Skip to main content

Relative frequency, the effect of more trials and expected frequency np (Year 12 Relative frequency and probability, 2024 Mathematics Standard 1 syllabus)

Syllabus dot point

“Use relative frequency as an estimate of probability, recognise that more trials bring relative frequency closer to theoretical probability, and calculate expected frequency using np”

8 min read

Quick answer

Relative frequency is the number of times an event happened divided by the number of trials, and it estimates probability, getting more reliable as the number of trials grows. Expected frequency is np, with n the number of repetitions and p the probability; it is an average, not a guarantee. Convert percentages to decimals first. Part of Year 12 Relative frequency and probability in the 2024 Mathematics Standard 1 syllabus.

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Practice questions

What this dot point is asking

Under the Mathematics Standard 11-12 Syllabus (2024), first examined in the 2027 HSC, Year 12 Standard 1 includes Relative frequency and probability as a focus area. Alongside sample spaces and tree diagrams (see sample spaces and two-stage events), NESA's page asks you to:

  • use relative frequency as an estimate of probability;
  • recognise that increasing the number of trials brings the relative frequency closer to the theoretical probability;
  • calculate the expected frequency of an event using npnp, where nn is the number of times an experiment is repeated and pp is the probability;
  • examine how probability and statistics are used in the media, government and corporate decision-making.

The answer

Key fact

relative frequency=number of times the event occurredtotal number of trials,expected frequency=np.\text{relative frequency} = \frac{\text{number of times the event occurred}}{\text{total number of trials}}, \qquad \text{expected frequency} = np.

Relative frequency comes from an experiment or survey and estimates the probability. Expected frequency uses the probability to predict how many times an event will happen. More trials make the relative frequency a more reliable estimate.

Relative frequency from data

When you cannot list equally likely outcomes (a drawing pin, a faulty product, a customer survey), do the experiment and record the results. If a pin lands point up 9393 times in 150150 drops, the relative frequency is 93150=0.62\frac{93}{150} = 0.62, so we estimate P(point up)≈0.62P(\text{point up}) \approx 0.62.

Why more trials matter

A short run is dominated by chance. Three heads from five tosses is a relative frequency of 0.60.6 even for a fair coin. As the number of trials increases, the relative frequency settles towards the true probability. This is why a poll of 20002000 people is more trustworthy than a poll of 2020.

Expected frequency

If an event has probability pp and the experiment is repeated nn times, the expected frequency is npnp. A bus that is late with probability 0.150.15 is expected to be late on 120×0.15=18120 \times 0.15 = 18 days out of 120120. Expected means "on average over many repetitions": the actual count in any one term can be 1515 or 2121.

Use pp from theory when it is known (a fair die has p=16p = \frac{1}{6}) and from relative frequency when it is not (an estimate from a survey).

Worked examples

From a table of results to a prediction

A shop recorded 250250 customers; 6565 paid by cash. 65250=0.26\frac{65}{250} = 0.26. Next month it expects 20002000 customers, so about 2000×0.26=5202000 \times 0.26 = 520 will pay by cash.

Marker's note: the first part estimates a probability, the second part uses it.

Percentages as probabilities

12%12\% of eggs in a farm's cartons are cracked, so p=0.12p = 0.12. In 500500 eggs, expect 500×0.12=60500 \times 0.12 = 60 cracked ones, and 440440 uncracked.

Marker's note: convert the percentage to a decimal before multiplying.

Comparing theory and experiment

A spinner has four equal sectors. In 200200 spins, sector 33 occurred 6161 times. Expected: 200×14=50200 \times \frac{1}{4} = 50. Relative frequency: 61200=0.305\frac{61}{200} = 0.305 against the theoretical 0.250.25. The result is higher than predicted, but 200200 spins is a fairly small number, so this alone does not prove the spinner is biased.

Marker's note: comment on the size of the difference and on the number of trials.

Common traps
Dividing by the wrong number
Relative frequency divides by the total number of trials, not by the number of times the event did not happen.
Treating expected frequency as exact
npnp is an average. Write "about" or "expected", and do not claim the exact count will occur.
Forgetting to convert percentages
Use 0.0250.025 for 2.5%2.5\%, not 2.52.5.
Believing a short run proves the probability is wrong
A fair coin can give 77 heads in 1010 tosses. Look at how many trials there were before drawing a conclusion.
Mixing up which probability to use
If the question gives you experimental results, use the relative frequency; if it describes a fair die or coin, use the theoretical probability.
Exam technique

Write "npnp" and substitute, so the method mark is visible. If asked to comment, give two things: how close the experimental result is to the theory, and how many trials were done. Follow the question on rounding: an expected number of people may be given as a whole number or a decimal.

Practice questions

Original practice questions graded from foundation to exam level, each with a full worked solution. Try them before revealing the solution.

foundation2 marks
A drawing pin was dropped 150150 times and landed point up 9393 times. Find the relative frequency of landing point up as a decimal and as a percentage.
Show worked solution →

Relative frequency is the number of times the event happened divided by the number of trials.

