HSC Maths Extension 1 mathematical induction: deep dive (2026 guide)
HSC · Maths Extension 1 · Study guide · 22 min read ·
A complete deep dive into mathematical induction for HSC Mathematics Extension 1. The principle, the four-part structure, fully worked walkthroughs of all three flavours (series, divisibility, inequalities), the standard exam traps, and an embedded practice question set with full solutions.
Mathematical induction is one of the highest-yield topics in HSC Mathematics Extension 1. It appears nearly every year, the structure is rigid, and the algebra is standardised. With practice, you should be able to bank these marks reliably.
This guide walks through the four-part structure, the three standard flavours (series, divisibility, inequalities), and the common traps. By the end you should have a template you can deploy on any HSC induction question, plus a set of practice questions with full step-by-step solutions.
The principle of mathematical induction
Let P(n) be a statement about a positive integer n. If:
P(1) is true (base case), and
for all positive integers k, P(k)⟹P(k+1) (inductive step),
then P(n) is true for all positive integers n≥1.
The intuition is a chain of dominoes. The base case knocks down the first; the inductive step ensures each falling domino knocks down the next. So every domino falls.
The starting integer can be anything. For some statements (like 2n>n2), the base case is n=5. The induction proves P(n) for all n≥5.
The four-part structure
Every induction proof has exactly four parts. Markers want to see each one labelled.
Part 1: Base case
Substitute n=1 (or the smallest valid n) into the statement and verify it by direct calculation. Show your working.
Part 2: Inductive hypothesis
Write "Assume the statement holds for n=k, that is, [state the statement at n=k]". This is the assumption you will use in the next part.
Part 3: Inductive step
Show that the statement holds at n=k+1. The technique depends on the flavour (series, divisibility, inequality), but the core move is to express the n=k+1 form in terms of the n=k form, then substitute the hypothesis.
Part 4: Conclusion
End with "By the principle of mathematical induction, the statement holds for all positive integers n." (Or the appropriate range.)
If a conclusion sentence is missing, markers can deduct a mark, even with otherwise correct working.
Flavour 1: Series identities
The most common HSC induction is a sum identity: ∑i=1nai=f(n).
Standard technique
In the inductive step, write ∑i=1k+1ai=∑i=1kai+ak+1, substitute the hypothesis for the k-term sum, then simplify to match f(k+1).
Prove by induction that ∑i=1ni2=6n(n+1)(2n+1) for all integers n≥1
Step 1. Base case (n=1). Verify the statement at the smallest valid integer. LHS =12=1. RHS =61⋅2⋅3=1. LHS = RHS, so the statement holds for n=1.
Step 2. Inductive hypothesis. Assume the statement holds for some integer n=k≥1, that is,
i=1∑ki2=6k(k+1)(2k+1).
Step 3. Set up the n=k+1 sum. Split off the last term so the hypothesis can be substituted directly.
i=1∑k+1i2=i=1∑ki2+(k+1)2=6k(k+1)(2k+1)+(k+1)2.
Step 4. Common factor. Factor out 6k+1 so the algebra collapses to a single product.
=6(k+1)[k(2k+1)+6(k+1)]=6(k+1)(2k2+7k+6).
Step 5. Factor the quadratic. Confirm the expression matches the formula at n=k+1. Since 2k2+7k+6=(k+2)(2k+3),
Conclusion. By the principle of mathematical induction, ∑i=1ni2=6n(n+1)(2n+1) for all integers n≥1.
Prove by induction that ∑i=1ni(i+1)=3n(n+1)(n+2) for all integers n≥1
Step 1. Base case (n=1). LHS =1⋅2=2. RHS =31⋅2⋅3=2. The statement holds for n=1.
Step 2. Inductive hypothesis. Assume the statement holds at n=k:
i=1∑ki(i+1)=3k(k+1)(k+2).
Step 3. Split off the (k+1)-th term. Use the hypothesis to rewrite the partial sum.
i=1∑k+1i(i+1)=3k(k+1)(k+2)+(k+1)(k+2).
Step 4. Common factor 3(k+1)(k+2). Pull it out and combine the bracket.
