Skip to main content
NSWPhysicsSyllabus dot point

Inquiry Question 2: How is it known that atoms are made up of protons, neutrons and electrons?

Investigate and analyse the Geiger-Marsden (Rutherford) gold foil experiment and Rutherford's nuclear model of the atom, and Chadwick's discovery of the neutron

A focused answer to the HSC Physics Module 8 dot point on the structure of the atom. The Geiger-Marsden gold foil experiment, Rutherford's nuclear model replacing the plum pudding, and Chadwick's 1932 discovery of the neutron using beryllium-alpha collisions and conservation of momentum and energy.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.811 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

NESA wants you to describe the Geiger-Marsden gold foil experiment and Rutherford's analysis that established the nuclear atom (small dense positive nucleus, mostly empty atom), then describe Chadwick's 1932 experiment that identified the neutron as a neutral particle of nearly the proton's mass using conservation of energy and momentum. Together these experiments completed the picture of the atom as a nucleus of protons and neutrons surrounded by electrons.

The answer

Geiger-Marsden gold foil experiment (1909)

Geiger Marsden gold foil scattering A source of alpha particles on the left fires a beam toward a thin gold foil at the centre. Most alpha particles pass through with negligible deflection. A small fraction scatters at moderate angles. A few back scatter at angles greater than ninety degrees. The pattern is explained by a tiny dense positive nucleus. α source gold foil undeflected (most) small deflection small deflection back scatter (~1 in 8000) nucleus Back-scatter requires a tiny dense positive nucleus, not a smeared positive cloud.

Background. Thomson's plum-pudding model (1897) had positive charge smeared diffusely over the atom with embedded electrons. To test it, Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden (under Rutherford, at Manchester) directed a beam of alpha particles (from radium decay) at a very thin gold foil and measured how many particles scattered into different angles using a movable scintillation detector.

What they expected. Under the plum-pudding model, the smeared positive charge should produce only small Coulomb deflections. Almost all alpha particles should emerge close to the forward direction with a small spread.

What they observed.

  • Most alpha particles passed through with almost no deflection (consistent with mostly empty space).
  • A small fraction (about 1 in 8000) scattered through angles greater than 90 degrees.
  • A handful were back-scattered, returning toward the source.

Rutherford's interpretation. The large-angle scattering events are impossible if the positive charge is smeared over the whole atom. They require the alpha particle to encounter a strong Coulomb repulsion from a very compact positive charge. Rutherford (1911) showed that the angular distribution of scattered alpha particles is exactly what a point-like positive nucleus produces, with a 1/r21/r^2 Coulomb force.

Rutherford's nuclear model

The picture that emerged:

  • Nearly all the mass and all the positive charge of the atom is concentrated in a tiny central nucleus, with radius 1015\sim 10^{-15} m.
  • The atom as a whole has radius 1010\sim 10^{-10} m, so the nucleus is 10510^{-5} of the atomic radius. The atom is mostly empty space.
  • Negatively charged electrons orbit the nucleus at relatively large distances.

Two open questions remained:

  1. Why don't the orbiting electrons radiate (since accelerating charges in classical electromagnetism should radiate and spiral in)? This was solved by Bohr's 1913 quantised-orbit model, see the related dot point.
  2. What balances the Coulomb repulsion between the protons inside the nucleus, and why does the nucleus appear to have more mass than just ZZ protons? Both pointed to a neutral nuclear constituent.

Chadwick's discovery of the neutron (1932)

Rutherford had postulated as early as 1920 that the nucleus contained, in addition to protons, neutral particles of similar mass that he called "neutrons". The decisive evidence came from a chain of experiments.

The puzzle. Bothe and Becker (1930) observed that bombarding beryllium with alpha particles produced a highly penetrating neutral radiation that, until 1932, was assumed to be high-energy gamma rays. Curie and Joliot (1932) showed that this radiation could eject protons from paraffin wax with surprisingly high kinetic energies.

Chadwick's experiment. James Chadwick (1932) sent the neutral radiation onto various target nuclei (hydrogen, helium, lithium, nitrogen) and measured the recoil kinetic energies of each target. Using conservation of energy and momentum, he tested two hypotheses.

