Derivatives and integrals of inverse trigonometric functions
“Differentiate inverse trigonometric functions and integrate functions that involve them”
Derivatives: , , , with chain-rule generalisations; integrals: and .
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
NESA wants you to know the standard derivatives of , and cold, apply the chain rule to compositions like , combine them with the product and quotient rules, and run the process in reverse to integrate functions that produce these inverse-trig antiderivatives. The whole topic is the calculus of the three inverse trig functions, so the graphs they come from and the domains they live on are not optional background: they explain every feature of the derivatives, including the awkward square root and the sign on .
The three results look like things to memorise, and they are, but they are far easier to keep straight if you can re-derive them from in a line of implicit differentiation. A marker can tell instantly whether you understand where comes from or are pattern-matching from a half-remembered formula sheet, and the "establish" or "hence" style questions reward the former.
Think of , and as "undo" buttons for sine, cosine and tangent: if , then undoes it. Because the undo buttons are just ordinary functions of , they have their own derivatives, and it turns out those derivatives are not trig functions at all but neat algebraic fractions involving . The and buttons only work for inputs between and (since that is all sine and cosine ever output), which is exactly why their derivatives contain and blow up at the edges , like a hill becoming a cliff. The button accepts any real input, so its derivative is friendly everywhere: biggest in the middle, fading towards zero at the far edges. Once you know these three "undo derivatives", integrating in reverse is just running the same fact backwards, the way knowing that unlocking a door reverses locking it.
The answer
Standard derivatives
Note that and have the same magnitude derivative but opposite signs, consistent with : differentiating that identity gives , so the two derivatives must be exact negatives. That is also why never appears as a standard integral: it would only duplicate the result up to sign.
The three derivatives to know are , and . Two features carry the meaning: the and derivatives blow up at (vertical tangents at the ends of the domain ), while the derivative is defined for all real and is largest at (steepest at the origin, flattening towards the horizontal asymptotes ). Read the graph and the derivative falls out.
Where the derivative comes from: implicit differentiation
Let , so . Differentiate implicitly with respect to :
This is correct but is in terms of ; we want it in terms of . For in the principal range , , so we take the positive square root: . Hence
The same method gives : from , differentiating gives , and , so . For , gives , and on the range we have , so and the minus sign survives: . The choice of sign on each square root is forced by the principal range, which is exactly why the graphs matter.
The three curves and where the derivatives live, stage by stage
Each inverse function is a reflection of a restricted piece of a trig function in the line , and that reflection explains the domain, the range and the shape of the derivative. The four panels build the picture one curve at a time.
Stage 1, restrict and reflect to build . is not one-to-one, so to invert it we keep only the rising piece on , where it passes the horizontal-line test. Reflecting that arc in swaps the axes and produces . The reflection sends the gentle slope of near its turning points into a steep slope for near , which is the geometric origin of the in the denominator.
Stage 2, read off the domain, range and the vertical tangents of . The reflected curve has domain (the range of ) and range (the restricted domain of ). At the two endpoints the tangent is vertical, so the gradient : that is the derivative becoming undefined as . In the middle the curve is least steep at , where the derivative is smallest, equal to .
Stage 3, the same construction for . Reflecting the piece of on gives : domain , range , and it decreases throughout (cosine falls on ). The decreasing graph is the geometric reason for the minus sign in ; the magnitude is identical to because the two curves are mirror images about the line .
Stage 4, and why its derivative is defined everywhere. on takes every real value, so its inverse has domain all reals and range . The vertical asymptotes of become the horizontal asymptotes of . The curve is steepest at the origin and flattens forever without reaching the asymptotes, which is exactly the behaviour of : largest at , tending to as . There are no endpoints, so unlike there is no domain restriction to worry about when you differentiate.
Chain rule extensions
In an exam the argument is almost never a bare ; it is some function . The chain rule multiplies the standard derivative by :
The single most common error in the whole topic is dropping the from the numerator, so write the inner function down explicitly, differentiate it, and place it on top before you simplify. For , and , giving . For , and , giving . Note that means you square the whole inner function: , not .
Standard antiderivatives (the reverse direction)
Every derivative above, read right to left, is an integral. The two that are quoted on the HSC reference sheet are:
Generalised to a constant (these are also on the reference sheet):
Refer to the dedicated integration-of-inverse-trig dot point for the completing-the-square and substitution techniques that reduce a messier quadratic to one of these forms.
