Exponential growth and decay: , , doubling and half-life
“Model unrestricted growth and decay with and solve the resulting separable differential equation”
Unrestricted exponential growth or decay obeys with solution ; the modified law solves to , which approaches the equilibrium . Use data points to find , and apply the doubling time or half-life as needed.
What this dot point is asking
NESA wants you to recognise scenarios that follow the unrestricted exponential model , write down and (when asked) verify the general solution , use given data to find the constants and , and solve doubling, halving and prediction problems. The Extension 1 course then extends this to the modified law , where the rate depends on the gap between and a fixed value , which models population control, cooling and any approach to an equilibrium.
The phrase to listen for is "rate of change proportional to". If the rate is proportional to the amount , you have pure exponential growth or decay. If it is proportional to the difference from a fixed level , you have the modified law. Nothing else in the syllabus has the defining property that its derivative is a constant multiple of itself (or of itself-minus-a-constant), which is exactly why an exponential is the answer in both cases.
Think of your bank balance earning interest every instant, or a cup of tea cooling on the bench. In both cases, the bigger the "gap" driving the change, the faster it happens: a huge balance earns more interest per second than a small one, and a very hot cup loses heat faster than a lukewarm one. That is exactly the pattern : the rate of change is always some fixed fraction of the current amount, which is why the graph shoots up ever more steeply for growth, or eases off ever more gently for decay. The tea, though, does not cool to absolute zero, it cools towards room temperature and then stops changing. That is the upgraded version, : the "gap" that shrinks is not itself but the distance between and the level it is heading for, whether that is room temperature, a sustainable population size, or any other equilibrium.
The answer
The unrestricted model
If a quantity grows or decays at a rate proportional to itself,
is the proportionality (or rate) constant. Its sign decides growth versus decay and its size sets the speed.
General solution and how to establish it
Treat it as a separable differential equation. Separate variables and integrate:
where is the initial value (it absorbs ). If a question says "show that" or "verify that satisfies ", do not separate variables; instead differentiate the given solution: , which matches, and note . Reading the verb correctly is worth a mark.
The unrestricted law always solves to , with the value at , for growth and for decay. The defining feature is that the doubling time (growth) and half-life (decay) do not depend on : it takes the same time to go from to as from to . To "establish" the solution in an exam, differentiate and show it equals rather than quoting it.
Finding from data
Given the initial value and one later reading :
For decay () the logarithm is negative, so , as it must be. Keep exact (for example ) until the final substitution to avoid rounding error.
Doubling time and half-life
Doubling time for growth: solve , cancel , and take logs to get .
Half-life for decay: solve to get , which is positive because .
Both cancel , which is the algebraic reason they are independent of the starting amount.
Continuous compound interest
A bank account earning interest at a continuous rate satisfies , so . This is the same model with and .
The modified law dN/dt = k(N - P), stage by stage
The Extension 1 step up from pure exponentials is the law in which the rate is proportional to the difference between and a fixed value :
It models a population held towards a sustainable level by culling or immigration, a body cooling towards room temperature , or any quantity drawn towards an equilibrium. Its solution (by separating variables, or by substituting so ) is
The four panels show what this forces the graph to do, and why acts as a horizontal asymptote whichever side you start.
Stage 1, the pure-exponential baseline. With the law is just . For the solution climbs forever, getting steeper as it rises, and there is no level it settles at. Comparing this with the modified law shows exactly what the term changes.
Stage 2, introduce the equilibrium value . In the modified law, exactly when , because there. So the horizontal line is an equilibrium: a quantity sitting at has zero rate of change and stays there forever. This single line organises the whole picture.
Stage 3, starting above . If then , and (with , the usual case for a controlled population or a cooling body) the term decays from a positive value to . So falls from and levels off at from above, never crossing it. The gap is what decays exponentially, exactly like a pure decay but measured from the line instead of from zero.
Stage 4, starting below . If then , so is a negative quantity decaying to : rises from up to . Either way the curve approaches the same horizontal asymptote , which is the hallmark of the modified law. Whether it climbs or falls is decided purely by whether starts below or above .
Newton's law of cooling is the same law with , the ambient temperature: solves to , and the temperature levels off at rather than at zero. See the separable differential equations dot point for the full derivation.
Out of scope: logistic growth
You may see the logistic model , which caps growth at a carrying capacity using a product rather than a difference. That belongs to Extension 2, not Extension 1; the Extension 1 "capped" model is the linear modified law above.
How exam questions ask about exponential models
The wording pinpoints which step is being tested:
- "The rate of change is proportional to ... Set up a differential equation." Translate the words: proportional to the amount gives ; proportional to the difference from a fixed level gives . Recognising the phrasing is the whole task.
- "Show that / verify that satisfies ." Differentiate the given solution and substitute; do not separate variables. State the initial condition too.
- "After , the amount is ... Find / the growth rate / the decay constant." Substitute the second data point and solve with a logarithm. Decay and cooling give .
- "Find the amount after ... / how much remains." Substitute into the fully fitted model.
- "How long until it doubles / halves / reaches a given value?" Set the model equal to the target and solve for with a logarithm; or use , .
- "A body cools / a population is controlled towards a level." The modified law: identify (ambient or sustainable value), quote , and remember the limit is , not .
- "Sketch the solution." Show the initial value, the correct growth or decay shape, and, for the modified law, the horizontal asymptote .
Six calculations covering finding the growth constant , predicting future values, working with half-life, exponential decay of drug concentration, continuous compounding, and working backwards from two data points.