  • Hypothesis A: the neutral radiation is gamma rays. To produce the observed nitrogen recoils, the photons would have had to carry about 50 MeV of energy, far more than energetically possible from the beryllium-alpha reaction (which has an available energy of only a few MeV).
  • Hypothesis B: the neutral radiation is a stream of massive neutral particles. Treating the collisions as elastic billiard-ball collisions, the kinetic energies of the recoils from different targets were consistent only if the projectile had a mass close to that of the proton.

The neutron hypothesis fitted all the data. Chadwick concluded that beryllium plus alpha gives carbon plus a neutron:

49Be+24He612C+01n^9_4\text{Be} + ^4_2\text{He} \to ^{12}_6\text{C} + ^1_0\text{n}

The neutron's mass was later measured as 1.00871.0087 u, slightly greater than the proton's 1.00731.0073 u. It has no electric charge.

Mass-and-momentum analysis (sketch)

For a head-on elastic collision of a particle of mass mm, speed v0v_0, with a stationary target of mass MM, the target recoils with speed:

v=2mv0m+Mv = \frac{2 m v_0}{m + M}

Chadwick measured vv for hydrogen targets (M=1M = 1 u) and for nitrogen targets (M=14M = 14 u). The ratio of recoil speeds depends only on mm (not v0v_0):

vHvN=m+14m+1\frac{v_H}{v_N} = \frac{m + 14}{m + 1}

Inserting his measured speeds and solving gave m1m \approx 1 u, confirming the neutron mass close to the proton mass.

The completed atomic picture

After Chadwick:

  • The nucleus contains ZZ protons and NN neutrons (collectively, A=Z+NA = Z + N nucleons).
  • The nucleus is held together by the strong nuclear force, which acts over very short distances and is independent of electric charge.
  • Electrons in number ZZ surround the nucleus, balancing the charge in a neutral atom.

This sets the stage for the rest of Module 8: nuclear stability (binding energy), radioactive decay (alpha, beta, gamma), and ultimately the quark structure of the nucleons.

Examples in context

Example 1. Rutherford backscatter at the Australian Synchrotron. A 5.5 MeV5.5 \text{ MeV} alpha particle approaches a gold nucleus (Z=79Z = 79) head-on. At distance of closest approach rminr_{\min}, kinetic energy converts entirely to electrostatic PE: Ek=(1/4πε0)2Ze2/rminE_k = (1/4\pi\varepsilon_0) \cdot 2 Z e^2 / r_{\min}. Solving: rmin=(1/4πε0)2×79×(1.6×1019)2/(5.5×1.6×1013)=9.0×10144.05×1038/8.8×1013=4.1×1014 m=41 fmr_{\min} = (1/4\pi\varepsilon_0) \cdot 2 \times 79 \times (1.6 \times 10^{-19})^2 / (5.5 \times 1.6 \times 10^{-13}) = 9.0 \times 10^{14} \cdot 4.05 \times 10^{-38} / 8.8 \times 10^{-13} = 4.1 \times 10^{-14} \text{ m} = 41 \text{ fm}, smaller than gold's nuclear radius. This is why Rutherford's 1911 result demanded a tiny dense nucleus: only point-like charges could produce the 1\sim 1 in 20,00020{,}000 backward-scattered alphas Geiger and Marsden saw.

Example 2. Chadwick's neutron analysis applied to an ANSTO Lucas Heights α\alpha + 9^9Be source. An alpha hits 9^9Be: 24He+49Be612C+n^4_2 \text{He} + {}^9_4 \text{Be} \to {}^{12}_6 \text{C} + n. Energy conservation: incident α\alpha at 5.30 MeV5.30 \text{ MeV}, products at rest in CM frame approximately. The nn recoils carrying 5.7 MeV\sim 5.7 \text{ MeV} of KE. Chadwick (1932) measured the recoil speed of struck protons in paraffin (3.3×107 m/s3.3 \times 10^7 \text{ m/s}) and nitrogen (4.7×106 m/s4.7 \times 10^6 \text{ m/s}). From conservation of momentum and KE in elastic collisions, the unknown particle mass solved to 1.16\approx 1.16 proton masses - neutral and nucleon-like. ANSTO neutron sources today use the same α\alpha + Be reaction.

Try this

Q1. State the conclusion drawn by Rutherford from the Geiger-Marsden gold-foil experiment. [2 marks]

  • Cue. Atom has a small, dense, positively charged nucleus, with most of the atom empty space.

