How do agencies of socialisation and social control shape conformity?
Analyse how agencies of socialisation and social control shape conformity and respond to nonconformity
A focused answer on agencies of socialisation and social control in the HSC Society and Culture Social Conformity and Nonconformity option, covering family, school, peers, media, religion and the state, and formal and informal control with Australian examples.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
What this dot point is asking
This dot point asks you to analyse the social machinery that produces conformity: the agencies of socialisation that teach norms and the mechanisms of social control that enforce them. NESA wants you to identify the major agencies (family, school, peers, media, religion and the state), explain how each transmits norms, and analyse how informal and formal social control reward conformity and sanction nonconformity. The reward is for showing how conformity is socially produced rather than simply chosen, and for connecting the analysis to power and authority.
The answer
Agencies of socialisation
Socialisation is the lifelong process by which people learn the norms, values and behaviours of their society. It works through agencies. The family is the primary agency, instilling foundational norms and identity in early childhood. Schools transmit not only knowledge but also discipline, punctuality and shared civic values. Peer groups exert powerful pressure to conform, especially in adolescence. The media model behaviour, attitudes and aspirations on a vast scale. Religion transmits moral codes and worldview. The state, through law and institutions, defines and reinforces the norms a society requires. Analysing how each agency shapes conformity demonstrates command of the option.
Primary and secondary socialisation
Socialisation occurs in stages. Primary socialisation in the family lays the foundation of norms, language and identity in early life and is especially formative. Secondary socialisation through school, peers, media, work and wider society builds on and sometimes challenges that foundation. The interaction between the two explains why people largely conform but also why conflicting messages from different agencies can produce tension and nonconformity. Showing this layered process lifts the analysis.
Informal social control
Social control is how a society maintains conformity to its norms. Informal control operates through everyday social interaction: approval and praise reward conformity, while disapproval, gossip, ridicule, shaming and exclusion sanction nonconformity. Informal control is pervasive and powerful precisely because it is constant and emotional, drawing on the human need for acceptance. Much conformity is secured informally, before any formal mechanism is involved.
Formal social control
Formal control is exercised by institutions with explicit authority: law, police, courts, prisons and the regulatory rules of organisations and schools. It carries official sanctions, from fines to imprisonment. Formal control becomes prominent when informal control fails or when behaviour breaches significant norms. In Australia, the legal system, regulators and institutional codes of conduct are the main agents of formal control. Distinguishing formal from informal control and showing how they work together is central to a high-band answer.
Power, authority and the Australian case
Agencies of socialisation and control are also agencies of power. Who controls the media, schools, religion and the state shapes which norms dominate, so socialisation reproduces existing power relations. In Australia, debates over media influence on young people, the regulation of social media for under-16s, school discipline and the role of policing show society negotiating how much control different agencies should exercise. The strongest responses link the agencies to power and authority, showing that conformity is produced by institutions that themselves embody power, and that those institutions also decide how nonconformity is treated.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of NESA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
2019 HSC5 marksExplain the role of media in shaping social attitudes towards nonconformists.Show worked answer →
Media is a powerful agency of socialisation and social control. For 5 marks, explain how it shapes how society views nonconformists (those who reject mainstream norms).
Media shapes attitudes through the way it represents nonconformists: it can stigmatise them through negative framing, stereotyping and moral panics, hardening public hostility and reinforcing conformity. Alternatively, it can normalise or celebrate nonconformity, building sympathy and acceptance and helping shift social norms over time. By selecting what to show and how to frame it, media acts as a gatekeeper of public attitudes.
Use an example: media coverage that demonises a subculture, or sympathetic coverage of a social movement that builds support. Explain both directions and link to a concrete example.
2022 HSC5 marksHow can values determine the boundaries between appropriate and inappropriate behaviours? Support your answer with a relevant example.Show worked answer →
Values are the shared principles a society or group holds about what is good and desirable. For 5 marks, explain how they set the line between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour.
Values underpin norms, the specific rules that translate values into expected behaviour. Behaviour aligned with a group's values is judged appropriate (conformity), while behaviour that breaches them is judged inappropriate or deviant. Because values vary between groups and change over time, these boundaries are relative and shift, which is why something once seen as deviant can become accepted.
Use an example: shifting values around smoking in public, or around inclusive language, redefining what counts as appropriate. Link values to norms to the judgement of behaviour, and support with one clear example.