Which integrals lead to inverse trigonometric antiderivatives, and how do we recognise them?
Integrate functions whose antiderivative involves , or
A focused answer to the HSC Maths Extension 1 dot point on inverse-trig integrals. The standard inverse-trig antiderivatives, recognising the and patterns, completing the square to fit them shown stage by stage, and linear substitutions, with worked examples.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
What this dot point is asking
NESA wants you to recognise integrands of the form , and their variants, and write the antiderivative in terms of or . You should be able to handle a constant , complete the square when the denominator is a full quadratic, and use a linear substitution when the inside is .
This dot point is really a pattern-recognition test. The two target integrals are short to quote; the marks are for seeing that a given integrand is one of them in disguise. A square root and a minus sign point one way; a sum of squares with no root points the other. The deeper skill, and the one that separates a -mark answer from a -mark one, is reshaping a quadratic like into a completed square so the standard form appears. That reshaping is the same "shift the graph to the origin" move you use everywhere in the course, seen here through the integral.
The answer
The two standard antiderivatives
The form, , exists but is rarely used: it only differs from the result by a sign, so the convention is to keep and carry any minus sign outside the integral.
The geometry is worth holding onto. The integrand is a bell-shaped curve, and the definite integral is the area under it. From to that area is exactly , which is the value the HSC asked for.
Generalising to a constant
The general forms come straight from a substitution. For the form, substitute so :
For the form, substitute (so ) and factor out of the denominator; one factor of cancels and one survives as the :
That single surviving is the most-dropped piece in the topic, so it is worth seeing exactly where it comes from rather than memorising it as a rule.
Recognising the patterns
Three quick checks sort almost every integrand:
- Square root of (constant minus ) in the denominator, numerator a constant: an . Example .
- Constant plus in the denominator (no root), numerator a constant: an . Example .
- Numerator is the derivative of the denominator: this is a logarithm, , not an inverse trig. Example integrates to , not an .
That last check is the crucial fork: is an , but (numerator ) is a log. Always glance at the numerator before committing.
Completing the square, stage by stage
When the denominator is a full quadratic such as , it is not in the form because of the linear term. Completing the square removes the linear term and exposes the standard form. The four panels track the integrand through the method.
Stage 1, spot that the integrand is off-centre. Graphing shows a bell whose peak is at , not at the -axis. A bell centred away from the axis is the visual signal that the denominator hides a completed square with ; here .
Stage 2, complete the square to read off . Take half the coefficient of , square it, and rewrite: . Now the denominator is in the form with , so . The completed square also confirms the peak position from the diagram.
Stage 3, substitute to centre the bell. Let , so . This shifts the graph three units left, moving the peak onto the axis, and turns the integral into , which is the pure form with . The substitution is the algebraic version of sliding the curve to the origin.
Stage 4, integrate and undo the substitution. Apply the form with : . The antiderivative is a scaled that flattens towards horizontal asymptotes. Finally replace to return to the original variable:
The version of the method is identical except the completed square sits under a square root, and a leading minus sign on must be factored out first. For , write , so the integrand becomes ; substitute and apply the form with .
Linear substitution shortcut
When the inside is linear, , you can quote the adjusted forms directly (the comes from ):
How exam questions ask about inverse-trig integrals
The wording flags how much reshaping is needed before the standard form appears:
- "Evaluate " or "" (constants only). A direct quote of the standard antiderivative; to marks. Watch the when .
- "Evaluate giving an exact answer." A definite integral: find the antiderivative, substitute the bounds, and keep exact values such as and .
- "Find " with a linear term. Complete the square first, then substitute and apply the form; usually marks, one of them for the completed square.
- "Find " with a quadratic under the root. Complete the square (factoring out any ) to reach , then the form.
- "Find " (linear numerator). Split it: write the numerator as a multiple of the denominator's derivative plus a constant. The first piece is a log, the second an after completing the square.
- A definite integral with limits outside for an form. A trap or a prompt to notice the integrand is undefined there; check the domain before integrating.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of NESA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
2023 HSC Q143 marksEvaluate .Show worked answer →
Standard antiderivative: .
Evaluate: .
Markers reward recognising the inverse-sine antiderivative and the exact evaluation at .
2020 HSC Q193 marksEvaluate .Show worked answer →
Standard antiderivative: .
Evaluate: .
Markers reward identifying the inverse-tangent antiderivative and the exact final value.
Practice questions
Original practice questions graded from foundation to exam level, each with a full worked solution. Try them before revealing the solution.
foundation2 marksFind .Show worked solution →
Match the standard form. Compare with . Here , so .
Marker's note: one mark for reading off from (not ), one for the correctly written antiderivative including .
foundation2 marksFind .Show worked solution →
Match the standard form. Compare with . Here , so .
Marker's note: one mark for , one for including the in front of . Writing without the leading is the classic slip.
foundation2 marksEvaluate , giving an exact answer.Show worked solution →
Antiderivative. With : .
Evaluate at the bounds.
Marker's note: one mark for the correct antiderivative, one for substituting both bounds and simplifying . Leave the answer in exact form; do not attempt to evaluate as a familiar angle, since it is not one of the standard values.
core3 marksFind .Show worked solution →
Factor the coefficient of out under the root. Write , so the integrand is .
Substitute , .
Marker's note: one mark for correctly factoring to , one for the substitution and the that comes from , one for back-substituting . A common error is writing instead of .
core4 marksFind .Show worked solution →
Complete the square in the denominator. Half of is , and , so .
Substitute , . This matches with :
Marker's note: one mark for the completed square shown as a separate line, one for correctly identifying , one for the substitution, one for back-substituting to the original variable. Skipping the completed-square line, even with a correct final answer, often still loses the method mark.
core3 marksThe diagram accompanying this question shows the region bounded by , the -axis, and the vertical lines and . Find the exact area of this region.Show worked solution →
Set up the definite integral. The area under the curve between and is
Evaluate at the bounds.
Marker's note: one mark for the correct integral expression from reading the diagram, one for the antiderivative , one for the exact value . A decimal approximation in place of the exact value loses the final mark.
exam5 marksFind .Show worked solution →
Split the numerator using the derivative of the denominator. The denominator differentiates to . Write as a multiple of plus a remainder:
Split the integral into a log piece and an arctan piece.
First piece: a logarithm. The numerator is exactly the derivative of the denominator, so
(no absolute value needed, since always).
Second piece: complete the square for the arctan. , so with , :
Combine.
Marker's note: one mark for the correct split of the numerator, one for identifying the log piece, one for completing the square in the remaining denominator, one for the correct arctan piece with its coefficient, one for the combined final answer. Forgetting to distribute the onto the from the arctan form (leaving instead of ) is the standard arithmetic slip.