93150=3150=0.62=62%.\frac{93}{150} = \frac{31}{50} = 0.62 = 62\%.

Marker's note: one mark for the correct fraction, one for the decimal or percentage. The denominator is the number of trials (150150), not the number of times it landed point down.

foundation2 marks
The probability that a bus is late is 0.150.15. Over a term of 120120 school days, how many days would you expect the bus to be late?
Show worked solution →

Use expected frequency npnp, with n=120n = 120 and p=0.15p = 0.15.

np=120×0.15=18 days.np = 120 \times 0.15 = 18 \text{ days}.

Marker's note: one mark for the substitution, one for 1818. The answer is an expected value, not a guarantee.

core3 marks
A fair die is rolled 300300 times. (a) How many sixes are expected? (b) A six actually came up 3838 times. Find the relative frequency of a six as a decimal correct to 33 decimal places and compare it with the theoretical probability.
Show worked solution →
(a) Expected number
p=16p = \frac{1}{6}, so np=300×16=50np = 300 \times \frac{1}{6} = 50.
(b) Relative frequency
38300=19150≈0.127\frac{38}{300} = \frac{19}{150} \approx 0.127.
Compare
The theoretical probability is 16≈0.167\frac{1}{6} \approx 0.167, so the experimental result is lower than expected. With only 300300 rolls, a difference of 1212 sixes from 5050 is quite possible by chance.

Marker's note: one mark for 5050, one for 0.1270.127, one for a sensible comparison. A comment that a short run can differ from the theory without the die being unfair is rewarded.

core3 marks
A coin is tossed in three experiments. After 1010 tosses there were 77 heads, after 100100 tosses there were 5656 heads, and after 10001000 tosses there were 508508 heads. Find the relative frequency of heads in each experiment and explain what the results show.
Show worked solution →

Relative frequencies.

Tosses Heads Relative frequency Difference from 0.50.5
1010 77 0.70.7 0.20.2
100100 5656 0.560.56 0.060.06
10001000 508508 0.5080.508 0.0080.008

What it shows. As the number of trials increases, the relative frequency gets closer to the theoretical probability of 0.50.5. Results from a larger number of trials are a more reliable estimate of probability.

Marker's note: one mark for the three values, one for the trend, one for stating that more trials give a better estimate.

core3 marks
A factory finds that 2.5%2.5\% of the phone covers it makes are faulty. In a batch of 800800 covers, how many are expected to be faulty, and how many are expected to be free of faults?
Show worked solution →

Faulty. p=0.025p = 0.025, so np=800×0.025=20np = 800 \times 0.025 = 20.

Not faulty. P(not faulty)=1−0.025=0.975P(\text{not faulty}) = 1 - 0.025 = 0.975, so 800×0.975=780800 \times 0.975 = 780. Check: 20+780=80020 + 780 = 800.

Marker's note: one mark for converting 2.5%2.5\% to 0.0250.025, one for 2020, one for 780780.

exam4 marks
A spinner has three colours. In 400400 spins it landed on red 148148 times, on blue 112112 times and on green 140140 times. (a) Find the relative frequency of each colour. (b) If the spinner were equally likely to land on each colour, how many times would each colour be expected in 400400 spins? (c) Use the relative frequency of red to estimate the number of reds in 10001000 spins.
Show worked solution →
(a) Relative frequencies
Red 148400=0.37\frac{148}{400} = 0.37, blue 112400=0.28\frac{112}{400} = 0.28, green 140400=0.35\frac{140}{400} = 0.35. These add to 11.
(b) Equally likely
Each colour has p=13p = \frac{1}{3}, so the expected frequency is 400×13=133.3‾400 \times \frac{1}{3} = 133.\overline{3}, about 133133 spins.
(c) Estimate for 10001000 spins
Using 0.370.37 as the probability, 1000×0.37=3701000 \times 0.37 = 370 reds.

Marker's note: one mark for each of (a) and (b), and two for (c), one for using the relative frequency as pp and one for 370370. Blue is noticeably below 133133, so it is reasonable to suspect the spinner is not fair, but 400400 spins is not enough to be certain.

exam3 marks
In a survey of 9090 randomly chosen residents of a town, 3636 said they prefer to travel to work by train. Estimate how many of the 45004500 residents of the town prefer the train, and give one reason why the estimate may not be accurate.
Show worked solution →
Relative frequency from the sample
3690=25=0.4\frac{36}{90} = \frac{2}{5} = 0.4.
Expected number in the town
4500×0.4=18004500 \times 0.4 = 1800 residents.
Why it may be inaccurate
The sample of 9090 is small compared with 45004500, so another sample could give a different proportion. A larger random sample gives a better estimate.

Marker's note: one mark for 0.40.4, one for 18001800, one for a valid reason such as a small sample or a possibly unrepresentative sample.

Practise this

Sources & how we know this

ExamExplained