Reading the integrand to pick the right form
The skill examined here is recognising which standard form an integrand matches. A square root of in the denominator signals an result; a sum in the denominator (no root) signals an result. Always identify first: in you have , so and the constant in front of is . A common slip is to read itself as , which gives the wrong constant.
When the inside is a multiple of , such as , factor it into the form and substitute , or quote the chain-rule-adjusted derivative directly. Either route is acceptable, but show the substitution if the marks are for method.
Connection to the derivatives
These integrals are nothing more than the derivative results read backwards, so the fastest way to recall them under exam pressure is to recall the three derivatives and reverse each one. If , then . Keeping the derivative-integral pairs together in your memory halves what you need to learn and guards against the sign error on the form, which never appears as a standard integral precisely because it duplicates the result up to sign.
How exam questions ask about inverse-trig calculus
The wording tells you which rule is being tested:
- "Differentiate / ." A direct chain-rule question. Identify the inner function , find , and put on top of the standard form. Most are marks: one for the form, one for the chain-rule factor.
- "Differentiate " or "." A product or quotient rule wrapped around an inverse-trig derivative. State the rule, then substitute the inverse-trig derivative for the relevant factor.
- "Find the gradient / equation of the tangent at ." Differentiate, then substitute . Keep surds exact unless told to round.
- "Show that " or "by writing ...". A derivation: use implicit differentiation and justify the positive square root from the principal range. Do not just quote the result.
- "Hence find ." The "hence" signals you should reverse the derivative you just computed. The integral is the antiderivative of the thing you differentiated.
- "State the domain of the derivative" or a question about vertical tangents. A graph question in disguise: and derivatives are defined only on ; everywhere.
Differentiate arcsin(2x)
The derivative of is . Here the inner function is with , so the chain rule multiplies the outer derivative by .
Final answer: .
Differentiate arctan(x^2)
The derivative of is . With and , the chain rule gives:
Final answer: .
Differentiate x arctan(x) with the product rule
Let the two factors be (so ) and (so ). The product rule gives .
Final answer: .
Evaluate the derivative of arcsin(x/2) at a point
For , the chain rule gives . Evaluate at : the denominator becomes .
Final answer: .
Evaluate an arcsin integral by substitution
To evaluate , write . Let , so , giving . The new limits are to .
Integrate and evaluate:
Final answer: .
Evaluate an arctan integral
To evaluate , the denominator matches with , so . The antiderivative is .
Evaluate at the bounds:
Since is not a standard tangent value, the answer is left in this form. (If the upper bound were , then and the result would be .)
Final answer: .
Differentiate arctan(x)/x with the quotient rule
Differentiate . This pairs the quotient rule with . With (so ) and (so ), the quotient rule gives:
Tidy into a single fraction:
Multiply top and bottom by to clear the inner fraction:
Final answer: . The key move is to substitute the inverse-trig derivative for and leave itself untouched in the term.
- Sign on
- , with a minus.
- Domain ignored
- derivative is undefined at , where the tangent is vertical.
- Missing chain-rule factor
- includes in the numerator, not just .
- Wrong in the integral formula
- has (not ), so the constant in front of is (not ).
- Forgetting absolute value with related logs
- When the integrand is , the antiderivative is , not an inverse-trig form.
- Squaring only part of the inner function
- has in the denominator, so the derivative is , not .
Write the standard form first, then layer the chain rule on top: for , put down , then multiply by and only then substitute . Markers split a -mark differentiation into one mark for the correct inverse-trig form and one for the chain-rule factor, so showing and explicitly banks the method mark even if the algebra slips. When a question says "show that" or "by letting ", you must derive the result by implicit differentiation and justify the sign of the square root from the principal range, not quote it. When it says "hence integrate", reverse the derivative you just found. Keep exact values (, surds) unless told to round, and check the domain: an or derivative only exists on .
Exam-style questions
Questions in the style of NESA exam questions on this dot point, each with a worked answer. They are written by ExamExplained unless tagged "Past paper"; the year shows the paper a question is modelled on.
HSC 2022-style2 marksDifferentiate with respect to .Show worked answer →
Use with , so .
HSC 2021-style3 marksEvaluate , giving an exact answer.Show worked answer →
The integrand matches with , whose antiderivative is .