Skip to main content
NSWPhysicsSyllabus dot point

Inquiry Question 2: How is it known that atoms are made up of protons, neutrons and electrons?

Investigate, assess and model Millikan's oil drop experiment to determine the elementary charge and the quantisation of electric charge

A focused answer to the HSC Physics Module 8 dot point on Millikan's oil drop experiment. Balancing gravity and electrical force on charged oil droplets between parallel plates, the equation mg = qE with E = V/d, the integer-multiple distribution of measured charges, and the value of the elementary charge e.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.89 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

NESA wants you to describe Millikan's apparatus, explain the force balance on a charged oil drop between parallel plates (qE=mgqE = mg with E=V/dE = V/d), use it to extract the charge on individual drops, and account for the observation that all measured charges are integer multiples of the elementary charge e=1.60×1019e = 1.60 \times 10^{-19} C, with the conclusion that electric charge is quantised.

The answer

Why the experiment was needed

Thomson's 1897 measurement of e/me/m for the electron was the charge-to-mass ratio, not the charge itself. To separate the two and find both the mass and charge of the electron, an independent measurement of ee alone was required.

The apparatus

Robert Millikan's 1909 experiment (refined through about 1913) used:

  • A small chamber containing two horizontal parallel metal plates separated by distance dd, with a small hole in the upper plate.
  • A potential difference VV applied between the plates, creating a uniform vertical electric field E=V/dE = V/d.
  • An atomiser to spray tiny oil droplets above the upper plate. A few droplets fall through the hole into the space between the plates.
  • A short-wavelength source (X-rays, or ionising radiation) to ionise some air molecules and so charge some droplets by attachment.
  • A microscope to track individual droplets and a stopwatch to measure terminal velocities.

Two methods

Stationary method (the simplest to describe). Adjust the voltage until a chosen droplet hangs motionless. The electric force on the charge balances gravity:

qE=mg,E=V/dqE = mg, \quad E = V/d

So:

q=mgdVq = \frac{mgd}{V}

The mass mm of the droplet is found by switching off the field and measuring the terminal velocity of free fall through the air, then using Stokes' law (or, in modern presentations, treating the droplet density and radius separately).

Falling-and-rising method (Millikan's actual method). With the field off, the droplet falls at terminal velocity vgv_g set by gravity vs viscous drag. With the field switched on (in the direction that drives the negative droplet upward), it rises at terminal velocity vEv_E set by net electric force vs drag. Combining vgv_g and vEv_E eliminates the radius-dependent constants and gives the charge qq directly.

Results

Millikan measured thousands of drops over many years. Every measured charge was a positive integer multiple of a single value:

qn=ne,n=1,2,3,q_n = n e, \quad n = 1, 2, 3, \dots

with e1.60×1019e \approx 1.60 \times 10^{-19} C. Drops with n=1n = 1 (singly charged) were the most common, but n=2,3,4n = 2, 3, 4 appeared often, and occasionally larger values. Sometimes a drop's charge would jump (after a momentary exposure to ionising radiation), but always to a different integer multiple of the same base unit.

The interpretation is direct: charge is quantised. The smallest unit of free charge in nature is ee, and macroscopic charges are integer multiples of it.

Millikan's best value was e=1.592×1019e = 1.592 \times 10^{-19} C, very close to the modern value 1.602×10191.602 \times 10^{-19} C. Combined with Thomson's e/me/m, this fixed the electron mass at me=9.11×1031m_e = 9.11 \times 10^{-31} kg.

Worked example: a heavier drop

A drop of mass 5.0×10155.0 \times 10^{-15} kg is held stationary between plates 5.0 mm apart with potential difference 460 V. Find the charge on the drop.

Electric field: E=V/d=460/5.0×103=9.2×104E = V/d = 460 / 5.0 \times 10^{-3} = 9.2 \times 10^4 V/m.

Force balance: qE=mgqE = mg, so q=mg/E=(5.0×1015)(9.80)/(9.2×104)=5.3×1019q = mg/E = (5.0 \times 10^{-15})(9.80)/(9.2 \times 10^4) = 5.3 \times 10^{-19} C.

In elementary charges: n=q/e=5.3×1019/1.60×10193.3n = q/e = 5.3 \times 10^{-19} / 1.60 \times 10^{-19} \approx 3.3.

The closest integer is 3, so the drop carries 3e=4.8×10193e = 4.8 \times 10^{-19} C. The 10% discrepancy in this textbook problem usually reflects measurement uncertainty rather than fractional charge.

Modern view

Charge quantisation in units of ee is observed in every macroscopic system. Quarks have charges of ±e/3\pm e/3 and ±2e/3\pm 2e/3, but they are confined inside hadrons and cannot be isolated as free particles. The smallest free charge is the electron's e-e (or its antiparticle's +e+e), exactly the unit Millikan measured.

Try it: Electric field calculator for E=V/dE = V/d between parallel plates, and explore the force on a charged droplet between them.

