Why is true for every angle, how does it link to , and how do you use the two together to prove a trigonometric identity and to simplify a trigonometric expression?
Prove and apply the Pythagorean identity and its rearrangements, and the ratio identity , to prove further trigonometric identities by transforming one side to the other and to simplify trigonometric expressions
A focused answer to the Year 11 Maths Advanced dot point on trigonometric identities: why holds for every angle, the rearrangements you will reach for, the ratio identity , how to prove an identity by transforming one side, and how to simplify trig expressions, with original worked examples.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
There is one equation that ties the three trigonometric ratios together, and once you have it you can rewrite almost any trigonometric expression in a simpler form. It is the Pythagorean identity , true for every angle , alongside the ratio identity . This dot point asks you to know why both are true, to prove further identities by transforming one side until it matches the other, and to simplify trigonometric expressions down to a single ratio. Everything on this page is in degrees, and none of it needs calculus or the compound-angle formulae, which come later.
The skill divides cleanly. Knowing the two identities is the easy half. The exam-worthy half is fluency with the rearrangements ( and are used far more often than the identity in its tidy form) and the discipline of a proof: you work on one side only, you never shuffle terms across the equals sign, and you write the reason beside each line. Get those habits and identities stop being puzzles and become routine.
A word on notation. The standard shorthand means , the whole ratio squared, not . The square sits on the function, so .
The answer
The Pythagorean identity and why it is always true
The identity is not a coincidence to memorise blindly; it is the theorem of Pythagoras read off the unit circle. Place a point on a circle of radius centred at the origin, with the radius at an angle measured from the positive -axis. By the unit-circle definition of the ratios, the coordinates of are exactly : the horizontal coordinate is and the vertical coordinate is .
Drop a perpendicular from straight down to the -axis. This makes a right-angled triangle whose horizontal leg has length , whose vertical leg has length , and whose hypotenuse is the radius, length . Pythagoras' theorem on that triangle says
which is precisely .
The same picture works for any angle, not just the acute one drawn. For an obtuse or reflex angle, sits in another quadrant and or turns negative, but squaring removes the sign, so the sum of the squares is still . That is why the identity holds for every angle, with no restriction.
The two rearrangements you will actually use
In its tidy form is memorable, but inside a proof you almost always need it rearranged so it replaces one squared ratio with an expression in the other:
Read each as a substitution licence. The first lets you swap for (or, going the other way, collapse down to ); the second does the same for . The single most common simplifying move in the whole topic is spotting a and rewriting it as , or a as . Train your eye to see those two patterns and most identities fall open.
The ratio identity and what it does
The second identity is
valid whenever . On the unit circle this is immediate: is defined as the vertical coordinate over the horizontal coordinate of , which is . Its job in algebra is to turn a into and so that everything is written in two ratios instead of three, after which the Pythagorean identity can finish the work. Read the other way, it also lets you collapse a stray back into a single . Whenever an expression mixes with and , rewriting the first is almost always the right opening move.
Proving an identity: work one side to the other
An identity is an equation that is true for every value of for which both sides are defined. That is different from an equation you solve, where you are hunting for the particular angles that make it true. Because an identity is already claimed to be true everywhere, you do not solve it. You demonstrate it, by transforming one side until it becomes the other, with a justified reason at each step.
The method that earns full marks every time is this. Choose the more complicated side to work on, usually the side with a fraction, a product, or more terms, because there is more you can do to it. Write it down labelled as (or ). Transform it line by line, using the Pythagorean identity, the ratio identity, and ordinary algebra (common denominators, factorising, cancelling). Keep going until it is identical to the other side, then write . The golden rule is that you never move terms across the equals sign: you are not allowed to treat an unproven identity like a solved equation, because that would assume the very thing you are trying to show.
Simplifying a trigonometric expression
Simplifying is proving without a target: you are handed one expression and asked to reduce it to its shortest equivalent, typically a single ratio such as or , or the constant . The toolkit is identical. Rewrite any as , put fractions over a common denominator, replace by (or by ), then cancel common factors. The expression usually collapses to one ratio. A good final answer is as short as it can be and is written in a single trigonometric function where possible.
How exam questions ask about trigonometric identities
The command word tells you exactly what is wanted:
- "Prove that ... = ..." or "Show that ... = ..." is a one-sided proof. Pick the messier side, transform it, justify each line, and finish on the other side. Both sides are printed, so the marks are entirely for the valid chain between them.
- "Simplify ..." has no target on the page; reduce the expression to a single ratio or a constant. Rewrite , use a Pythagorean rearrangement, and cancel.
- "Given that , find the exact value of (or )" means use to get the other squared ratio, take the square root, and choose the sign from the quadrant stated. Then the ratio identity gives .
- "Hence ..." tells you to reuse the identity you just proved or the value you just found; do not start the next part from scratch.
- "Find the exact value" forbids a rounded decimal, so leave a surd such as and rationalise where natural.
- A printed right-hand side in a "show that" is a gift: it tells you the form to aim for, so engineer the working to land on it exactly.
Practice questions
Original practice questions graded from foundation to exam level, each with a full worked solution. Try them before revealing the solution.
foundation2 marksSimplify each expression to a single trigonometric ratio. (a) . (b) .Show worked solution →
(a) Replace the top using a rearrangement of the Pythagorean identity. From , the numerator is , so
(b) Replace by the ratio identity. Since ,
Answer: (a) ; (b) .
foundation3 marksThe angle is acute and . Without finding , use the identities to find the exact value of (a) and (b) .Show worked solution →
(a) Use the Pythagorean identity to get . Rearrange to :
Choose the sign. Because is acute, is positive, so
(b) Use the ratio identity for .
Answer: and .
core3 marksProve the identity .Show worked solution →
Start from the side with room to change (the LHS).
Replace the numerator using a rearrangement of the Pythagorean identity. Since , we have , so
Cancel one factor of .
Conclusion. The two sides are equal for all with , so the identity is proved.
core3 marksThe angle is obtuse (between and ) and . Find the exact value of and of .Show worked solution →
Find from the Pythagorean identity. Rearranging ,
Choose the sign from the quadrant. An obtuse angle lies in the second quadrant, where is positive, so
Find with the ratio identity.
The negative sign is the expected check: is negative in the second quadrant.
Answer: and .
core3 marksProve the identity .Show worked solution →
Begin with the LHS and replace by the ratio identity.
Cancel the common .
Conclusion. The sides match for all with , so the identity holds.
exam3 marksProve that .Show worked solution →
Recognise a difference of two squares on the LHS. Treat and as the two squared quantities:
Replace the second bracket using the Pythagorean identity. Since ,
Conclusion. The identity is proved for all .
exam4 marksProve the identity .Show worked solution →
Combine the LHS over the common denominator .
Expand the numerator.
Apply the Pythagorean identity . The and together make :
Cancel the common factor .
Conclusion. The identity holds for all with and .