=3(k+1)(k+2)[k+3]=3(k+1)(k+2)(k+3).
Step 5. Match the target. The right-hand side at n=k+1 is 3(k+1)((k+1)+1)((k+1)+2)=3(k+1)(k+2)(k+3). The two expressions agree, so P(k)⟹P(k+1).
Conclusion. By the principle of mathematical induction, ∑i=1ni(i+1)=3n(n+1)(n+2) for all integers n≥1.
Flavour 2: Divisibility
Prove that E(n) is divisible by d for all positive integers.
Standard technique
In the inductive step, manipulate E(k+1) to expose a multiple of d. Often the trick is to write E(k+1) in terms of E(k) (using the hypothesis E(k)=dM) plus a remainder that is also a multiple of d.
Prove by induction that 7n−1 is divisible by 6 for all integers n≥1
Step 1. Base case (n=1)
71−1=6=6⋅1, which is divisible by 6. The statement holds for n=1.
Step 2. Inductive hypothesis
Assume the statement holds at n=k, that is, 7k−1=6M for some integer M. Equivalently, 7k=6M+1.
Step 3. Rewrite the n=k+1 expression
Pull out one factor of 7 so the hypothesis can be substituted.
7k+1−1=7⋅7k−1=7(6M+1)−1.
Step 4. Expose a multiple of 6. Expand and simplify.
7(6M+1)−1=42M+7−1=42M+6=6(7M+1).
Since 7M+1 is an integer, 7k+1−1 is divisible by 6, so P(k)⟹P(k+1).
Conclusion. By the principle of mathematical induction, 7n−1 is divisible by 6 for all integers n≥1.
Prove by induction that 5n+3 is divisible by 4 for all integers n≥1
Step 1. Base case (n=1)
51+3=8=4⋅2, which is divisible by 4. The statement holds for n=1.
Step 2. Inductive hypothesis
Assume the statement holds at n=k, that is, 5k+3=4M for some integer M. Equivalently, 5k=4M−3.
Step 3. Rewrite the n=k+1 expression
Pull out one factor of 5.
5k+1+3=5⋅5k+3=5(4M−3)+3.
Step 4. Simplify and factor out 4.
5(4M−3)+3=20M−15+3=20M−12=4(5M−3).
Since 5M−3 is an integer, 5k+1+3 is divisible by 4, so P(k)⟹P(k+1).
Conclusion. By the principle of mathematical induction, 5n+3 is divisible by 4 for all integers n≥1.
Prove by induction that n3+5n is divisible by 6 for all integers n≥1
Step 1. Base case (n=1)
13+5⋅1=6=6⋅1, which is divisible by 6. The statement holds for n=1.
Step 2. Inductive hypothesis
Assume the statement holds at n=k, that is, k3+5k=6M for some integer M.
Step 3. Expand (k+1)3+5(k+1)
Use the binomial expansion so the hypothesis can be substituted.
(k+1)3+5(k+1)=k3+3k2+3k+1+5k+5=(k3+5k)+3k2+3k+6.
Step 4. Substitute the hypothesis and factor. Replace k3+5k with 6M and tidy.
(k3+5k)+3k2+3k+6=6M+3k(k+1)+6.
Step 5. Show 3k(k+1) is divisible by 6. Among any two consecutive integers k and k+1, one is even, so k(k+1) is even. Write k(k+1)=2N for some integer N. Then 3k(k+1)=6N, and
(k+1)3+5(k+1)=6M+6N+6=6(M+N+1),
a multiple of 6. So P(k)⟹P(k+1).
Conclusion. By the principle of mathematical induction, n3+5n is divisible by 6 for all integers n≥1.
Flavour 3: Inequalities
Prove E(n)≤F(n) (or strict) for all n≥n0.
Standard technique
In the inductive step, show that the growth from n=k to n=k+1 on one side is at least as much as on the other. Use the hypothesis to bound E(k) in terms of F(k), then extend.
Prove by induction that 2n>n2 for all integers n≥5
Step 1. Base case (n=5)
25=32 and 52=25. Since 32>25, the statement holds for n=5.
