How do we use the substitution method to evaluate integrals that arise from the reverse chain rule?
Apply integration by substitution to evaluate definite and indefinite integrals, including reverse chain rule cases
A focused answer to the HSC Maths Extension 1 dot point on integration by substitution. Choosing the right substitution, transforming the integrand and differential, changing limits for definite integrals, and standard reverse chain rule patterns, with worked examples.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
What this dot point is asking
NESA wants you to evaluate integrals where the integrand is a composition or contains a factor that is (almost) the derivative of another factor, by choosing a substitution that undoes the chain rule. You should be fluent both with the rote mechanics and with recognising the patterns that signal a substitution is appropriate.
The reason substitution works is that integration is differentiation run backwards, and the chain rule is the differentiation rule for compositions. So when an integrand looks like "a function of something, times the derivative of that something", a substitution collapses it back to the simple integral it came from. Seeing that structure quickly is what separates a fast, clean solution from a stuck one.
The answer
The general method
For an integral :
- Identify the inner function and let .
- Compute .
- Rewrite the integral entirely in terms of : . Nothing in may remain.
- Evaluate the integral in .
- For an indefinite integral, substitute back to . For a definite integral, either substitute back and use the original limits, or change the limits to -values and skip the back-substitution.
Choosing a good
Look for one of these patterns in the integrand:
- A function inside another function (, , ). Set equal to the inner.
- A function and its derivative appearing as a product. Set equal to the function whose derivative is present.
- A linear inside argument: , . Substitute, or use the linear-argument shortcut.
The quick test: after substituting, does every disappear? If a stray survives that you cannot express through , the choice was wrong - try a different inner function.
Changing limits, stage by stage
The mechanics that students most often slip on is the definite integral: choosing , transforming the differential, and changing the limits in step. The figures below walk through the 2022 HSC integral to show how the substitution moves the whole problem from -space to -space while preserving the area.
Stage 1, the integral in . The integral is the area under from to . We will not compute this area directly; we will transform it.
Stage 2, choose the substitution. The inner function is , and the spare factor is (up to a constant) its derivative. Let ; then , so . That is exactly the leftover piece of the integrand, which is the sign of a good choice.
Stage 3, change the limits. Because the variable has changed, the limits must change with it: feed each -limit through . So gives , and gives . The integral now runs from to .
Stage 4, the integral in . Replacing with turns the problem into , a one-line power integral. The shaded area is identical to the one in Stage 1, so no back-substitution to is needed - the -limits already carry the right interval. Evaluating gives .
Linear inside argument
For , the shortcut is , where is the antiderivative of .
For example, . The is the substitution done in your head; the constant slope means contributes a single factor.
Reverse chain rule patterns
Memorise these common patterns; recognising them on sight saves setting up a full substitution:
When the substitution leaves a stray
Sometimes the natural substitution does not clear every at once. For , choosing handles the root but leaves an ; the trick is that also gives , so the stray is itself expressible in . Rearranging the substitution to express the leftover factor is a standard Extension 1 move, shown in the worked examples below.
How exam questions ask about integration by substitution
- "Use the substitution to evaluate ..." The substitution is handed to you; show , the transformed integrand, the limit change (if definite), and a clean exact answer.
- "Evaluate " (no substitution named). You must spot the structure yourself. Look for an inner function whose derivative is present as a factor.
- "Find "-shaped integrands. Recognise the log pattern; the answer is .
- "Hence find the exact value ..." Definite integral: change limits to -values, integrate, evaluate. "Exact" means leave surds, , and in - no decimals.
- A square root times a linear factor. Substitute the inside of the root and re-express the stray factor through .
- A linear inside a standard function (, ). Use the shortcut.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of NESA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
2022 HSC Q153 marksUse the substitution to evaluate .Show worked answer →
With , , so .
Change limits: ; .
.
.
Markers reward the substitution statement, the differential transformation, the limit change, and a clean exact answer.
2021 HSC Q184 marksUse the substitution to evaluate .Show worked answer →
.
Limits: ; .
.
Markers reward the substitution choice, the differential, the limit change, and a clean evaluation. An alternative is to recognise directly.
Practice questions
Original practice questions graded from foundation to exam level, each with a full worked solution. Try them before revealing the solution.
foundation2 marksUse the substitution to find .Show worked solution →
Set up the substitution. With , , so .
Rewrite and integrate.
Back-substitute.
Marker's note: one mark for correctly finding and rewriting the integral entirely in , one for the correct antiderivative back-substituted to .
foundation2 marksFind .Show worked solution →
Recognise the log pattern. The numerator is exactly the derivative of the denominator , so this is with .
Marker's note: one mark for recognising the numerator as the derivative of the denominator, one for the correct answer including the absolute value (since can be negative).
foundation3 marksUse the substitution to evaluate .Show worked solution →
- Set up
- With , , so .
- Change limits
- ; .
- Transform and evaluate
Marker's note: one mark for the correct and sign, one for correctly changed limits (reversed, since decreases as increases), one for the exact value . Forgetting to reverse the limits (writing instead of ) while also dropping the negative sign from is the standard slip; the two errors cancel here only because both were made, which is a trap, not a shortcut.
core4 marksUse the substitution to evaluate .Show worked solution →
- Set up
- With , , so .
- Change limits
- ; .
- Transform and evaluate
Marker's note: one mark for the substitution and differential, one for the correctly changed limits, one for integrating correctly, one for the exact value .
core4 marksThe table below gives values of at several points. | | | | | |---|---|---|---| | | | | | Using the substitution , find the exact value of , and comment on why this exact value is consistent with the table showing staying positive throughout .Show worked solution →
- Set up
- With , , so .
- Change limits
- ; .
- Transform and evaluate
Numerically, .
Comment: This is positive, which is consistent with the table: every tabulated value of on is non-negative (zero only at ), so the integral, being an area under a non-negative curve, must be positive.
Marker's note: one mark for the substitution and differential, one for the correctly reversed limits, one for the exact value , one for linking the sign of the answer to the tabulated data being non-negative.
exam5 marksUsing an appropriate substitution, show that .Show worked solution →
Choose the substitution. Let , so and , giving . Split off one factor of to leave expressible in :
Expand and integrate term by term.
Back-substitute .
which is exactly the required expression.
Marker's note: one mark for choosing and splitting off the stray , one for correctly expressing and , one for expanding the product correctly, one for integrating each power, one for back-substituting to the required form. Candidates should verify by differentiating their final answer if time allows, since sign errors are common with this substitution.
