010 collapses) and the display of the dead raises real ethical questions.

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Exam-style questions

What this dot point is asking

QCAA wants you to engage with the issues that arise when historians and archaeologists reconstruct, conserve and display Pompeii and Herculaneum. You should cover the history of excavation since 1748, the famous body casts and the Herculaneum skeletons, the modern scientific techniques now applied, the conservation crisis at the sites, and the ethical questions raised by studying and displaying human remains. This is the dot point where Ancient History becomes most explicitly about method and ethics.

The answer

The history of excavation

Pompeii and Herculaneum were rediscovered in the eighteenth century. Herculaneum was tunnelled from 1738 and Pompeii excavated from 1748, both under Bourbon royal patronage. Early work was effectively treasure hunting: statues, frescoes and valuables were removed for royal collections, often with little or no record of where they were found, and tunnels were sometimes backfilled. This destroyed context that can never be recovered and is a major limitation on the evidence we have today.

A turning point came with Giuseppe Fiorelli, director from 1863. He introduced systematic, recorded excavation, divided the town into regions, insulae and house numbers (the system still used), and excavated layer by layer from the top down. Fiorelli professionalised the dig and made Pompeii a site of archaeological method rather than plunder. Twentieth-century directors such as Amedeo Maiuri (who worked at both sites for decades) extended scientific excavation, though Maiuri's haste also caused damage.

The body casts

Fiorelli's most famous innovation was the body cast. The victims who died in the surge phase decomposed inside the hardened ash, leaving body-shaped cavities. Fiorelli poured liquid plaster into these voids, producing casts that preserve the posture, clothing folds and sometimes facial expressions of people at the moment of death. The Garden of the Fugitives, the casts of a dog twisting against its chain, and family groups are among the most powerful images of the ancient world. The casts are a brilliant reconstruction technique, but they also raise the ethical issue that they are, in effect, sculptures made from the dead.

Herculaneum tells a different story. For a long time few bodies were found there, and it was assumed most residents had escaped. Then in the 1980s archaeologists excavated the boat sheds (fornici) on the ancient shoreline and found over 300 skeletons of people who had sheltered there waiting for rescue and were killed instantly by the heat of the surge. Because Herculaneum was sealed by the surges rather than slow pumice fall, actual bone survives, allowing study impossible at Pompeii.

Modern scientific techniques

Modern science has transformed what the human remains can tell us. CT scanning of body casts (the 2015 project on the Pompeii casts) revealed bones, dental health and even age and build without destroying the plaster. At Herculaneum, analysis of the skeletons has examined diet, disease, occupational stress on bones, and the cause and speed of death (research argued the extreme heat caused instantaneous death). DNA analysis, including a 2022 study sequencing a Pompeii victim's genome, and isotope analysis of teeth (showing where people grew up) add biological and demographic detail. These techniques let historians reconstruct population health and origins, not just architecture.

Conservation pressures

Conservation is a serious and ongoing problem. Once excavated, frescoes, mosaics and structures are exposed to sun, rain, plant growth, pollution and tourism (Pompeii receives millions of visitors a year). Decades of underfunding led to visible decay, culminating in the 2010 collapse of the House of the Gladiators, which drew international attention. The European-funded Great Pompeii Project from 2012 stabilised structures and improved drainage and management. A live debate exists over whether to excavate the roughly one-third of Pompeii still buried: leaving it protects it for future methods, but it also remains vulnerable underground. Conservation versus excavation is a genuine tension.

Ethics of the dead

The human remains raise ethical questions that QCAA expects students to engage with. The body casts and skeletons are the remains of real people who died in terror. Displaying them to tourists, photographing them, and using them in research can be seen as disrespectful or as exploiting the dead for spectacle and revenue. Others argue the remains are our most direct connection to the victims and that respectful study honours them and advances knowledge. There are also questions of consent (the dead cannot consent), of cultural ownership, and of how the dead should be curated and displayed. A strong response weighs the scientific and educational value against the dignity of the dead rather than asserting one side.

Key fact

Giuseppe Fiorelli, director from 1863, both professionalised excavation (introducing the region-insula-house numbering still used) and invented the plaster-cast technique by pouring plaster into the cavities left by decomposed bodies, turning the victims into the most recognisable evidence of the disaster.

Building a QCAA response on excavation, conservation and ethics

A common Unit 3 task asks you to discuss the issues in reconstructing and preserving the sites. Work through it in steps.

Step 1: Trace the history of excavation

Open with the 1748 treasure-hunting phase and the lost context, then Fiorelli's professionalisation from 1863.

Step 2: Explain the human-remains evidence

Cover Fiorelli's body casts at Pompeii and the boat-shed skeletons at Herculaneum, noting why bone survives at one site and not the other.

Step 3: Show how modern science extends the evidence

Use CT scanning, DNA and isotope analysis to explain what can now be recovered without destroying the remains.

Step 4: Address the conservation tension

Cover exposure, tourism, the 2010 collapses, the Great Pompeii Project, and the excavate-versus-protect debate over the buried third.

Step 5: Weigh the ethics and judge

Set the scientific and educational value against the dignity of the dead and reach a calibrated position.

Common traps
Treating the evidence as complete
Roughly a third of Pompeii is still unexcavated, and early treasure hunting destroyed context. The record is partial and damaged.
Assuming the body casts are the actual bodies
They are plaster filling the cavities left by decomposed bodies. At Herculaneum, by contrast, actual skeletons survive.
Ignoring the ethics question
QCAA explicitly wants engagement with the ethics of studying and displaying the dead. Do not skip it.
Forgetting conservation
The 2010 collapses and the Great Pompeii Project show that preserving the site is an active, contested problem, not a settled one.

Exam-style questions

Questions in the style of QCAA exam questions on this dot point, each with a worked answer. They are written by ExamExplained unless tagged "Past paper"; the year shows the paper a question is modelled on.

Practice6 marks
Use Sources 1 and 2 in the stimulus book to explain how modern techniques have improved the reconstruction of the victims. (Source 1 is a Fiorelli plaster body cast; Source 2 is a CT scan image of a cast revealing the skeleton inside.)
Show worked answer →

This IA1 source-examination question awards marks for what each source contributes and how the techniques compare.

Source 1 (plaster cast)
Explain that Fiorelli's casts preserve posture, clothing folds and expression by filling the cavities left by decomposed bodies, but are plaster, not bone.
Source 2 (CT scan)
Explain that non-destructive CT scanning reveals the bones, dental health, age and build inside the cast, extracting biological data the plaster alone could not.
Marks
Reward a contribution for each source and a comparison showing how science extends the original technique.
Practice9 marks
Evaluate the ethical issues raised by the study and display of human remains at Pompeii and Herculaneum.
Show worked answer →

A Paper 2 extended response weighing the issue and reaching a judgement.

The case for concern
The casts and skeletons are real people who died in terror; displaying and photographing them for tourists can be seen as disrespectful spectacle, and the dead cannot consent.
The case for study
The remains are our most direct connection to the victims; respectful research (DNA, CT, isotope analysis) honours them and advances knowledge of ancient health and origins.
Judgement
Conclude by weighing scientific and educational value against the dignity of the dead, reaching a calibrated position rather than asserting one side. Markers reward engagement with both sides and a supported verdict.

Practise this

Sources & how we know this

ExamExplained