Examples in context

Example 1. Replicating Millikan's experiment at a Sydney high-school open day. A student observes an oil drop of radius r=1.0×106 mr = 1.0 \times 10^{-6} \text{ m} falling at terminal speed vt=1.2×104 m/sv_t = 1.2 \times 10^{-4} \text{ m/s} in air (η=1.81×105 Pa s\eta = 1.81 \times 10^{-5} \text{ Pa s}, oil ρ=920 kg/m3\rho = 920 \text{ kg/m}^3). Stokes's law gives the drop mass m=(6πηrvt)/g=6π×1.81×105×106×1.2×104/9.8=4.18×1015 kgm = (6 \pi \eta r v_t) / g = 6 \pi \times 1.81 \times 10^{-5} \times 10^{-6} \times 1.2 \times 10^{-4} / 9.8 = 4.18 \times 10^{-15} \text{ kg}. Switching on V=5500 VV = 5500 \text{ V} across d=1.5 cmd = 1.5 \text{ cm} plates (so E=3.67×105 V/mE = 3.67 \times 10^5 \text{ V/m}) holds it stationary: qE=mgqE = mg, so q=mg/E=4.18×1015×9.8/3.67×105=1.12×1019 Cq = mg/E = 4.18 \times 10^{-15} \times 9.8 / 3.67 \times 10^5 = 1.12 \times 10^{-19} \text{ C}. This is 0.7e\sim 0.7 e, so the student should round to 1e1 e within experimental error.

Example 2. Charge quantisation in a modern Lucas Heights ion-trap. Single-ion Paul traps at ANSTO Lucas Heights hold isolated 40^{40}Ca+^+ ions with charge q=+e=1.60×1019 Cq = +e = 1.60 \times 10^{-19} \text{ C}. The trap measures changes in the ion's micromotion when it captures an extra electron, dropping qq to 00. The minimum step is exactly ee, just as Millikan found, but now resolved to 11 part in 10910^9 rather than Millikan's 1%1\%. CODATA 2019 fixed e1.602176634×1019 Ce \equiv 1.602176634 \times 10^{-19} \text{ C} exactly as a defined SI constant - a direct lineage from Millikan's 1909-1913 oil drops to the modern definition of the ampere.

Try this

Q1. State Millikan's conclusion about electric charge from the oil-drop experiment. [2 marks]

  • Cue. Electric charge is quantised; all observed charges are integer multiples of e=1.60×1019 Ce = 1.60 \times 10^{-19} \text{ C}.

Q2. An oil drop of mass 3.2×1015 kg3.2 \times 10^{-15} \text{ kg} is held stationary between parallel plates separated by 1.0 cm1.0 \text{ cm} with V=980 VV = 980 \text{ V} applied. Calculate the drop's charge and the number of excess electrons. [4 marks]

  • Cue. E=V/d=9.8×104 V/mE = V/d = 9.8 \times 10^4 \text{ V/m}; qE=mgqE = mg, so q=mg/E=3.2×1015×9.8/9.8×104=3.2×1019 Cq = mg/E = 3.2 \times 10^{-15} \times 9.8 / 9.8 \times 10^4 = 3.2 \times 10^{-19} \text{ C}; n=q/e=2n = q/e = 2 electrons.

Q3. Millikan observed drops with the following charges (in units of 1019 C10^{-19} \text{ C}): 1.6,3.3,4.7,6.5,8.01.6, 3.3, 4.7, 6.5, 8.0. (a) Identify the common factor. (b) Explain why no drops had charge 2.4×1019 C2.4 \times 10^{-19} \text{ C}. (c) Outline the role of Stokes's law in determining drop mass. [2+2+2 marks]

  • Cue. (a) Each is approximately n×1.6×1019 Cn \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19} \text{ C} with n=1,2,3,4,5n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. (b) Not an integer multiple of ee. (c) Terminal velocity vtv_t in still air gives radius then mass via ρ\rho.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of NESA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

2023 HSC4 marksAn oil drop of mass 3.20 x 10^-15 kg is held stationary between two parallel plates separated by 6.00 mm. The potential difference between the plates is 490 V. Calculate the charge on the drop and state how many elementary charges this represents. (g = 9.80 m/s^2, e = 1.60 x 10^-19 C.)
Show worked answer →

The drop is in equilibrium: electrical force up balances gravity down.

qE=mgqE = mg, with E=V/dE = V/d:

q=mgdV=3.20×1015×9.80×6.00×103490q = \frac{mgd}{V} = \frac{3.20 \times 10^{-15} \times 9.80 \times 6.00 \times 10^{-3}}{490}
q=1.882×1016490=3.84×1019q = \frac{1.882 \times 10^{-16}}{490} = 3.84 \times 10^{-19} C.

In elementary charges:

n=q/e=3.84×1019/1.60×1019=2.4n = q/e = 3.84 \times 10^{-19} / 1.60 \times 10^{-19} = 2.4.

Rounding to the nearest integer, the drop carries 2 elementary charges, suggesting the experimentally rounded charge would be 2e=3.20×10192e = 3.20 \times 10^{-19} C. (The exam value of 2.4 likely indicates rounding in the question; either answer with n=2n = 2 or commentary on the integer-multiples observation is acceptable.)

Markers reward E=V/dE = V/d, force balance, numerical answer for qq, and the explicit "integer multiple of ee" interpretation.

2018 HSC3 marksExplain how Millikan's experimental results demonstrated that electric charge is quantised.
Show worked answer →

Millikan measured the charge on each of many individual oil drops. He found that every measured value was an integer multiple of a single basic charge: q=neq = n e with n=1,2,3,n = 1, 2, 3, \dots. No drop ever carried, say, 1.5 or 2.7 times that basic charge. Sometimes a single drop's charge changed (after exposure to X-rays, for example), but the new value was always an integer multiple of the same basic charge.

The natural explanation is that charge comes in discrete packets of size ee, the elementary charge, and macroscopic charges are integer multiples of these packets. The continuous-charge model of classical electromagnetism does not predict this clustering.

Markers reward the observation of integer multiples, no fractional charges, and the conclusion that charge is quantised in units of ee.

Related dot points