Step 2. Inductive hypothesis
Assume the statement holds at some integer n=k≥5, that is, 2k>k2.
Step 3. Set up the n=k+1 inequality
Use the hypothesis after doubling.
2k+1=2⋅2k>2k2.
Step 4. Show 2k2≥(k+1)2 for k≥5. Expand the target: (k+1)2=k2+2k+1. Compare:
2k2−(k2+2k+1)=k2−2k−1.
The roots of k2−2k−1=0 are k=1±2, so k2−2k−1≥0 when k≥1+2≈2.41. Since k≥5>1+2, we have 2k2≥(k+1)2.
Step 5. Combine. Chain the inequalities:
2k+1>2k2≥(k+1)2.
So 2k+1>(k+1)2 and P(k)⟹P(k+1).
Conclusion. By the principle of mathematical induction, 2n>n2 for all integers n≥5.
Prove by induction that 3n>n3 for all integers n≥4
Step 1. Base case (n=4)
34=81 and 43=64. Since 81>64, the statement holds for n=4.
Step 2. Inductive hypothesis
Assume the statement holds at some integer n=k≥4, that is, 3k>k3.
Step 3. Set up the n=k+1 inequality
Multiply the hypothesis by 3.
3k+1=3⋅3k>3k3.
Step 4. Show 3k3≥(k+1)3 for k≥4. Expand (k+1)3=k3+3k2+3k+1 and compare:
3k3−(k+1)3=2k3−3k2−3k−1.
At k=4: 2⋅64−3⋅16−12−1=128−48−12−1=67≥0. The derivative with respect to k is 6k2−6k−3=3(2k2−2k−1), which is positive for k≥2, so 2k3−3k2−3k−1 is strictly increasing for k≥4. Hence 3k3≥(k+1)3 for all k≥4.
Step 5. Combine. Chain the inequalities:
3k+1>3k3≥(k+1)3.
So 3k+1>(k+1)3 and P(k)⟹P(k+1).
Conclusion. By the principle of mathematical induction, 3n>n3 for all integers n≥4.
Flavour 4: Recursive sequences with a closed form
A recursively defined sequence a1, an+1=g(an) is often given with a proposed closed form. Prove the closed form by induction.
Let a1=1 and an+1=3an+2 for n≥1. Prove by induction that an=2⋅3n−1−1 for all integers n≥1
Step 1. Base case (n=1)
Closed form: 2⋅30−1=2−1=1. Given: a1=1. The values agree, so the statement holds for n=1.
Step 2. Inductive hypothesis
Assume the closed form holds at n=k, that is, ak=2⋅3k−1−1.
Step 3. Apply the recursion
Use the definition ak+1=3ak+2 and substitute the hypothesis.
ak+1=3(2⋅3k−1−1)+2=6⋅3k−1−3+2=2⋅3k−1.
Step 4. Match the closed form at n=k+1. The proposed formula gives ak+1=2⋅3(k+1)−1−1=2⋅3k−1. The two expressions agree, so P(k)⟹P(k+1).
Conclusion. By the principle of mathematical induction, an=2⋅3n−1−1 for all integers n≥1.
Common traps and how to avoid them
Trap: Skipping the base case
A base case is not optional. Without it, your inductive step has nothing to start from. Always include it explicitly.
Trap: Assuming the conclusion
The hypothesis is the statement at n=k. The step proves the statement at n=k+1. Do not phrase the step as "assume P(k+1)" or substitute P(k+1) into your work as a known fact.
Trap: Algebra in the step
Most exam errors are algebraic, not logical. Factor out common terms early. If you cannot match the target f(k+1) form, write out f(k+1) explicitly first and aim for it.
Trap: Off-by-one indexing
∑i=1k+1ai=∑i=1kai+ak+1. The new term added is ak+1, not ak.
Trap: Missing conclusion
Mark-up rubrics often allocate a mark for the explicit "by the principle of mathematical induction" sentence. Do not forget it.
Trap: Strong induction without saying
If your step uses P(k−1) in addition to P(k), you need strong induction. State the hypothesis as "assume P(j) holds for all 1≤j≤k".