Find the growth constant from a doubling time
A bacterial culture doubles every hours. The doubling condition is at . Substituting into and cancelling :
Predict a population value
A population starts at and grows at a continuous rate of per year, so . After years, substitute directly into :
Extract from a given half-life
Carbon-14 has a half-life of years. At the half-life , the amount is , so . Solve for :
The negative sign confirms decay.
Find when a decaying quantity reaches a threshold
A drug concentration decays exponentially. After hours it is of the initial value. First find from the condition:
Then find when the concentration falls to of initial:
Apply the model to continuous compounding
$5000 is invested at per annum continuous compounding. The model is with . After years:
So the investment is worth about $9111.
Work backwards from two data points
A culture has bacteria after hour and after hours. Dividing the two expressions eliminates the unknown :
So per hour, giving a doubling time of hour.
Recover using the -hour data point:
Final answers: per hour; ; per year; drug falls to at about hours; investment value $9111; , doubling time hour.
The modified law: a cooling cup of coffee (edge case)
A cup of coffee at degrees C is left in a room at degrees C and cools so that . After minutes it is degrees C. The solution of the modified law is , and here , so . The equilibrium is the room temperature .
Use the second reading to find : Substitute the -minute reading :
The negative confirms cooling. To find the temperature after minutes, note , so :
Final answer: per minute, and degrees C. The temperature is heading for the room value , not zero, because the gap is what decays.
- Sign of
- Decay has . Forgetting the negative sign gives an exploding-exponential model.
- Confusing with
- is the value at . If the question gives you values at and , neither is unless extracted by working backwards.
- Half-life formula sign
- when gives a positive half-life. Using directly would give a negative answer.
- Mixing continuous and periodic rates
- A bank account with annual interest compounded once is not the same as continuous. The continuous-compounding rate is approximately the annual percentage rate for small percentages.
- Approximating too early
- Keep symbolic () until the final substitution. Truncating to decimals can introduce visible error.
- Using the wrong solution for the modified law
- solves to , not . The constant sits in front and the exponential multiplies the gap .
Write the model first, then read the verb. "Show that / establish" means differentiate the given solution and confirm it satisfies the differential equation (and check the initial value); it does not mean separate variables. "Set up a differential equation" means translate "rate proportional to ..." into or, for a gap, . Carry as an exact logarithm (for example ) until the very last line, and state its sign explicitly: decay and cooling give . For the modified law, identify as the equilibrium or ambient value and quote ; the limiting value as is , not . Always finish with units (years, hours, degrees) and round only at the end.
Exam-style questions
Questions in the style of NESA exam questions on this dot point, each with a worked answer. They are written by ExamExplained unless tagged "Past paper"; the year shows the paper a question is modelled on.
HSC-style4 marksA radioactive substance decays so that the rate of decay is proportional to the amount remaining. After years, of the original amount remains. How long until remains? Give your answer to the nearest year.Show worked answer →
Model: , solution . Decay means .
At : , so , giving .
For : , so years.
Markers reward the model, solving for from the given data, using the model to find the half-life time, and a clean numerical answer.
Practice questions
Original practice questions graded from foundation to exam level, each with a full worked solution. Try them before revealing the solution.
foundation2 marksA quantity satisfies with and . Find after units of time, correct to one decimal place.Show worked solution →
Write the solution and substitute. The model solves to , so
Marker's note: one mark for quoting with the correct values substituted, one for the evaluated answer (accept to ).
foundation2 marksShow that satisfies the differential equation .Show worked solution →
Differentiate the given function.
This matches the differential equation exactly, so satisfies it.
Marker's note: one mark for correctly differentiating , one for identifying the result as (not merely restating the derivative). Separating variables here is the wrong method: "show that" requires differentiating the given solution.
foundation3 marksA radioactive isotope decays according to . Its half-life is years. Find the exact value of , and hence find what fraction of the original amount remains after years.Show worked solution →
Find from the half-life. At , , so
Use to find the fraction remaining at . Since is exactly three half-lives,
Marker's note: one mark for exactly, one for recognising years is three half-lives, one for the fraction . Rounding to a decimal early and then cubing it is a common source of a slightly wrong final fraction.
core4 marksA population of feral animals is controlled towards a sustainable level of according to . Initially there are animals, and after years there are . (a) Find . (b) Find the population after years, correct to the nearest whole animal.Show worked solution →
Part (a): set up the modified-law solution and substitute the data point. The general solution is
At , :
Part (b): substitute .
Since ,
Marker's note: one mark for the correctly formed , one for solving for exactly, one for correctly substituting , one for the rounded final answer of animals. Using instead of the modified-law solution is the standard error here.
core4 marksA hot metal rod at degrees C is placed in a coolant bath held at a constant degrees C. Its temperature obeys . After minutes it has cooled to degrees C. Find the temperature after minutes, correct to one decimal place.Show worked solution →
Set up the model. With and ,
Find from the -minute reading. At , :
Substitute .
Since ,
Marker's note: one mark for the correctly set-up model , one for solving for exactly from the -minute data, one for correct substitution of , one for the final answer near degrees C (accept to ). The rod approaches the bath temperature , not zero.
exam5 marksThe table below gives the population of a colony of bacteria, which is known to obey unrestricted exponential growth . | (hours) | | | | |---|---|---|---| | | | | | (a) Show that the growth constant satisfies . (b) Find exactly. (c) Find the missing population at hours, correct to the nearest whole bacterium.Show worked solution →
Part (a): use the and readings. With , the model is . At , :
as required.
Part (b): solve for .
Part (c): substitute , noting it is exactly half of . Since ,
Marker's note: one mark for correctly forming from the table, two for solving to the exact form , one for recognising is half of so , one for the final population of . Candidates who round early often land on or instead of the exact ; this is acceptable within rounding tolerance but the exact route is cleaner.