Q2. Calculate the distance of closest approach of a 4.0 MeV4.0 \text{ MeV} alpha particle to a gold nucleus (Z=79Z = 79). [3 marks]

  • Cue. Ek=k2Ze2/rE_k = k \cdot 2 Z e^2 / r; r=8.99×109×2×79×(1.6×1019)2/(4.0×1.6×1013)=5.7×1014 mr = 8.99 \times 10^9 \times 2 \times 79 \times (1.6 \times 10^{-19})^2 / (4.0 \times 1.6 \times 10^{-13}) = 5.7 \times 10^{-14} \text{ m}.

Q3. Chadwick's 1932 discovery completed the proton-neutron-electron picture of the atom. (a) Write the nuclear reaction used by Chadwick. (b) Explain how he deduced the neutron's mass using momentum conservation in collisions with protons and nitrogen nuclei. (c) State two properties of the neutron that distinguish it from the proton. [2+3+2 marks]

  • Cue. (a) 24He+49Be612C+n^4_2 \text{He} + {}^9_4 \text{Be} \to {}^{12}_6 \text{C} + n. (b) Elastic-collision kinematics: speeds of recoiling H and N nuclei give mass ratio; mnmpm_n \approx m_p. (c) Neutral charge; slightly larger mass (1.008 u1.008 \text{ u} vs 1.007 u1.007 \text{ u}); unstable when free (T1/2=10.2 minT_{1/2} = 10.2 \text{ min}).

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of NESA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

2021 HSC5 marksOutline the Geiger-Marsden gold foil experiment and explain how its results led Rutherford to propose the nuclear model of the atom in place of Thomson's plum-pudding model.
Show worked answer →

Geiger and Marsden (1909, working under Rutherford) directed a beam of alpha particles from a radioactive source at a thin gold foil. A movable detector (a scintillation screen) measured the number of alpha particles scattered through different angles.

Most alpha particles passed through the foil with little or no deflection, as expected for a diffuse positive charge spread over the atom (Thomson's plum-pudding model). However, a small but non-zero fraction were deflected through very large angles, and a few were even back-scattered through more than 90 degrees.

Rutherford famously remarked that this was "as if you had fired a 15-inch shell at a piece of tissue paper and it came back and hit you." The plum-pudding model could not produce such large deflections, because its smeared-out positive charge gave only small Coulomb forces on the fast alpha particles.

Rutherford (1911) concluded that the positive charge and almost all of the mass of the atom is concentrated in a tiny central nucleus, around 101510^{-15} m in radius compared with the atom's 101010^{-10} m. Most alpha particles pass through the (mostly empty) atom; a small fraction encounter the nucleus head-on and recoil. He worked out the angular distribution and showed it matched a 1/r21/r^2 Coulomb force from a point-like positive charge.

Markers reward the setup, the unexpected back-scattering, the inadequacy of the plum-pudding model, and the nuclear conclusion (small dense positive nucleus, mostly empty atom).

2019 HSC4 marksDescribe Chadwick's experiment to confirm the existence of the neutron, and explain how he distinguished neutrons from gamma rays.
Show worked answer →

Curie and Joliot (1932) showed that bombarding beryllium with alpha particles produced a neutral radiation that, in turn, ejected protons from paraffin wax. They assumed this radiation was gamma rays.

Chadwick (1932) repeated the experiment but also let the neutral radiation strike a nitrogen target and measured the recoil kinetic energy of the nitrogen nuclei. Applying conservation of energy and momentum, he found that gamma rays would have had to carry implausibly high energies (around 50 MeV) to give the observed recoils, far greater than expected for beryllium-alpha reactions.

A neutral particle of mass approximately equal to the proton, however, could give the observed proton and nitrogen recoils consistently and with reasonable energies. Chadwick concluded the radiation was a stream of neutral particles with mass close to the proton, and named them neutrons.

The reaction is:

49Be+24He612C+01n^9_4\text{Be} + ^4_2\text{He} \to ^{12}_6\text{C} + ^1_0\text{n}.

Markers reward the setup (alpha on beryllium, neutral radiation, recoil targets), the inconsistency of the gamma-ray interpretation, the conservation-of-momentum-and-energy reasoning, and the identification of the neutron with mass close to the proton.

Related dot points