Exam strategy
In Section II, induction questions typically run 4-6 marks. Allocate 5−8 minutes per question. The proof has four parts, each worth approximately one mark:
Base case (1 mark)
Inductive hypothesis (1 mark)
Inductive step, including correct algebraic manipulation and explicit use of the hypothesis (2-3 marks)
Conclusion (1 mark)
If you get stuck on the algebra, write down what the formula should look like at n=k+1 and work backwards. Markers reward partial progress.
Practice patterns
Pattern A: sum of an arithmetic-like or geometric-like series
Prove ∑i=1n(3i−1)=2n(3n+1), ∑i=1n2i=2n+1−2, or ∑i=1ni(i+1)(i+2)=4n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3).
Pattern B: divisibility by a fixed integer
Prove 11n−4n is divisible by 7, or n3+5n is divisible by 6.
Pattern C: exponential beats polynomial
Prove 3n>2n2 for n≥4, or n!>3n for n≥7.
Pattern D: recursive sequence has a given closed form
Sequence a1=1, an+1=3an+2. Prove an=2⋅3n−1−1.
Where induction appears in the wider syllabus
Induction is not just a stand-alone topic. It underpins:
Proof of Pascal's rule and the binomial theorem.
Verification of closed-form formulas for recursively defined sequences.
Proofs of divisibility results that show up in number theory (Extension 2).
Geometric proofs by induction on the number of sides, regions, or vertices.
The technique is genuinely useful for the rest of your maths education, not just an HSC topic.
Check your knowledge
Try these questions before reading the solutions. They are roughly arranged from easier to harder.
Prove by induction that ∑i=1n(2i−1)=n2 for all integers n≥1.
Prove by induction that ∑i=1n2i=2n+1−2 for all integers n≥1.
Prove by induction that 9n−1 is divisible by 8 for all integers n≥1.
Prove by induction that ∑i=1ni⋅i!=(n+1)!−1 for all integers n≥1.
Prove by induction that 11n−4n is divisible by 7 for all integers n≥1.
Prove by induction that 2n≥n+1 for all integers n≥1.
Prove by induction that n!>2n for all integers n≥4.
The sequence is defined by a1=2 and an+1=2an+1 for n≥1. Prove by induction that an=3⋅2n−1−1 for all integers n≥1.
Solutions
Q1
Step 1. Base case (n=1)
LHS =2(1)−1=1. RHS =12=1. Holds.
Step 2. Inductive hypothesis
Assume ∑i=1k(2i−1)=k2.
Step 3. Split off the (k+1)-th term
i=1∑k+1(2i−1)=k2+(2(k+1)−1)=k2+2k+1=(k+1)2.
Step 4. Match the target
(k+1)2 is the formula at n=k+1. So P(k)⟹P(k+1).
Conclusion
By the principle of mathematical induction, ∑i=1n(2i−1)=n2 for all integers n≥1.
Q2
Step 1. Base case (n=1)
LHS =21=2. RHS =22−2=2. Holds.
Step 2. Inductive hypothesis
Assume ∑i=1k2i=2k+1−2.
Step 3. Split off the (k+1)-th term
i=1∑k+12i=(2k+1−2)+2k+1=2⋅2k+1−2=2k+2−2.
Step 4. Match the target
The formula at n=k+1 is 2(k+1)+1−2=2k+2−2. So P(k)⟹P(k+1).
Conclusion
By the principle of mathematical induction, ∑i=1n2i=2n+1−2 for all integers n≥1.
Q3
Step 1. Base case (n=1)
91−1=8=8⋅1, divisible by 8. Holds.
Step 2. Inductive hypothesis
Assume 9k−1=8M for some integer M. So 9k=8M+1.
Step 3. Rewrite at n=k+1
9k+1−1=9⋅9k−1=9(8M+1)−1=72M+9−1=72M+8=8(9M+1).
Step 4. Conclude divisibility
Since 9M+1 is an integer, 9k+1−1 is divisible by 8. So P(k)⟹P(k+1).
Conclusion
By the principle of mathematical induction, 9n−1 is divisible by 8 for all integers n≥1.