← Proof (ME-P1)

NSWMaths Extension 1Syllabus dot point

How do we use induction to prove general statements involving a recursion, a formula or a property?

Apply mathematical induction to prove general statements about a recursive sequence, a property of a formula, or a recursive procedure

A focused answer to the HSC Maths Extension 1 dot point on induction for general (non-series, non-divisibility, non-inequality) statements. Closed-form for a recurrence, properties preserved by an iterative process, and worked examples.

Generated by Claude OpusReviewed by Better Tuition Academy7 min answer

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

What this dot point is asking

NESA wants you to use induction to prove statements that do not fall into the three standard categories (sums, divisibility, inequalities). The most common are closed-form formulas for recursively defined sequences and properties preserved by an iterative process.

The answer

Closed form for a recurrence

Suppose a1=ca_1 = c and an+1=f(an)a_{n + 1} = f(a_n). A typical question asks you to prove a closed-form formula an=g(n)a_n = g(n) by induction.

Strategy:

  1. Base case: Verify g(1)=cg(1) = c.
  2. Hypothesis: Assume ak=g(k)a_k = g(k).
  3. Step: Use the recurrence: ak+1=f(ak)=f(g(k))a_{k + 1} = f(a_k) = f(g(k)). Show f(g(k))=g(k+1)f(g(k)) = g(k + 1).
  4. Conclusion: By induction, an=g(n)a_n = g(n) for all positive integers nn.

Properties preserved by a process

Often a problem describes a process or iteration and asks you to prove some property is preserved. The induction step shows that if the property holds at iteration kk, it holds at iteration k+1k + 1.

Strong induction (rarely needed in HSC)

For some problems, the step at n=k+1n = k + 1 needs not just the hypothesis at n=kn = k but at all n≀kn \le k. This is strong induction. It is rare in HSC Extension 1; standard induction is usually enough. If you find you need it, state the hypothesis as "assume the statement holds for all n≀kn \le k" and use any earlier instance you need.

Multi-variable extensions

Some statements have a parameter and an additional integer variable. You can induct on either, holding the other fixed.

For example, "prove that βˆ‘i=1nf(i)=g(n)\sum_{i = 1}^{n} f(i) = g(n) for all positive integers nn" inducts on nn regardless of ff. The proof handles ff symbolically.

Related dot points